Page 1 of 2

Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 4:14 pm
by trev
Do I need one? They are quite expensive and I never justified having one. I use my stockpot for everything. What is so good about a Le Creuset? Does it cook better or what? Today I'm making some sauce and shopping at Williams Sonoma online. They are having a cookware sale.

Here is the sauce I am making. I've tried it with lasagna and it was great, so tonight I'm trying it with spaghetti.

1 pound sweet Italian sausage
3/4 pound lean ground beef
1/2 cup minced onion
2 cloves garlic, crushed
1 (28 ounce) can crushed tomatoes
2 (6 ounce) cans tomato paste
2 (6.5 ounce) cans canned tomato sauce
1/2 cup water
2 tablespoons white sugar
1 1/2 teaspoons dried basil leaves
1/2 teaspoon fennel seeds
1 teaspoon Italian seasoning
1 tablespoon salt
1/4 teaspoon ground black pepper
2 tablespoons chopped fresh parsley

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 9:46 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
trev wrote:I use my stockpot for everything.

Oh, I know what you mean! I use my stock pot for everything!

I can stock pot all the time!

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:11 pm
by Mikey
I assume that your stock pot is for every day use.

On special occasions you bring out da kine bud?

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 11:14 pm
by trev
Mikey, do you have a Le Creuset???

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:23 am
by Mikey
trev wrote:Mikey, do you have a Le Creuset???
Nope. But I'm hoping to get a couple for Christmas.

(They have an outlet store in Carlsbad)

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 3:47 am
by mvscal
trev wrote:Do I need one?
Do you need a Le Creuset? No. Do you need heavy, enameled cast iron casseroles? Absolutely. My casseroles (3 qt round, 5 qt oval) are Cuisinart which are cheaper but not particularly cheap. They are well worth it.

They excel at long, low temperature cooking. The thick cast iron retains and distributes heat very well. They're also ideal for braising meat and are oven safe. They should be your go to pots for sauces, soups, stews and stove top pot roasting.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 2:21 pm
by smackaholic
the OL has some sort of cast iron pot. don't know what the brand is, but, it isn't le crouset, which i thinks translates to "i like to cook and pay too much for stuff". Excellent for cooking chickens in.

i 'spose it makes sense to have fancy french cookware if you are a professional cook or just rolling in money. if you are neither and you paid retail, you are a stupid poseur.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 4:09 pm
by Goober McTuber
Or if you want one where the enamel isn't going to start to chip a week after you bought it.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:09 am
by smackaholic
Do you clean your cookwear with an air chisel, goobs?

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 1:26 am
by Goober McTuber
If you knew anything about the subject you are addressing, well, that would be a fucking first. The reason some of that enameled cast iron is so Goddamned expensive is due to the quality of the enamel. I didn't go with the French job, but the stuff Mario Batali put his name on is not bad for half the price. There are countless stories to be found on the web about people who bought $40 enameled cast iron pots and found chips in the enamel right out of the box. Kill yourself now, you hopeless tard.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:21 pm
by trev
No, crock pot food is OK, but not the same as cooked on stove or oven in ANY type of pot.

I don't think there is anything wrong with wanting the name brand Le Creuset. I might go with the Cuisinart brand though, thanks mvs. Or check out Mario's first. I won't go with a cheapo one, no way. Heard the stories........

I'm also picky about colors. I don't like red pots. Or green. And that's what seems to be on sale. I want white, black or blue. (no jokes about the black and blue, please.)

:)

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sun Dec 25, 2011 12:33 pm
by smackaholic
Goober McTuber wrote:If you knew anything about the subject you are addressing, well, that would be a fucking first. The reason some of that enameled cast iron is so Goddamned expensive is due to the quality of the enamel. I didn't go with the French job, but the stuff Mario Batali put his name on is not bad for half the price. There are countless stories to be found on the web about people who bought $40 enameled cast iron pots and found chips in the enamel right out of the box. Kill yourself now, you hopeless tard.
So, I'm a dumbass for ridiculing people for spending way too much on a pot? Then you admit to buying a half price one?

And lets say one does buy a 40 dollar one from a store. Look at the fukking thing first. Is it chipped? Grab another. And if it is chipped, will it cook any differently?

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 5:00 am
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote: So, I'm a dumbass for ridiculing people for spending way too much on a pot?
No, you're just a dumbass. Period.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 3:30 pm
by smackaholic
Goober McTuber wrote:
smackaholic wrote: So, I'm a dumbass for ridiculing people for spending way too much on a pot?
No, you're just a dumbass. Period.
Ohhh, good one. Nice job KYOA, gramps.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 6:47 pm
by Mikey
smackaholic wrote:
So, I'm a dumbass for ridiculing people for spending way too much on a pot? Then you admit to buying a half price one?
Way too much is a relative description. If I can afford $30 or $40 more for something that will not only function well but look good and last a lifetime, then I didn't spend way too much.

