Bye bye affirmative action...don't let the door hit you on your ass...

[Sven Golly]

Final recognition that AA is, and has always been, unconstitutional.

I'm sure it's a dark day for you libs.

And please, all you lawyers out there, explain how quotas were a GOOD thing.

[FiatLux]

About time.

They got it right.

[Kierland]

They didn’t get rid of affirmative action there are still all manner of ways to get into college with shitty grades.

[Sven Golly]

They didn’t get rid of affirmative action there are still all manner of ways to get into college with shitty grades.

You're testament to that.

[Sudden Sam]

Sotomayer’s dissent is a pile of garbage. It should, in itself, disqualify her from serving on the court.

[Mikey]

Sotomayer’s dissent is a pile of garbage. It should, in itself, disqualify her from serving on the court.

Do you think Thomas and Alito should be serving on the court?

[Sudden Sam]

Sotomayer’s dissent is a pile of garbage. It should, in itself, disqualify her from serving on the court.

Do you think Thomas and Alito should be serving on the court?

Sure don’t. In their case(s), though, due to recent revelations about their relationships with persons impacted by their decisions.

[Kierland]

Sotomayer’s dissent is a pile of garbage. It should, in itself, disqualify her from serving on the court.

Do tell.

[88BuckeyeGrad]

Racists gonna racist. I personally cannot wait for KKKierland to provide his compelling justifications for Harvard and UNC’s continued discrimination against members of the Asian community.

[Kierland]

Read the opinion. It clearly states how racial admissions are necessary… for military universities. Do you ever get tired of being a stupid fuck you projecting Nazi?

The United States as amicus curiae contends that race-based admissions programs further compelling interests at our Nation’s military academies. No military academy is a party to these cases, however, and none of the courts below addressed the propriety of race-based admissions systems in that context. This opinion also does not address the issue, in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present.

[88BuckeyeGrad]

Read the opinion. It clearly states how racial admissions are necessary… for military universities. Do you ever get tired of being a stupid fuck you projecting Nazi?

The United States as amicus curiae contends that race-based admissions programs further compelling interests at our Nation’s military academies. No military academy is a party to these cases, however, and none of the courts below addressed the propriety of race-based admissions systems in that context. This opinion also does not address the issue, in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present.

Read much, KKKierland? And how does your whatabout "military universities" response justify discrimination against applicants of Asian ancestry at Harvard and UNC?

After all these years, you are still not very good at this.

[Sudden Sam]

University-centered higher education will disappear soon anyway. AI will see to that.

[General Peters]

Racists gonna racist. I personally cannot wait for KKKierland to provide his compelling justifications for Harvard and UNC’s continued discrimination against members of the Asian community.

Bitch can't do it. Sore subject. Facts crush little white guilt riddled people like himself. But Potato Head assures us that there's no discrimination against the Asians so dipshit KKKierland believes it.

The socialist leftists are the only ones DYING for us to go back to the 1960s or better yet 1860s

[General Peters]

After all these years, you are still not very good at this.

True. But two things he is good at, and that's self loathing and calling everything the CISMAZISMMSSS

What a pitiful little shit

[Mikey]

The socialist leftists are the only ones DYING for us to go back to the 1960s or better yet 1860s

Funny, I thought that’s what MAGA is all about. So which decade do YOU want to go back to?

[Kierland]

Read the opinion. It clearly states how racial admissions are necessary… for military universities. Do you ever get tired of being a stupid fuck you projecting Nazi?

The United States as amicus curiae contends that race-based admissions programs further compelling interests at our Nation’s military academies. No military academy is a party to these cases, however, and none of the courts below addressed the propriety of race-based admissions systems in that context. This opinion also does not address the issue, in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present.

Read much, KKKierland? And how does your whatabout "military universities" response justify discrimination against applicants of Asian ancestry at Harvard and UNC?

After all these years, you are still not very good at this.

I’m not the one who wrote the opinion and it’s Whatabout the military section, I’m just trying to explain to a toddler what English means. You do know what a compelling interest is, right? So “in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present” racism there is cool. So again, takkke your projection and stickkk it up your ass, well if you can find time when it’s not being pegged by your Nazi wife.

[Kierland]

Racists gonna racist. I personally cannot wait for KKKierland to provide his compelling justifications for Harvard and UNC’s continued discrimination against members of the Asian community.

Bitch can't do it. Sore subject. Facts crush little white guilt riddled people like himself. But Potato Head assures us that there's no discrimination against the Asians so dipshit KKKierland believes it.

The socialist leftists are the only ones DYING for us to go back to the 1960s or better yet 1860s

I literally just did it, but you feelings got in the way of you reading my facts. Projection much you fuckin Nazi?

[Screw_Michigan]

Funny, I thought that’s what MAGA is all about. So which decade do YOU want to go back to?

The 1860s were such a great era for liberals and minorities. I keep forgetting about that.

[Screw_Michigan]

I’m not the one who wrote the opinion and it’s Whatabout the military section, I’m just trying to explain to a toddler what English means. You do know what a compelling interest is, right? So “in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present” racism there is cool. So again, takkke your projection and stickkk it up your ass, well if you can find time when it’s not being pegged by your Nazi wife.

I do love when 88braincells plays the "you're not a good lawyer" card and you kick him square in the nuts.

[88BuckeyeGrad]

Screwy is also unable to read and think for himself. If KKKierland says that "This opinion also does not address the issue" means "in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present 'racism there is cool'", he believes it. He even spikes the football on the basis of it.

[Kierland]

Ok then what does it mean Lionel?

[88BuckeyeGrad]

Ok then what does it mean Lionel?

"This opinion does not address the issue."

[Kierland]

I can read dumbfuck. I am trying to find out if you know what that means you stupid dirt farmer.

