Thanks for your well-informed opinion, and detailed analysis, Perry Mason
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
by smackaholic
You’re welcome.
Do you think just maybe there was an itsy-bitsy bit of jury intimidation here?
And they read it as unintentional M2.
I’m no Perry Mason as has been pointed out, but isn’t “murder” an intentional act?
I think he’ll get a good lawyer on the appeal and he’ll do manslaughter 2, in the end.
Good luck to Police forces throughout the country with their recruitment efforts
I can’t imagine why anyone would want to become a cop today.
The result will be settling for what they can get. And we’ll get more cases of cops thinking a gun is a taser.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
by Kierland
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:07 pm
Murder never should have been on the table.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fuck off traitor.
Your murderous 1-6 mob is next fuckwit.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:42 pm
by Kierland
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
I’m no Perry Mason as has been pointed out, but isn’t “murder” an intentional act?
No, you halfwitted snotball.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:55 pm
by Diego in Seattle
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
I’m no Perry Mason as has been pointed out, but isn’t “murder” an intentional act?
1) Chauvin was using a method of restraint that was not permitted by policy.
2) Chauvin kept Floyd in the hold for nine minutes, twenty nine seconds.
If you don't think that was intentional feel free to hold your breath for nine minutes & twenty nine seconds
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:17 pm
by smackaholic
I am not saying Chauvin isn’t a fukking idiot and a shit cop.
That doesn’t change the fact that our legal system requires beyond a reasonable doubt.
If Floyd was a healthy person without enough lethal drugs in his system to kill a person, then you could say, yup, he killed him.
But that wasn’t the case.
As for him being choked out, the video is inconclusive.
Chauvin was an asshole. He was obviously trying to teach Floyd a lesson.
I won’t shed any tears for him, but, This is a case where we’ve said “fukk reasonable doubt”.
The appeal will be moved.
The trouble is, will that jury be any less susceptible to intimidation?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:42 pm
by ML@Coyote
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:17 pm
I won’t shed any tears for him.
Neither will I.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:51 pm
by Diego in Seattle
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:17 pm
I am not saying Chauvin isn’t a fukking idiot and a shit cop.
That doesn’t change the fact that our legal system requires beyond a reasonable doubt.
If Floyd was a healthy person without enough lethal drugs in his system to kill a person, then you could say, yup, he killed him.
But that wasn’t the case.
Lincoln had both malaria & smallpox. Perhaps JWB's bullet didn't kill the 16th POTUS....
As for him being choked out, the video is inconclusive.
The video is only inconclusive to those predisposed to exonerate Chauvin (to put it mildly).
Chauvin was an asshole. He was obviously trying to teach Floyd a lesson.
Chauvin was using a method of restraint that was not permitted by department policy, and applied pressure to an area where the esophogus & carotid arteries reside for a period of time that no person could survive either being closed off. He knew what he was doing, and it wasn't teaching a lesson. And that's why he was convicted of M2.
I won’t shed any tears for him, but, This is a case where we’ve said “fukk reasonable doubt”.
You remind me of an OJ juror who couldn't understand the difference between blood type & DNA and thus voted for acquittal.
The appeal will be moved.
The trouble is, will that jury be any less susceptible to intimidation?
Appeals are heard by appellate judges, not juries, moron.
And it's the racists who resort to intimidation. See opponent of MTG.
And it’s likely to get worse before it gets better.
Sincerely,
January 6
That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.
The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
And it’s likely to get worse before it gets better.
Sincerely,
January 6
That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.
The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
They walked out N-azi. Suck more orange dick t-raitor.
So he had a stroke unrelated to being beaten and GF died from drugs unrelated to not having air for 9:29.
You are a stupid POS.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 4:27 pm
by Mikey
Smackaholic is overweight and out of shape. If he got shot in the chest and died five minutes sooner in the hospital because of the plaque in his coronary arteries then the shooter would be let off the hook.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:46 pm
by ML@Coyote
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
Good luck to Police forces throughout the country with their recruitment efforts
I can’t imagine why anyone would want to become a cop today.