In your case, you'd be spending next month's food budget to buy the stuff, you'd probably would never use it, it would be totally out of place next to your $30 painted on teflon cookware set and toaster oven, and you'd prolly ruin it by putting it under your dripping ceiling during the next rainstorm. So, yes, you'd be spending way too much.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 8:11 pm
by smackaholic
Mikey wrote:
smackaholic wrote:
So, I'm a dumbass for ridiculing people for spending way too much on a pot? Then you admit to buying a half price one?
Way too much is a relative description. If I can afford $30 or $40 more for something that will not only function well but look good and last a lifetime, then I didn't spend way too much.

In your case, you'd be spending next month's food budget to buy the stuff, you'd probably would never use it, it would be totally out of place next to your $30 painted on teflon cookware set and toaster oven, and you'd prolly ruin it by putting it under your dripping ceiling during the next rainstorm. So, yes, you'd be spending way too much.
:lol: :lol:

better to spend that extra jack on a lawn mower that stands up to being left outside all summer, right?

if i'm not mistaken, the lecruset was around 300, wasn't it? goobs said he has one that was plenty good enough at half price. so more like 150 bucks difference.

just for the hell of it, i dug out the OL's cast iron pot. it is orange and yes, around the outside of the handles, it is thoroughly chipped. didn't bother to look inside which is were chipping would affect actual performance. i think she picked it up at a tag sale for 2 bucks, but not sure. anyhoo, shit coming out of it is still damn tasty. prolly not as tasty as what comes out of you gourmet fags pots, but that has a lot more to do with the cooker than the cookery.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:43 pm
by Mikey
Not sure how much the large dutch oven was, but the OL picked one up at the factory outlet and she said it was marked down by about 50%, so it prolly cost too much - but not way too much.

I'll let you know if it was worth it after the osso bucco I'll be fixing in it tonight.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:45 pm
by Mikey
The wife gave me a 7 liter casserole (dutch oven) and a 12 inch cast iron skillet. I was thinking about trading in the skillet for a french (oval) oven but instead I used the skillet last night for browning the veal shanks, and the casserole for braising them in the oven. Glad I kept the skillet, because it's awesome. Nice even heat for browning, but the most impressive thing was how flat the bottom is. We have a ceramic glass top electric stove and if a pan isn't perfectly flat it tends to rock back and forth depending on where the weight of the contents is. Areas that aren't in contact with the burner get less heat. This new skillet was rock solid.

Anyhow, this was the best osso bucco yet to come from my kitchen.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:37 pm
by smackaholic
I know what you mean about those damn glass top ranges. I have an old cast iron pan that used to sit fairly well on the stove, till someone got stupid and left it sitting on a hot burner empty too long and warped the fuggen thing. wish i was on the CNG line, i'd switch over in a second. have actually contemplated going with a propane, but, it is kinda pricey.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:28 pm
by Mikey
We have propane for water heat, space heating and the gas clothes dryer. We're now paying something like $3.60/gallon. Gas stoves are nice, but I'd have to run a new line to the kitchen and use even more propane.

Also the pool heater is hooked up but I never use it. Heated the spa with propane a few times when we first installed it, and I learned my lesson right quick next time the propane bill came.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:20 pm
by smackaholic
all this propane and propane accessories talk has me thinking this shithole doesn't have a hank hill troll. or does it? can't find my spreadsheet. prolly buried under an extension cord.

last summer i topped off the RV tank and seem to remember paying a ridiculously low price or around 2.25 or so. could that be right?

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:48 pm
by Mikey
Yours is probably subsidized.

Gub'mint 'pane.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 1:43 am
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
smackaholic wrote: So, I'm a dumbass for ridiculing people for spending way too much on a pot?
No, you're just a dumbass. Period.
Ohhh, good one. Nice job KYOA, gramps.
I don't think you really understand the concept of KYOA. If you did, you'd log off of here permanently.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 8:18 pm
by smackaholic
I understand it perfectly. A text book example would be....

saying yer a dumbfukk for thinking spending 300 bones on a pot is a waste of money

and then say you went with a 150 buck model.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:49 am
by mvscal
Mikey wrote:Anyhow, this was the best osso bucco yet to come from my kitchen.
Told ya. They cook like a dream.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:58 am
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote:I understand it perfectly. A text book example would be....

