Page 1 of 1
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:56 am
by Mikey
Well, except there were 375,000 Coronavirus deaths in the US in 2020 between March and December.
So, nice try.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2021 4:44 am
by Left Seater
You whiffed on the point.
Biden said 200,000 should have the President be declared unfit for office. He now has far more than that number of deaths on his own hands.
So was he lying then or should he be declared unfit for office now?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2021 3:22 am
by LTS TRN 2
Mikey wrote: ↑Wed Dec 01, 2021 3:56 am
Well, except there were 375,000 Coronavirus deaths in the US in 2020 between March and December.
So, nice try.
Dying "with Covid" is not the same as dying "of Covid," though the media toddles along saying it is. But what's your excuse?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:47 pm
by Kierland
Go ahead and fill is in nut job.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 7:15 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Papa Willie wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 3:47 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:47 pm
It’s okay if people die from COVID while Brandon is in office.
"15 will soon be down to zero."
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:12 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Like a miracle
Covid 19 affects virtually nobody
"I knew I was infected and I tried to infect Biden at the first debate so I got hopped up on speed and ranted and raved like a blithering lunatic"
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:38 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Is $375 more than $130,000?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2021 8:51 pm
by Kierland
I think his Meth addiction is one of the things that attracted duhron to dump.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 1:38 am
by Left Seater
The whataboutism and TDS remains strong in the liberals here.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:08 am
by Kierland
Yeah what about that time your god dump tried to overthrow the government?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:39 am
by Diego in Seattle
Papa Willie wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 4:43 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:08 am
Yeah what about that time your god dump tried to overthrow the government?
Trump was voted out over a year ago. Why don’t you quit jerking off whatabouts and use something relevant for a fucking change?
When the GOP stops kissing Dump's ring is when he will no longer be relevant.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 12:12 pm
by Kierland
More to the point, when he is properly investigated for his crimes he will be irrelevant. Oh and Hillary’s emails say they are full of shot in the subject anyways.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:59 pm
by Left Seater
Papa Willie wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:11 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:39 am
When the GOP stops kissing Dump's ring is when he will no longer be relevant.
Wrong as per usual. For example none of the conservative posters here are kissing the ring as you say.
Instead most of the liberal posters bring up their TDS on a daily basis.
Stop lying to yourself, or don’t. In fact keep up the lying, it will only help us in the mid-terms.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:20 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:59 pm
Papa Willie wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:11 pm
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:39 am
When the GOP stops kissing Dump's ring is when he will no longer be relevant.
Wrong as per usual. For example none of the conservative posters here are kissing the ring as you say.
Instead most of the liberal posters bring up their TDS on a daily basis.
Stop lying to yourself, or don’t. In fact keep up the lying, it will only help us in the mid-terms.
When your party violates laws & norms you don't call them out for it. Why TF do you think you have any right to call the other party out for what you see as violations?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 11:53 pm
by Kierland
“We don’t want cops killing us!” You are a fucking POS.
“Hang Mike Pence!” An unguided tour.
The right is mental.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:55 am
by LTS TRN 2
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:47 pm
Go ahead and fill is in nut job.
What, you're robustly clueless as to how this scam works?
First, whenever anyone checks into a hospital--let's say a diabetic hippo feeling a bit under the weather--they are given an immediate Covid test. These quick tests have a 30-50% false result rate, but no matter. With a positive test, the patient is immediately given a walloping dose of who knows what, and within a day--or even hours--they need a respirator and often die. But regardless of how they die--diabetes complications, heart disease, flu, old age, ANYTHING, if they've tested positive for Covid, it counts as a Covid death. Got it? And yes, this includes George Floyd. Yes, he is tallied in that shocking 370,000 figure. As for how many people have actually died just from Covid, it's probably a couple thousand at best.