Recruitment efforts shouldn't suffer because bad cops are prosecuted for their crimes. If you plan on being a bad cop, don't apply for the job. You're neither wanted nor needed. That should be the message. The problem isn't with the prosecution of bad cops. The problem is with the portrayal of all (or most) cops as bad. The press has a big hand in this. They should spend more time reporting on all the good things police officers do, and less time on the miscreants and idiots. I guess it's unfortunate that stories about good cops don't "sell papers."
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
Good luck to Police forces throughout the country with their recruitment efforts
I can’t imagine why anyone would want to become a cop today.
Recruitment efforts shouldn't suffer because bad cops are prosecuted for their crimes. If you plan on being a bad cop, don't apply for the job. You're neither wanted nor needed. That should be the message. The problem isn't with the prosecution of bad cops. The problem is with the portrayal of all (or most) cops as bad. The press has a big hand in this. They should spend more time reporting on all the good things police officers do, and less time on the miscreants and idiots. I guess it's unfortunate that stories about good cops don't "sell papers."
Agreed. They should spend more time reporting on the good things. But they shouldn't let up on exposing the assholes. Especially the murderers. Cops are SUPPOSED be good and don't necessarily need to be fawned over, it’s their job. Some may go beyond that, but the bad shit causes a lot more damage than all the good shit can make up for.
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
Good luck to Police forces throughout the country with their recruitment efforts
I can’t imagine why anyone would want to become a cop today.
Recruitment efforts shouldn't suffer because bad cops are prosecuted for their crimes. If you plan on being a bad cop, don't apply for the job. You're neither wanted nor needed. That should be the message. The problem isn't with the prosecution of bad cops. The problem is with the portrayal of all (or most) cops as bad. The press has a big hand in this. They should spend more time reporting on all the good things police officers do, and less time on the miscreants and idiots. I guess it's unfortunate that stories about good cops don't "sell papers."
First off you have no idea what the press is saying because you don’t listen to them, at least according to you.
Second, all (most) cops are bad. The proof is how many bad cops we know about. Kinda like priests, they might not all diddle kids, but they cover for the ones that do. You really think most cops are good but there happened to be the only four bad ones there to kill GF? You just don’t want to admit the truth so you make up a reality to fit that. Psych 101.
Lastly good cops don’t sell papers. Uber Drivers that don’t rape their fares don’t either. It’s called “man bites dog” and it’s how news has always worked more or less. But I am SURE you don’t want any light on the miscreants and idiots cause you like things the way they are.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:21 pm
by The Seer
Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
Your murderous 1-6 mob is next fuckwit.
Good news. The ONLY casualty from 1-6 was the unarmed female veteran that was trespassing...and killed by an anonymous cop who's identity has remained *STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL*...and her family no doubt didn't even receive enough cash to cover burial...unlike the going rate for a drug addled loser that commands 27 million for the "family".....who would give every cent back just to have their beloved GF back in their loving arms...
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Wed Apr 21, 2021 11:33 pm
by Softball Bat
smackaholic wrote:That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.
The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
Yeah, the whole thing was pretty much a big nothing.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:10 am
by Kierland
It was more of a stroll around the capital.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 12:17 am
by Softball Bat
Sometimes smackaholic's posts read as if they are intended as parody.
Wtf on steroids.
That's what happens when you choose to be "informed" by the likes of Jesse Watters, Greg Gruntfart, and Fucker Carlson.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:35 am
by ML@Coyote
Kierland wrote: ↑Wed Apr 21, 2021 9:58 pm
You just don’t want to admit the truth so you make up a reality to fit that. Psych 101.
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
Good luck to Police forces throughout the country with their recruitment efforts
I can’t imagine why anyone would want to become a cop today.
