T1B

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:37 pm**

Mikey wrote:I notice that 88 doesn't actually have any rebuttal to the fact the Brett lied multiple times to the committee, and became belligerent and evasive when asked some straightforward questions. Only that Kagan and Sotomayor are somehow "worse" (with no actual facts, just his own off-the-rails love of anything "conservative"), and that some Republicans voted for two of Obama's appointees so the current puke should somehow get an automatic pass.

In other words...nothing. I also notice he didn't include Merrick Garland in his shining example of Republican bipartisanship.

Maybe Melty can pick up the baton and come up with something better.

nah.....

Have you linked to where they proved he lied? I missed that story.

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:44 pm**

Killian wrote:
Mikey wrote:I notice that 88 doesn't actually have any rebuttal to the fact the Brett lied multiple times to the committee, and became belligerent and evasive when asked some straightforward questions. Only that Kagan and Sotomayor are somehow "worse" (with no actual facts, just his own off-the-rails love of anything "conservative"), and that some Republicans voted for two of Obama's appointees so the current puke should somehow get an automatic pass.

In other words...nothing. I also notice he didn't include Merrick Garland in his shining example of Republican bipartisanship.

Maybe Melty can pick up the baton and come up with something better.

nah.....
Have you linked to where they proved he lied? I missed that story.

Pretty fucking easy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/pl ... 45a4e0920d

OK your turn. Help Ol' 88 out and provide some links to where Kagan and Sotomayor are "complete buffoons," and far less qualified than Brett.

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:58 pm**

Since he falsely claims that Kavanaugh lied about the drinking age, I'm going to go ahead and call bullshit on this opinion piece.

Kavanaugh never stated that he was of legal age. He stated that the seniors were of age in 1982, which was true. He also stated that the legal drinking age in Maryland for most of his HS years was 18, which again, was true.

30 seconds of reading and this story loses credibility. Any others?

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:06 pm**

Papa Willie wrote:

Posted: **Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:09 pm**

https://nypost.com/2014/04/26/justice-s ... t-so-wise/

One for Sotomayor, the other wouldn't link.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 3:22 pm**

88 wrote:
Mikey wrote:I notice that 88 doesn't actually have any rebuttal to the fact the Brett lied multiple times to the committee
Notice that Mikey does not identify any supposed lies told by Judge Kavanaugh to the committee thereby making it impossible for 88 to respond to his baseless assertions.

I provided a link in response to Killian - you do know now to follow those, I assume?
Where's your link?

88 wrote: They are not Democrats. They are DEMON RATS!!! :brad: :brad:

OK I know you like BEER. Maybe sometimes too much BEER. And it's legal for you to drink BEER. And you like BEER.
But you might want to back away from the BEER for a while.

88 wrote:Merrick Garland ... was nominated at a time when the Senate was controlled by the other party. He never had a chance.

So, what you're saying is that no President should nominate a Supreme Court Justice unless he/she has a majority in the Senate.
A novel concept. At least it was until 2016.

Seriously, though. Consider backing away from the BEER.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 4:23 pm**

So in conclusion, those of you on this board who are Democrats/Leftists/Marxists/Socialists/Commies believe that at the ripe age of 15 Brett Kavanaugh, as evil ringleader and master villain, ran a gang rape squad and managed to either convince everyone at the school and particularly those involved to never say a peep about this to anyone OR did it in such secrecy that 9/11 conspirators loading the Twin Towers with explosives would stand amazed at his nefarious underhanded misdeeds. Is that about right? Did I miss anything? Perhaps he was a plebe or pledge to the Illuminati or the Skull and Bones and had to secretly perform this act as an initiation rite to prove himself worthy to those wicked Booooooooooooooshes up in Kennebunkport?

Gullible doesn't even begin to describe how clueless you guys are.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 5:28 pm**

Rooster wrote:So in conclusion, those of you on this board who are Democrats/Leftists/Marxists/Socialists/Commies believe that at the ripe age of 15 Brett Kavanaugh, as evil ringleader and master villain, ran a gang rape squad and managed to either convince everyone at the school and particularly those involved to never say a peep about this to anyone OR did it in such secrecy that 9/11 conspirators loading the Twin Towers with explosives would stand amazed at his nefarious underhanded misdeeds. Is that about right? Did I miss anything? Perhaps he was a plebe or pledge to the Illuminati or the Skull and Bones and had to secretly perform this act as an initiation rite to prove himself worthy to those wicked Booooooooooooooshes up in Kennebunkport?

Gullible doesn't even begin to describe how clueless you guys are.

