T1B

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 1:55 pm**

The BBC reports that the EU is now looking into a Washington Post report on hidden jails for terror suspects in Europe. All of this classified national security information was leaked to the Post anonymously — clearly by individuals opposed to the program — but somehow Joseph Wilson and the Democrats are not upset about this leak.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:33 pm**

So who in the Republican Bush White House leaked this information?

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 2:36 pm**

Oh, DrDetard started a new thread...

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 3:48 pm**

BSmack...or who in the CIA leaked it? It's well known that the CIA was slamming Bush all on background in the run-up and even after the start of the war in Iraq.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:07 pm**

Yea, that front for the Democratic party the CIA was aiming to take down Poppy Bush's son.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:45 pm**

DrDetroit wrote:The BBC reports that the EU is now looking into a Washington Post report on hidden jails for terror suspects in Europe. All of this classified national security information was leaked to the Post anonymously — clearly by individuals opposed to the program — but somehow Joseph Wilson and the Democrats are not upset about this leak.

What? The American news media actually doing what they're fucking supposed to? That is outrageous.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:56 pm**

B - it's no secret that many in the CIA don't like Dubya...what else can explain the corrdinated effort at CIA to leak information and to approve a recently retired CIA agent to author a book directed at blasting Bush?

Nishlord - oh, buy...are you one of these types that believes that the media is our government watchdog? No thanks...

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 4:58 pm**

DrDetroit wrote:B - it's no secret that many in the CIA don't like Dubya...what else can explain the corrdinated effort at CIA to leak information and to approve a recently retired CIA agent to author a book directed at blasting Bush?

So the CIA turned into a bunch of peace pipe smoking liberals?

Or could it be that national security experts think Bush's policies are full of shit?

Take your pick.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:02 pm**

B:

So the CIA turned into a bunch of peace pipe smoking liberals?

Sheesh...do you have a problem with plain English or is it you MO to simply lie about what is posted?

Or could it be that national security experts think Bush's policies are full of shit?

Again, why do you hate plain English?

First, no one argued that the CIA turned liberal.
Second, no one believes that the CIA has a monopoly on national security experts, which they shouldn't be anyway.

It's hilarious that all of a sudden the CIA has become the experts now for you guys after demonizing the CIA for decades. I wonder why this theme is not being explored by the mainstream media.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:02 pm**

mvscal wrote:Go ahead and link me up to the last great CIA success story.

Bashing Bush, of course.

Sincerely,
Democrats

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:04 pm**

DrDetroit wrote:It's hilarious that all of a sudden the CIA has become the experts now for you guys after demonizing the CIA for decades. I wonder why this theme is not being explored by the mainstream media.

I believe they’re just trying to piss you off.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:07 pm**

I'm outraged that I wasted time opening this abortion of a thread. Jesus, you're a boring twat.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:17 pm**

Goober McTuber wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:It's hilarious that all of a sudden the CIA has become the experts now for you guys after demonizing the CIA for decades. I wonder why this theme is not being explored by the mainstream media.
I believe they’re just trying to piss you off.

What a waste of time, eh?

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:18 pm**

JCT wrote:I'm outraged that I wasted time opening this abortion of a thread. Jesus, you're a boring twat.

You keep saying this, JCT, yet you keep openning the threads I post. Why?

Either you're clinically insane or you find something enjoyable about it. Don't front, just be yourself.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:22 pm**

I heard about it from Col. Flagg...I mean Captain Perkins.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 5:30 pm**

DrDetroit wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:It's hilarious that all of a sudden the CIA has become the experts now for you guys after demonizing the CIA for decades. I wonder why this theme is not being explored by the mainstream media.
I believe they’re just trying to piss you off.
What a waste of time, eh?

Apparently not. You are constantly outraged by these occurrences, your protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:05 pm**

I'm constantly outraged???

So now I'm supposed to take my emotional cues from you?? LOL!!

