T1B

B. de Blasio: creepy
T. Ryan: 'tard
J. Castro: intelligent
C. Booker: will rise
E. Warren: batshit crazy
B. O'Rourke: fruit cake
A. Klobuchar: dwarfish clod
T. Gabbard: interesting
J. Inslee: used car salesman
J. Delaney: deer in the headlights

People watch politics ?



Too funny!

It sounds like they piled on Beta. I didn’t watch the debate since I’m away right now, but the news reports make it seem like Warren won it.

Biggest Loser:

Chuck Todd

You think Trump is a good guy so your take on the Ds is worth zero you nazi POS.

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:12 am You think Trump is a good guy so your take on the Ds is worth zero you nazi POS.

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST, Moving Sale...WOW! C'mon, dude...
...that's bringing a suitcase nuke to a fist fight! Whoa dude.

First they came for the...

88 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:56 am ...and orders of magnitude better than the last empty suit of corruption who occupied the office.

Dubya's malfeasance was nearly bested by Obama's moral cowardice.
And you wonder why younger Americans have absolute contempt for democracy.

88 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:56 am
I think Trump is an egomaniac that I wouldn’t hang out with if he paid the tab. But he is the second best president in my lifetime, and orders of magnitude better than the last empty suit of corruption who occupied the office. I know, the potted plant you are going to cast your vote for in 2020 hasn’t germinated yet. So you should just go into a Thanksgiving dinner mode and take your paper plate and sippee cup over to the card table in the corner. Your peers await.

He is an authoritarian shitstain. He is 2nd or third worst in my lifetime, but I’m gauging him on his competence too which you must have left out of the equation. If I was a greedy vile shit I would probably have him near the top also. As of now I’m in Tulsi’s camp. You can come at her if you want.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:07 am
Dubya's malfeasance was nearly bested by Obama's moral cowardice.
And you wonder why younger Americans have absolute contempt for democracy.

What does democracy have to to with W being POTUS?

Night Two...


M. Williamson: wingnut
J. Hickenlooper: over his head and needs a toothbrush
A. Yang: fuzzy math
P. Buttigieg: overrated
J. Biden: skeletor
B.Sanders: woofing dog
K. Harris: unhinged
K. Gillibrand: a child
M. Bennet: born in New Delhi
E. Swalwell: Greg Marmalard



Pretty dismal lineup.

I read it. You said you don’t agree with her on a lot, hence my reference.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 3:38 am
A. Yang: fuzzy math

How is it fuzzy?

His paln is to give every adult $1,000 a month.
Cost, according to the man asking the question, would be 3.2 trillion a year.
How do you pay for it?


Yang says...

A VAT half of European level would generate over 800 billion in new revenue.
This would in-turn create millions of new jobs.
It would make the nation healthier (literally, he claims) -- so we would save money on incarceration, emergency room service, homeless services, etc.
Then this overall healthier populace would lead to an increase of our GDP by 700 billion dollars.


The 700 billion sounds like a hopeful fairy tale.
I'm not sure about the 800 billion, either.

Even if we give him the benefit of the doubt, he is still short by well over 1 trillion dollars.

But, I have no doubt there is more to the paln, and I am just not understanding it all.
lol







Yeah, okay.

So a European VAT and $500/mo.
Problem solved.
Anything else?

88 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:56 am I think Trump is an egomaniac that I wouldn’t hang out with if he paid the tab. But he is the second best president in my lifetime, and orders of magnitude better than the last empty suit of corruption who occupied the office. I know, the potted plant you are going to cast your vote for in 2020 hasn’t germinated yet. So you should just go into a Thanksgiving dinner mode and take your paper plate and sippee cup over to the card table in the corner. Your peers await.

That’ll RACK just for the quotable lines it contains! Niiiiiiiiiice.

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:21 am So a European VAT and $500/mo.
Problem solved.
Anything else?

What problem did five hundred bones solve? I must be missing something. Is that supposed to be a significant amount?

What you are missing is brain activity.
It’s your monthly car payment every month and the electricity bill every month and $50 a week for food.
Or it’s a three dollar and hr raise for every person working or not.
So yes it’s significant.

It is definitely significant.
For poor folk, $1,000 (or even half that) every month changes their world around.


I question the overall math, as well as the ramifications of his concept.

I also question if it is even constitutional on a national level.

I do give Yang some credit, though, and am glad he is on the stage.
America is in trouble.
Things are clearly not working in the present dynamic and it is good (imo) to have someone up there who is willing to float ideas and be willing to think outside the box.

88 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:56 am I think Trump is an egomaniac that I wouldn’t hang out with if he paid the tab. But he is the second best president in my lifetime

You are a mess

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 7:34 am It is definitely significant.
For poor folk, $1,000 (or even half that) every month changes their world around.


I question the overall math, as well as the ramifications of his concept.

I also question if it is even constitutional on a national level.

I do give Yang some credit, though, and am glad he is on the stage.
America is in trouble.
Things are clearly not working in the present dynamic and it is good (imo) to have someone up there who is willing to float ideas and be willing to think outside the box.

I'd concede that a grand a month is significant money for people living near the poverty line and for seniors on a fixed income. However, in terms of universal income, $1000 a month is carrying-around cash for middle class and up. The question is, if social security is soon to go bust, where do they expect to find billions of dollars lying around to throw at people? I'm certain that if this idea were to gain traction, the first order of business would be to means test the recipients. Then it'd just be one more entitlement for a particular class of people, negating the whole "universal" aspect of it.

I remain unconvinced.

88 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:10 pm Free stuff from the sky

We should buy more fighter jets and bombs. Fuck poor people. War mongering is where it’s at eh Adolf?

