Page 1 of 2
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:24 pm
by WolverineSteve
Once again The D fails to win it all. Much of the problem stems from the close proximity to Flint. All the good violent criminal recruits are split between the two powerhouses. I'm not making excuses but St. Louis has a stronghold on regional talent all the way to Chicago. With much of Kwame's clan leaving town early by way of death and incarceration many experts believe that Detroit is in for a rebuilding year or two. This is not the case as the great crime programs simply reload. There is so much raw young talent already in the pipeline that the D is poised to be in the debate for #1 for years to come.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:31 pm
by Carson
Need to post this in BTPCF so Screwey can see that Bamaham ranking.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 4:59 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Carson wrote:Need to post this in BTPCF so Screwey can see that Bamaham ranking.
Oh, I see it. I just don't care.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 5:41 pm
by Wolfman
Chicago= not available? Interesting.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:04 pm
by smackaholic
good to see my home town, hartford slip into the top twenty. and unlike some shitholes cities that have well developed farm systems, hartford is surrounded by lilly white upper middle class 'burbs that contribute nothing.
rack them!
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:21 pm
by BSmack
smackaholic wrote:good to see my home town, hartford slip into the top twenty. and unlike some shitholes cities that have well developed farm systems, hartford is surrounded by lilly white upper middle class 'burbs that contribute nothing.
rack them!
You can't tell me that the homies from Bridgeport and New Haven don't work their way into the Hartford recruiting pool. Plenty off gangbangin talent in the CT. That's why those suburbs are so lilly white.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 6:32 pm
by jiminphilly
Time to cook the books.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:31 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
smackaholic wrote:hartford is surrounded by lilly white upper middle class 'burbs that contribute nothing.
They contribute plenty.
Who do you think ventures down the sidestreets of Albany Ave, checking out the dealer's wares? White boys from the burbs, that's who. Come on, now...
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:32 pm
by smackaholic
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:smackaholic wrote:hartford is surrounded by lilly white upper middle class 'burbs that contribute nothing.
They contribute plenty.
Who do you think ventures down the sidestreets of Albany Ave, checking out the dealer's wares? White boys from the burbs, that's who. Come on, now...
that kind of makes them the rich boosters, not the recruits.
actually, come to think of it, hartford has a damn fine farm system. it's a little island in the caribbean that has two chief exports, MLB players and hoodlums. the ballplayers scatter all over, but the hoodlums keep the hartford criminal roster deep and talented. If I'm not mistaken, the hartford PR farm system is surpassed only by NYC.
not bad for a city of little more than 100K people. we're like the fukking gonzaga of crime.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:34 pm
by smackaholic
BSmack wrote:smackaholic wrote:good to see my home town, hartford slip into the top twenty. and unlike some shitholes cities that have well developed farm systems, hartford is surrounded by lilly white upper middle class 'burbs that contribute nothing.
rack them!
You can't tell me that the homies from Bridgeport and New Haven don't work their way into the Hartford recruiting pool. Plenty off gangbangin talent in the CT. That's why those suburbs are so lilly white.
new haven and b'port are interconference rivals. if anything, they siphon some of the better PR talent away from hartford.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2010 8:40 pm
by smackaholic
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:smackaholic wrote:hartford is surrounded by lilly white upper middle class 'burbs that contribute nothing.
They contribute plenty.
Who do you think ventures down the sidestreets of Albany Ave, checking out the dealer's wares? White boys from the burbs, that's who. Come on, now...
and what's up with you fukking chowd slackers? the best you can muster is a 35 ranking for fukking springfield?
that's fukking weak.
beantown barely cracks 100? or did they? pretty sad. i will give you this, at least you got some white boy talent in southie unlike the rest of new england.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:26 am
by Dinsdale
If you told me that only one city in the U&L cracked the Top 100, I would have chuckled, and refused to insult everyone by answering.
Nice work, Tacoma. They've established longtime dominance in the regional stats.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:17 am
by OCmike
What's hilarious about both Richmond and Oakland making the top ten is that both are either across the bridge from or next to ultra-wealthy regions of the Bay Area. Both were also pretty nice cities about 60 years ago. That they've managed to turn to complete shit and sustain it for half a century amidst all the wealth, growth and crazy-high property values in the area is really quite an achievement.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:28 am
by mvscal
Jsc810 wrote: RANK CITY SCORE
1 St. Louis, MO 381.62
2 Camden, NJ 374.33 70
3 Detroit, MI 356.44 71
4 Flint, MI 310.31 72
5 Oakland, CA 308.29 73
6 Richmond, CA 287.15 74
7 Cleveland, OH 260.60 75
8 Compton, CA 260.13 76
9 Gary, IN 250.48 77
10 Birmingham, AL 244.83 78
2010 City Crime Rate Rankings
Good job, nigggers. Way to turn your neighborhoods into godawful shitholes.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:26 am
by H4ever
mvscal wrote:Jsc810 wrote: RANK CITY SCORE
1 St. Louis, MO 381.62
2 Camden, NJ 374.33 70
3 Detroit, MI 356.44 71
4 Flint, MI 310.31 72
5 Oakland, CA 308.29 73
6 Richmond, CA 287.15 74
7 Cleveland, OH 260.60 75
8 Compton, CA 260.13 76
9 Gary, IN 250.48 77
10 Birmingham, AL 244.83 78
2010 City Crime Rate Rankings
Good job, nigggers. Way to turn your neighborhoods into godawful shitholes.
