T1B

I thought we were being invaded?

It was fake news.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Whatever happened to "the Caravan?"

And the caravan is on it's way
I can hear the merry gypsies play
Mama mama look at Emma Rose
She's a-playin with the radio
La, la, la, la...

Smackie Chan wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:Whatever happened to "the Caravan?"

And the caravan is on it's way
I can hear the merry gypsies play
Mama mama look at Emma Rose
She's a-playin with the radio
La, la, la, la...

RACK any and all Van the Man resets...

OK, as long as we're going with obscure musical caravan references, here's one.

Heading for TJ, Nice. I've been dissatisfied with my landscapers of late.

1784 miles from San Diego.

If they walk 12 hours per day at 3 mph they should be here in 50 days. Just in time for your New Year's party.

Of course, the El Paso (1162 miles) contingent will just miss Hanukkah.

But then again, they could pull a fast one and sneak unseen into Brownsville by the Sunday after Thanksgiving.

Papa Willie wrote:I imagine some will die and others will quit, so it won't be too big when it gets to the border.

Thank God and G0d we sent 15,000 troops down there. We might have been overrun otherwise.

Bump

Can I get a Caravan update from one of you Trump ball washers? Are we on the verge of invasion yet?

The invaders are getting closer every day. It’s a good thing we have all those soldiers deployed at our southern border.

Mexico continues to offer asylum, most are turning it down which certainly says something about the motives of the caravan. Some LGBT caravan members have arrived at the border just below San Diego. The vast majority are near Puerto Vallarta.

Why do you hate google?

Mikey wrote:invaders

Its just a handful of stroller pushing South Americans wanting a better life in the USA. I'm sure screwey, mikey and the rest of the sky screamers in here will gladly welcome them into their homes and neighborhoods with open arms.

Are 5,000 troops needed to stop that?

Well, maybe Don thinks a bunch of his men will have to sit things out due to bone spurs, or something.

Now there is a great idea. For all those Screwy types that want to allow these caravan members into the US they should step up and offer to house, feed and assimilate them. Screwy and those who feel as he does should take responsibility and face the same consequences as parents would when their minor children do something wrong. Screwy can also teach them English and teach them what they need to know for their citizenship test.

Sudden Sam wrote:Moats are nice. We should build a lovely moat across the southern border.



We could fill it with burning oil during invasions.

We could build a 2,000 miles wide moat like the one that kept all the people from Europe and Asia out.

Too bad we can’t redo the 19th century. Rather than just pushing west, we could have hung a left at the rio grande and extended our land grab to panama, where we ended up building a moat anyway.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Softball Bat wrote:Are 5,000 troops needed to stop that?

Well, maybe Don thinks a bunch of his men will have to sit things out due to bone spurs, or something.

If they were all equivalent to sirfistafuck you'd need a lot more.

Left Seater wrote:Now there is a great idea. For all those Screwy types that want to allow these caravan members into the US they should step up and offer to house, feed and assimilate them. Screwy and those who feel as he does should take responsibility and face the same consequences as parents would when their minor children do something wrong. Screwy can also teach them English and teach them what they need to know for their citizenship test.

Keep up with your strawmen, it shows your true intellectual dishonesty. Nobody here is advocating letting all of them into the US.

Why don't you address the issue of sending 5,000 plus soldiers to the border to stop the invasion?

Mikey wrote: Keep up with your strawmen, it shows your true intellectual dishonesty. Nobody here is advocating letting all of them into the US.

Why don't you address the issue of sending 5,000 plus soldiers to the border to stop the invasion?

How many do you want to let in?

50%?

75?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote: Keep up with your strawmen, it shows your true intellectual dishonesty. Nobody here is advocating letting all of them into the US.

Why don't you address the issue of sending 5,000 plus soldiers to the border to stop the invasion?

How many do you want to let in?

50%?

75?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think our system is well set up to figure it out. Of course, that's not good enough for your hysterics because you want zero to be admitted.

Left Seater wrote:Now there is a great idea. For all those Screwy types that want to allow these caravan members into the US they should step up and offer to house, feed and assimilate them. Screwy and those who feel as he does should take responsibility and face the same consequences as parents would when their minor children do something wrong. Screwy can also teach them English and teach them what they need to know for their citizenship test.

Thank you for the hearty laff, you're always good for a few chuckles. I always love how when anyone says that it is absurd we have 5,000 troops on the border to prepare for this "caravan," all the Trump ballwashers insist we must personally house, feed, clothe and take legal responsibility for them or else we're FUKKING HYPOCRITES BLERGH!

No wonder you guys got your asses kicked last week. Wakey wake

Sirfindafold wrote:Its just a handful of stroller pushing South Americans wanting a better life in the USA. I'm sure screwey, mikey and the rest of the sky screamers in here will gladly welcome them into their homes and neighborhoods with open arms.

I live in a wonderfully diverse neighborhood filled with Central Americans. They'd certainly be welcomed here with open arms, you racist, bile spewing hemorrhoid.

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote: Keep up with your strawmen, it shows your true intellectual dishonesty. Nobody here is advocating letting all of them into the US.

Why don't you address the issue of sending 5,000 plus soldiers to the border to stop the invasion?

How many do you want to let in?

50%?

75?

I'm not qualified to make that decision, and neither are you. The point, as screwy said, is that we have a system for working this out that may be flawed but has worked OK up till now. We definitely don't need 5,000 troops at the border to shoot anybody trying to cross. Congress has the power to change the system. Maybe they should do their job instead of constantly demagoguing it.

If you think its' so important to stop them, why don't you grab a gun and head down there yourself. That may sound pretty ridiculous but it's also analogous to the suggestion that anybody criticizing this should open their own doors and take them all in.

Screw_Michigan wrote:
I live in a wonderfully diverse neighborhood filled with Central Americans. They'd certainly be welcomed here with open arms, you racist, bile spewing hemorrhoid.

You DO realize that the LBGT members of the "caravan" fled (with help) because they feared for their safety, right?

RIGHT?

What makes you think they'd treat you any different from the rest of your "community"?

Maybe you can hook the up with jobs mopping a waste water treatment plant.

Mikey wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote: Keep up with your strawmen, it shows your true intellectual dishonesty. Nobody here is advocating letting all of them into the US.

Why don't you address the issue of sending 5,000 plus soldiers to the border to stop the invasion?

How many do you want to let in?

50%?

75?

I'm not qualified to make that decision, and neither are you. The point, as screwy said, is that we have a system for working this out that may be flawed but has worked OK up till now. We definitely don't need 5,000 troops at the border to shoot anybody trying to cross. Congress has the power to change the system. Maybe they should do their job instead of constantly demagoguing it.

If you think its' so important to stop them, why don't you grab a gun and head down there yourself. That may sound pretty ridiculous but it's also analogous to the suggestion that anybody criticizing this should open their own doors and take them all in.

You clearly have lost your sense of humor. No one would think Screwy capable of hosting anyone, much less asylum seekers.

As for the troops on the border, we should have them available at all times to assist the Border Patrol folks. Trump likely should have sent the National Guard and not active duty soldiers. Both Bush and Obama sent National Guard troops to support the Border Patrol. Same should have been done here. Bottom line is our Southern Border is wide open. Add 5,000 plus people at one or more points and we will be able to do nothing to stop them. No sane person is suggesting to shoot them. We just let them swim across the river and then round them up and send them back. If you want to claim asylum, then follow the rules. Breaking our laws before you even make your asylum claim is a bad idea.

Left Seater wrote: No sane person is suggesting to shoot them.

Nobody's accusing smackaholic of being sane.