Rooster wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:44 pm $1000 a month is carrying-around cash for middle class and up. The question is, if social security is soon to go bust, where do they expect to find billions of dollars lying around to throw at people? I'm certain that if this idea were to gain traction, the first order of business would be to means test the recipients. Then it'd just be one more entitlement for a particular class of people, negating the whole "universal" aspect of it.

I remain unconvinced.

No middle class person has 1,000 carry cash.
Learn to read, the $ comes from the VAT now that we only have a few companies and most mom and pop stores are dead it’s a whole different world. Alaska saw the future years ago and they still don’t means test. So go fuck yourself you stupid twat.

88 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 3:54 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:13 pm

88 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 12:10 pm Free stuff from the sky

We should buy more fighter jets and bombs. Fuck poor people. War mongering is where it’s at eh Adolf?

I think defense spending is completely out of control and unwarranted. I would cancel 2/3 of the spending if they gave me the pen. I've said that a lot in here. Again, you post without any knowledge about what you post. It's your thing. Keep Moving Sale-ing along.

No you wouldn’t or you wouldn’t have Don’s tiny dick up your ass. The point is there are lots of people getting “free stuff” that you never bitch about unless pressed on the issue. That shows that you don’t really care about it as much as you care about being a parrot for the war monger crowd.

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:15 pm No you wouldn’t or you wouldn’t have Don’s tiny dick up your ass. The point is there are lots of people getting “free stuff” that you never bitch about unless pressed on the issue. That shows that you don’t really care about it as much as you care about being a parrot for the war monger crowd.

As long as the free shit goes to guys like him and not underprivileged minorities he's A-OK with it.

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Jun 28, 2019 3:38 am Night Two...

P. Buttigieg: overrated

Fraudulent neo-liberal homo that wants you to trade in your pension for gay pride parades.

Your kids don't need subsidized education or a viable future...they need condoms! Condoms everywhere!
Why graduate when you can transition!

Dims on this board...


Who should your party back?

Personally, I see slop.

Biden, Warren, and Sanders?

LMAO!

Absolute jokes.


I am not seeing anyone right now?

Is there anyone to draft?

Damn, your party sucks ass.


Thoughts?

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 2:36 am Thoughts?

Why would you bump a thread from a month ago ?

Other than it was a thread you started ?


There are far more interesting threads on the page to respond to.

twit wrote:Why would you bump a thread from a month ago ?

Is it really hard to understand, twit?

If you're a Dim, chime in.

If not, stick a thumb up your @ss and stfu.

I like Warren, she is by far the best candidate in the field who would actually benefit US citizens rather than corporate and wealthy interests such as banks. She is the only one who has proven herself willing to take on these said banks, which are scared shitless of her. Unfortunately she is also a woman so she will be demonized as shrill and cast aside by our female phobic electoral base.

Pres Tulsi and VP Liz would be good with me.
Liz and Tulsi less so.

For sale on Amazon...






https://www.amazon.com/Anti-trump-t-shi ... B0795VFZ4H




But why 2019?





Oh, I get it...


United States presidential line of succession
Vice President - Mike Pence
Speaker of the House - Nancy Pelosi
President pro tempore of the Senate - Chuck Grassley
etc.





#tinfoil

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:14 pm Unfortunately she is also a woman so she will be demonized as shrill and cast aside by our female phobic electoral base.

It has zero to do with being a woman and everything to do with her bat shit crazy takes. Start with Pocahontas, then look at her plan to eliminate Puerto Rico’s debt, then chew on her desire to end private health insurance.

Those alone make her a joke of a candidate. No surprise you are all in with her.

The woman that should run is Condy Rice. Too bad she never will.

You voted for a crazy person so your opinion isn’t worth shit you fat greedy racist.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Sun Aug 18, 2019 8:01 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:14 pm Unfortunately she is also a woman so she will be demonized as shrill and cast aside by our female phobic electoral base.

It has zero to do with being a woman and everything to do with her bat shit crazy takes. Start with Pocahontas, then look at her plan to eliminate Puerto Rico’s debt, then chew on her desire to end private health insurance.

Those alone make her a joke of a candidate. No surprise you are all in with her.

The woman that should run is Condy Rice. Too bad she never will.

Lol, that's exactly what American needs---another neo-conservative shill running for president.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Aug 17, 2019 5:14 pm She is the only one who has proven herself willing to take on these said banks, which are scared shitless of her.

Yep, those big banks are fucking scared out of their minds by some bat shit crazy liberal bitch. She is going to get elected and fuck their shit up in the first month. They are quaking in their Gucci loafers. You fucking moron.

Oh I have no doubt banks are scared of her. She will probably move to confiscate wealth and give it to the government for Medicare for all or free college or more welfare.

They should be scared of the pitchforks.

Left Seater wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:35 am Oh I have no doubt banks are scared of her. She will probably move to confiscate wealth and give it to the government for Medicare for all or free college or more welfare.

Gets it

Derron wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:26 am Yep, those big banks are fucking scared out of their minds by some bat shit crazy liberal bitch. She is going to get elected and fuck their shit up in the first month. They are quaking in their Gucci loafers. You fucking moron.

Duhron has a tiny penis.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2019 12:17 pm

Left Seater wrote: ↑Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:35 am Oh I have no doubt banks are scared of her. She will probably move to confiscate wealth and give it to the government for Medicare for all or free college or more welfare.

Gets it

This should scare you as well Screwy. Any confiscation of money is a huge red flag. It will drive tons of money outside of the US. Further this is money that has already been taxed. Look no further than Apple who has kept billions out of the US economy and tax rolls. It wouldn't be that difficult for average US citizens to start moving their holdings overseas as well.