T1B

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2019 7:23 am**

Porky
Bsmack
Mikey
Rooster
Screwy
Leftseater
Smakiechan
CreditCard... Russ
Derron
Shmick
R-Jack
mvscal
88
PSUfan
Wolfman
Jsc 810

I'm sure I'm missing some more.

At what point did you fat fucks give up on life... and start to post on message boards all day ?

There should be some great stories in hindsight.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2019 10:13 am**

Why is your name missing from that list, Mr. FiatLux?

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:29 pm**

Lnever make any lists.

Not even the ones I belong on.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:49 pm**

At 17,986 posts, yeah, you probably should be on that list, ‘Holic.

Posted: **Mon Feb 25, 2019 7:23 pm**

At least they can lose weight. There's no hope for you.

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 6:45 pm**

I can diet. FiatSux will always be stupid.

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:27 pm**

I may have a five-head and I'm not thin as I was five years ago, but I'm definitely not shutyomouth-fat.

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:46 pm**

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:47 pm**

Papa Willie wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:I may have a five-head and I'm not thin as I was five years ago, but I'm definitely not shutyomouth-fat.
Isn't it odd how you & Milton are too chickenshit to posts pictures of yourselves?

I'd bet that you both easily outweigh me.

Put together, you mean?

Here's Melty once again asking for photos of other men on a message board. You can't make this shit up.

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:48 pm**

Papa Willie wrote: Isn't it odd how you & Milton are too ~~chickenshit~~ smart to posts pictures of yourselves?

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:49 pm**

RageSpray

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 7:50 pm**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:RageSpray

How did you get Bernie Sanders in this photo?

Posted: **Tue Feb 26, 2019 8:09 pm**

BSmack wrote:I can diet. FiatSux will always be stupid.

Rack it!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted: **Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:46 am**

Fat fucks are lazy losers.

Am I wrong?

Posted: **Wed Feb 27, 2019 6:42 am**

FiatLux wrote:Fat fucks are lazy losers.

Am I wrong?

Well, Porky, you're up to bat.

Are you still the loser living in a trailer park in Gorge a... like the GPS shows ?

We kinda developed these things here in the (San Francisco Bay Area.. called GPS devices)... so, we can keep track of you fat fucks.

Did you pass out from an overdose of KFC... which happens to be less than a block away from your trailer ?

Too funny !

Posted: **Wed Feb 27, 2019 7:08 am**

I've confused "Porky" once again.

It's become boring... it's so easy

the truth

Posted: **Wed Feb 27, 2019 9:24 am**

Get a grip, you FAT FUCKING RETARD.

Posted: **Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:14 pm**

Softball Bat wrote:Get a grip, you FAT FUCKING RETARD.

That is never going to happen.

Posted: **Wed Feb 27, 2019 5:55 pm**

Ya know, stoolio running zip code smack about the bay area’s contribution to tech wouldn’t be so bad.....if he was a techie himself at one of those companies.

But he ain’t.

He’s a fukking carny.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:00 pm**

Here's an article on California from Victor Davis Hanson, a prominent political writer and resident of California.

California's Rendezvous with Reality
by Victor Davis Hanson

Years of lax policies and overspending are finally catching up to the Golden State.

Californians brag that their state is the world’s fifth-largest economy. They talk as reverentially of Silicon Valley companies Apple, Facebook, and Google as the ancient Greeks did of their Olympian gods. Hollywood and universities such as Caltech, Stanford, and Berkeley are cited as permanent proof of the intellectual, aesthetic, and technological dominance of West Coast culture. Californians also see their progressive, one-party state as a neo-socialist model for a nation moving hard to the left. But how long will they retain such confidence?