saying yer a dumbfukk for thinking spending 300 bones on a pot is a waste of money

and then say you went with a 150 buck model.
Yes, a 50% savings is always a waste of money, you fucking moron. BTW, it's pretty easy to find for $120.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 12:28 am
by smackaholic
you continue to prove my original point, you senile old fukk. that point being that spending 300 bones on a pot is kinda silly when perfectly acceptable pots are available at less than half that.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:40 am
by trev
Goobs is trying to say don't buy the $50 version. I have to agree with that. Buy the $120 or over. You get what you pay for.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:49 pm
by smackaholic
trev wrote:Goobs is trying to say don't buy the $50 version. I have to agree with that. Buy the $120 or over. You get what you pay for.
nah, what he is doing is his usual you're a moron ankle biting shtick.

i never said buy the cheapest thing you can find. i simply said if you pay full retail for lecruset, you are a dumbass or maybe just 88 type rich.

just went and looked at the OL's pot again. the lid says rachael ray, so i guess it's of the 50 dollar variety. whatever. knowing her, she likely found it at a yard sale or good will store for 3 dollars. the handle is chipped, but, inside it looks fine and i suspect stuff out of it tastes about the same as it would out of a 300 dollar lecruset.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:24 pm
by trev
She scored if she found a pot like that for $3. I'm still looking for Le Creuset type pot. They aren't that easy to find in white, black or blue.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:32 pm
by smackaholic
It's the type in that it's cast iron enamel. i am certain it doesn't have the same quality enamel though. Oh fukking well. I've had plenty of stuff out of it and haven't gotten a chunk of enamel yet.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:32 am
by mvscal
trev wrote:She scored if she found a pot like that for $3. I'm still looking for Le Creuset type pot. They aren't that easy to find in white, black or blue.
You might want to consider ordering from an online source. Cuisanart only comes in red and blue. Le Creuset has a full range of colors but you will pay out the ass.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:51 am
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote:
trev wrote:Goobs is trying to say don't buy the $50 version. I have to agree with that. Buy the $120 or over. You get what you pay for.
nah, what he is doing is his usual you're a moron ankle biting shtick.
No, trev pretty much nailed it. You got one part right, though. You are a moron.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 7:24 am
by smackaholic
Goober McTuber wrote:No, trev pretty much nailed it. You got one part right, though. You are a moron.
I wonder what is more detrimental to reading comprehension, being older than dirt or a huge vodka fan?

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 2:59 pm
by trev
Overstock.com has the Cuisinart in blue. $87 for the 5 1/2 quart, $110 for the 7 quart.

What size would you get?

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:07 pm
by Mikey
trev wrote:Overstock.com has the Cuisinart in blue. $87 for the 5 1/2 quart, $110 for the 7 quart.

What size would you get?
I think it depends on what you plan to use it for.

I got the 7 liter (7.25 qt) Le Crueset, which is 11 inches across. It was just large enough to take the 5 pieces of osso bucco that I fixed last week. The 5 quart probably would have been too small. The large one is pretty heavy though. If you're making smaller meals the 5 quart might be easier to handle.

My next purchase will probably be the 5 quart oval French oven, which would serve dual purposes of having a smaller volume pot plus be perfect for braising a pork loin roast without having too much space around the sides.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2012 4:13 pm
by trev
I would only need the 7 quart on occassion. Not sure I want to lug it around on daily basis. I thiink I will get the 5.5 for now.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:50 am
by mvscal
trev wrote:Overstock.com has the Cuisinart in blue. $87 for the 5 1/2 quart, $110 for the 7 quart.

What size would you get?
The one that gets the most work is my 3 qt round. It's my go to sauce pan. I have a five quart oval that I use occasionally. As Mikey said, it's great for pork loin roasts. For anything bigger, I have a Graniteware roaster.

I suppose it depends on how many people there are in your FUCKING FAMILY. I generally cook for three.

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:57 pm
by smackaholic
just did a roast in the cheapo rachel ray bucket.

actually, i planned to, but, after searing the roast i found that all the veggie that were 'sposed to join it wouldn't fit, so it went into a somewhat larger stainless steel pot.

it came out fine, although i really wish i put more 'shrooms and taters in it.

i have a question about fancy cast iron pots in general.

if you are cooking in the oven, what is the difference? i understand the nice even heating characteristics of cast iron and how that matters on the stove top, but, it seems like in an oven, the heating surface would be pretty even in other types of pots. is it just that you can use the same pot for surface searing and roasting in the oven?

Re: Le Creuset

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:04 pm
by Goober McTuber
smackaholic wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:No, trev pretty much nailed it. You got one part right, though. You are a moron.
I wonder what is more detrimental to reading comprehension, being older than dirt or a huge vodka fan?
Being just flat out stupid seems to work for you.