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:08 pm**

I tried to answer Detard's post point for point. But Bablefish's Retard to English translator broke when I inserted his post.

Sufice it to say that if you think the CIA is somehow involved in demonizing the President of the United States, you are on fucking drugs and should be worried about the DEA breaking down your door, not posting on a message board.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:12 pm**

You mean all of those "anonymous" quotes from the CIA were meant to help Bush?

Dude, screw your head on straight.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:32 pm**

DrDetroit wrote:You mean all of those "anonymous" quotes from the CIA were meant to help Bush?

Yea, they were meant to steer him away from a disaster. That he didn't heed those calls is his fucking problem.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:51 pm**

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:You mean all of those "anonymous" quotes from the CIA were meant to help Bush?
Yea, they were meant to steer him away from a disaster. That he didn't heed those calls is his fucking problem.
Why would he heed those calls when the motherfucking Director of Central Intelligence is telling him it's a "slam dunk" that Iraq was concealing illegal stockpiles of chemical weapons?

Is he supposed to say, "No way, dude. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I believe the anonymous leaker (Plame?) not you."

Only if he was smart.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:55 pm**

DrDetroit wrote:I'm constantly outraged???

So now I'm supposed to take my emotional cues from you?? LOL!!

Yes, you are constantly outraged. And no, you take emotional cues from no one. I’m sure it’s just a knee-jerk reaction to everything you read in the “liberal media”. LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:08 pm**

Hmmm, I wonder why we didn't see these same anonymous CIA sources similarly informing Clinton that he should not attack Iraq??

Wrong. These anonymous leaks were merely meant to hurt the President. The President was only using that agency's own intelligence estimates, wtf would they be mad about? Well, they blame shifting, sniffling that they weren't really wrong, their intelligence was just misused and manipulated. :roll:

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:09 pm**

Why would he heed those calls when the motherfucking Director of Central Intelligence is telling him it's a "slam dunk" that Iraq was concealing illegal stockpiles of chemical weapons?

Is he supposed to say, "No way, dude. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I believe the anonymous leaker (Plame?) not you."

And yet you got a lot of mileage out of blaming Clinton for "bombing an aspirin factory," when HE relied on flawed intel.

Fukken hypocrites.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:40 pm**

Conservatives didn't blast him for bombing an aspirin factory, liar. We hammered him because that was it. Color us underwhelmed.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:45 pm**

Conservatives didn't blast him for bombing an aspirin factory, liar.

Yes they did, moron.

Google it, idiot.

They acted like Clinton personally set the coordinates and pushed the little button, dumbass.

LMAO, shithead.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:50 pm**

Dickhead, what are you struggling with? We were underwhelmed and felt that he should have gone much further.

It was not criticism simply because it was specifically an aspirin factory, but because that was it, nothing more.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 7:59 pm**

Dickhead, what are you struggling with? We were underwhelmed and felt that he should have gone much further.

No you didn't, bitch.

Republicans were wailing like scared little girls over Kosovo, assface.

"There's no exit strategy, what about Monica, we're scared, Bluto, we don't want to invade Yugoslavia."

Face it, you feckstains played armchair quarterback and mocked him, buttfinger.

LMAO, pooperdupe.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:11 pm**

Now you want to talk about Kosovo? Which is it?

And, yes, Clitnon was rightfully criticized for Kosovo.

We weren't sitting back in the first three months wailing about how poorly planned this was (althought there was appropriate criticism of the 15,000 foot rule) and no exit strategy.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 8:34 pm**

In any event, I don't recall any conservatives claiming that he deliberately lied about that intelligence, do you?

I remember conservatives putting Clinton on a list of the most "Evil Men of All Time." I think he beat out Stalin and Pol Pot, but trailed Hitler and Satan. :)

Now you want to talk about Kosovo? Which is it?

Yeah, and Republicans transforming overnight into Peace and Love hippies.

