T1B

...I'm getting tired of starting this thread.

We couldn't do diddley-poo offensively...

Sorry, wrong sport...

If the Sooners don't learn how to 1) attack a zone, and 2) switch on their backside rotations in their own zone, then we're going to be near the bottom of the Big 12 South when it's all said and done. Right now, the only team that we're playing better than is Baylor, and they're rusty. We're in "mid-season" form, allegedly.

We gave up WAY too many offensive rebounds (or, more specifically, points off of them) last night. We're not a good enough team offensively that we can afford to give away chippies at the other end... Also, Bookout had a VERY uncharacteristic shooting night. Add to that the fact that we were sloppy with the ball, couldn't put a hand in Gardner's face, and got a pretty questionable whistle at the end of the game, and yeah...

...your 2005 Oklahoma Sooners.

[Cue Babs Trying To Run Mouth... at least I show up after losses, you piece of shit. I'm just tired of doing this much showing up...]

the_ouskull

the_ouskull wrote:...and got a pretty questionable whistle at the end of the game...

You mean that call in the last minute or so when the ball went out of bounds off of OU and the sooner bench jockey batted it back in bounds and the refs gave the ball back to OU?

Yeah, that was pretty questionable.

War Wagon wrote:

the_ouskull wrote:...and got a pretty questionable whistle at the end of the game...

You mean that call in the last minute or so when the ball went out of bounds off of OU and the sooner bench jockey batted it back in bounds and the refs gave the ball back to OU?

Yeah, that was pretty questionable.

War Wagon the game was a pitiful display of officating all around. The no call on the blatant travel where the mizzou kid slides across the floor with the ball was just as pitiful as the no call on the out of bounds. Oklahoma did not lose that game because of officiating, if that is what Skull was trying to imply then I disagree with him. The biggest reason we lost is because since Hollis Price and Quannas graduated we haven't had a guard that could hit water falling out of a boat from behind the arc.

the_ouskull wrote:...I'm getting tired of starting this thread.

I enjoyed the first edition much more.

Just lurkin' :wink:

SunCoastSooner wrote:The no call on the blatant travel where the mizzou kid slides across the floor with the ball was just as pitiful as the no call on the out of bounds.

His ass wasn't on the ground. He stayed dribbling. That ain't traveling.

The biggest reason we lost is because since Hollis Price and Quannas graduated we haven't had a guard that could hit water falling out of a boat from behind the arc.

Damn you for reminding me of them.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:The no call on the blatant travel where the mizzou kid slides across the floor with the ball was just as pitiful as the no call on the out of bounds.

His ass wasn't on the ground. He stayed dribbling. That ain't traveling.

He stayed dribbling my red injun ass . If he stayed dribbling then I've stayed black and proud. Put the glass dick down and come back to the real world where the mizzou player was not only not dribbling he was rolling on the fucking court for god's sake. I can understand having homer shades on but Jesus I doubt you are blind and watching the game by brail. It was a poorly officiated game and I admit to that but my God Bace I give you more credit than I do the other Mizzou fans, I assume you could find your ass with a map and flashlight. Maybe I give you too much credit though.

The biggest reason we lost is because since Hollis Price and Quannas graduated we haven't had a guard that could hit water falling out of a boat from behind the arc.

Damn you for reminding me of them.

:twisted:

Yes, Godbold cheated. Yes, that Mizzou player traveled, no, Taj did not foul the shooter at the end.

...and no, OU did not lose because of the officating. They lost because of the they suck.

the_ouskull

SunCoastSooner wrote:Bace I give you more credit than I do the other Mizzou fans...

How ironic in that I give you less credit than I do the other OU fans.

So I guess that makes us sorta' even, in a ponderous way.

Please don't send me any more PM's dawg.

I don't play that shit.

the_ouskull wrote:
...and no, OU did not lose because of the officating. They lost because of the they suck.

the_ouskull

I can't believe you said it, and I could not agree more.

the_ouskull wrote:no, Taj did not foul the shooter at the end.

because Big XII play is rough or because taj didn't touch him?

OUMO wrote:

the_ouskull wrote:
...and no, OU did not lose because of the officating. They lost because of the they suck.

the_ouskull

I can't believe you said it, and I could not agree more.

We don't suck, this team is very talented, they just have no heart outside of Taj and a pine riding Sophmore Point Guard, but we don't suck.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

the_ouskull wrote:no, Taj did not foul the shooter at the end.

because Big XII play is rough or because taj didn't touch him?

It should have been a jump ball if anything. When two players are rolling on the ground, both with the ball in their hands, it is a jump ball.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

the_ouskull wrote:no, Taj did not foul the shooter at the end.

because Big XII play is rough or because taj didn't touch him?

You say that as if it can't be both... It was a horseshit, ticky tack "foul" at the end of a play that included a travel by the offensive team, and more than likely, a foul by Bookout while the ball was on the floor... To call THAT foul, in that situation, was ridiculous considering everything else, especially the travel, that they passed up on. BUT, that's a loss now, and it's in the past. I'm not dwelling... With this team, I can't afford to dwell.

the_ouskull