T1B

The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who also obtained senior executives resumes and copies of passports via an unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.

Great sources there. No problem verifying or vetting these sources at all. Crock of shit.

Rack one of the comments:


At no time was the Obama Administration aware of exactly what the Obama Administration was doing.

Yeah, RACK him.
It's obvious and hard to believe that anyone would disagree with his sentiment.


But then again, it's not really a war Barry palns to have with Syria.
He just intends to drop some bombs.

Examining that, we could turn it around.

Barry's military toys have been killing innocent civilians with drone strikes the past few years.
What if someone decided that Barry's actions were enough of a MORAL OBSCENITY that they would need to drop some bombs on DC (sorry Screw) because of it?

Early autumn bombs raining on DC.
How fun!

Would we consider bombs falling on DC to be war?

poptart wrote:
Barry's military toys have been killing innocent civilians with drone strikes the past few years.
What if someone decided that Barry's actions were enough of a MORAL OBSCENITY that they would need to drop some bombs on DC (sorry Screw) because of it?

Hmmm...Americans poking people in the eye until they decide to punch back...hmmm...sounds vaguely familiar...something about the month of September...the 10th?...no, that's not it...

:|

What a drama queen. You don't know what you're getting into, which is why you don't get into it to begin with.

Scott wrote:I don't have a problem with the collateral damage in the strikes on Al Qaeda

Surprised you do

I don't believe the "good" we are doing necessarily outweighs the anger we stir up by operating this way.

It seems to me that many Americans can rationalize and wave off innocent humans being killed by "us" -- because it is happening in far off lands, to mostly brown people.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:What a drama queen. You don't know what you're getting into, which is why you don't get into it to begin with.

He signed up for the national defense, which is what our constitution calls for.

Yeah, it was noble 150 years ago. Today, it's more of a reflection of a loser with no job prospects.

....and the supine media would cover this with the same ferocity as Benghazi.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:...a loser with no job prospects.

Cubicle drone says what?

Yes, of course. Any opposition to Bath House Barry's idiotic policy proposals must be racist.



No possibility of him being an incompetent fuck up at all.

Go fuck yourself, idiot.

KC Scott wrote:So you're opposed to the drone strikes on terrorists?

Not at all. I'm opposed to cruise missile strikes on people who are killing the same brand of terrorist that we are drone striking in Pakistan and Yemen.

Where was your outrage when GHWB and GWB were in charge and thousands of Iraqis civillians were killed in Gulf Wars 1 & 2?

I couldn't give a shit less about foreign civilians getting killed. I don't give a shit if they're killed with drone stikes or with tanks or with chemical weapons or machetes. The only thing I give a shit about is whether or not we have a strategic interest at stake. To the extent that we have any interest in Syria at all, it would be to keep Assad in power.

As I said earlier, you are a fucking idiot. Iraq is not Syria. Syria has not invaded neighboring countries in which we have a vital strategic interest. Despite the ineptitude of our execution in both Iraqi conflicts, the underlying premise and the strategic interest was clear.

You do realise that Oplatelip is contemplating strikes on Assad's forces not the Islamist nutters he is fighting....right?

KC Scott wrote: I don't have a problem with the collateral damage in the strikes on Al Qaeda

Yes because these "innocent" victims are guilty based on their nationality. Fuck off, moron.

mvscal wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:...a loser with no job prospects.

Cubicle drone says what?

Swing and a miss.

Yeah, I'm sure you're a real wheeler and dealer with the sky the limit. Keep clacking away in your little box, little man.

Why not? What the fuck would you know? I do just fine for myself, thanks. In any event, you're just deflecting because you know I'm right.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Swing and a miss.

That's Killitard's card. I think you have to ask him permission to use it.

KC Scott wrote:I'm against cruise missle launches or any intervention in the Syrian civil war

Well, allrighty then...

KC Scott wrote:Yes - amazing you wern't observant enough to deduce that from this:

Is there a reason why your last couple of posts in this thread were written in Bi-on-his-knees bold? Please tell me you haven't traded the Macallan for Cosmos...

Let's hope this isn't true, indeed...

Scott is a manly man.

