Page 1 of 2

Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:13 am
by Arch Angel
I don't understand.

Do people in Oklahoma have a BLM movement. Grant it, the guy was on PCP and stupid as fuck. Black, big and the white cop was a female and probably pissed in her panties, but nothing about it.

I guess the media was not interested because it doesn't help their agenda.

sHillary is going to NC to a fail situation. No white is going to change their vote on the outcome after the latest video. What is she doing?

KKKlown Trump should just keep his trap shut about it though or he will lose more votes.

Why can't we get decent 3rd party that can get these two clowns out of the running? Seeing a felon and a clown is not a good voting option.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:57 am
by Screw_Michigan
Arch Angel wrote:the guy was on PCP
Wrong...again. Why do you keep repeating this?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:33 pm
by Arch Angel
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Arch Angel wrote:the guy was on PCP
Wrong...again. Why do you keep repeating this?
He was doped up. He did not comply with simple instructions. He got smoked for not following instructions.

It is simple for any civilize human being. Cop with gun say stop. You stop and do as they say. Simple really.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:15 pm
by poptart
He was unarmed, wasn't he?
He wasn't a fleeing felon.
Did he really pose a significant threat to kill (or cause serious bodily harm) to the officer who ended up capping him?

Don't think this one looks too good for the officer.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:30 pm
by Arch Angel
poptart wrote:He was unarmed, wasn't he?
He wasn't a fleeing felon.
Did he really pose a significant threat to kill (or cause serious bodily harm) to the officer who ended up capping him?

Don't think this one looks too good for the officer.
Let me make this simple, Mr. Tart.

Did the cop say, stop, hands up and don't move?

You know when a person with a weapon says that, you by law are required to do as they say. After that, you are playing with your life.

I don't understand why perps cry about getting shot when they don't follow simple instructions. Whites up here gets blasted a lot for not following orders but I haven't seen any riots. The blacks up here tends to do as the cops say without any problems. And I don't think any has been shot in the 8 years I have been here but I know a lot of them been arrested and released and my workplace don't frown upon drug charges and will let you work here. My boss/owner says, they want to work, why should I deny them that right.

The ones that comes by my office says great things about the company and my boss and getting paid almost double flipping burgers helps as well. They work hard and getting a decent wage, that is the right way of treating us and not allowing the crap that goes on today. When my boss asks that we need more people, he comes to me and ask do you know anyone needing a job, I will pay $12 starting out, six months they get a 2 dollar raise.

I do my part in society, I wonder what the Democrats do in return. I will tell you, not a goddamn thing. They need welfare blacks for the vote.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:55 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Arch Angel wrote:
He was doped up.
Wrong, again. Either you are an idiot or a liar. Which is it? Either way, you don't look so good.

No wonder you live in the middle nowhere. You are a whack job.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 1:57 pm
by Arch Angel
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Arch Angel wrote:
He was doped up.
Wrong, again. Either you are an idiot or a liar. Which is it? Either way, you don't look so good.

No wonder you live in the middle nowhere. You are a whack job.
Um, okay simpleton and no wonder you are a board bitch.

Did the cop say, don't move and hands up?

Did he move, yes. Well end of discussion.

<drops mic>

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 2:01 pm
by Moving Sale
Yes Tom, cops are gods. That is a great take. Good god you are one vapid fuck.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:17 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Arch Angel wrote: Um, okay simpleton and no wonder you are a board bitch.

Did the cop say, don't move and hands up?

Did he move, yes. Well end of discussion.

<drops mic>
Nobody believes the garbage that comes out of your mouth, no wonder you stopped posting here for years.

You've been repeatedly posting a bullshit take that the Tulsa victim was "doped up" and I am challenging that because there is absolutely no proof that he was "doped up." So either provide some fucking evidence or shut the fuck up.

Again...you are a fucking whackjob.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:39 pm
by Arch Angel
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Arch Angel wrote: Um, okay simpleton and no wonder you are a board bitch.

Did the cop say, don't move and hands up?

Did he move, yes. Well end of discussion.

<drops mic>
Nobody believes the garbage that comes out of your mouth, no wonder you stopped posting here for years.

You've been repeatedly posting a bullshit take that the Tulsa victim was "doped up" and I am challenging that because there is absolutely no proof that he was "doped up." So either provide some fucking evidence or shut the fuck up.