Incoherent mash-up doesn't even begin to describe most of your posts.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 6:08 pm**

So the NYT reports that Trump has been committing tax fraud on a massive scale for basically his whole life. Gee, can't imagine why he'd nominate Kavanasty, who believes sitting presidents should be immune to prosecution.

Nice going, GOPtards.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 6:21 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
Rooster wrote:So in conclusion, those of you on this board who are Democrats/Leftists/Marxists/Socialists/Commies...
Incoherent mash-up doesn't even begin to describe most of your posts.

Wait a minute Goober McMaher, I didn’t see that he addressed independents in his post, as you claim to be.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 6:35 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote: Gee, can't imagine why he'd nominate Kavanasty, who believes sitting presidents should be immune to prosecution.

Still running out this lie/straw man/fake news? So sad.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 6:40 pm**

L45B wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
Rooster wrote:So in conclusion, those of you on this board who are Democrats/Leftists/Marxists/Socialists/Commies...
Incoherent mash-up doesn't even begin to describe most of your posts.
Wait a minute Goober McMaher, I didn’t see that he addressed independents in his post, as you claim to be.

It doesn't matter. His straw man made up of the evil ringleader of a gang rape squad and 9/11 conspiracies and the Illuminati or the Skull and Bones and those wicked Booooooooooooooshes up in Kennebunkport was such a ridiculously exaggerated rant that went way beyond what most anyone on this board has put forward. Kind of like when he suggested that a baby passing through the birth canal was somehow incestuous.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:32 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote:So the NYT reports.....

Lost me right there. The NYT belongs on a roll.....

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:33 pm**

Yeah, keep walking around with your head shoved squarely up your ass.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 10:47 pm**

Joe in PB wrote:The NYT belongs on a roll.....

That's not true. They're really good at duping Americans into bullshit wars...

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:09 pm**

Joe in PB wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:So the NYT reports.....
Lost me right there. The NYT belongs on a roll.....

Actually it's a lot better on sliced sourdough, lightly toasted.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:13 pm**

Screw_Michigan wrote:Yeah, keep walking around with your head shoved squarely up your ass.

You have that market cornered. You keep putting words in his mouth, but none of us are surprised.

Posted: **Wed Oct 03, 2018 11:42 pm**

Mikey wrote:Sotomayor ... somehow "worse" (with no actual facts, just his own off-the-rails love of anything "conservative")

Very much on the record as saying that a justice's "national origin" somehow affects what the Constitution says.

Completely unfit for SCOTUS (as is Kavanaugh).

Posted: **Thu Oct 04, 2018 12:50 am**

And who was it, Ruth Buzzy G, I think, who says that international law should be considered when making rulings.

Posted: **Thu Oct 04, 2018 5:49 pm**

Lol, so my straw man was over-the-top ridiculous, but accusing a 15 year old boy of being a gang rape ringleader isn't? That is some kind of rationalization there, Mr. Goober. My posts are written to highlight the the gross obscenities which are a staple of the Left's thinking and spurious accusations, a group of which you are a member, all protestations aside.

Here is the reality: Kavanaugh frightens you because in your mind he threatens that cherished freedom to kill your own children-- although in your case you are likely both too old to sire any squalling bastards due to a most probable erectile dysfunction caused by age, alcoholism, and obesity and the fact that you are so ugly no woman would have you. So there's that.

Beyond the patently thin excuse of abortion, there is no reason to not confirm Kavanaugh as he is a strict originalist when it comes to the Constitution-- unless like your fellow Lefties, you like your politics to produce the outcome, not the process by which you arrive to it. That is the salient aspect of the Left wing of the Supreme Court: The end justify the means. It explains why the Democrats have gone to such lengths to ruin a man's work, reputation, and life.

Posted: **Thu Oct 04, 2018 6:31 pm**

Rooster wrote:Lol, so my straw man was over-the-top ridiculous, but accusing a 15 year old boy of being a gang rape ringleader isn't? That is some kind of rationalization there, Mr. Goober. My posts are written to highlight the the gross obscenities which are a staple of the Left's thinking and spurious accusations, a group of which you are a member, all protestations aside.

Here is the reality: Kavanaugh frightens you because in your mind he threatens that cherished freedom to kill your own children-- although in your case you are likely both too old to sire any squalling bastards due to a most probable erectile dysfunction caused by age, alcoholism, and obesity and the fact that you are so ugly no woman would have you. So there's that.

Beyond the patently thin excuse of abortion, there is no reason to not confirm Kavanaugh as he is a strict originalist when it comes to the Constitution-- unless like your fellow Lefties, you like your politics to produce the outcome, not the process by which you arrive to it. That is the salient aspect of the Left wing of the Supreme Court: The end justify the means. It explains why the Democrats have gone to such lengths to ruin a man's work, reputation, and life.

1. I didn't see anyone here suggesting that a 15 year old boy was a gang rape ringleader. I'm not even sure who this 15-year-old is?
2. Your posts are written to exaggerate any viewpoint you disagree with.
3. Kavanaugh doesn't frighten me (he has said that Roe v Wade is settled law). He is just a very poor choice for the position.
4. I do not suffer from ED (yet), I'm not an alcoholic, I'm not obese, and you've seen my picture so you already know how devastatingly handsome I am. You're batting .000 at this point.
5. To me, the reason not to approve Kavanaugh has nothing to do with abortion. And if he's not approved, Trump could easily submit another nominee that is openly anti-abortion and that has no skeletons in his closet.
6. I'd say Kavanaugh has certainly helped to damage his own reputation.

Posted: **Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:48 am**

schmick wrote:Kavanaugh threatens the left because the ONLY way the left has been able to govern is through the courts.

Even out in crazy ass liberal California, the voters voted to throw every illegal immigrant and their kids out of public schools, public housing, public welfare, foodstamps.... and the left had to fight it in the courts to over turn it.

Californians also voted against gay marriage TWICE, and again the dims had to turn to the courts to get their

Even crazy ass liberal Californians are against the way the dims want to rule this country, it's why owebama put so many lefty judges in place. The dims use scare tactics about women's rights because they fear having a judge there that will defer to the constitution because that is how they push their agenda.

Kavanaugh is not gang rapist he is just a man who will not let dim politicians go against the will of the people

Yes, racist, sexist, homophobic pieces of shit, you got that right. God bless the judiciary. And fuck you for hating democracy, which is unsurprising considering your authoritarian preferences.

If ass wipes like you had your way we'd still have segregated schools. Fuck you.

Posted: **Fri Oct 05, 2018 6:58 am**

Left Seater wrote: Valid point. Time to go fly anyway and look down on this globe...errr pancake.

\

So..you're still pretending to be a pilot? Really?

As for the Kav Circus, sure he's a smarmy and very partisan prick, but she's a caricature of PC lunacy run amok. A desperate stunt by the angled Demos, and ...he sure ain't in yet....

But consider that the next nominee (my initial prediction

) is the crazy blond Christer bitch from Indiana...

Posted: **Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:26 am**

Screw_Michigan wrote: If ass wipes like you had your way we'd still have segregated schools. Fuck you.

Pay attention, Fredo. Schmick purports to be conservative, not liberal.

Posted: **Fri Oct 05, 2018 1:55 pm**

LTS TRN 2 wrote:
Left Seater wrote: Valid point. Time to go fly anyway and look down on this globe...errr pancake.
\

So..you're still pretending to be a pilot? Really?

As for the Kav Circus, sure he's a smarmy and very partisan prick, but she's a caricature of PC lunacy run amok. A desperate stunt by the angled Demos, and ...he sure ain't in yet....

But consider that the next nominee (my initial prediction ) is the crazy blond Christer bitch from Indiana...

So, now we’ve moved on to “smarmy” as the Kavanaugh adjective of the day.

I don’t have my constitution on me, but I don’t recall any “smarmy fukks need not apply” language in it, regarding SCOTUS nominees.

And yeah, get ready for the next pic being even more distasteful to the dems. Kavanaugh was actually quite moderate.

My prediction is that the republicans pick up 5-6 seats and next year Thomas taps out, which means his seat stays conservative time for another generation. Had R Buzzy G demonstrated that sort of forethought 5 years ago, her seat would have stayed safely liberal. But she’s a stupid senile old cunt. And Father Time and TGOF are looking at her. She will be replaced by Trump.....with a conservative and the meltage will be Epcot. It will contribute more to AGW than CO ever could hope to.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted: **Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:01 pm**

Posted: **Fri Oct 05, 2018 8:43 pm**

Joe Manchin just announced he is a yes vote.

Is Dandy Don Meredith in the house?

Turn out the lights.....

Up till now, I was sad to see this happen, but it looks as if this shameful exhibition may have ruined any chance of picking up the house.

Nice going, scumbags.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 2:36 am**

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Yes, racist, sexist, homophobic pieces of shit, you got that right. God bless the judiciary. And fuck you for hating democracy, which is unsurprising considering your authoritarian preferences.

