Trump Asks Russia To Hack Shrillary's Emails

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:14 pm

OUR NEXT FUCKING PRESIDENT

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he hoped Russia had hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, essentially sanctioning a foreign power’s cyberspying of a secretary of state’s correspondence.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”

Just amazing. Isn't this treason?

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:19 pm

You're joking, and so was Trump.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:38 pm

Wolfman wrote:You're joking, and so was Trump.

Try again, tard.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 4:54 pm

Wolfman wrote:You're joking, and so was Trump.

Not really. Trump's stated foreign policy positions relating to Europe are 100% in alignment with what would give Putin wet dreams.

Wakey Wakey.
Trump, the true Manchurian Candidate, wants top be Putin's BFF and the best way for that to happen is to get elected.

I usually disagree with this guy, mainly because he thinks the best answer for any problem is to send in more troops but, in this case he's spot on.

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la ... story.html

Trump's opposition research firm: Russia's intelligence agencies

Max Boot

As a lifelong Republican, I don’t much care who runs the Democratic National Committee. But I am deeply disturbed by the way that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced to resign as the DNC head over the weekend. WikiLeaks released 20,000 stolen emails revealing a clear, if unsurprising, preference for Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders among Democratic officials. This appears to be a foreign intervention in American politics — and it may only be the beginning.

Last month, CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity firm hired by the DNC, traced the source of the leaks to two groups of hackers (“Cozy Bear” and “Fancy Bear”) associated with two Russian intelligence agencies. Moscow’s virtual fingerprints are all over this operation, including hyperlinks in Cyrillic and Internet protocol addresses linked to previous Russian hacks. In short, this appears to be a Russian intelligence operation designed to damage Clinton.

The Russians have every reason to sabotage the Democratic candidate. Her opponent, Donald Trump, is more pro-Russia than any previous presidential candidate. As far back as 2007, Trump was telling CNN that Russian President Vladimir Putin was doing a “great job.” In 2013, Trump tweeted: “Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow - if so, will he become my new best friend?” In 2015, Trump told MSNBC that Putin was a real leader, “unlike what we have in this country,” and that reports of Putin killing political opponents didn’t bother him — “Well, I think our country does plenty of killing also,” he said.

Trump repeatedly says he would “get along very well with” Putin. In return Putin has praised Trump as “bright and talented.” Trump positively glows as he repeats reports that “Putin likes me.”

The Trump-Russia links beneath the surface are even more extensive, as Franklin Foer has shown in Slate. Trump has sought and received funding from Russian investors for his business ventures, especially after most American banks stopped lending to him following his multiple bankruptcies. Trump’s de facto campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was a longtime consultant to Viktor Yanukovich, the Russian-backed president of Ukraine who was overthrown in 2014. Manafort also has done multimillion-dollar business deals with Russian oligarchs.

Trump has sought and received funding from Russian investors for his business ventures, especially after most American banks stopped lending to him.

Trump’s foreign policy advisor Carter Page has his own business ties to the state-controlled Russian oil giant Gazprom. He recently delivered a speech in Moscow slamming the United States for its “hypocritical focus on ideas such as democratization” and praising Russia for a foreign policy supposedly built on “noninterference,” “tolerance” and “respect.” (Try telling that to Ukraine.) Another Trump foreign policy advisor, retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, flew to Moscow last year to attend a gala banquet celebrating Russia Today, the Kremlin’s propaganda channel, and was seated at the head table near Putin. Flynn is a regular guest on Russia Today; he refuses to say whether he gets paid.

Given the pro-Putin orientation of Trump and his circle, it is no surprise that his campaign quietly rolled back a call in the GOP platform for arming Ukraine to fight back against Russian aggression, as most Republican foreign-policy experts have advocated. Trump has more than once criticized NATO, the chief obstacle to Russian designs, as obsolete and has said he wouldn’t necessarily come to the aid of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s members if they are attacked by Russia. Trump also cheered Britain’s vote to exit the European Union, another institution that Putin sees as an impediment to his influence.

