Page 1 of 3

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:28 pm
by R-Jack
Papa Willie wrote:I think Newt's a fuckhead.
Kinda answered your own question there pal.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:31 pm
by Tom In VA
Whenever I hear the word Newt.

I think of the witch scene in Monty Python.

"Well I got better".

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:41 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Papa Willie wrote:Ya - I saw Mikey's & Screwy's thoughts in the slap thread.

Question - what's wrong with what he did? Shouldn't you forgive him? I mean - you forgave Clinton, right? You forgave MLK, right? You forgive ANY fucking liberal who fucks around, but why not Newt?

For the record, I think Newt's a fuckhead.
Go read a book you illiterate son of a bitch.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:44 pm
by R-Jack
Screw_Michigan wrote:Go read a book you illiterate son of a bitch.
If he's illiterate, what's that going to do for him?

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:46 pm
by smackaholic
I think Newt is a brilliant dude. Would prolly make a good pres, but, as a man, he is a POS.

Not saying I wouldn't vote for him, but, he's not my first pic. And to have the nerve to say I fukked around because I was working so hard to help my country.....really?

Newt, go fukk yourself.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:55 pm
by mvscal
smackaholic wrote:Would prolly make a good pres, .
No, he wouldn't. He's just another corporate globalist whore like Chimpy and Oplatelip. Haven't we had enough of assholes like that fucking up the country?

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:10 am
by smackaholic
mvscal wrote:
smackaholic wrote:Would prolly make a good pres, .
No, he wouldn't. He's just another corporate globalist whore like Chimpy and Oplatelip. Haven't we had enough of assholes like that fucking up the country?
you might be right. really not sure.

I doubt it matters much anyway as he doesn't stand a chance. Between the libtards that loathe him and the social conservatives apalled at the way he ditches OLs, there are just too many that wouldn't consider voting for him.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:54 am
by Q, West Coast Style
Papa Willie wrote:Ya - I saw Mikey's & Screwy's thoughts in the slap thread.

Question - what's wrong with what he did? Shouldn't you forgive him? I mean - you forgave Clinton, right? You forgave MLK, right? You forgive ANY fucking liberal who fucks around, but why not Newt?

For the record, I think Newt's a fuckhead.
It's not as much about forgiveness as it is about hypocrisy and being an opportunist. MLK's most remembered for advancements in racial equality. You could argue infidelity is of little relevance there. Clinton was (is) beloved for showing compassion towards the less-fortunate socioeconomically. You could argue that infidelity is of little relevance there.

Newt, on the other hand, has tried hard to gain political support by currying favor with social conservatives. Infidelity is much more relevant in this realm. Espcially since this group tends to make the most noise about "family values" and "respect for marriage" etc. So, in a way, he's trying to speak as a leader in the one area where he is least qualified to lead. I think that's the biggest problem people have with Newt.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:03 am
by Tom In VA
Reasonable post Q.

I think the "social conservatives" need butt the fuck out of the picture and recognize how immoral shit is going to get when the economy tanks and the shit hits the fan.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:19 am
by mvscal
Q, West Coast Style wrote:Newt, on the other hand, has tried hard to gain political support by currying favor with social conservatives.
100% Bullshit.

Going by your "most remembered for" standard, Gingrich was most remembered for leading the Republican victory in 104th Congress which was based on the Contract with America and didn't have jackmotherfuckingshit to do with social conservatives.

1.require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply to Congress;
2.select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse;
3.cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third;
4.limit the terms of all committee chairs;
5.ban the casting of proxy votes in committee;
6.require committee meetings to be open to the public;
7.require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase;
8.guarantee an honest accounting of the Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting.

Stop talking out of your ass, idiot.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:13 am
by smackaholic
Papa Willie wrote: 1. MLK Jr. was a fucking PREACHER. He's the LAST motherfucker on earth that should have fucked around. If that isn't fuckheadian, I don't know what is.

2. A United States PRESIDENT should be trying to set a better example for well - ANYBODY, as opposed to shooting skeet on a fucking pig in the Oval Office.

3. Newt was never as much, but you could lump him in with Clinton. Any motherfucker that will fuck around on his own family WILL NOT be afraid to fuck his "country" over.
rack.

don't really give a fukk about martin getting a little something on the side as he was a privatecitizen. none of my bidness.

clinton is different. i could give a fukk that he was unfaithful. i do give a fukk that he used his position of power to humidify his cigar in an underling. doesn't matter if it was consensual. in bidness or in the military, this gets you gone, yesterday.

and yes, a man that will fukk around on his OL....repeatedly, is not a trustworthy person. EOS. Doesn't matter whether or not he espouses morality in his political platform.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:27 am
by Diego in Seattle
smackaholic wrote:
Papa Willie wrote: 1. MLK Jr. was a fucking PREACHER. He's the LAST motherfucker on earth that should have fucked around. If that isn't fuckheadian, I don't know what is.