California’s 40 million residents depend on less than 1 percent of the state’s taxpayers to pay nearly half of the state income tax, which for California’s highest tier of earners tops out at the nation’s highest rate of 13.3 percent. In other words, California cannot afford to lose even a few thousand of its wealthiest individual taxpayers. But a new federal tax law now caps deductions for state and local taxes at $10,000 — a radical change that promises to cost many high-earning taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars. If even a few thousand of the state’s 1 percent flee to nearby no-tax states such as Nevada or Texas, California could face a devastating shortfall in annual income.

During the 2011-16 California drought, politicians and experts claimed that global warming had permanently altered the climate, and that snow and rain would become increasingly rare in California. As a result, long-planned low-elevation reservoirs, designed to store water during exceptionally wet years, were considered all but useless and thus were never built. Then, in 2016 and 2017, California received record snow and rainfall — and the windfall of millions of acre-feet of runoff was mostly let out to sea. Nothing since has been learned. California has again been experiencing rain and cold that could approach seasonal records. The state has been soaked by some 18 trillion gallons of rain in February alone. With still no effort to expand California’s water storage capacity, millions of acre-feet of runoff are once again cascading out to sea (and may be sorely missed next year).

The inability to build reservoirs is especially tragic given that the state’s high-speed rail project has gobbled up more than $5 billion in funds without a single foot of track laid. The total cost soared from an original $40 billion promise to a projected $77 billion. To his credit, newly elected governor Gavin Newsom, fearing a budget catastrophe, canceled the statewide project while allowing a few miles of the quarter-built Central Valley “track to nowhere” to be finished.

For years, high-speed rail has drained the state budget of transportation funds that might have easily updated nightmarish stretches of the Central Valley’s Highway 99, or ensured that the nearby ossified Amtrak line became a modern two-track line. California politicians vie with each other to prove their open-borders bona fides in an effort to appeal to the estimated 27 percent of Californians who were not born in the United States.

But the health, educational, and legal costs associated with massive illegal immigration are squeezing the budget. About a third of the California budget goes to the state’s Medicare program, Medi-Cal. Half the state’s births are funded by Medi-Cal, and in nearly a third of those state-funded births, the mother is an undocumented immigrant.

California is facing a perfect storm of homelessness. Its labyrinth of zoning and building regulations discourages low-cost housing. Its generous welfare benefits, non-enforcement of vagrancy and public health laws, and moderate climate draw in the homeless. Nearly one-third of the nation’s welfare recipients live in the state, and nearly one in five live below the poverty line. The result is that tens of thousands of people live on the streets and sidewalks of the state’s major cities, where primeval diseases such as typhus have reappeared.

California’s progressive government seems clueless how to deal with these issues, given that solutions such as low-cost housing and strict enforcement of health codes are seen as either too expensive or politically incorrect.

In sum, California has no margin for error.

Spiraling entitlements, unwieldy pension costs, money wasted on high-speed rail, inadequate water storage and delivery, and lax immigration policies were formerly tolerable only because about 150,000 Californians paid huge but federally deductible state income taxes. But no more. Californians may have once derided the state’s 1 percent as selfish rich people. Now, they are praying that these heavily burdened taxpayers stay put and are willing to pay far more than what they had paid before.

That is the only way California can continue to spend money on projects that have not led to safe roads, plentiful water, good schools, and safe streets.

A California reckoning is on the horizon, and it may not be pretty.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:18 pm**

You should leave.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:37 pm**

I don’t live in California. I left around the time I began contracting because the thought of investing, as tax proponents call it, to the tune of 10.3% of my gross wages was anathema to me. If I got something for my money, like terrific roads on Highway 99 or cheap fuel, I might have stayed, but to see my tax dollars get frittered away to illegal aliens was a step too far.

I’ll admit that there are some things I miss, like flying into Yosemite at treetop level all throughout the year. I miss flying into Chrissy Field at the foot of the Golden Gate Bridge. I miss flying up to the Dardanelles and Kirkwood.

But the bad so far outweighs the good and in such a lopsided fashion that I doubt that I’ll ever return except to visit my kids.