Trump’s campaign — whose slogan might as well be “Make Russia Great Again”— presents Putin with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reorient American foreign policy in Russia’s favor. Without the countering influence of the U.S., Putin has a good chance to achieve his dream of undoing the collapse of the Soviet Union, which he has called a “geopolitical catastrophe,” by re-swallowing Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and other former Soviet republics.

Putin may just be getting started in his campaign to elect Trump. Bloomberg reported in June the Clinton Foundation was breached by Russian hackers. The Russians may also have acquired the emails that Hillary Clinton sent as secretary of State. Putin might be holding back explosive material until October, when its release could ensure a Trump victory.

Such a development ought to alarm all Americans, even Republicans. The idea of a hostile foreign power interfering in a U.S. election is a threat to our democracy, one that Republican leaders would be condemning if they hadn’t checked their principles at the gate in exchange for tickets on the Trump Train.

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 5:03 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:OUR NEXT FUCKING PRESIDENT

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he hoped Russia had hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, essentially sanctioning a foreign power’s cyberspying of a secretary of state’s correspondence.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Just amazing. Isn't this treason?

What's amazing is your inability to understand human language. He said "IF.....THEN SHARE WITH THE WORLD!"

I thought PSUFAN was stupid, but you take dumbfukkk to a new level.

In summary, you are either retarded or a corrupt fukkkking liar, like Hitlery Clinton!

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 5:04 pm

Wolfman wrote:You're joking, and so was Trump.

You understand human language so you get it. PSU_Michigan is a liar and a illiterate dumbfukkk. Nuff said.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:11 pm

So some of the righty wingnuts wailed and gnashed their teeth over the possibility of a Socialist in the White House, all the while preferring a Communist sympathizer. Is that about right?

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:27 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:So some of the righty wingnuts wailed and gnashed their teeth over the possibility of a Socialist in the White House, all the while preferring a Communist sympathizer. Is that about right?

There is ABSOLUTELY no reason that the United States and Russia can't be friends. Some of my best friends are Russians.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:20 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:So some of the righty wingnuts wailed and gnashed their teeth over the possibility of a Socialist in the White House, all the while preferring a Communist sympathizer. Is that about right?

Putin isn't a Communist. He's an narcissistic megalomaniac murdering cult figure oligarch who happens to belong to the Communist Party in Russia.
Pretty much everything that Trump aspires to.

Bucmonkey · Post by **Bucmonkey** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:01 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:So some of the righty wingnuts wailed and gnashed their teeth over the possibility of a Socialist in the White House, all the while preferring a Communist sympathizer. Is that about right?

There is ABSOLUTELY no reason that the United States and Russia can't be friends. Some of my best friends are Russians.

God damn...

x-infinity...

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:52 pm

While they're looking for Hillary's emails perhaps they could find tRump's tax return...

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 10:09 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:While they're looking for Hillary's emails perhaps they could find tRump's tax return...

What is your major malfunction, kiddie fukkkker!

Trumps Tax Returns are being audited by the IRS! Nobody and I mean "NOBODY" would release their tax return until the audit is finished!

Just report to your nearest sex offender registry and shut the fukkkkk up, PEDO!

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 10:27 pm

Barack H. Obama's college records
I hope I live long enough to read them. If he didn't list himself as a foreign student, I'll eat my copy of them , and without BBQ sauce.

Bucmonkey · Post by **Bucmonkey** » Wed Jul 27, 2016 10:41 pm

You must be trolling 88...please...

Left Seater · Post by **Left Seater** » Thu Jul 28, 2016 2:14 am

Screw_Michigan wrote:OUR NEXT FUCKING PRESIDENT

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he hoped Russia had hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, essentially sanctioning a foreign power’s cyberspying of a secretary of state’s correspondence.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Just amazing. Isn't this treason?

Probably on par with the Sect or State deleting 30,000 emails.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:13 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:So some of the righty wingnuts wailed and gnashed their teeth over the possibility of a Socialist in the White House, all the while preferring a Communist sympathizer. Is that about right?