Ya know....I don't think anyone can call that a racist statement (other than the N bomb) wonder what the percentage of blacks in that top ten are? Anyone have some time to run the numbers?
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:33 am
by Bizzarofelice
problem with the report is st. louis city is only 300K of the urban core and st. louis county is the 1.1 million with more white people who don't rape thirteen year olds. this report only accounts for the 300K father rapers in the urban core.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 5:54 am
by BSmack
Bizzarofelice wrote:problem with the report is st. louis city is only 300K of the urban core and st. louis county is the 1.1 million with more white people who don't rape thirteen year olds. this report only accounts for the 300K father rapers in the urban core.
You can say the same thing about Rochester. Outside of a half mile wide by 5 mile long crescent shaped "combat zone", there ain't a lot of crime here in the 585. The town I live in hasn't had a homicide in 30 years.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 1:25 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
smackaholic wrote:and what's up with you fukking chowd slackers? the best you can muster is a 35 ranking for fukking springfield?
You can categorize a Chowd as someone from Boston, Eastern MA, or New England as a whole, I guess. It does
not mean someone from MA. So your '
you chowd slackers' comment doesn't really make sense. In fact, you're much closer to Springfield (take Rt 83 -- maybe 25 miles) than Springfield is to Boston (90 miles.)
To me, Springfield is just Hartford North. A shithole of a city with very little to offer, unless you're into drugs and/or crime. Actually, Springfield
was good for one thing. Staind and Godsmack used to play there all of the time before making it big. In the 90s, Springfield was a great place to see live bands.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:54 pm
by R-Jack
BSmack wrote:Bizzarofelice wrote:problem with the report is st. louis city is only 300K of the urban core and st. louis county is the 1.1 million with more white people who don't rape thirteen year olds. this report only accounts for the 300K father rapers in the urban core.
You can say the same thing about Rochester. Outside of a half mile wide by 5 mile long crescent shaped "combat zone", there ain't a lot of crime here in the 585. The town I live in hasn't had a homicide in 30 years.
You can say the same thing about Richmond, CA. Outside of the three square mile Iron Triangle, there isn't a whole lot of cri......................oh fuck it. It's a shithole.
The only thing that is different about Richmond is in most cities you cross the train tracks to get to the bad side of town. You cross the train tracks in the Iron Triangle and you end up in Point Richmond, which is a change of pace to say the least.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:57 pm
by Screw_Michigan
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Actually, Springfield was good for one thing. Staind and Godsmack used to play there all of the time before making it big. In the 90s, Springfield was a great place to see live bands.
Two of the most pathetic, gawd-awful bands on the face of the earth. Sounds like Hartford North is a better place now that those two piles of shit don't play there anymore.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:59 pm
by Screw_Michigan
OCmike wrote:What's hilarious about both Richmond and Oakland making the top ten is that both are either across the bridge from or next to ultra-wealthy regions of the Bay Area.
It's like that everywhere there is lots of money in big-time cities. In DC there is tremendous wealth right next to tremendous poverty. Especially in the yuppie gentrifying areas, you have people living in $500k condos next to housing projects.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:02 pm
by mvscal
Bizzarofelice wrote:this report only accounts for the 300K father rapers in the urban core.
Yeah, that's what I said.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:17 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Screw_Michigan wrote:ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Actually, Springfield was good for one thing. Staind and Godsmack used to play there all of the time before making it big. In the 90s, Springfield was a great place to see live bands.
Two of the most pathetic, gawd-awful bands on the face of the earth. Sounds like Hartford North is a better place now that those two piles of shit don't play there anymore.
As Staind gained popularity (and 'sold out'), I liked their music less and less. I still like Godsmack. I don't think they ever changed. I value your opinion on the subject though. Almost as much as Jon's FB updates.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:19 pm
by Screw_Michigan
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:I still like Godsmack. I don't think they ever changed.
