Northwestern coming out quick against UCLA

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:39 pm

they look like they are ready to play.

Olson looks rattled.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:41 pm

reverse, 15-zip Cats.

dude misses the PAT.

Spinach Genie · Post by **Spinach Genie** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:41 pm

This game must be a typo.

Sincerely,
Sir m2 the festive

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:49 pm

22-0

INT return for a TD. Olson throws it to D lineman.

Spinach Genie · Post by **Spinach Genie** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:51 pm

On the bright side, UCLA is keeping their defense off the field.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:51 pm

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:56 pm

Spinach Genie wrote:This game must be a typo.

Sincerely,
Sir m2 the festive

fucla always starts slow...

by the way Buc, I was at the Emerald Bowl yesterday... I left midway through the 4th because I couldn't handle anymore of that great football they play in the south.

#24 Georgia Tech???? 10

The West... Utah 38

Is that the same GT team that beat Miami and the mighty Auburn

m2

socal · Post by **socal** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:59 pm

:shakeshead:

At least we're on the board against the 117th best defense in the nation.

Spinach Genie · Post by **Spinach Genie** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:02 pm

Damn. I forgot to start my thread bragging on the superiority of Georgia Tech, didn't I?

by the way Buc, I was at the Emerald Bowl yesterday

A nut sponsored bowl, I imagine you were. :P

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:08 pm

Believe the Heupel wrote:I guess I missed when Georgia Tech and Miami joined the SEC.

Not an m2 fan, but in fairness, I think he was lambasting (or at least trying to lambaste) an entire region, not just one conference.

Georgia Tech and Miami are both in the South, albeit not in the SEC.

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:11 pm

Spinach Genie wrote:Damn. I forgot to start my thread bragging on the superiority of Georgia Tech, didn't I?

by the way Buc, I was at the Emerald Bowl yesterday
A nut sponsored bowl, I imagine you were. :P

That'd be a good idea...

...didn't that shit team(Georgia Tech) beat the Mighty SEC Powerhouse Auburn

Just another case of how bad football is in the South

m2

Spinach Genie · Post by **Spinach Genie** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:26 pm

I got your point the first time, Sir Swishalot. I'll keep it in mind while the bulk of the SEC plays for the big money Monday. :wink:

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:33 pm

First off, fuck you homos who have today off and get to watch FB.

Second, yay me b/c I took N'Western in my pool.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:34 pm

PSUFAN wrote:

I don't get it.

Sincerely,

22-22

Spinach Genie · Post by **Spinach Genie** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:36 pm

Never have I seen such a meeting of two titan defenses.

Spinach Genie · Post by **Spinach Genie** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:48 pm

Field goal?! There should be penalties against those in this game!

Van · Post by **Van** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:54 pm

Spinach Genie wrote:On the bright side, UCLA is keeping their defense off the field.

Bwaaahahaaaa!!!

Spinach Genie · Post by **Spinach Genie** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:59 pm

Van wrote:
Spinach Genie wrote:On the bright side, UCLA is keeping their defense off the field.
Bwaaahahaaaa!!!

If only Northwestern could do the same.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:02 pm

PSUFAN wrote:

I don't get it.

Sincerely,

UCLA - 29

Northwestern - 22

M2 · Post by M2 » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:07 pm

The Seer wrote:
PSUFAN wrote:

I don't get it.

Sincerely,

UCLA - 29

Northwestern - 22

m2 wrote:
fucla always starts slow...

"Skid marks" doesn't watch much PAC 10 football... he wont get it.

m2

War Stoops · Post by **War Stoops** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:10 pm

Easy, fellas. I think PSU Fan was indicating that UCLA was about to flip the proverbial switch as is their modus operandi.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:12 pm

War Stoops wrote:Easy, fellas. I think PSU Fan was indicating that UCLA was about to flip the proverbial switch as is their modus operandi.

And your part-time job is providing PSU with parachutes........

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:14 pm

Spinach Genie wrote:Never have I seen such functional, effective offenses.

FTFY-NC

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 9:55 pm

PSUFAN wrote:

I still don't get it.

Sincerely,

Ucla 36

NW 22

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 10:05 pm

Cicero wrote:First off, fuck you homos who have today off and get to watch FB.

I have to work as well. Then hopping a bus up to Charlotte for our Bowl Game tomorrow.