The funny thing is, when we announced that we were leaving our friends expressed amazement that we’d ever leave. When we told them we didn’t wish to pay such exorbitant taxes they told us they thought everyone paid that much. Like the frog in the slowly heating pot of water, they never gave any thought to the crazy high taxes and how it gets spent.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 3:54 pm**

Rooster wrote:I don’t live in California. I left around the time I began contracting because the thought of investing, as tax proponents call it, to the tune of 10.3% of my gross wages was anathema to me. If I got something for my money, like terrific roads on Highway 99 or cheap fuel, I might have stayed, but to see my tax dollars get frittered away to illegal aliens was a step too far.

I’ll admit that there are some things I miss, like flying into Yosemite at treetop level all throughout the year. I miss flying into Chrissy Field at the foot of the Golden Gate Bridge. I miss flying up to the Dardanelles and Kirkwood.

But the bad so far outweighs the good and in such a lopsided fashion that I doubt that I’ll ever return except to visit my kids.

The funny thing is, when we announced that we were leaving our friends expressed amazement that we’d ever leave. When we told them we didn’t wish to pay such exorbitant taxes they told us they thought everyone paid that much. Like the frog in the slowly heating pot of water, they never gave any thought to the crazy high taxes and how it gets spent.

The uber-rich won't leave. They are insulated from the 3rd world state it is becoming. I will be the first to admit, I'd likely live there if I had an 8 figure net worth. It really does have unmatched nature beauty and weather. But the middle-class are leaving in droves and will continue to. And that is where the money is.

At some point, maybe they'll come to their senses, but I am afraid that 50 years of stuffing the place full of people who think a 3rd world existence is the norm, won't permit this.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:08 pm**

smackaholic wrote:
Rooster wrote:I don’t live in California. I left around the time I began contracting because the thought of investing, as tax proponents call it, to the tune of 10.3% of my gross wages was anathema to me. If I got something for my money, like terrific roads on Highway 99 or cheap fuel, I might have stayed, but to see my tax dollars get frittered away to illegal aliens was a step too far.

I’ll admit that there are some things I miss, like flying into Yosemite at treetop level all throughout the year. I miss flying into Chrissy Field at the foot of the Golden Gate Bridge. I miss flying up to the Dardanelles and Kirkwood.

But the bad so far outweighs the good and in such a lopsided fashion that I doubt that I’ll ever return except to visit my kids.

The funny thing is, when we announced that we were leaving our friends expressed amazement that we’d ever leave. When we told them we didn’t wish to pay such exorbitant taxes they told us they thought everyone paid that much. Like the frog in the slowly heating pot of water, they never gave any thought to the crazy high taxes and how it gets spent.
The uber-rich won't leave. They are insulated from the 3rd world state it is becoming. I will be the first to admit, I'd likely live there if I had an 8 figure net worth. It really does have unmatched nature beauty and weather. But the middle-class are leaving in droves and will continue to. And that is where the money is.

At some point, maybe they'll come to their senses, but I am afraid that 50 years of stuffing the place full of people who think a 3rd world existence is the norm, won't permit this.

And yet you live in a state with a higher overall tax burden than California (according to WalletHub):

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-h ... den/20494/

6. Connecticut
Total tax burden: 10.19 percent

Property tax burden: 4.17 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.34 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 2.68 percent

10. California
Total tax burden: 9.57 percent

Property tax burden: 2.66 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.65 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 3.26 percent

Maybe you should consider moving out here. Better yet, forget that we already have enough snowbirds.

And who knows, maybe WalletHub is just another media shill for the Democrats.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:58 pm**

Rooster wrote:I don’t live in California.

Glad you left. The fewer dum dums the better.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:11 pm**

I’m glad I left too. And I never attempted to hide the fact that I’m just a dumb helicopter pilot, so you got me there, yes sir.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:47 pm**

Papa Willie wrote:
Wow. I’m pretty happy with Georgia - certainly after reading that...

And we're happy that you're happy with Georgia.