As for Fauci's fan dance of ever changing "science" that we're all supposed to dutifully believe in and obey, it's complete bullshit and he knows it. His own shameless hypocrisy in his ever-shifting decrees and warnings are obviously meant to be permanent. And as we see in Australia and Europe, it's a blatant power grab of unprecedented proportions.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:23 am
by Diego in Seattle
LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:55 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:47 pm
Go ahead and fill is in nut job.
What, you're robustly clueless as to how this scam works?
First, whenever anyone checks into a hospital--let's say a diabetic hippo feeling a bit under the weather--they are given an immediate Covid test. These quick tests have a 30-50% false result rate, but no matter. With a positive test, the patient is immediately given a walloping dose of who knows what, and within a day--or even hours--they need a respirator and often die. But regardless of how they die--diabetes complications, heart disease, flu, old age, ANYTHING, if they've tested positive for Covid, it counts as a Covid death. Got it? And yes, this includes George Floyd. Yes, he is tallied in that shocking 370,000 figure. As for how many people have actually died just from Covid, it's probably a couple thousand at best.
You're so full of shit...
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:32 am
by Kierland
“A couple of thousand” so how do you account for the actual death rate being higher than 2019? Is that all made up too?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:51 am
by LTS TRN 2
Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:23 am
LTS TRN 2 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 12:55 am
Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Dec 04, 2021 2:47 pm
Go ahead and fill is in nut job.
What, you're robustly clueless as to how this scam works?
First, whenever anyone checks into a hospital--let's say a diabetic hippo feeling a bit under the weather--they are given an immediate Covid test. These quick tests have a 30-50% false result rate, but no matter. With a positive test, the patient is immediately given a walloping dose of who knows what, and within a day--or even hours--they need a respirator and often die. But regardless of how they die--diabetes complications, heart disease, flu, old age, ANYTHING, if they've tested positive for Covid, it counts as a Covid death. Got it? And yes, this includes George Floyd. Yes, he is tallied in that shocking 370,000 figure. As for how many people have actually died just from Covid, it's probably a couple thousand at best.
You're so full of shit...
Sure, it wasn't considered as a cause of death as far as the trial, but he was still counted in the tally. Yes, just like every other person with comorbidities.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 4:55 am
by LTS TRN 2
Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:32 am
“A couple of thousand” so how do you account for the actual death rate being higher than 2019? Is that all made up too?
What does "actual death rate" mean? I'm speaking of those who died exclusively from Covid, period. Let's remember that about 60K was the usual annual death rate from the flu, but it's dropped to fucking zero.
I don't understand your utter density and denial of the obvious falsity of this entire massive scam. Look at Australia and Germany right now. And look at what Fauci and his his slithering brethren are steadily moving towards.
Wake the fuck up!
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:02 am
by Kierland
Of course you don’t know what an actual death rate is, you are a fucking moron spouting BS.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:17 am
by LTS TRN 2
Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:02 am
Of course you don’t know what an actual death rate is, you are a fucking moron spouting BS.
As the mortality figures for COVID-19 continue to rise, people are wondering where they will stop. The actual death toll for COVID-19 won’t be calculable for some time, but there are early indications that it may be significantly lower than calculations of deaths per confirmed cases lead one to believe.
As an article in Lancet Infectious Diseases pointed out, calculating mortality rates based on the number of deaths divided by the number of confirmed cases of infection is not representative of the actual death rate. There are two issues, the authors said. First, the denominator should be the number of people who were infected at the same time as those who died. The second issue is that many people experienced very mild symptoms and so did not seek medical treatment and were not included in the calculation.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:26 pm
by Kierland
Blah blah blah. 570,000 more people died last year than in 2019 the highest death rate since 1943. But that is just a coincidence in your FB mom world I guess.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:53 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Kierland wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 1:26 pm
Blah blah blah. 570,000 more people died last year than in 2019 the highest death rate since 1943. But that is just a coincidence in your FB mom world I guess.
