They bring along weirdness and try to convince the masses it is normal.
They started a decade-or-so-ago with Breast Cancer Awareness Month in the NFL.
All sort of pink things on the field, in the surroundings, and on your TV screen during the month of October.
They start trotting out teams in goofball uniforms on... Thursday night football.
Then soon, teams, NFL, MLB, and NBA, start more regularly wearing pajama-type uniforms -- with wild color patterns, etc.
Then one day the Washington Nationals sashay out for their game wearing -----> sissy boi pink uniforms.
And everyone is just sort of okay with it.
Father: Oh yeah, son. That must be a faggot team.
Son: Oh. Okay. I'm good with that.
Can you imagine if some team would have rolled out like that to play a game against the Oakland A's in 1972?
psst...
11 year old girls decorate their room with pink shit.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 6:30 am
by Mikey
Softball Bat wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 4:06 am
They bring along weirdness and try to convince the masses it is normal.
They started a decade-or-so-ago with Breast Cancer Awareness Month in the NFL.
All sort of pink things on the field, in the surroundings, and on your TV screen during the month of October.
They start trotting out teams in goofball uniforms on... Thursday night football.
Then soon, teams, NFL, MLB, and NBA, start more regularly wearing pajama-type uniforms -- with wild color patterns, etc.
Then one day the Washington Nationals sashay out for their game wearing -----> sissy boi pink uniforms.
And everyone is just sort of okay with it.
Father: Oh yeah, son. That must be a faggot team.
Son: Oh. Okay. I'm good with that.
Can you imagine if some team would have rolled out like that to play a game against the Oakland A's in 1972?
psst...
11 year old girls decorate their room with pink shit.
Calm down. It’s Mother’s Day.
Charlie Finley would probably have been % on board.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 7:02 am
by Mikey
n 1963, Finley changed the team's colors to Kelly Green, Fort Knox Gold, and Wedding Gown White. In 1967, he replaced the team's traditional black spikes with white. Finley also started phasing out the team name "Athletics" in favor of "A's." (When Mickey Mantle saw the A's' green-and-gold uniforms, he jeered, "They should have come out of the dugout on tippy-toes, holding hands and singing," according to Baseball Digest
Yes, Mother's Day -- so trot out the fairy uniforms.
Just like during Breast Cancer Awareness Month they plaster pink everywhere.
Good excuse.
It's professional athletics, man.
Not a trip to the friggin' hair salon to get your nails done.
I chose the Oakland A's of 1972 on purpose.
Their uniforms at that time were ----> out there.
The most "out there" club of 50 years ago would never have entertained the thought of actually walking out for a pro sports contest wearing Richard Fvcking Simmons garb.
THAT is how wack this current spectacle is.
#incrementally
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 8:14 am
by Wolfman
I knew something was up when my football officials organization had us using pink whistles.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 11:27 am
by Diego in Seattle
Blame Joe Arpaio. He's the one who brought us pink outfits for men.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 11:55 am
by Softball Bat
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 11:27 am
Blame Joe Arpaio. He's the one who brought us pink outfits for men.
haha!
Nice!
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 2:08 pm
by Mikey
l to r:
Softball Bat taking the lead in the fight to save American masculinity.
Somebody’s gotta do it. I guess.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 3:02 pm
by Kierland
Wolfman wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 8:14 am
I knew something was up when my football officials organization had us using pink whistles.
Oh course you had no problem with the Go Army stuff and the Fly overs or the beer beer beer ads or the….
Try to make at least a little sense, and occasionally address the actual topic.
And no, I’m not clicking on your virus infected download. Do us all a huge favor and step in front of a speeding train.
Thank you very much.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 11:31 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Mikey wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 11:11 pm
Try to make at least a little sense, and occasionally address the actual topic.
And no, I’m not clicking on your virus infected download. Do us all a huge favor and step in front of a speeding train.
Thank you very much.
You mean that there's nothing incremental about Admiral Levine? Agreed, and the suggestion of any incremental imposing of the alphabet spectrum upon society is just another display of idiocy by the Christer idiot. Of course it's rampant and romping.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 09, 2022 11:43 pm
by Left Seater
LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Mon May 09, 2022 11:31 pm
alphabet spectrum upon society
I dunno. I am a proud supporter of LGBFJB.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 2:15 am
by LTS TRN 2
Well it's up to seven letters AND a plus sign +
And while I suppose that's incremental, it certainly reflects the clear agenda of seeking to destroy any sort of basic definitions of gender. And the most pernicious of these subgroups is of course the T, the "trans" mental disorder of gender dysphoria being openly promoted and encouraged. This is an immeasurably greater threat to the public than anything from regular old gay men or mannish dykes--who seem quaint compared to the utter derangement we see in the freak show that is "trans." And no surprise these hideous and tortured looking folks are filling the quickly swelling ranks of Dissociative Identity Disorder, a Tik Tok phenomenon which is perhaps the nadir of Western civilization to date.