You can polish a turd, but shit is still shit.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:26 pm
by mvscal
H4ever wrote:mvscal wrote:RANK CITY SCORE
1 St. Louis, MO 381.62
2 Camden, NJ 374.33 70
3 Detroit, MI 356.44 71
4 Flint, MI 310.31 72
5 Oakland, CA 308.29 73
6 Richmond, CA 287.15 74
7 Cleveland, OH 260.60 75
8 Compton, CA 260.13 76
9 Gary, IN 250.48 77
10 Birmingham, AL 244.83 78
2010 City Crime Rate Rankings
Good job, nigggers. Way to turn your neighborhoods into godawful shitholes.
Ya know....I don't think anyone can call that a racist statement (other than the N bomb) wonder what the percentage of blacks in that top ten are? Anyone have some time to run the numbers?
St. Louis...............51.2%
Camden................53.3%
Detroit..................81.5%
Flint.....................53.3%
Oakland...............29.8% assisted by 25.2% wetbacks (55% dirt people)
Richmond CA........36.6% niggger, 26.5% wetback (63.1% shitskin)
Cleveland.............52.5%
Compton..............40% niggger, 56.8% wetback (a true shithole's shithole)
Gary....................84%
Birmingham..........73.5%
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 7:10 pm
by White Cock
mvscal wrote:[St. Louis...............51.2%
Camden................53.3%
Detroit..................81.5%
Flint.....................53.3%
Oakland...............29.8% assisted by 25.2% wetbacks (55% dirt people)
Richmond CA........36.6% niggger, 26.5% wetback (63.1% shitskin)
Cleveland.............52.5%
Compton..............40% niggger, 56.8% wetback (a true shithole's shithole)
Gary....................84%
Birmingham..........73.5%
Now, what color are you? I heard it was brown. Is that wetback, or shitskin, or what?
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:22 am
by Wolfman
I still say scoreboard Chicago. Where dead people vote multiple times and crime records are not available; and Barry Sotero's pal will probably be the next mayor.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:46 am
by smackaholic
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:smackaholic wrote:and what's up with you fukking chowd slackers? the best you can muster is a 35 ranking for fukking springfield?
You can categorize a Chowd as someone from Boston, Eastern MA, or New England as a whole, I guess. It does
not mean someone from MA. So your '
you chowd slackers' comment doesn't really make sense. In fact, you're much closer to Springfield (take Rt 83 -- maybe 25 miles) than Springfield is to Boston (90 miles.)
To me, Springfield is just Hartford North. A shithole of a city with very little to offer, unless you're into drugs and/or crime. Actually, Springfield
was good for one thing. Staind and Godsmack used to play there all of the time before making it big. In the 90s, Springfield was a great place to see live bands.
I see what you're saying. If springfielders are chowds, so am I. I think if you had to draw a chowd border on the map, it would run along 495 on the north/west, then down along the west edge of providence and the east shore of naragansett bay.
How's about I just amend my statement to masshole slackers?
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:49 am
by Mikey
370 Newport Beach, CA (59.87)
374 Orange, CA (62.13)
391 Irvine, CA (72.95)
394 Lake Forest, CA (75.34)
397 Mission Viejo, CA (79.97)
There seems to be a cluster in SW Orange County that's seriously lacking in crime. What can be done about this?
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:16 am
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
smackaholic wrote:How's about I just amend my statement to masshole slackers?
I have no problem with this.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 4:26 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Actually, Springfield was good for one thing. Staind and Godsmack...
Asphyxiate yourself by flexing in a phone booth.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 6:29 am
by Go Coogs'
Houston coming in at 45. A far cry from their dominence in the late 80s early 90s.
I'm sure if you took out the illegal messican sex offenders, then Houston' would drop another 75 spots in the rankings.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:24 am
by BSmack
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Actually, Springfield was good for one thing. Staind and Godsmack...
Asphyxiate yourself by flexing in a phone booth.
You know he could do that.
sin
KC Scott
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:11 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Asphyxiate yourself by flexing in a phone booth.
If you choose to not decide on giving your Geddie Lee RealDoll another rusty trombone, you still have made a choice.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:31 pm
by smackaholic
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Asphyxiate yourself by flexing in a phone booth.
If you choose to not decide on giving your Geddie Lee RealDoll another rusty trombone, you still have made a choice.
other than a slight miswording (it's if you choose not to....) that is quite possibly the best rush haytah smack i've read in this shit hole.
rack it.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:49 pm
by smackaholic
out
fukking
standing
rack scott! post of the week.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 5:49 pm
by smackaholic
out
fukking
standing
rack scott! post of the week.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 5:30 pm
by Dinsdale
RACK Birmingham!
That's so U&L-like, I had to laugh.
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:11 pm
by smackaholic
Re: St. Louis #1
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2010 6:19 pm
by Dinsdale
It's not as bad here since the scrap yards quit paying out cash for non-ferrous metals (still get cash for iron/steel scrap).
And they quit paying cash for catalytic converters and car batteries -- they seem to disappear less than they used to.