Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 2:24 am
Stanford made that look easy. Does Oregon suit up any LBs?
Page 1 of 2
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 2:42 am
Think I might stick around for the second half after all.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 2:43 am
Alioti pulling a no-show.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 2:53 am
It's ALWAYS too early IMO.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 2:57 am
Blatant hit out of bounds.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:05 am
2 minute warning.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:07 am
De Anthony should De try to De recover his own De fumbles and not let De Stanford take away a nice De scoring opportunity...
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:10 am
Looks a lot like last year, except we're scoring more points. One 96 yard drive that took 6 minutes. This one will be 95 if they take it all the way.Papa Willie wrote:Mikey wrote:Blatant hit out of bounds.
I was talking about the fumble.
Fuck, Mikey. Other than going to prevent in the drive where the Ducks marched right down the field - damn if your guys' game plan isn't fucking flawless. Ducks can't score if their O ain't on the field...
I still won't be surprised if Oregon gets a few long TD plays. I just hope we can hold them off like so far.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:14 am
Wonder if Oreganfan will make youtube videos Decrying about dirty play.Mikey wrote:Blatant hit out of bounds.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:17 am
Can someone please explain to me why Oregon sucks anytime a game actually matters? Jay-zus.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:25 am
Oregon should just put 11 in the box. Maybe grab the ref too and throw him at Stanford?
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:30 am
Dins mentioned allowalotti...but he has his personnel in the right place...just can't stop 'em.
Organ needs to let Mariota loose to do his thing. Gotta run him some in 2nd half.
Organ needs to let Mariota loose to do his thing. Gotta run him some in 2nd half.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:33 am
If Stanford can put together a few more 20 play drives it's over.
But that's a big if.
But that's a big if.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:35 am
Mikey wrote:If Stanford can put together a few more 20 play drives it's over.
But that's a big if.
I like your chances...
That said, I was hoping Oregon could run the table this year and get a Pac team in the MNC game...guess it's not to be....Stanford would have an easy time vs. tOSU.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:50 am
Love the pass rush
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:51 am
If Bama and FSU win out, the Rose Bowl matchup will be Saweet!The Seer wrote:Mikey wrote:If Stanford can put together a few more 20 play drives it's over.
But that's a big if.
I like your chances...
That said, I was hoping Oregon could run the table this year and get a Pac team in the MNC game...guess it's not to be....Stanford would have an easy time vs. tOSU.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:51 am
Dins has posted more in the OU/Baylor thread than this one.KC Scott wrote:Dinsdale wrote:
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:52 am
Really blatant holding going on right now.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:54 am
FUMBLE!!!
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 3:54 am
Down for the count.
Hate to be happy about that but...
Hate to be happy about that but...
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:01 am
Nothing beats Roids...
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:01 am
Stanford needs to tack on an insurance TD here.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:05 am
Seriously, let's wait until the fourth quarter is half over a least before talking about "insurance". It still could be Oregon scoring insurance by then.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Stanford needs to tack on an insurance TD here.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:13 am
Severe SEC bias and such.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:16 am
Three and out and Oregon is starting to play dirty.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:17 am
I'm not saying things were suspenseful, I'm saying don't shut the offense down just yet. It was a 20-0 game at the time and funny shit can happen.
Stanford is dominating. Once again, a good pro style beats a good spread.
Stanford is dominating. Once again, a good pro style beats a good spread.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:18 am
Looks like the Ides of Ranked Thursday Road Favorites has come home to roost...
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:18 am
Typical fucking Oregon. Why should I be so foolish to ever take those guys seriously?
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:23 am
Oregon players crying? BBBWWWAAAHHHAAA!
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:24 am
RACK Tyler Gaffney, BTW.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:25 am
Keep the starters in and go for the shutout.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:25 am
Fuck, Palmer...STFU!
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:28 am
Still wish we could trade a few of those FGs for TDs.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:41 am
Was that WR for Oregon crying?
Can't wait for the gif of that one to show up.
Can't wait for the gif of that one to show up.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:43 am
Dude was being comforted by his QB- before the end of the 3rd qtr.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:44 am
They miss spelled the t-shirts should say "We want Mama"
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:50 am
We did not fucking need that.
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:51 am
Is an Uh-Oh in order?
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:53 am
FUCK x 100
Re: Ducks/Trees.
Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:57 am
Where's the fucking pass rush?