2. A United States PRESIDENT should be trying to set a better example for well - ANYBODY, as opposed to shooting skeet on a fucking pig in the Oval Office.

3. Newt was never as much, but you could lump him in with Clinton. Any motherfucker that will fuck around on his own family WILL NOT be afraid to fuck his "country" over.
rack.

don't really give a fukk about martin getting a little something on the side as he was a privatecitizen. none of my bidness.

clinton is different. i could give a fukk that he was unfaithful. i do give a fukk that he used his position of power to humidify his cigar in an underling. doesn't matter if it was consensual. in bidness or in the military, this gets you gone, yesterday.

and yes, a man that will fukk around on his OL....repeatedly, is not a trustworthy person. EOS. Doesn't matter whether or not he espouses morality in his political platform.
I would say that you've about covered it. But I would add that a preacher boinking around doesn't put the country at risk through blackmail/extortion. It does put the country at risk when it's the POTUS doing the boinking.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:30 am
by smackaholic
Diego in Seattle wrote:
smackaholic wrote:
Papa Willie wrote: 1. MLK Jr. was a fucking PREACHER. He's the LAST motherfucker on earth that should have fucked around. If that isn't fuckheadian, I don't know what is.

2. A United States PRESIDENT should be trying to set a better example for well - ANYBODY, as opposed to shooting skeet on a fucking pig in the Oval Office.

3. Newt was never as much, but you could lump him in with Clinton. Any motherfucker that will fuck around on his own family WILL NOT be afraid to fuck his "country" over.
rack.

don't really give a fukk about martin getting a little something on the side as he was a privatecitizen. none of my bidness.

clinton is different. i could give a fukk that he was unfaithful. i do give a fukk that he used his position of power to humidify his cigar in an underling. doesn't matter if it was consensual. in bidness or in the military, this gets you gone, yesterday.

and yes, a man that will fukk around on his OL....repeatedly, is not a trustworthy person. EOS. Doesn't matter whether or not he espouses morality in his political platform.
I would say that you've about covered it. But I would add that a preacher boinking around doesn't put the country at risk through blackmail/extortion. It does put the country at risk when it's the POTUS doing the boinking.
good point. his dumbfukkery was an extremely wreckless thing to do. getting some ass on the side when you are married to hillarybeast is very understandable, but, be smart about it.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:07 pm
by mvscal
Jsc810 wrote:he will be almost impossible to beat.
He has royally fucked up everything he's touched. He's one and done.

It's the economy, stupid. Remember?

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:07 pm
by Sirfindafold
Jsc810 wrote:he will be almost impossible to beat.

Apparently you don't keep up with current events.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:14 pm
by Sirfindafold
Jsc810 wrote:Waiting on you to identify who will beat him .....
B H Obama. Heard of him?

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:18 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Jsc810 wrote:Waiting on you to identify who will beat him .....
Someone without purple lips.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:37 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:he will be almost impossible to beat.
He has royally fucked up everything he's touched. He's one and done.

It's the economy, stupid. Remember?
If you don't think the economy will be better in 18 months, then you may have a point. But back here on earth, things will be better. And Obama's re-election hopes will improve. Then again, you were the one who said he would never beat Hillary. And then you said he would never beat McCain. I guess if you keep predicting Obama's demise, you'll eventually be right. :meds:

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:44 pm
by mvscal
BSmack wrote:But back here on earth, things will be better.
And you base this on what?

Rising employment? Ooops, maybe not. Uhhh, how about a balanced Federal budget? OK, forget about that. Oh, I know! It must be our low inflation! That's the ticket! What? Aw...fuck. All right, all right. The ONE thing we know we can count on is the low cost of energy. Gas is only what? 4 bucks a gallon?

You're a fucking moron.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:47 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:But back here on earth, things will be better.
And you base this on what?

Rising employment? Ooops, maybe not. Uhhh, how about a balanced Federal budget? OK, forget about that. Oh, I know! It must be our low inflation! That's the ticket! What? Aw...fuck. All right, all right. The ONE thing we know we can count on is the low cost of energy. Gas is only what? 4 bucks a gallon?

You're a fucking moron.
I base it on the action I am seeing in the job market. You know, the thing Americans actually give a shit about. The thaw is coming.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:50 pm
by mvscal
BSmack wrote:I base it on the action I am seeing in the job market.
There is no action in the job market, you fucking dipshit.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:52 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
BSmack wrote:
I base it on the action I am seeing in the job market.