Again...you are a fucking whackjob.

Actaully idiot, no one actually believes you.

Again, I guess you miss the short bus a few times when you were a child, wait, still post like one. Let me put it in First Grader's terms. Stop, hands up. Even First Graders know what that mean.

I will drop the mic again.

Like I told Oompa Loompa, I am someone you don't want to get in a war with, you will lose EVERY TIME. I am of the old school where I beginnings started in the fucking 90's, I know how to bring it and you don't. Big difference there......friend.

Val Venis (KKK), Peephole (KKK), the old black guy that pass (God rest his soul), Jersey, Invictus, they knew how to fight, you are like a amateur version of them and no fun. I don't even care about yours or anyone's affiliation, I would just fuck you up. I battled the best and I am still here. A lot of people here know what I am capable of and they are seeing it first hand and you know what, the first thing they will think "Oh fuck they pissed him off" and they are right.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:50 pm
by Diego in Seattle
poptart wrote:He was unarmed, wasn't he?
So was this guy....until 1:08:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6z8q4l ... verified=1

Whether or not a gun (or any other type of weapon) is found afterward does not determine whether a subject was armed. The issue is whether an officer has a reasonable belief that his/her life (or the lives of others) is in immediate danger.

WTF is with this site getting YT direct links blocked?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 3:58 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Diego in Seattle wrote:The issue is whether an officer has a reasonable belief that his/her life (or the lives of others) is in immediate danger.
Yeah, cops never lie about this stuff.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:04 pm
by Arch Angel
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:The issue is whether an officer has a reasonable belief that his/her life (or the lives of others) is in immediate danger.
Yeah, cops never lie about this stuff.

Oompa Loompa and a clown.

How quaint.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:35 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:The issue is whether an officer has a reasonable belief that his/her life (or the lives of others) is in immediate danger.
Yeah, cops never lie about this stuff.
Hands up, don't shoot?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:59 pm
by Mikey
Arch Angel wrote: Grant it.
Where's your self of steam?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:56 pm
by Arch Angel
Mikey wrote:
Arch Angel wrote: Grant it.
Where's your self of steam?
Maybe I am tired of noobs who can't verbally spar with me.

They are pathetic, aren't they?

It is bad I can take on two of them at the same time and dispatch them at a whim.

I long for the old days when they actually bring it. These two are boring, really boring. They can't get the best of me with this weak ass shit is deplorable.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:00 pm
by Moving Sale
Cry bode again Tom.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:20 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Moving Sale wrote:Cry bode again Tom.
He doesn't need to. You just did it for him.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 7:54 pm
by Moving Sale
Do tell

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:12 pm
by poptart
Arch Angel wrote:Let me make this simple, Mr. Tart.

Did the cop say, stop, hands up and don't move?

You know when a person with a weapon says that, you by law are required to do as they say. After that, you are playing with your life.
No kidding?

That fact does not make the officer's actions correct.

People are "required by law" to a lot of things.
Doesn't mean they should be executed on the spot if they fail to comply.


You should really eject, dude.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:20 pm
by poptart
Diego wrote:Whether or not a gun (or any other type of weapon) is found afterward does not determine whether a subject was armed. The issue is whether an officer has a reasonable belief that his/her life (or the lives of others) is in immediate danger.
You didn't word that properly, but your point is correct.

That said, the officer will have a much easier time justifying deadly force if a weapon was actually present.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 8:41 pm
by Arch Angel
poptart wrote:
Arch Angel wrote:Let me make this simple, Mr. Tart.

Did the cop say, stop, hands up and don't move?

You know when a person with a weapon says that, you by law are required to do as they say. After that, you are playing with your life.
No kidding?

That fact does not make the officer's actions correct.

People are "required by law" to a lot of things.
Doesn't mean they should be executed on the spot if they fail to comply.


You should really eject, dude.
I don't know, by law, resisting arrest is a means to shoot you. Try again.

Stop what you are doing, really means stop what the fuck are you are doing.

You have been here 15 plus years so don't go tard on me dude, please don't. When I speak it is facts. Yeah you might not like them or switch them, or refute them, but in the end they are facts that you can't refute.

If I take on three of you I will welcome it, but since none of you have anything to back your claims I suggest to you Mr. Tart. Just don't go there, okay?

