T1B

u went out on a limb there

88 wrote:He won.

Party pooper.

Btw, McCain is projected to win Kentucky...

while Obama is going to win Vermont...

with a whole 10% of the vote in.

Scoreboard McCain 8-3

Bold move 88.

He'll have my support, even after he fucks up, he''ll be our President. I trust he will make decisions based on the best interests of the nation, uphold his oath of office, and do what his handlers suggest.

Tom In VA wrote:I trust he will make decisions based on the best interests of the nation, uphold his oath of office, and do what his handlers suggest.

You're very naive.

If he wins in a landslide, which I doubt that he will... he will assume that he's received a mandate to do whatever the fuck he wants.

And with a Dem controlled Congress, that's just what he'll do.

Jeebus, can't you putz's wait until the polls close in a few more States before throwing in the towell?

I just want to tell you both good luck. We're all counting on you.

Positive Mental Attitude Wags, that's all.

If Obama wins, I'll get up, go to work, live my life. That is until I get laid off.

While still too close to call, McCain is up 53% to 46% in Virginia.

This from a state where Obama had a 9 point lead in the polls going in.

Dems, you may start gripping now.

Hey Wags, you know when it's late in the 3rd period and a hockey goalie hasn't been scored on, you never say 'Oh man, he might get a shutout'

Okay ?

War Wagon wrote:While still too close to call, McCain is up 53% to 46% in Virginia.

You mean according to those proven accurate exit polls?

War Wagon wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:I trust he will make decisions based on the best interests of the nation, uphold his oath of office, and do what his handlers suggest.

You're very naive.

If he wins in a landslide, which I doubt that he will... he will assume that he's received a mandate to do whatever the fuck he wants.

And with a Dem controlled Congress, that's just what he'll do.

Jeebus, can't you putz's wait until the polls close in a few more States before throwing in the towell?

remember that mandate the dems got two years to go ahead and close the books on iraq?

The Anti-Christ has won.
We are all doomed.
My record player will be left on my back porch if anyone wants it and can brave the WMD fallout.

Mikey wrote:

War Wagon wrote:While still too close to call, McCain is up 53% to 46% in Virginia.

You mean according to those proven accurate exit polls?

Those aren't exit polls, those are raw, but real numbers.

Granted, only 13% of the vote is in.

War Wagon wrote:Granted, only 13% of the vote is in.

Well, that's enough for me!

-Dumbfuck Wagon

P.S. CNN: LaPorte County, Indiana, is not the Chicago suburbs. Thanks for playing, though.

Let the landslide begin

Pour it on BSmack

88 wrote:

BSmack wrote:Let the landslide begin

That is the spirit.

I should also say that I accept your concession in the spirit it was given.

BSmack wrote:Let the landslide begin

What better way to celebrate than flipping between election broadcasts and Craps hockey while following, in Whitey's case, BLOW-BY-BLOW coverage on the board.

RACK this place. FUCK Loudon County.

88 wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Pour it on BSmack

Denial is the first stage, my friend. Time to move to anger.

Pour it on BSmack was meant to have him pour on his victory dance and gloating.

God damn, twice in one week too. FIrst with the Skins, now with the election.

Tom In VA wrote:I trust he will... uphold his oath of office

His oath involves upholding the Constitution of the United States of America...


Including the Forgotten Amendment, the Tenth.


Over/under on Barry breaking his oath after being sworn in:


I'll go with 5 minutes...


Since he hasn't upheld the oath of his last office, so why assume he'll start now?

Look Dins, no need to get all negative and hate filled tonight, okay, this is our President you're talking about. History is being made.

Tom In VA wrote:He'll have my support, even after he fucks up, he''ll be our President. I trust he will make decisions based on the best interests of the nation, uphold his oath of office, and do what his handlers suggest.

Rack Tom in Va. You won't see any lockstep republican or democrat sack-up like that.

88 wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Look Dins, no need to get all negative and hate filled tonight, okay, this is our President you're talking about. History is being made.

Wow, a grand leap to acceptance. Positive coping. I'm impressed.

No need to languish. Start the healing process right away.

And you know, it's for real, I'm actually very content and peaceful right now.