Putin isn't a communist, idiot. China is communist and guess who is in their pocket?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:16 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:OUR NEXT FUCKING PRESIDENT

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he hoped Russia had hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, essentially sanctioning a foreign power’s cyberspying of a secretary of state’s correspondence.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Just amazing. Isn't this treason?

Yes, deleting emails from an unauthorized server containing classified information is treason. What are you afraid of? The deleted emails were just about yoga class and wedding plans, right? How is that a national security issue?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:28 pm

mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:So some of the righty wingnuts wailed and gnashed their teeth over the possibility of a Socialist in the White House, all the while preferring a Communist sympathizer. Is that about right?
Putin isn't a communist, idiot. China is communist and guess who is in their pocket?

Sorry. Putin "is and has always been fond of communist “ideas”".

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 3:01 pm

That's why he put them into practice...oh, wait, he didn't.

Try again.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 3:09 pm

But you're OK with a possible future POTUS cozying up to him.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:11 pm

mvscal wrote: Yes, deleting emails from an unauthorized server containing classified information is treason. What are you afraid of? The deleted emails were just about yoga class and wedding plans, right? How is that a national security issue?

I agree, Shrillary should be tried for this. Absolutely.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:22 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:But you're OK with a possible future POTUS cozying up to him.

Why wouldn't I be? He is the leader of the Russian Federation, isn't he? I have been advocating closer economic and military ties to Russia for many years now.

IMO, we blew it after the collapse of the Soviet Union. We had a great opportunity to normalize relations. Instead we immediately started another Cold War with this New World Order bullshit and Bubba Jeff and his screeching harpy drove NATO right up to Russia's borders. Naturally they aren't down with that program and I can't say that I blame them either.

Russia should be one of our most important strategic allies. The have abundant natural resources, particularly in energy, and are somewhat backwards technically. It is a natural partnership. With a firm agreement with Russia in place, we can say good bye and fuck you very much to the Saudis and all the rest of that filthy Arab scum forever.

We need to bail on NATO completely. Start a new Northern Strategic Partnership: US, UK and the RF.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:24 pm

Do you support the US continuing to buy the Russian rocket engine for nat sec launches?

What does the US gain from closer economic ties to Russia?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:33 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:Do you support the US continuing to buy the Russian rocket engine for nat sec launches?

No. We should be building our own engines. It's a little embarrassing that we don't.

What does the US gain from closer economic ties to Russia?

Access to a developing market, plenty of energy resources and the elimination of our reliance on Middle Eastern shit splats.

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:50 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:Do you support the US continuing to buy the Russian rocket engine for nat sec launches?

What does the US gain from closer economic ties to Russia?

Ask PSU_FAN.....oh wait.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:58 pm

mvscal wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:Do you support the US continuing to buy the Russian rocket engine for nat sec launches?
No. We should be building our own engines. It's a little embarrassing that we don't.

What does the US gain from closer economic ties to Russia?
Access to a developing market, plenty of energy resources and the elimination of our reliance on Middle Eastern shit splats.

Would this all be contingent on Russia ceasing expansion into Eastern Europe?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:02 pm

How is that any of our business?

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:06 pm

mvscal wrote:How is that any of our business?

So money!

Telling Russia what to do in Crimea, Ukraine, Latvia is like Russia telling us what to do in Texas!

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:08 pm

mvscal wrote:How is that any of our business?

Uh, NATO?

The Big Pickle · Post by **The Big Pickle** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:10 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
mvscal wrote:How is that any of our business?
Uh, NATO?

Hold on Mission Viejo....I'll handle this one.

NATO is obsolete!

Germany is one of the worlds largest economies. Let the germans stop Russia! :)

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 5:25 pm

The Big Pickle wrote:
mvscal wrote:How is that any of our business?

So money!

Telling Russia what to do in Crimea, Ukraine, Latvia is like Russia telling us what to do in Texas!

No it's not, you drooling retard. It would be if Texas were no longer a part of the United States. Which is not a bad idea, BTW.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:01 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
mvscal wrote:How is that any of our business?
Uh, NATO?

What is NATO doing on the Russian border? It was supposed to be a defensive alliance not an aggressive, imperial bureaucracy. Now were supposed to send our troops to die in Latvia? For what? No, thanks.

