T1B

The article: Affluent Ivy League Princesses End Year Still Spitting Poison To Media Because It's Safer Than 'Don't Talk About It, Be About It'

The best response (even if votes don't back it up):

Tandoori Chicken, Sydney, Australia wrote: So if they are not prepared to stand up and complain about it, why are they bothering us about it ... it doesn't affect us it affects them..

Mods, please merge this thread with the main one.

It is disingenuous and petty of the team to condemn their coach for 'winning before everything', if they themselves have decided not to jeopardize their chance to win before everything.

It is petty to smile and lie to Lia's face about standing behind Lia, then talk shit about her to global media anonymously, then have the balls to discuss unsportsmanlike behavior like false starts (behavior destroying the concentration of their rivals).. all while bitter that they don't have the backing of the school.

What would you tell your daughters? Shit or get off the pot? Or it's ok to seek cake and eat it, too?

Women shouldn't be competing in sports anyway. They should be learning how to cook and do the laundry.

Notice that these so-called "female" athletes who are really men that had genital mutilation do not compete in real female competition like gymnastics. On a similar note, I guess the producers of Jeopardy are looking the other way too with the current champion.
Happy 2022 to one and all.

Wolfman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:44 am Notice that these so-called "female" athletes who are really men that had genital mutilation do not compete in real female competition like gymnastics. On a similar note, I guess the producers of Jeopardy are looking the other way too with the current champion.
Happy 2022 to one and all.

Isn't it past your bed time?

Wolfman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:44 am On a similar note, I guess the producers of Jeopardy are looking the other way too with the current champion.

And on a similar note what the fuck does gender have to do with a game show competition?

^^^^^^^^
I doubt that. Men are a bit top heavy and at least would be at a disadvantage on the balance beam. Looking at all this sex change in sports, no woman "becoming a man" would not likely have an advantage in any men's sports.

If gender is fluid and a social construct as liberals like to say, then why do we even have men’s and women’s events?

There should just be a single 100 meter race.

Wolfman wrote: ↑Sat Jan 01, 2022 11:16 pm ^^^^^^^^
I doubt that. Men are a bit top heavy and at least would be at a disadvantage on the balance beam. Looking at all this sex change in sports, no woman "becoming a man" would not likely have an advantage in any men's sports.

Speaking of....

Amid trans athlete debate, Penn’s Lia Thomas loses to trans Yale swimmer
Though Thomas managed to win two events Saturday, she came in sixth in the 100-yard freestyle after competing head-to-head against Henig, a junior at Yale. Henig is eligible to compete on the women’s team as a trans man because he’s chosen not to receive gender-affirming hormones, also known as hormone replacement therapy, such as testosterone.

Sounds scripted, or Henig is juicing on the sly.

If Henig wants to be a man, she should compete as a man instead of fence-straddling.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Jan 02, 2022 1:51 pm If gender is fluid and a social construct as liberals like to say, then why do we even have men’s and women’s events?

There should just be a single 100 meter race.

Women can't compete competively in the sports generating the most revenue, waifus are sci-fantasy only. The people willing to pay money aren't interested in female athletes unless they also fit waifu criteria (exception Serena proving the Kournikova rule), and even then men's sports dwarf women's sports. Is this about right?