Page 1 of 1

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 2:39 pm
by Left Seater
That is absolutely a block in the back. On top of that I have never seen a block in the back call reviewed. Can anyone else link me up to a block in the back call that was reviewed? I actually don't think the review was for the block in the back call. I think the review was to check each of the backwards passes. The official who threw the flag must have waived it off himself.

Not to mention the fact that Miami players ran onto the field prior to the score when the ball carrier was around the 10 yard line. That is a live ball unsportsmanlike foul. So at least their should have been an untimed down for Miami from about the 25.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 4:50 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
This is what I was talking about in another thread. There were a million penalties on that play but they couldn't call any of them because that would have conflicted with the "original call on the field", or in this case, the original no-calls on the field. It's so stupid.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 6:15 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
ACC suspends refs for 4 Miami-Duke mistakes, including 1 that cost Blue Devils the win
http://www.sbnation.com/college-footbal ... e-referees

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2015 8:10 pm
by Killian
Jsc810 wrote:
I used to live in Miami and still am a fan
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 12:07 am
by Delaware Dave
Visit the keys alot when you lived there JSC??? :lol:

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:01 am
by Left Seater
War Wagon will be along shortly to explain who you can and can't root for.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 2:20 pm
by Killian
Jsc810 wrote:Whether you approve of my preferences doesn't matter to me.
Obviously not.
JSC810 wrote:WTF are you tards babbling about?
You care so little that you decide to start name calling.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 3:27 pm
by King Crimson
Left Seater wrote:War Wagon will be along shortly to explain who you can and can't root for.
yeah yeah, screw michigan will complain i can't be an OU fan because i grew up in Norman and my uncle played QB for the Sooners. i went to Vanderbilt because i could. wouldn't you? i grew up in Norman, i wanted to go someplace else. big deal. i went to every OU home game from 1975 to 1986.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 6:36 pm
by Screw_Michigan
King Crimson wrote: yeah yeah, screw michigan will complain i can't be an OU fan because i grew up in Norman and my uncle played QB for the Sooners. i went to Vanderbilt because i could. wouldn't you? i grew up in Norman, i wanted to go someplace else. big deal. i went to every OU home game from 1975 to 1986.
You're a douche, that's for sure. Take pride in your alma mater instead of some school you never attended. I couldn't care less how many games you attended in Norman.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 6:41 pm
by Goober McTuber
Screw_Michigan wrote:
King Crimson wrote: yeah yeah, screw michigan will complain i can't be an OU fan because i grew up in Norman and my uncle played QB for the Sooners. i went to Vanderbilt because i could. wouldn't you? i grew up in Norman, i wanted to go someplace else. big deal. i went to every OU home game from 1975 to 1986.
You're a douche, that's for sure. Take pride in your alma mater instead of some school you never attended. I couldn't care less how many games you attended in Norman.
Kalamazoo Tech attendee who pimps George Washington says what?

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 6:47 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Apples and oranges.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 7:24 pm
by Dinsdale
Screw_Michigan wrote:Apples and oranges.
I suppose you're right... KC has an intimate connection with OU Football, and you're a bandwagoning vagabond.

You didn't just kinda kick your own ass -- you went yard on that thing.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 8:14 pm
by The Seer
Pac 12 refs are smirking at other league's officials as they submit blown calls (and replays) in fruitless attempts to approach their level of incompetency.

:meds:

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2015 8:19 pm
by Dinsdale
Like Seer said -- 4+ blown calls on one play? BFD. PAC refs blow that many calls on every play.

Re: isn't this a block in the back?

Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:20 am
by King Crimson
Screw_Michigan wrote:Apples and oranges.

i laughed out loud. what a tremendous pussy. you know, my friend, you are not currying a lot of favor here.

everyone is making fun of you. and i teased you out like easy.

anyone who uses the word "douche" is almost always one themselves.

hey, hooray for you. how does that wet spot in your bed feel?