You're not in the job market.

You're in the rec room your office playing Legend Of Zelda - Ocarina Of Time studying, remember.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:48 pm
by mvscal
It's OK, Marty. Libtards have lost even a nodding acquaintance with economic reality. It will be a minor miracle if our situation is not worse 18 months from now but, since I'm such a nice guy, I would rather light a candle than curse their darkness:

The bottom line is that soaring energy costs and rising inflation will more than wipe out any imaginary gains in the job market.

Energy costs will rise due to the continuing instability in the Middle East and the crippling of our domestic production. Naturally, this means rising operating costs for business which spikes job growth and leads to lower tax revenues for government.

The impact of astronomical federal spending on inflation will be worsened by lower tax revenues and a softening bond market. PIMCO, the worlds largest bond investor has dumped US treasury securities and I doubt they will be the last to do so. This will lead to further quantitative easing ie. printing more dollars and the beginnings of an inflationary spiral.

Rising energy costs and inflation are going to fistfuck US households which will lead to lower consumer confidence and much less discretionary spending.

There is no motherfucking way in hell that things are "getting better." Only the dimmest of dumbfucks are still floating on their raft of Hope and Change.

We're all just little shit speckles in a giant shit tornado so drink up, boys. I know I am...big time.

Image

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:33 am
by poptart
Jsc810 wrote:Newt can't beat Obama. Don't see anyone else doing it either.

Note: I'm not saying that I'm voting for Obama, just that as a matter of election politics, he will be almost impossible to beat.
I disagree completely.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=34181&p=646972&hili ... ad#p646972
poptart wrote:Barry has NO chance in 2012.

Zero.

0%

None.

Not ANY chance.

Toast.

You can slam that into your brick head.


I think there's a good chance he won't even make it to 2012 in the Oval Office.

He's already lost those who put him in office -- the moderates, and they most definitely will NOT be coming back.

NO way.

Some on the left will dutifully suck his nuts dry no matter what he does (that's you, dummy), but it won't help him in the least in 2012 ... if he's even in the picture at all.

He and his braindead cohorts in Washington have set us on a course of certain failure and things are going to get SO bad that Barry will barely be able to show his face in public.
Posted December 28, 2009.

I stand by it.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:46 am
by LTS TRN 2
mvscal wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:he will be almost impossible to beat.
He has royally fucked up everything he's touched. He's one and done.

It's the economy, stupid. Remember?
So..it's the Mormon Casino Greeter vs. the Muslim Foreign National?

Seriously, .....Romney? Just say it. Cuz so far, no one has dared actually mouthing the words.."Romney is electable..."...or is that "acceptable"..?

C'mon, let's hear the actual squawk!

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:01 am
by Roger_the_Shrubber
LTS,

I kinda hate ya in an internet kinda way, but,,,.........

You are dead on. Romney is about as electable as Hitler. The Mormon thing will get more heavily reported on, so he is gone.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:42 pm
by smackaholic
Romney has two problems.

First there's the mormon thing. A mormon on the conservative side can't be elected because too many christian conservatives hate them with a passion. A lib mormon might stand a chance. But, i believe there is only one in the universe, harry reid and he ain't goin nowhere.

Second is the romneycare dealio. I think this pretty much deals it against him.

One other thing that doesn't help. He has 5 grown sons with a cumulative military resume equal to BH's. This doesn't look good at all, especially from a conservative.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:21 pm
by Sirfindafold
The corn in Romney's shit could govern better Barack Hussein Obama

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:01 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
mvscal wrote:We're all just little shit speckles in a giant shit tornado so drink up, boys. I know I am...big time.

Image
Rack any and all Jim Lahey references

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:27 pm
by OCmike
smackaholic wrote:Romney has two problems.

First there's the mormon thing. A mormon on the conservative side can't be elected because too many christian conservatives hate them with a passion. A lib mormon might stand a chance. But, i believe there is only one in the universe, harry reid and he ain't goin nowhere.
The mormons are hated with a passion? Is that an east coast thing? I'm asking that seriously. We left coasters are relative neighbors with them and they aren't hated...unless they knock on our door on a weekend during football season. What they are here is mocked for the magic underpants and pitied because of they wear "the required uniform" while riding moutain bikes all over town, and forced to go on a mission to do shit like build sewers in French Guyana while trying not to die of Malaria and Typhus.