Naw, my letter salad doesn’t have a T and it has nothing to do with gays.
Try again.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 2:35 am
by Kierland
It’s about food or taxes or his wives barren uterus.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 3:50 am
by Diego in Seattle
Kierland wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 2:35 am
It’s about food or taxes or his wives barren uterus.
So basically she's a failed domestic infant supplier.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 5:15 am
by Left Seater
Two jealous idiots jerking each other off.
Gross.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 11:24 am
by Diego in Seattle
So all you have is projection from what you, schmuck & L450BS are doing...got it.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 10, 2022 4:57 pm
by Kierland
Fatman projecting about projection.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Fri May 13, 2022 6:49 am
by LTS TRN 2
Left Seater wrote: ↑Tue May 10, 2022 2:22 am
Naw, my letter salad doesn’t have a T and it has nothing to do with gays.
Try again.
Why would anyone care about your nonsense? You're some clown who pretends to be a pilot. Who openly says that a 757 disappeared through a 10-foot hole in a massive concrete wall. Do you even exist?
Unfortunately there exists an actual crisis of a lunatic Bolshevik Woke mob running amok. And it's an alphabet mafia--with real clout and consequences.
And this includes all manner of Queer acceptance, encouragement and indoctrination. And you--and fellow clowns--are tossing silly insults?
Re: incrementally
Posted: Fri May 13, 2022 7:54 pm
by Left Seater
Nice rant.
Keep running you tin foil hat conspiracy theories.
Meanwhile the letter salad is:
Let's Go Brandon Fuck Joe Biden
Re: incrementally
Posted: Fri May 13, 2022 8:47 pm
by Kierland
Your brain does indeed produce word salad.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Fri May 13, 2022 11:20 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri May 13, 2022 7:54 pm
Nice rant.
Keep running you tin foil hat conspiracy theories.
Meanwhile the letter salad is:
Let's Go Brandon Fuck Joe Biden
It wasn't a rant, but a concise and accurate take. You can't defend a single part of the 9/11 Commission report and you know it. And to see you squirm and wriggle--"what about the fairings?"--is as pathetic as anything ever displayed on this palsied forum.
But I agree completely about
LGB-FJB most certainly.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Sat May 14, 2022 3:24 am
by Left Seater
Right, you completely ignored the fairings and want to hang your hat on some grainy super enlarged photo that shows a normal airplane. Your knowledge of airplanes and aircraft systems is on par with a trash can’s knowledge of them. And you continue with the conspiracy theory that would have required hundreds if not thousands of people to pull off and yet not a single deathbed confession.
Adjust your tin foil hat and enjoy the fake lunar eclipse this weekend.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 3:00 am
by LTS TRN 2
Left Seater wrote: ↑Sat May 14, 2022 3:24 am
Right, you completely ignored the fairings and want to hang your hat on some grainy super enlarged photo that shows a normal airplane. Your knowledge of airplanes and aircraft systems is on par with a trash can’s knowledge of them. And you continue with the conspiracy theory that would have required hundreds if not thousands of people to pull off and yet not a single deathbed confession.
Adjust your tin foil hat and enjoy the fake lunar eclipse this weekend.
Are you kidding? I have clear and compelling arguments to undermine ALL of the 9/11 Commission's assertions and assumptions. And you can start with the pentagon, or Shankesville, or the WTC towers. Every single part of the official story falls apart. And as for requiring hundreds or thousands to pull off the New Pearl Harbor, this is nonsense. It could easily be less than a hundred--who were all dedicated, not merely hired.
As for my knowledge of airplanes, I know that the engines on a 757 hang fifteen feet below the nose, and that the point of impact on the pentagon wall was only ten feet off the ground--with not a scratch on the lawn. And i know that flying a 757 requires serious training, and that a total novice with ZERO experience could not possibly fly it--or punch in the auto-pilot and somehow set it for the pentagon while flying below the radar--while of course observed by no one.
As for the moon, the eclipse is quite real, but not the landings. :wink:
Re: incrementally
Posted: Sun May 15, 2022 11:49 am
by Softball Bat
LTS wrote:As for the moon, the eclipse is quite real, but not the landings.
The supposed moon landings are completely ridiculous.
This landed on the moon?
Download these pics and zoom in a bit and take a closer look at the... craftsmanship that went into this -----> greatest farce in human history.
Look folks, they duped your parents with this crazy bullshit back when they had black-and-white TV and 3 news channels.
But anyone who looks at this NASA absurdity can see within a few minutes that the moon landings never happened.