Scott wrote:Al Qaeda doesn't worry about killing innocents and the countries wehre they dwell don't seem concerned with eradicating them

We either strike them or wring our hands about collaterals waiting for them to kill more innocents

I'll take the first option

Where was your outrage when GHWB and GWB were in charge and thousands of Iraqis civillians were killed in Gulf Wars 1 & 2?

If the Obama wasn't a Nog that you and many others despise, this would be a non issue.
Instead it's just another dittohead point for the far right to throw against the wall

Innocent people being killed is one of the horrors of war.

GW's Iraq war was sold to us (and Congress) on the false pretense of WMDs being there.
Or... if they were there, they were never found.
And the war went on WAY too long.

That said, the war was approved by Congress, and Congress (the people) continued to fund it.

In said war, innocent people will die.


In the case of drone warfare, it turns a large chunk of the globe into a potential "war" zone.
The parameters of this "war" are extremely nebulous.

It gives off the appearance (at least to me) that someone is just making shit up -- and people are dying.
Brown people.

And is this "warfare" something the U.S. people have voted for?
Is oversight of the program sufficient?

No and no.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... ed/275451/


Btw, your "you must be a racist because you're opposing Barry" is one of the most piss-weak takes I have ever read anywhere.

Nick here, fuck you.

This current run up of necessary crisis is brought to you as usual by the utterly criminal and disgusting Fake State.

It's fun, I admit, to see the New Chimp squirm like a toad, but somehow the level of sanity weighs in..and he's caught in the light...we all wait....

Scott wrote:BTW - Hilarious seeing a teapartier quoting libtard atlantic and worrying about the rights of brown people

Did you worry Obozo should have gotten congressional approval before taking out OBL too?

I think opposition to drone warfare has very strong support among tea partiers.


To my understanding, Barry did have congressional authorization to to use military force against those responsible for 9/11.

- The Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Pub. L. 107-40, codified at 115 Stat. 224 and passed as S.J.Res. 23 by the United States Congress on September 14, 2001, authorizes the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001. The authorization granted the President the authority to use all "necessary and appropriate force" against those whom he determined "planned, authorized, committed or aided" the September 11th attacks, or who harbored said persons or groups. The AUMF was signed by President George W. Bush on September 18, 2001. -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorizat ... Terrorists

As mvs has already pointed out, taking out Sadaam was in our interest. The troubles started early on with the moronic de-baathification policy that basically said if you are higher up than a junior O in the army, you are history. That put an awful lot of folks on the other side and made the job a metric shit ton tougher than it needed to be. Eventually we stumbled to near victory anyhoo and barry decided to take his toys and go home to some other shithole.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:It's fun, I admit, to see the New Chimp squirm like a toad, but somehow the level of sanity weighs in..and he's caught in the light...we all wait....

Are you seriously counting on sanity from DC? Bambi the Nobel Peace Prize winning War Pig has got a hardon to liberate THE FUCK out of some Syrians with a bukkake blast of cruise missiles, drone strikes and "limited ground forces."

He will be ably abetted by compliant hypocrites in his own party and delusional maniacs in the GOP like John McLoon, Linda Gramnesty and Orange Man. The only opposition to this absurd farce is coming from the far left and the far right...oh, yes and 80% of the American people but nobody in Washington really gives a fuck what we think.

Don't you give a shit about Israel?

that isn't a Navy Officer

mvscal wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote:It's fun, I admit, to see the New Chimp squirm like a toad, but somehow the level of sanity weighs in..and he's caught in the light...we all wait....

Are you seriously counting on sanity from DC? Bambi the Nobel Peace Prize winning War Pig has got a hardon to liberate THE FUCK out of some Syrians with a bukkake blast of cruise missiles, drone strikes and "limited ground forces."

He will be ably abetted by compliant hypocrites in his own party and delusional maniacs in the GOP like John McLoon, Linda Gramnesty and Orange Man. The only opposition to this absurd farce is coming from the far left and the far right...oh, yes and 80% of the American people but nobody in Washington really gives a fuck what we think.

Wrong, 1-malt, the brakes have been applied by Putin. Did he really say he would deploy a missile shield from his ships in the region? Whoah! In any event, it is a bit kooky to see Rand Paul and Dennis Kucinich shoulder to shoulder. As for the malignant Zionazis, they will simmer and seeth, and probably murder a bunch more people real soon.