Obviously there is a basic health crisis in this country based on obesity and general dire health conditions stemming from junk food and no exercise, etc. And so yes, more people are going to die. So what? It's not connected to Covid at all, except that many of these fat fucks need but a nudge to gamboling in the Elysian Fields.
And what the fuck is an "FB mom world"? You mean Zuckfuck's advertising silo? I never go near it.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 12:16 am
by Kierland
570,000 more deaths in 2020: Must have been too much sugar.
Sin,
2TrnIdiot
——-
THINK you fucking asshole, THINK! If it was sugar it would be about the same as 2019.
And the FB mom jab is because you sound like a sheep from a stupid FB mom group, but if you don’t go there you must be independently stupid.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 3:06 am
by LTS TRN 2
Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 12:16 am
570,000 more deaths in 2020: Must have been too much sugar.
Sin,
2TrnIdiot
——-
THINK you fucking asshole, THINK! If it was sugar it would be about the same as 2019.
And the FB mom jab is because you sound like a sheep from a stupid FB mom group, but if you don’t go there you must be independently stupid.
The subject is folks who died exclusively from Covid. you seem confused and wriggling like a cornered rat.
Meanwhile the lunacy romps on...
https://katu.com/news/coronavirus/orego ... definitely
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:17 am
by Kierland
Ok MAGA mutt explain how 570,000 more people died in 2020 and don’t say sugar cause that’s just stupid.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 7:46 am
by LTS TRN 2
Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Dec 07, 2021 5:17 am
Ok MAGA mutt explain how 570,000 more people died in 2020 and don’t say sugar cause that’s just stupid.
How many just from Covid? It's obvious you can't stop squirming and dodging...but...so what? Who and what the fuck are you? That is, you've got no game at all. So..why are you even here? :?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 12:02 pm
by Kierland
Oh fuck off you stupid racist POS. Obviously most were covid or we wouldn’t have the huge spike. And since you asked, I’m here to kick your fucking head in you sniveling little bitch.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2021 4:59 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Covid ain't no big deal.
Sincerely,
Johnny Rodgers
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:43 am
by LTS TRN 2
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:53 am
by Kierland
You have memes just no facts.
What a fucking sheep.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:55 am
by Screw_Michigan
Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 1:53 am
You have memes just no facts.
What a fucking sheep.
Imagine belittling vaccines that have saved hundreds of millions of lives around the world. All in tribute to a death cult leader that wanted to investigate how to kill covid inside the body with infrared light and bleach.
Racism is a hell of a drug.
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:57 am
by Kierland
Did your FB mom group tell you that?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:05 am
by Screw_Michigan
schmick wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:39 am
What vaccine? There is no vaccine for kung flu
Where did you get your MD, Schmick?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:41 am
by LTS TRN 2
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 3:05 am
schmick wrote: ↑Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:39 am
What vaccine? There is no vaccine for kung flu
Where did you get your MD, Schmick?
It's amazing how many people think an epidemiologist is a scientist in a lab, peering through microscopes and using fancy equipment. But no, an epidemiologist analyzes data, period. Like a stock broker. And in this case what we have is not merely a matter of gross malfeasance and chicanery not seen since Bernie Madoff, but a slithering unaccountable psychopath--also the highest paid federal employee--who is desperate to cover his ass as far as how this whole thing was gain of functioned in the first place.
As for the amazing vaccines, why aren't you acknowledging how completely different and draconian is this vaccine campaign compared to any other in history? Why are you accepting the outrageous bullshit of a virus with a 99.7% recovery rate being treated with a Zero Tolerance as though it's the Black Plague? And why are vaccines suddenly rushed to market as never before--not even close? And more and more, plus boosters and permanent masks? What's your excuse for being the true sheep here and accepting any of this monstrous scam?
Re: Is 350,000 more than 200,000 or is math racist?
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2021 2:24 pm
by Kierland
You can’t even explain 570,000 extra deaths you racist POS.
