T1B

Am I the only one for whom this isn't working? Just curious.

Now back to all Katy/Otis/LV talk. PTI.

yeah, same issue here.

I don't really care. I just thought it would be a blast to post a thread on something different.


1st.

I thought of posting a thread about the first female to ever win a PBA event but realized we don't have a bowling forum.

That was pretty cool, though. This chick thrashed some tough competition.

Diogenes wrote:I just thought it would be a blast to post a thread on something different.

Objection. It's a tangential reference to the same topic, since it's a function of the board having to be accessed through an alternate URL, which is unnecessary save for the havoc wreaked by the defendants.

The View active topics link is kaput as well. I realize the people running this place have other things to do. Just thought I'd mention it in case nobody brought it to their attention.

Smackie Chan wrote:

Diogenes wrote:I just thought it would be a blast to post a thread on something different.

Objection. It's a tangential reference to the same topic, since it's a function of the board having to be accessed through an alternate URL, which is unnecessary save for the havoc wreaked by the defendants.

Overturned. If I had said totally unrelated or completely different your point be valid. I chose my words carefully.

Diogenes wrote:

Smackie Chan wrote:

Diogenes wrote:I just thought it would be a blast to post a thread on something different.

Objection. It's a tangential reference to the same topic, since it's a function of the board having to be accessed through an alternate URL, which is unnecessary save for the havoc wreaked by the defendants.

Overturned. If I had said totally unrelated or completely different your point be valid. I chose my words carefully.

Objection upheld on appeal. Adverbs do not substantially or significantly alter original meaning.

Smackie Chan wrote:

Diogenes wrote:

Smackie Chan wrote:Objection. It's a tangential reference to the same topic, since it's a function of the board having to be accessed through an alternate URL, which is unnecessary save for the havoc wreaked by the defendants.

Overturned. If I had said totally unrelated or completely different your point be valid. I chose my words carefully.

Objection upheld on appeal. Adverbs do not substantially or significantly alter original meaning.

Appellate ruling overturned by your HS English teacher.

Diogenes wrote:Am I the only one for whom this isn't working?

Doesn't work for me either.

OTOH, it makes it much easier to switch my trolls around.

Diogenes wrote:

Smackie Chan wrote:Objection upheld on appeal. Adverbs do not substantially or significantly alter original meaning.

Appellate ruling overturned by your HS English teacher.

Adverbs typically express some relation of place, time, manner, attendant circumstance, degree, cause, inference, result, condition, exception, concession, purpose, or means. In this case, your defense of choosing words carefully is inadequate - the ruling is that the use of the word different implies a significant departure from the subject matter at hand, when, in fact, it is directly related to and correlated with that subject. An example of a subject different from said subject matter would be WW's bowling post, which bears no reasonable resemblance to the unfortunate subject matter.

All further attempted refutations of the objection that has been rightfully upheld are hereby rendered moot due to apathy.

Court is adjourned.

Smackie Chan wrote:

Diogenes wrote:

Smackie Chan wrote:Objection upheld on appeal. Adverbs do not substantially or significantly alter original meaning.

Appellate ruling overturned by your HS English teacher.

Adverbs typically express some relation of place, time, manner, attendant circumstance, degree, cause, inference, result, condition, exception, concession, purpose, or means. In this case, your defense of choosing words carefully is inadequate - the ruling is that the use of the word different implies a significant departure from the subject matter at hand, when, in fact, it is directly related to and correlated with that subject. An example of a subject different from said subject matter would be WW's bowling post, which bears no reasonable resemblance to the unfortunate subject matter.

All further attempted refutations of the objection that has been rightfully upheld are hereby rendered moot due to apathy.

Court is adjourned.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Obviously a Clinton appointee.

What does is mean again?

Diogenes wrote:What does is mean again?

That's a discussion for the chapter on verbs and forms of be.

The temporary domain causes problems with cookies and sessions. Don't worry - that'll be fixed up once the domain situation is fixed up.

PSUFAN wrote:The temporary domain causes problems with cookies and sessions.

As opposed to 'sessions?

Heh heh...'praps not.

Smackie Chan wrote:As opposed to 'sessions?

deftly played

Eye of the Tigress right there.

I doubt many know how hard it is to even qualify for a PBA event, much less a major. And what she pwned today was a major.

History was made today.

It's bowling.

Wags wrote:History was made today.

Yes, it was...in New Orleans.

Van wrote:It's bowling.

Did you have a point to make?

I think I made it. It's bowling. The guys she beat were probably drunk and/or suffering from nachos heartburn. :D

Bowling is tougher than you may think. The oil patterns at a PBA event would fuck up my world.

Cute, but again no point.

You think the world of BTPCFB is tough?

Try the ruthless motherfuckers in the PBA.

My point is that a girl tamed them... some part of that you don't get?

Dio wrote:Log me

heh-heh-heh heh-heh-heh

poptart wrote:

heh-heh-heh heh-heh-heh-Munchlord-heh-heh-Douchelord-heh-heh-heh-you said lord-heh-heh-heh

l to r: SG and LV, watching Headbanger's Ball

It does work, but...........

You have to have the Secret invis______member password.

Van wrote: l to r: SG and LV, watching Headbanger's Ball

how long do you plan on 'sessin?

:D

SG, thanks to the redirecting efforts of Katy and LV, I was dropped into LV's crypt the other day, where I saw your sister - a middle-aged woman, mind you - referring to someone as 'munchlord'. This, after seeing her add '-lord' to other brilliant words such as 'douche', 'gay', 'fag' and, her alltime favorite, 'jizz'.

As long as you two keep talking like thirteen year old stoners, I'll keep thinking of you that way.

Dude, you're at an anonymous internet message board in a forum called "Cul de Smack"... not exactly the bastion of mature and proper English grammar.

SG, middle-aged women and their brothers shouldn't be routinely using 'munchlord', 'gaylord' and 'jizzlord' as their nuclear material tipped spears o' smack. I'm not even commenting on her grammar, per se. I'm talking about the fact that she speaks like a thirteen your old stoner. She still heavily relies on Hair Metal phrases any reasonable adult ditched back in the '80s.

Is Missouri that backwards that you monkeys don't even realize how blatantly stupid you sound? When did Missouri become Kazakhstan? How are you twenty years behind the times? More to the point, how is it that a forty-four year old woman's speech hasn't advanced one iota since junior high?

Could you fix it so that Diaphanous is logged off automatically each visit? TIA.

Goober McTuber wrote:Could you fix it so that Diaphanous is logged off automatically each visit? TIA.

That feature ended at trev.

IndyFrisco wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

That feature ended at trev.

The ignore feature works much better when people don't go around quoting mindless anklebiters like McTurd.

Goober McTuber wrote:Could you fix it so that Diaphanous is logged off automatically each visit? TIA.

We've got bigger fish to fry. We're working on a button that turns his cosmo into a fucking BEER.