Recruitment efforts shouldn't suffer because bad cops are prosecuted for their crimes. If you plan on being a bad cop, don't apply for the job. You're neither wanted nor needed. That should be the message. The problem isn't with the prosecution of bad cops. The problem is with the portrayal of all (or most) cops as bad. The press has a big hand in this. They should spend more time reporting on all the good things police officers do, and less time on the miscreants and idiots. I guess it's unfortunate that stories about good cops don't "sell papers."
Recruitment has suffered terribly thanks to the war that has been waged by democrats attempting to pander to balck folks. It was started with Obama's "the cops acted stupidly" statement because cops were doing their fukking job.
The biggest victim has been the people who live in the hood who are dependent on cops doing the hard but necessary job of aggressive policing in places that badly need it. Murder rates have skyrocketed because the cops have decided to look the other way. And who can blame them? If I was a cop 2 years from retirement, I would do the same.
Chauvin was an asshole. Likely should have been canned long ago, but public sector unions, especially in democrat run areas are very powerful.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:47 am
by Kierland
ML-
Difference is I back my takes with facts and logic, so yeah you can SAY it, you just won’t be right like I am.
smackaholic wrote:That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.
The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
Yeah, the whole thing was pretty much a big nothing.
No, it wasn't a big nothing. But, had the Capitol cops had the backup they requested, maybe it could have been.
But Pelosi and company wanted a big something, so they denied help.
smackaholic wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:40 pm
Good luck to Police forces throughout the country with their recruitment efforts
I can’t imagine why anyone would want to become a cop today.
Recruitment efforts shouldn't suffer because bad cops are prosecuted for their crimes. If you plan on being a bad cop, don't apply for the job. You're neither wanted nor needed. That should be the message. The problem isn't with the prosecution of bad cops. The problem is with the portrayal of all (or most) cops as bad. The press has a big hand in this. They should spend more time reporting on all the good things police officers do, and less time on the miscreants and idiots. I guess it's unfortunate that stories about good cops don't "sell papers."
Recruitment has suffered terribly thanks to the war that has been waged by democrats attempting to pander to balck folks. It was started with Obama's "the cops acted stupidly" statement because cops were doing their fukking job.
The biggest victim has been the people who live in the hood who are dependent on cops doing the hard but necessary job of aggressive policing in places that badly need it. Murder rates have skyrocketed because the cops have decided to look the other way. And who can blame them? If I was a cop 2 years from retirement, I would do the same.
Chauvin was an asshole. Likely should have been canned long ago, but public sector unions, especially in democrat run areas are very powerful.
Yes it’s the unions in dem areas. You are a blathering idiot.
“Cops decided to look the other way” yeah they are also t-raitors, so fuck them and fuck you.
smackaholic wrote:That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.
The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
Yeah, the whole thing was pretty much a big nothing.
No, it wasn't a big nothing. But, had the Capitol cops had the backup they requested, maybe it could have been.
But Pelosi and company wanted a big something, so they denied help.
Link please.
Re: Chauvin verdict
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2021 2:01 am
by ML@Coyote
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 1:47 am
ML-
Difference is I back my takes with facts and logic, so yeah you can SAY it, you just won’t be right like I am.
smackaholic wrote:That mob was put down. One of them was even shot dead.
The cop they allegedly killed, yeah, he had a stroke. Likely pushed over the edge by all the commotion. Could have just as easily had it brought on by his OL yelling at him.
Yeah, the whole thing was pretty much a big nothing.
No, it wasn't a big nothing. But, had the Capitol cops had the backup they requested, maybe it could have been.
But Pelosi and company wanted a big something, so they denied help.
'Tard, your orange president pumped out the bogus narrative that the election was stolen from him.
For two months.
He was lying. Duh!
Dump's mouth-breathing worshipers went to DC on the 6th because he told them to come there.
He incited them, stoked them, lied to them, and baited them into going off the deep end for him.
Dump is a lying sack of shit, and he and his deluded gang of racist, low IQ losers are entirely to blame for the attack on the U.S. Capitol Building.