If someone, now, in 2022 still clings to the fairy tale that man landed on the moon, well, they are willfully stupid.
Free your' mind, for goodness sake!
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 5:29 am
by LTS TRN 2
The fun flick Project Avalanche provides the full details--easily masked in a comedy. But halfway through, you'll suddenly sense and realize...it's true.
You know what I didn't see last night, a line cutting across the moon from the flat erff. What I did see was a curved reduction in light move across the moon until if was very dark and then a curved gradual increase in the light from the moon.
I would love to see the flat erffers explain how the eclipse happened from a flat erff perspective.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Mon May 16, 2022 10:15 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Some jackwad has always got to go raising the ante....
Before Columbus and Magellan was all that--Trippin', rippin'--gettin' fat,
tellin the big four-one-one on the million spittin'
chicklet tails of trails of tribes and bribes and peacock lies to politicize the big surprise
of not falling over the edge--but I ain't chillin' wit that villain,
the felon Magellan all yellin' the world's like a melon--
you know--I know--that what you see is what you ghat--the muthafuckin' world is flat!
Now these scientists with their mental fists
keep tryin' to pulverize 'n hypnotize--turn the eyes into lies--
subjugate and alienate the totality of our reality--enslaving and engraving
the world with its power--every hour every day, bustin' the one on the play
to circumnavigate the soul--fillin' it up like a bowl--well, it's time to fight back!--
with a base attack--let's go!--yo!--on the one-an' make it phat--the muthafuckin' world is flat!
You say you've been around the world--you've seen it turn like a ball--
pharmaceutical slave mines--keep you one foot in the grave mines
an' that ain't all--you seen pictures from tricksters--Capricorn One had their fun--
with strobes and globes rectifying the subjective perspective possessive trip--
All On Board the scientific slave ship--
it's Science this and Science that --
the opposite of Cole King Nat-- --
they got you buyin' 'n relyin'--ain't no use in tryin' to get away--
Science already owns you--tells you, sells you--go ring the bells,
you Quasimodo fool--say Houston, we gotta problem!-
-The world's like a bank an' Science is tryin' to rob em!'
'Tell the schools that Science is blind as a bat, 'n the muthafuckin' world is flat!
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 2:13 am
by Softball Bat
Lefty wrote:I would love to see the flat erffers explain how the eclipse happened from a flat erff perspective.
Describe what you believe caused the lunar eclipse.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 2:23 am
by LTS TRN 2
He clearly said what caused it, you chirpy idiot.
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 2:46 am
by Softball Bat
Lefty wrote:What I did see was a curved reduction in light move across the moon until if was very dark and then a curved gradual increase in the light from the moon.
poptart wrote:Describe what you believe caused the lunar eclipse.
LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 2:23 am
He clearly said what caused it, you chirpy idiot.
I did not ask him to describe what he saw.
He already did that.
I asked him to describe what he believes caused what he saw.
Lefty wrote:What I did see was a curved reduction in light move across the moon until if was very dark and then a curved gradual increase in the light from the moon.
poptart wrote:Describe what you believe caused the lunar eclipse.
LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 2:23 am
He clearly said what caused it, you chirpy idiot.
I did not ask him to describe what he saw.
He already did that.
I asked him to describe what he believes caused what he saw.
And you think that mewling semantic fan dance means anything? He clearly implied that because the earth is ball-shaped it created a crescent shape of shadowed eclipse upon the artificial structure we know as the Moon. What's wrong with you? Why is it that everything you say seems strangled at birth, as it were, by your sheer idiocy? No surprise you're a Christer preacher, or some such a huckster of pure gibberish--but only skilled enough to pan it off to Koreans. The lowest rung of whatever qualifies as Protestant these days. Ugh..
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 8:44 am
by Softball Bat
LTS wrote:He clearly implied that because the earth is ball-shaped it created a crescent shape of shadowed eclipse upon the artificial structure we know as the Moon
That's it?
You didn't do very well, champ.
lol
Why did it happen on that day and at that time?
Why was it visible only to people in certain locations?
Re: incrementally
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 8:13 pm
by Left Seater
Pretty much what JSC posted.
As for why it is only visible to some people and not others can be completely explained using a flashlight, a globe and softball when it is dark out.
Place the flashlight on a box flat on your dining table. Put the globe on the table as well in the line of site of the flashlight's beam. Pass the softball from the light of the flashlight behind the globe and across to the light on the other side. Watch the shadows that are created on the ball. If you turn the globe so that N America was just entering the side opposite the flashlight, you replicate exactly the people who could see the eclipse.
Now, your turn. Take a flat earth model and flashlight and softball and show us how it creates the same shadows visible in the same spaces.
% on board.