[Kierland]

Justice Jakkkson is an idiot. The opinion doesn’t even address that issue.

Sin,
88Nazis

[88BuckeyeGrad]

The court has come to rest on the bottom line conclusion that racial diversity in higher education is only worth potentially preserving insofar as it might be needed to prepare Black Americans and other underrepresented minorities for success in the bunker, not the boardroom.

Props to the law clerk who came up with that one.

It truly is a spectacular lie. If you like that sort of thing, I suppose you should give proper credit to the law clerk who wrote it and the moron who tacked her name on the dissent that included it.

The only mention of the military in the majority opinion (Footnote 4; Page 22):

The United States as amicus curiae contends that race-based admissions programs further compelling interests at our Nation’s military academies. No military academy is a party to these cases, however, and none of the courts below addressed the propriety of race-based admissions systems in that context. This opinion also does not address the issue, in light of the potentially distinct interests that military academies may present.

Hell of a "bottom line conclusion" eh?

[Kierland]

That’s it, just bash yourself in the face with a hammer a few more times. The court gave the go ahead for race based admissions and you can’t even see it because you are too busy pimping your cult of cruelty.

[Sudden Sam]

It would be humiliating to be admitted to a school because of one’s race.

Why is the far left so anti merit-based admissions?

[Sven Golly]

Why? Because the left is full of victim-oriented people. Merit be damned in their world.

[Screw_Michigan]

Why? Because the left is full of victim-oriented people. Merit be damned in their world.

Says the party of Jim Crow

[Kierland]

It would be humiliating to be admitted to a school because of one’s race.

Why is the far left so anti merit-based admissions?

Nice Strawman.

[Sudden Sam]

Why? Because the left is full of victim-oriented people. Merit be damned in their world.

Says the party of Jim Crow

Say what?!?!

[88BuckeyeGrad]

That’s it, just bash yourself in the face with a hammer a few more times. The court gave the go ahead for race based admissions and you can’t even see it because you are too busy pimping your cult of cruelty.

I would really like you to try that kind of argument in Court.

KKKierland Esq: Your Honor, since the Court expressly stated that it did not address the issue of whether race-based admissions programs further compelling interests at our Nation’s military academies, the Court absolutely positively 100% gave the go ahead for race based admissions at our Nation's military academies.

Judge: How do you come to that conclusion?

KKKierland Esq: Because the dissents kind of sort of said something like that.

Judge: Mr. KKKierland, did your professors teach you in law school that statements appearing in the dissent form any part of the Court's opinion?

KKKierland Esq: No. But I have determined that they are great, when I like them, and can be used to bash someone in the face with a hammer a few times, right?

Judge: Mr. KKKierland, please see the Clerk on your way out of the courtroom. You are going to need to make an appointment with disciplinary counsel.

[Kierland]

That’s it, just bash yourself in the face with a hammer a few more times. The court gave the go ahead for race based admissions and you can’t even see it because you are too busy pimping your cult of cruelty.

I would really like you to try that kind of argument in Court.

KKKierland Esq: Your Honor, since the Court expressly stated that it did not address the issue of whether race-based admissions programs further compelling interests at our Nation’s military academies, the Court absolutely positively 100% gave the go ahead for race based admissions at our Nation's military academies.

Judge: How do you come to that conclusion?

KKKierland Esq: Because the dissents kind of sort of said something like that.

Judge: Mr. KKKierland, did your professors teach you in law school that statements appearing in the dissent form any part of the Court's opinion?

KKKierland Esq: No. But I have determined that they are great, when I like them, and can be used to bash someone in the face with a hammer a few times, right?

Judge: Mr. KKKierland, please see the Clerk on your way out of the courtroom. You are going to need to make an appointment with disciplinary counsel.

So you Nazi fuck, why don’t you tell us if that ruling struck down race based admissions at West Point. Or maybe you can try your act but with Justice Jackson as the foil.

That is if your wife will let you post again.

[Sudden Sam]

A lady predicted this in 2016:

Progress?!

[Kierland]

You know, the things you hate like bodily autonomy (for others) and inclusion (of people not like you).

[Sudden Sam]

The level of hysteria on MSNBC is astounding.

Reid just said that only white Christians and billionaires have rights.

She’s funny.

[Kierland]

You should quote her instead of paraphrasing her.

In other news the Oracles declared it legal to discriminate against Asians applying to Harvard, wait make that LGBT people looking for a website. I’m sure 88nazis has read it so maybe he can fill us in on if it applies to people looking for doctors or Christians needing clothes.

[Mikey]

So I guess the knuckledraggers are OK with activist judges now.

Who would ever have thunk it?

[88BuckeyeGrad]

In the Harvard/UNC case, the SCOTUS said the 14th Amendment means what it says. You cannot discriminate on the basis of race. Progressives are butt hurt.

In the Colorado website case, the SCOTUS said that the 1st Amendment means what it says. You cannot abridge the freedom of one’s speech. Again, Progressives are butt hurt.

Why? Because Progressives are used to robed oracles of their choosing dictating to the supposedly self-governed what the laws are. When they do not get to force the People to do as they dictate, they get butt hurt.

If the Progressives truly believe the self-governed consent to race based policies, then it ought to be really fucking easy to use the political processes readily available to enshrine those views into law. But that won’t be possible because the self-governed do not consent. Bummer.

The same is true for forced speech. If the self-governed think it is a good idea to allow government to force you what to say and to punish you if you do not toe the line, then enshrine that into law. There are mechanisms in place that allow political decisions of that sort to be enacted. But the self-governed are not buying that flaming bag of shit. So if the Progressives that cannot force it on the self-governed are butt hurt. Bummer.

[Mikey]

Somebody forced you to say something?
Ponderous. I feel sorry for you.