There you go. A nutshell concise summary of the Democratic liberal spew that is requisite reading and memorization for any pussy bleeding liberal worth their shit. The "fuck you for hating democracy" blast is epic coming from a government dick sucker like you.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 12:49 pm**

Time to say something, I'd never in a millions years, think I'd say.

Rack Susan Collins.

While it was just a tiny bit long winded, that was one hell of a speech yesterday.

She did a hell of a job explaining, in way too much detail, how she came to her decision. I suspect I will go back to disliking her shortly, but it is nice for now.

Who would have ever thought that the GOP Senatorial co-MVPs regarding this shit-show would be Suzie and Linda Graham?

This is further proof that strong leaders bring out the best in their troops. And like him or hate him, TGOF is nothing, if not a strong leader. If GW had been at the helm, he would have folded like a cheap suit. Trump is basically Churchill....well other than the fact that Churchill was quite possibly the greatest speaker in history and the D.....well, let's just say he's not.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 1:06 pm**

Last night on the drive home I decided to listen to snowflake radio, "Progress" radio, Channel 127 on the magic radio.

It was at once entertaining and totally unlistenable. I made it through maybe 15 minutes before I had to bail. They kept going between the "incomplete FBI investigation" and "he's not confirmed yet".

I may have to tune in again today to see if today's host can out-suck last night's.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 1:44 pm**

Barf Kavanaugh will make a shitty SCJ because he will shit all over the Commerce Clause just like every other SCJ since the 1940’s has.
Does the “right” care that he will shit on the USC? No, no they don’t. Instead they will say they like him because he follows the USC even though he does the opposite.
Welcome to our post fact world.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 2:44 pm**

You are right, however, you sometimes must go with less shitty. Kavanaugh is undoubtedly less shitty than anything Hillary would have given us.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 4:04 pm**

Time to Ammend the commerce clause ammendment.

I would leave it at "There shall be no tariffs between the several states. Period." Add in some legal mumbo jumbo explaining that it is not to go any deeper than the no tariffs statement.

Then we could fire roughly 75% of the people in DC, maybe more. That 3 bedroom, 2 bath ranch in Alexandria would go from 800K to about 80K, but who gives a fukk. Time for the beltway to find out what a burst bubble tastes like.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 4:57 pm**

smackaholic wrote: She did a hell of a job explaining, in way too much detail, how she came to her decision.

Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. She was a yes from the beginning.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 5:04 pm**

Kavanaugh will be the first justice nominated by someone who lost the popular vote to earn his seat on the bench with support from senators representing less than half of the country while having his nomination opposed by a majority of the country.

American Apartheid.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 5:25 pm**

No one gives a fuck about your first point and you can thank Harry Reid for the second.

American Apartheid? Give me a fucking break. I didn't really give a shit about this nomination 3 months ago, but after the character assassination of Kavanaugh and outright lies put out there to try to bring him down, and the resulting hyperventilation and tears by hyper partisan pussies such as yourself, this has turned into a victory almost as sweet as Trump's.

Well done, lefties. By overplaying this hand so badly you've virtually assured the Senate stays red and the house is back to a toss up.

Posted: **Sat Oct 06, 2018 6:26 pm**

Since when did we vote for SC nominees? Or are you just making up more lies/straw men/fake news that the majority of the citizens oppose this nomination?

Posted: **Sun Oct 07, 2018 2:09 pm**

I have a buddy that works for the DC building inspector's office.

He said that BK just pulled a few permits to remodel screwey's dome. He's putting in a hot tub, pool table, stripper pole and a wet bar. Also gonna soundproof the hell outta the walls in consideration to the neighbors.

Posted: **Sun Oct 07, 2018 2:22 pm**

88 wrote: That would have been a welcome litmus test in the age of no litmus tests.

Mcturtle’s only litmus test was “no dems allowed” which may be a good idea in the short term but in the long term, I fear it will do more to hurt the Court than anything Garland could have done to hurt the Rs. The Court works on magic. Nobody needs to listen to them. They are 9 oracles behind a green curtain. If the Ds have any balls (I am looking at you Gavin) they will just tell the Court to pound sand and the institution will melt like a western witch in water.

Posted: **Sun Oct 07, 2018 2:30 pm**

Killian wrote:after the character assassination of Kavanaugh and outright lies put out there to try to bring him down

Poor little baby. Did they hurt your itty bitty feeelings? Does baby need his bottle?

T1B

Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh

Re: Stick a fork in Brett Kavanaugh