Thanks Dr. Hanson.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:21 pm**

Rooster wrote:I’m glad I left too. And I never attempted to hide the fact that I’m just a dumb helicopter pilot, so you got me there, yes sir.

At least you admit you are a dum dum. Maybe there is hope for you.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 8:39 pm**

Rooster wrote:...Victor Davis Hanson, a prominent political writer...

Prominent among who? The 5 or 6 soft-handed, doughy-chinned neo-conservatives left in America?

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:41 pm**

Mikey wrote:
smackaholic wrote:
Rooster wrote:I don’t live in California. I left around the time I began contracting because the thought of investing, as tax proponents call it, to the tune of 10.3% of my gross wages was anathema to me. If I got something for my money, like terrific roads on Highway 99 or cheap fuel, I might have stayed, but to see my tax dollars get frittered away to illegal aliens was a step too far.

I’ll admit that there are some things I miss, like flying into Yosemite at treetop level all throughout the year. I miss flying into Chrissy Field at the foot of the Golden Gate Bridge. I miss flying up to the Dardanelles and Kirkwood.

But the bad so far outweighs the good and in such a lopsided fashion that I doubt that I’ll ever return except to visit my kids.

The funny thing is, when we announced that we were leaving our friends expressed amazement that we’d ever leave. When we told them we didn’t wish to pay such exorbitant taxes they told us they thought everyone paid that much. Like the frog in the slowly heating pot of water, they never gave any thought to the crazy high taxes and how it gets spent.
The uber-rich won't leave. They are insulated from the 3rd world state it is becoming. I will be the first to admit, I'd likely live there if I had an 8 figure net worth. It really does have unmatched nature beauty and weather. But the middle-class are leaving in droves and will continue to. And that is where the money is.

At some point, maybe they'll come to their senses, but I am afraid that 50 years of stuffing the place full of people who think a 3rd world existence is the norm, won't permit this.
And yet you live in a state with a higher overall tax burden than California (according to WalletHub):

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-h ... den/20494/

6. Connecticut
Total tax burden: 10.19 percent

Property tax burden: 4.17 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.34 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 2.68 percent

10. California
Total tax burden: 9.57 percent

Property tax burden: 2.66 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.65 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 3.26 percent

Maybe you should consider moving out here. Better yet, forget that we already have enough snowbirds.

And who knows, maybe WalletHub is just another media shill for the Democrats.

If you are looking for me to defend Ct, you'll be waiting a long time.

This once very wealthy state is swirling the drain. You have the issue of poor fukkers from south of the border swarming in. Over the last half century, we have had a very similar problem. The difference is, our latin invading horde walked right in the front door from Puerto Rico. American citizens, every last one of them. In fact, a number of dominicans come in posing as puerto ricans.

We moved away about 24 years ago. Unfortunately, the OL talked me into coming back 3 years later. Should have stayed in TN. A kid in college, 2 good jobs and a paid off mortgage in a nice semi-rural town are the only things keeping us here. The difference between you and me is that you seem to not have a problem with your state being run into the financial ditch. I hate the hell out of it. Our plan is to either sell and run away in the next 5 years or so, or maybe just say fuggit and ride it out here. At that point the fact that our home will have no market value won't be so important. My kids might argue otherwise, but too fukkin' bad.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 9:42 pm**

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
Rooster wrote:...Victor Davis Hanson, a prominent political writer...

Prominent among who? The 5 or 6 soft-handed, doughy-chinned neo-conservatives left in America?

There's more of us than that.

And my chin isn't doughy......well, maybe a few of them are.

Posted: **Thu Feb 28, 2019 10:02 pm**

I am hoping that Cali doesn’t change, for decades at least. Look it is nice to visit and the weather is nice. (Although pulling out the fruit tree heaters when the temperature is 71 on a restaurant patio is beyond me, but to each their own.)