Thanks in advance.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:45 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Arch Angel wrote:since none of you have anything to back your claims
Oh the irony is over-fucking-whelming, you hypocrite.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:49 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Diego in Seattle wrote:Hands up, don't shoot?
They're not police.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:00 am
by Arch Angel
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:Hands up, don't shoot?
They're not police.
you still posting?

Get the fuck out of here you idiot.

When I post you don't. That is first grade education you idiot.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:04 am
by Mikey
Arch Angel wrote:
Mikey wrote:
Arch Angel wrote: Grant it.
Where's your self of steam?
Maybe I am tired of noobs who can't verbally spar with me.

They are pathetic, aren't they?

It is bad I can take on two of them at the same time and dispatch them at a whim.

I long for the old days when they actually bring it. These two are boring, really boring. They can't get the best of me with this weak ass shit is deplorable.

Image

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:18 am
by Arch Angel
You got me Mikey, I am befuddled by that.

Nice one...my friend. It is over my head. At least admit defeat on something but these nastiest ass cocksuckers...eerr mean cockroaches like Fail and Screwey and probably Tart got me off tilt right now.

I guess taking on more than two peeps or noobs is too much.

So edumacate me Master Mikey?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:21 am
by Moving Sale
Probably?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:22 am
by Diego in Seattle
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:Hands up, don't shoot?
They're not police.
So in a discussion about whether the a shooting is justified or not, "witnesses" are allowed to lie but cops aren't.

You're dismissed.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:35 am
by Mikey
Arch Angel wrote:You got me Mikey, I am befuddled by that.

Nice one...my friend. It is over my head. At least admit defeat on something but these nastiest ass cocksuckers...eerr mean cockroaches like Fail and Screwey and probably Tart got me off tilt right now.

I guess taking on more than two peeps or noobs is too much.

So edumacate me Master Mikey?
Well I suppose I should cut you some slack.

You obviously haven't been around for a while, since that meme has been for at least eight years;
and while the "smack" you've been running the past few days probably seems "fresh" to you, that tired shit pretty much jumped the shark around the same time as AlGore.
What happened? You get stuck in the wayback machine or sumpin'?

Sort of fun to follow, though. Anything to break up Pikkkle's constant stream of stupidity.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:07 am
by Screw_Michigan
Diego in Seattle wrote: So in a discussion about whether the a shooting is justified or not, "witnesses" are allowed to lie but cops aren't.
Oh well. Police are allowed to lie to witnesses and the public.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:21 am
by Diego in Seattle
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote: So in a discussion about whether the a shooting is justified or not, "witnesses" are allowed to lie but cops aren't.
Oh well. Police are allowed to lie to witnesses and the public.
Whiney little bitch, aren't you?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:33 am
by Arch Angel
Why is that blacks up here in Wisconsin not shot when they follow simple orders?

When a cop here pulls out a weapon points it at you and tell you to stop and put hands up. We blacks comply no deaths.

The WHITES here in Wisconsin don't do that, they want to run or get a weapon and get bullets in them. I don't see any WLM groups protesting or rioting or destroying their own neighborhoods.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:27 am
by poptart
AA wrote:I don't know, by law, resisting arrest is a means to shoot you. Try again.
A lot of things might get you shot by a cop.
Doesn't mean it is a justifiable outcome.

Police are supposed to apprehend suspects, not dish out capital punishment.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:33 am
by Arch Angel
poptart wrote:
AA wrote:I don't know, by law, resisting arrest is a means to shoot you. Try again.
A lot of things might get you shot by a cop.
Doesn't mean it is a justifiable outcome.

Police are supposed to apprehend suspects, not dish out capital punishment.
I will give you that. But what part of don't move is what puzzles me.

Cop with gun say don't move. Why would I move? Can you give me any plausible idea why I should move?

Thanks.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:39 am
by Arch Angel
I am leaving for a while.

Be well. Stan and Goob, if I am in Madison I will PM you for a drink at your favorite bar.

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:19 pm
by Bucmonkey
:lol:

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:53 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
A black guy, a racist, and an old man walk into a bar...

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:33 am
by Mikey
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:A black guy, a racist, and an old man walk into a bar...
Wouldn't that be walks into a bar in this case?

Re: Tulsa shooting - no riot

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2016 10:36 pm
by Moby Dick
Autopsy says this dude had PCP and TCP in his blood...


do stupid shit..win stupid prizes.