All religions have their share of wacky stuff that you have to take on faith. But If I'm being honest, because of the loony shit they believe and practice, I'd have a hard time voting for a mormon. Any of the other major religions wouldn't be a problem. But to me Mormons are like Scientologists.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:34 pm
by smackaholic
OCmike wrote:
smackaholic wrote:Romney has two problems.

First there's the mormon thing. A mormon on the conservative side can't be elected because too many christian conservatives hate them with a passion. A lib mormon might stand a chance. But, i believe there is only one in the universe, harry reid and he ain't goin nowhere.
The mormons are hated with a passion? Is that an east coast thing? I'm asking that seriously. We left coasters are relative neighbors with them and they aren't hated...unless they knock on our door on a weekend during football season. What they are here is mocked for the magic underpants and pitied because of they wear "the required uniform" while riding moutain bikes all over town, and forced to go on a mission to do shit like build sewers in French Guyana while trying not to die of Malaria and Typhus.

All religions have their share of wacky stuff that you have to take on faith. But If I'm being honest, because of the loony shit they believe and practice, I'd have a hard time voting for a mormon. Any of the other major religions wouldn't be a problem. But to me Mormons are like Scientologists.
Hate is too strong a word. I'd say our opinions of them is kind of like yours which means many will not consider voting for them.

Personally, I have to laugh at any uhhhhh....christer ('sup let's turd?) for what I consider to be a rather silly religion. In fact, if I gotta do a rank'em on whack beliefs of the various christian sects I'd have to put catholics at the top of the list, based primarily on their shameful rules for priests and the absolutely ridiculous get ups their upper management sport. Magic undies got nothing on silly vatican headgear.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:37 pm
by BSmack
Martyred wrote:
BSmack wrote:
I base it on the action I am seeing in the job market.

You're not in the job market.

You're in the rec room your office playing Legend Of Zelda - Ocarina Of Time studying, remember.
I guess that beats jacking off into a bag of cheetos.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:50 pm
by smackaholic
BSmack wrote:
Martyred wrote:
You're in the rec room your office playing Legend Of Zelda - Ocarina Of Time studying, remember.
I guess that beats jacking off into a bag of cheetos.
not so sure about that. i'd say a few more dude's have played the jack off game than zelda.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:56 pm
by War Wagon
OCmike wrote: I'd have a hard time voting for a mormon. Any of the other major religions wouldn't be a problem.
So, you'd vote for a muslim?

Myself, I don't care that Romney is a mormon as it has nothing to do with if he can do the job. From all appearances, he's got the best chance of beating Obama, at least at this point.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:20 pm
by Mace
Eighteen months is an eternity in politics and it's impossible to make any kind of accurate prediction for the 2012 presidential election.....other than predicting that mvscal won't be voting and that he'll still be preaching doom and gloom for the U.S. of A. It has to suck going through life always seeing the glass as half empty.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:22 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:We're all just little shit speckles in a giant shit tornado so drink up, boys. I know I am...big time.

Image
Trailer Park Boys resets will always get racked. And thank you for doing your part.
People lined up early Saturday morning on St. Paul Street in Rochester for a chance at one of 100 new jobs.

The High Falls Brewery plans to hire 100 more workers by May.

Company officials said business is booming and the company expects to be operating around the clock, seven days a week.

YNN spoke with one man who has been hoping to join the brewery for a long time.

"Yeah, I’ve been living in this area all my life so you know I figure it's the best place to work,” said Roosevelt Adams. “I've been trying to get here for a long time, since I was 18."

Once the new workers are hired, Genesee Brewery will have 562 union and non-union employees.

http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_st ... e-brewery/

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:32 pm
by Mace
Unemployment in Iowa is down to 6.1%, still a point or two above normal but dropping.....and will get even better this spring when the construction business kicks in. The Dow is over 12,000....despite the doom and gloom predicted by mvscal, poptart, and others a few months ago....and any rational person has to believe the economy on the mend, even though we've still got some work left to do.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 7:50 pm
by War Wagon
Housing starts are still way down. The recession started with the housing market implosion and will only really end when that gets healthy again. I don't see that happening anytime soon.

My companys' business is directly tied to the homebuilding industry. March has traditionally been our busiest month of the year as contractors ramp up for the spring/summer building season. We're not getting much in the way of orders, at least not for the domestic market, and the mfg. plant has been running at less than half of capacity.

This not a good sign that the economy is turning around.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 8:52 pm
by Bizzarofelice
I want to know if Newt's wife is a vampire. If yes, she is powerless outside of the White House but could really fuck things up if we invite her in.

Re: So about Newt and liberals.

Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:14 pm
by poptart
Mace wrote:and any rational person has to believe the economy on the mend
LOL

How many trillions have been added to the deficit?

There is no recovery.