I hope the stool doesn't slip out from under my feet as I untie the noose.

Tom In VA wrote:Look Dins, no need to get all negative and hate filled tonight, okay, this is our President you're talking about. History is being made.

And the moment he breaks his "oath," he's no longer MY president, although you're welcome to try and keep him.


Viva La Revolution!

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/sch ... 11-04.html

Well .... if he doesn't veto this ....

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday defended the so-called Fairness Doctrine in an interview

Tom In VA wrote:Well .... if he doesn't veto this ....

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday defended the so-called Fairness Doctrine in an interview

Well ya'know... airwaves/communication actually do fall under "interstate commerce," which is something the federal government has been GRANTED the power to regulate.


But it doesn't mean they HAVE to. The free market would certainly do a better job of making it "fair and balanced" than a two-party Congress ever could.

We agree on that.

88 wrote:Someone has to lose.

Tonight, that is America.

And if the election had gone the other way... it would have been America losing.


http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution ... rview.html


You people should click the above link. It's a pretty neat bit of writing, and I'm quite certain most of you have never actually read it before. It's like all crazy and stuff -- it GRANTS CERTAIN POWERS TO THE FED. And it's got this neat line where it says that if a power isn't SPECIFICALLY GRANTED, then the fed needs to keep their dirty fucking mitts out of it... it's like toooootalllly crazy and shit.

88 wrote:John Sununu - GONZERS

Another D pickup in the Senate. Line up the replacements for Stevens/Ginsburg/Breyer/Souter.

Yep, Karl Rove's vision of building an insurmountable GOP majority in all 3 branches are now officially in ruins.

88 wrote:John Sununu - GONZERS

Another D pickup in the Senate.

Gordon Smith (R - OR) is probably gonzers, too, although there's been no such projections from the media yet.l

Dinsdale wrote:

88 wrote:Someone has to lose.

Tonight, that is America.

And if the election had gone the other way... it would have been America losing.


http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution ... rview.html


You people should click the above link. It's a pretty neat bit of writing, and I'm quite certain most of you have never actually read it before. It's like all crazy and stuff -- it GRANTS CERTAIN POWERS TO THE FED. And it's got this neat line where it says that if a power isn't SPECIFICALLY GRANTED, then the fed needs to keep their dirty fucking mitts out of it... it's like toooootalllly crazy and shit.

Dins, that link is obsolete. Live in the now man. The framers of that didn't take into consideration the vast amount of power they could obtain by promising redistribution of wealth.

Here dude, relax and read the New Path:
http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

Tom In VA wrote:Dins, that link is obsolete. Live in the now man. The framers of that didn't take into consideration the vast amount of power they could obtain by promising redistribution of wealth.

Edmund Burke just rose from his grave, puked all over his shoes, and dove right back into his grave.

Who is he ? Is he another one of those old white men that set up this country after we bombed Hiroshima and stole it from the Indians ?

BSmack wrote:Let the landslide begin

And just where have you been?

'bout fucking time.

Looks like you may also get a filibuster proof Senate.

So, you going to Disneyland?

Dinsdale wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:Dins, that link is obsolete. Live in the now man. The framers of that didn't take into consideration the vast amount of power they could obtain by promising redistribution of wealth.

Edmund Burke just rose from his grave, puked all over his shoes, and dove right back into his grave.

Sounds like a Slayer video waiting to happen.

I played a lyre

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Tom In VA wrote:He'll have my support, even after he fucks up, he''ll be our President. I trust he will make decisions based on the best interests of the nation, uphold his oath of office, and do what his handlers suggest.

Rack Tom in Va. You won't see any lockstep republican or democrat sack-up like that.

That's not sacking up. That's bending over and saying, "please sir, may I have another?"

However, I will accept the will of the American voter and respect the process.

War Wagon wrote: However, I will accept the will of the American voter and respect the process.

And that's different from my attitude how ?

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:Let the landslide begin

I laughed.

Keep laughing. Your unerring negative predictive powers are legend.

Tom In VA wrote:

War Wagon wrote: However, I will accept the will of the American voter and respect the process.

And that's different from my attitude how ?

I won't grin while I'm bearing it.

You would be if you were farting like I am.