BraveFan · Post by **BraveFan** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:02 pm

This could've been a good game if Northwestern didn't turn it in after the first quarter. NW's receivers are really having trouble with the shadows.... either that or they just picked a really bad game to drop more passes than they've dropped all season combined.

The Big Ten is three for three in blowing leads. Bunch of pieces of shit!

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:09 pm

PSUFAN wrote:

I don't get it.

Sincerely,

Ucla 43

Nw 31

BraveFan · Post by **BraveFan** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:24 pm

Are you kidding me? Has that ever happened in the history of college football?

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Dec 30, 2005 11:26 pm

PSUFAN wrote:

I don't quite understand.

Sincerely,

UCLA 50

NW 38

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:40 am

bwaahaha! Yep, I meant that UCLA was going to flip the switch.

Thanks, Stoopsie. :|

Props to the Cicadas for realizing that Northwestern doesn't actually play defense.

socal · Post by **socal** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:04 pm

PSUFAN wrote:Props to the Cicadas for realizing that Northwestern doesn't actually play defense.

It does take UCLA about 17 years to figure out most defenses.

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:26 pm

That's a hot-lookin' sig....just sayin.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 7:22 pm

Jimmy Medalions wrote:That's a hot-lookin' sig....just sayin.

I believe socal is a trojie....wearin that sig like a badge of honor...do you walk around with your pinkie in their back pockets too????

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 8:52 pm

It is a badge of honor for SoCal. He's honoring his commitment.

Dude's a freak but he's nothing if not an honorable freak. :-)

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:01 pm

Van wrote:It is a badge of honor for SoCal. He's honoring his commitment.

Dude's a freak but he's nothing if not an honorable freak. :-)

But he ain't even a Bruinfan. Shouldn't there be an honor code whereby imposters don't purposely embarrass a program they care and know nothing about?

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:06 pm

The Seer wrote:I believe socal is a trojie....

I believe you are wrong on that one :wink:

socal · Post by **socal** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 10:24 pm

Seer, what is the fuck has crawled up your ass and died?

And, what makes you think I'm not only a Trojan fan but not a Bruin fan?

Lookit, bitch, I ain't gonna kiss your ass just because you're God's greatest gift to UCLA since Kermit Washington or Mark Harmon. It's just a fucking sig bet, one I've had with Van and Meds for multiple years. Yeah, it hasn't exactly worked out for me but that ain't no reason for you to bleed out of your dickhole and call me Tommy Trojan. It's really none of your concern.

And, Meds, this being New Year's and all, you know Auld Lang Syne and whatnot, kindly fuck off. You, too, Van.

(Is that better Seeper?)

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:32 pm

socal wrote:Seer, what is the fuck has crawled up your ass and died?

And, what makes you think I'm not only a Trojan fan but not a Bruin fan?

Lookit, bitch, I ain't gonna kiss your ass just because you're God's greatest gift to UCLA since Kermit Washington or Mark Harmon. It's just a fucking sig bet, one I've had with Van and Meds for multiple years. Yeah, it hasn't exactly worked out for me but that ain't no reason for you to bleed out of your dickhole and call me Tommy Trojan. It's really none of your concern.

And, Meds, this being New Year's and all, you know Auld Lang Syne and whatnot, kindly fuck off. You, too, Van.

(Is that better Seeper?)

See? You proved my point! No Bruinfan would summon K. Washington or M. Harmon to establish program loyalty....

But, in the spirit of the "Holiday Season", I will give you the benny of the doubt until Jan. 5th, as to which time I assume your "sig-bet" committments will expire....

=Freeman McNeil

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:42 pm

Just how do you have TWO onside-kicks returned for td's? That is just ridiculous. Nice job NW.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Dec 31, 2005 11:50 pm

Seer, I think SoCal's sig bet commitment requires him to wear that sig for 50 posts. See, SoCal posts so infrequently that giving him a "time period" end date would mean he'd only show that sig four or five times, tops.

Instead, 50 posts. 50 posts, even if that means he's still wearing that sig when he's wearing bably blue and gold Depends and his former students are visiting him at the Home and spoon feeding him apple sauce...

Also, make no mistake, SoCal is a dyed in the wool Bruin Lifer, and not just for basketball either. In other words, he very honestly came by this challenged existence of his...

:wink: