T1B

When I see a smackaholic post that starts with "i think" or "i suspect" I typically gloss over the rest assuming it's 100% bullshit.

I find the "Mammy" troll to be slightly amusing.

I'd motorboat the fuck out of Rumplewife's rack.

I've only abused my mod buttons twice, and both times were to frame bradhusker as a homosexual.

Your turn.

One time I got a pog in the mail that smelled like dead gerbils.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: I've only abused my mod buttons twice, and both times were to frame bradhusker as a homosexual.

.

you must have beenm drunk at the time. everybody knows you don't have to frame the guilty

I have 47 trolls here.

AP will be along shortly to out them all.

I just finished motorboating Mt. Rumplewife.

[melt]I once sent a PM to PSUFAN letting him know that no matter what anyone says about Mt. Rumplewife, I wasn't going to quit the site.[/melt]

I seriously think ucant was a dick for playing along with Marty's gay bashing of Scotty. It was kind of high schoolish of ucant to mingle in with the popular crowd.

Go Coogs' wrote: I seriously think ucant was a dick for playing along with Marty's gay bashing of Scotty. It was kind of high schoolish of ucant to mingle in with the popular crowd.

u just figured out ucant was a dick?

In other breaking news, so is Scott.

Just curious though, who is this "popular crowd" that you speak of? Obviously, you don't think you're a part of it.

It's every man for himself in here Rumps.

War Wagon wrote:Just curious though, who is this "popular crowd" that you speak of?

I have no idea, but Shirley I'm in it.

War Wagon wrote:u just figured out ucant was a dick?

Well, there are varying degrees of being a dick. A lot of T1b regulars have posted with unmistakeable intentions of being just that; a dick. However, those intentions extend from circumstances that are far more different than ucant's dickhead ambitions on Scotty. Scotty buried himself, no doubt, by a repeated account of ucant's girthiness. But ucant could've either stayed clear of Marty's play on the matter or he could've posted something along the lines of, "Sheesh, Scotty, didn't know you thought of me that way. All kidding aside, Scotty is good peeps IRL and he is right...I'm massive." That would've deflated the situation. Just sayin'.

Being a two-faced dick after dude picked up the lunch tab IRL is kinda shitty. I don't care if this is an "all bets are off" board or not.

Just curious though, who is this "popular crowd" that you speak of? Obviously, you don't think you're a part of it.

The popular crowd doesn't identify specific members per se, but more of a group of people who attach onto a pile-on no matter what they personally think of the subject matter. It's a form of trolling that is more prevalent than you'd think. Seriously, nobody wants to be THAT guy defending the JON's, the Pauls, and Scotty's gay bashing situation. Once you do that, then you become a target too.

I'm guilty of this form of trolling as is everyone else on this board.

Go Coogs' wrote: I'm guilty of this form of trolling as is everyone else on this board.

So, we're all one big in-crowd here, per your definition?


That being the case, I'd hate to see what "losers" look like.

I don't tell my secrets.

Rumps just deleted his response to Dins. I don't think Rumps is cut out to post here... because it's so mean and all.

Dinsdale wrote:So, we're all one big in-crowd here, per your definition?

No, Dins. We all have our own opinions on a variety of topics. But when it comes to epic fails such as JON and Paul's miscues, a person or two may want to defend those guys because they can rationalize it, but they won't do it. They would rather join in on the fun.

Atomic Punk wrote:Rumps just deleted his response to Dins. I don't think Rumps is cut out to post here... because it's so mean and all.

I didn't answer Dins' question correctly, so I started over. You got me, AP.

Go Coogs' wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:So, we're all one big in-crowd here, per your definition?

No, Dins. We all have our own opinions on a variety of topics. But when it comes to epic fails such as JON and Paul's miscues, a person or two may want to defend those guys because they can rationalize it, but they won't do it. They would rather join in on the fun.

Uhm, yeah -- I've got a pretty deece grip on the dynamic here.

In my response/question, I was merely making a suggestion that everyone here was a loser.

It's this kind of subtle cleverness that has me so firmly entrenched in the in-crowd... I'm kind of epic like that.

Well played on your part, Dins. And yes, we're all losers.

Go Coogs' wrote:And yes, we're all losers.

Not in the Golf Forum, we're not.

MODS, when are you gonna ban shutyomouth?

Rumps wrote:And yes, we're all losers.

That's a solid bottom line conclusion, yes.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I'd motorboat the fuck out of Rumplewife's rack.

2th. I'd even be willing to give her a pearl necklace for her troubles.

Go Coogs' wrote:Seriously, nobody wants to be THAT guy defending the JON's, the Pauls, and Scotty's gay bashing situation

I don't read this message board all the time and must have never seen what you are talking about. Gay bashing? Are you serious? Gay is gay. Why the owner of the board allows for a lot of the stuff that goes on here is beyond me. Gay bashing went out of style at least 15 years ago. Whoever the victim was. Scotty. That's just sad. Really sad.

I would never make any confession on here that's for sure. But nice try.

I used to think Toddowen was pretty cool.

Go Coogs' wrote:But ucant could've either stayed clear of Marty's play on the matter or he could've posted something along the lines of, "Sheesh, Scotty, didn't know you thought of me that way. All kidding aside, Scotty is good peeps IRL and he is right...I'm massive." That would've deflated the situation. Just sayin'.

Being a two-faced dick after dude picked up the lunch tab IRL is kinda shitty. I don't care if this is an "all bets are off" board or not.

I'd be curious to see what your thoughts are about Scott talking shit about numerous other people he's met (this means you, Jackasses), disseminating information to the board that was posted in a supposed 'private' forum, and sharing other ‘real life’ information to the board.