However as long as Cali wants to take in illegals, give health care to everyone at little or no cost, have generous benefits for homeless, let illegals vote in some elections and not strictly enforce drug laws, I see that as a win. Our homeless population in SAT has declined a bit due to the vast majority of them wanting to get to Austin or Cali. Unfortunately buying them bus tickets is seen as bad pool and a good way to draw more looking for free transport to Cali.

At the same time, Mikey who seems like a level headed person, hasn’t chosen to leave Cali. So that says something. However, if Mikey were to chose to bail, I might start getting worried.

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:23 am**

smackaholic wrote:At that point the fact that our home will have no market value won't be so important. My kids might argue otherwise, but too fukkin' bad.

Your home has no market value because of Democrats? Why? Did they come over and do your reno work?

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 2:40 am**

Mikey wrote:
And yet you live in a state with a higher overall tax burden than California (according to WalletHub):

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-h ... den/20494/

6. Connecticut
Total tax burden: 10.19 percent

Property tax burden: 4.17 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.34 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 2.68 percent

10. California
Total tax burden: 9.57 percent

Property tax burden: 2.66 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.65 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 3.26 percent

Maybe you should consider moving out here. Better yet, forget that we already have enough snowbirds.

And who knows, maybe WalletHub is just another media shill for the Democrats.

So, Holic's (statistical) "burden" is 10.19% of $31 billion

Yours is 9.57% of $210 billion.

Talk about manipulating numbers.

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 3:28 am**

Dinsdale wrote:
Mikey wrote:
And yet you live in a state with a higher overall tax burden than California (according to WalletHub):

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-h ... den/20494/

6. Connecticut
Total tax burden: 10.19 percent

Property tax burden: 4.17 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.34 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 2.68 percent

10. California
Total tax burden: 9.57 percent

Property tax burden: 2.66 percent
Individual income tax burden: 3.65 percent
Total sales and excise tax burden: 3.26 percent

Maybe you should consider moving out here. Better yet, forget that we already have enough snowbirds.

And who knows, maybe WalletHub is just another media shill for the Democrats.

So, Holic's (statistical) "burden" is 10.19% of $31 billion

Yours is 9.57% of $210 billion.

So?
You’re really not very good at math, are you?

What if a state, county or whatever, had a base of $1 billion and a “burden” of 100%. By your logic they’d be better off than either CT or CA.

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 7:53 am**

What this country really needs is more "babysitters"... to make sure "fat fucks" get off the couch and go to work.

Sup, Porky(Georgia), Left Seater (San Antonio), BlubberSmack (upstate New York), DownSyndrome a holic.(Connecticut), and the Dems' biggest retard (Screwy).

I/we... have a time limit... on supporting your asses... since you"are" Americans.

Get a job... you FAT FUCKS !

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:03 pm**

BSmack wrote:
smackaholic wrote:At that point the fact that our home will have no market value won't be so important. My kids might argue otherwise, but too fukkin' bad.
Your home has no market value because of Democrats? Why? Did they come over and do your reno work?

I am not talking about my home in particular. I am talking about real estate values in general. If you had a home in detoilet it likely had strong value in the 60s. Today it is likely worth shit, regardless of the level of maintenance you did. Just as a complete dump in Dorchester which you couldn’t give away in 1990 is today worth a fortune due to the gentrification that has taken place there. I suspect Boston might be ripe for a serious correction though. Massachusetts isn’t run as badly as Connecticut, but it isn’t that much better. Western Mass real estate is t any better than Connecticut’s.

As for it being 100% democrats faults, not really. We had a few rep governors over the last 30 years and they didn’t help things much. Rolland sorta tried and all it got him was some time in club fed.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:05 pm**

Funny, no matter what they try to do, prices seem to keep going up around here.

Until they don't.

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:35 pm**

Rack toolio for stirring up some noise in here

Posted: **Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:37 pm**

Oregon is trying some sort of statewide rent control. Maybe that will work, or it won’t. But hey let them give it a shot.

T1B

Fat People...

Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...

Re: Fat People...