Time to pull the plug. If the Euros want to defend Estonia, have at it. Count me out.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:08 pm

mvscal wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:
mvscal wrote:How is that any of our business?
Uh, NATO?
What is NATO doing on the Russian border? It was supposed to be a defensive alliance not an aggressive, imperial bureaucracy. Now were supposed to send our troops to die in Latvia? For what? No, thanks.

Time to pull the plug. If the Euros want to defend Estonia, have at it. Count me out.

Nobody asked you to go to Estonia.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:36 pm

mvscal wrote: What is NATO doing on the Russian border? It was supposed to be a defensive alliance not an aggressive, imperial bureaucracy. Now were supposed to send our troops to die in Latvia? For what? No, thanks.

Time to pull the plug. If the Euros want to defend Estonia, have at it. Count me out.

I'm not disagreeing with you. Just pointing out commons responses if the US was to improve ties with Russia. Any effort to do so would be contingent on Russia pulling back in Eastern Europe because hawks believe we need to be the world's policeman. I don't think anyone really thinks the US is going to go to war over Estonia and Latvia.

NATO really is a joke. The world's welfare system.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 6:43 pm

The reason the Russians are in Ukraine in the first place is because of Euro sponsored coup in Ukraine which threatened to put another NATO nation on Russia's border. That would have started a real war. Russia got what it wanted: Crimea. They're just keeping the pot boiling in east Ukraine. Quite frankly, the Russian military isn't really all that. I don't think Putin would risk a major defeat.

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:22 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:OUR NEXT FUCKING PRESIDENT

DORAL, Fla. — Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he hoped Russia had hacked Hillary Clinton’s email, essentially sanctioning a foreign power’s cyberspying of a secretary of state’s correspondence.

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing,” Mr. Trump said, staring directly into the cameras. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.”
Just amazing. Isn't this treason?

Technically, the Russians would just be providing Hillary's State Department and the FBI some IT help. After all, those lost and deleted emails were actually owned by the Archival Section of the DoS and were not Clinton's to delete, regardless how many were blue wedding dress photos or overheated descriptions of Bill doing the Downward Dog with Monica. Since they are already in possession of these emails-- as is Iran, North Korea, ISIS, and China --the only possible person who has committed treason is Hillary, but she might get a pass due to double jeopardy or something. Trump is merely suggesting that foreign powers with greater email retrieval capabilities than us could help solve the Case of the Missing Emails. They could probably also help Lois Lerner find her lost hard drive. Sad how awful the US government is at this whole interweb thing, isn't it? The Obamacare website with only 7 sign-ups in the first month, the IRS targeting scandal, the DoS extracurricular email server, multiple non-Blackberry government issued cellphones, lost Secret Service cellphones with the President's itinerary and schedule on them, briefcases filled to overflowing with government and military service member's SSNs and personal information, and China's easy access to 28 million government employees'
secret clearance background check information. This list goes on and on.

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:41 pm

As pointed out by several pundits, Trump's call for Russian help in leaking is a clever trap. That is, when Hillary's camp screams treason, they're tacitly admitting that indeed the (leaked) e-mails did contain sensitive information. And thus she was lying (again).

Rooster · Post by **Rooster** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:53 pm

Whoa.
/checks Hades' OAT for freeze warnings
I never thought I'd read something of LTS' that I wholeheartedly agreed with. I expected some diatribe or screed against the filthy Bolshevik Jews manipulating the media to further enrich Israel.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:00 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:As pointed out by several pundits, Trump's call for Russian help in leaking is a clever trap. That is, when Hillary's camp screams treason, they're tacitly admitting that indeed the (leaked) e-mails did contain sensitive information. And thus she was lying (again).

33,000 emails chock full of pay to play scumbaggery just waiting to burst open like a bag of rotten meat. No wonder she's sharting herself in a drunken stupor.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Jul 29, 2016 9:25 pm

LTS TRN 2 wrote:That is, when Hillary's camp screams treason, they're tacitly admitting that indeed the (leaked) e-mails did contain sensitive information.

Actually, they're not.