Here's the thing, guy... I like Scott. My opinion of the man hasn't changed. However, unless you're comfortable with Scott discussing details of your life with people from this board as he sees fit, then you better not share any information with him. Or anyone he talks to. He's a cool cat, yes. But he gossips like an old hen. I find his ‘board behavior’ to be rather… inappropriate at times. Especially for someone who has been trusted with being an Admin.

As far as me being ‘two-faced’… feel free to re-read the first paragraph. I think there’s just as many people from this board who like Scott as dislike him. He thrives upon being a polarizing figure and when things go badly for him, he only has himself to blame.

Papa Willie wrote:I used to absolutely defuckinglight in trolling you fuckers - really more to IRRITATE a lot of you.

You give yourself way too much credit. Something tells me that you already knew that, so no need in talking about that anymore.

Confession? I used to think that Dinsdale was running the bradhusker troll.

Edit to add: I like Scott. I just don't want to be THAT guy defending him.

I don't have 27 TVs. I only have 17.

[gah]I talked to Katy several times on the phone as she was helping me get the T1B radio thing going which caused ShrunkenPerk to go in a fit of rage and jealousy.[/gah]

I'd motorboat Aggie Gal in a heartbeat.

Sudden Sam wrote:

IndyFrisco wrote: [gah]I talked to Katy several times on the phone[/gah]

No one showed up at your door with a dead puppy in a sack?

:? My spreadsheet is not up to date.

Scott wrote:It was a real bitch move for you to make up your little - "let's take a steam" story.

As an objective observer of the board, I'll tell you what I thought about when ucant said that.

I thought ---> it prolly didn't happen that way, if at all.
I never considered it a LIE.

I just laffed at it
I took it as just a board guy talkin' shit, because that's what goes on here.
No need to take it seriously, Scott, because most of the board probably didn't.
We're just fuckin' around.

At any rate, Scott, if you didn't like ucant's comment, you really ought to step back and consider who it was that choose to go INTO discussion about a real-time meeting you had with another guy from the board.

It might have been that ucant never wanted any of that real-time info to come out onto the board in the first place.

He just took what you did and upped the ante a little bit.

For all I really know, ucant isn't a BIG man at all, anyway.
He might be a beanpole, like Wagon.

And I really don't care either way.

I just want some good stories, some solid takes, and a few laffs.

KC Scott wrote:Beacuse a couple in PM said the same thing Rumps said - It was a real bitch move for you to make up your little - "let's take a steam" story.

Did ANYONE seriously believe that for a minute?


That is... awesome.

Is it really this easy?



Hey y'all... that same night I walked into the men's room and Scott was offering to hold dude's junk for them while they peed... because that how men's room attendants roll in KC.

poptart wrote:For all I really know, ucant isn't a BIG man at all, anyway.

Oh, he's real big alright... and spectacular.

Sin,
KC Scott

KC Scott wrote:Beacuse a couple in PM said the same thing Rumps said - It was a real bitch move for you to make up your little - "let's take a steam" story.

Well, there you go, Rumps. If you feel the need to defend NOJ or KFC Paul, you do it in a PM.

KC Scott wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:I'd be curious to see what your thoughts are about Scott talking shit about numerous other people he's met (this means you, Jackasses), disseminating information to the board that was posted in a supposed 'private' forum, and sharing other ‘real life’ information to the board.

Yea - I'll be waiting to see what the other Jackass say too. Beacuse a couple in PM said the same thing Rumps said - It was a real bitch move for you to make up your little - "let's take a steam" story.

What's even more amazing is you still try and justify lying by "you gave away personnal information by telling the board I'm a big guy".
if you consider that personal info then you are batshit as AP

Liars rationalize their lies - and that's exactly what you did and continue to do.
The rest of your rambling is the exact same " it's OK I did this beacuse...."

I keep telling you kids that board romance is a bad idea. But do you listen?

poptart wrote: He might be a beanpole, like Wagon.

I prefer the term svelte.

War Wagon wrote:

poptart wrote: He might be a beanpole, like Wagon.

I prefer the term svelte.

Geeky was more what I was thinking.

In all seriousness, Scott. I am sorry if anyone took that shit as gospel. Given what transpired up to that point, I thought everyone knew it was 'smack.'

Hey, Ucant.
Hey, Scott.
Nice to meet you. Now let's go work out then take a steam bath.

Yeah. Totally plausible in a Penthouse Forum kind of way. WTF is wrong with you people?

KC Scott wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:In all seriousness, Scott. I am sorry if anyone took that shit as gospel. Given what transpired up to that point, I thought everyone knew it was 'smack.'

Hey, Ucant.
Hey, Scott.
Nice to meet you. Now let's go work out then take a steam bath.

Yeah. Totally plausible in a Penthouse Forum kind of way. WTF is wrong with you people?

Yea, it's disturbing considering Wags represents the median in Board Reading IQ here

No way he represents the median.

More like the MEAN, Gobbles.

KC Scott wrote:

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Did ANYONE seriously believe that for a minute?

Here's one moron you hooked......... bode you

So, you were and have been quite butt hurt over the whole deal... to the extent that you take quotes from a private forum and paste them in your sig trying to prove your innocence and expose ucant as a liar.

That about right?

You're pathetically shallow.

Hey, go buy yourself some nice new expensive toy and post pics. That should cheer you up.

War Wagon wrote: You're pathetically shallow.

Hey, go buy yourself some nice new expensive toy and post pics. That should cheer you up.

I_F needs the company. Everyone needs fliends.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

War Wagon wrote: You're pathetically shallow.

Hey, go buy yourself some nice new expensive toy and post pics. That should cheer you up.

I_F needs the company. Everyone needs fliends.

Who the fuck said I needed friends? Now pick up your mop and get back to work.