It's all about playing politics, about winning this weird deathmatch between Democrats and Republicans at all costs as if the existence of the Universe depended on it.

It's why people find your one-sided, blindly obedient devotion to all things Republican so fukken ponderous.

When I think of politics, I think of the scene from Godfather II:

Sen. Geary: Because I intend to squeeze you. I don't like your kind of people. I don't like to see you come out to this clean country in oily hair and dressed up in those silk suits, and try to pass yourselves off as decent Americans. I'll do business with you but the fact is that I despise your masquerade, the dishonest way you pose yourself. Yourself and your whole f--king family.

Michael Corleone: Senator, we're both part of the same hypocrisy. But never think it applies to my family.

Posted: **Fri Nov 04, 2005 9:12 pm**

Okay, you know what, you simply cannot have a reasonable discussion with those who are going to use the lunatic fringe as being representative of the entire party or movement.

And it's much different from your party leaders actually equating Bush to Hitler.

It's why people find your one-sided, blindly obedient devotion to all things Republican so fukken ponderous.

it's why that opinion of me is totally irrelevant. As I noted yesterday and dozens of times on this board...I disagree with the Bush administration and the Republicans on many things...it's just you dumbfucks ignore that because you cannot deal with that.

Example:
Uncontrolled spending
Farm subsidies
Immigration
Protectionist trade policies
Medicare Rx
Campaign finance reform

But I'm a lockstep Bush man and Republicans, right?

:roll:

Find another excuse to duck arguments.

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 12:30 am**

DrDetroit wrote:All of this classified national security information was leaked to the Post anonymously — clearly by individuals opposed to the program

What national security information?

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:36 am**

RadioFan wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:All of this classified national security information was leaked to the Post anonymously — clearly by individuals opposed to the program
What national security information?

Scooter Libby's porn novel.

Here's the reviews at Amazon

Leave it to the dittonazis to be writing softcore porn while espousing "family values".

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:00 am**

RadioFan wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:All of this classified national security information was leaked to the Post anonymously — clearly by individuals opposed to the program
What national security information?

Well, supposedly, according to the report we have here, these prisons were "secret."

Are you having trouble understanding that?

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:25 am**

DrDetroit wrote:Are you having trouble understanding that?

No more so than you giving credibility to the "liberal media" for a definition of "secret."

Fucking tard.

Let's try this again:

A.

DrDetroit wrote:All of this classified national security information was leaked to the Post anonymously — clearly by individuals opposed to the program

B.

RadioFan wrote:What national security information?

You posed question A. I responded with B.

Answer the question in your own thread or have it sent to trots.

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:40 am**

So, your answer is

DrDetroit wrote:Well, supposedly, according to the report we have here, these prisons were "secret."

Is that correct, mensa?

Or is that just a supposed answer?

Seriously, everyone is more than tired of your act.

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:48 am**

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:04 am**

From the Washington Post article I linked to in the very first post here, asshat:

The secret facility is part of a covert prison system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago

Posted: **Sat Nov 05, 2005 2:27 pm**

DrDetroit wrote:From the Washington Post article I linked to in the very first post here, asshat:

The secret facility is part of a covert prison system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago

What does that have to do with national security. The Pentagon Papers were top secret. But they damn sure did not help national security.

Posted: **Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:08 am**

BSmack wrote:
DrDetroit wrote:From the Washington Post article I linked to in the very first post here, asshat:

The secret facility is part of a covert prison system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago
What does that have to do with national security. The Pentagon Papers were top secret. But they damn sure did not help national security.

They were crucial to national security.

Daniel Elsberg belongs on our Wall of Heroes right beside Comerade Kerry.

Sin,

General Giap.

T1B

Where is the outrage??

Where is the outrage??

Re: Where is the outrage??

Re: Where is the outrage??

Re: Where is the outrage??

Re: Where is the outrage??

Re: Where is the outrage??

Re: Where is the outrage??