T1B

Softball Bat wrote:

MS wrote:Everything they complain about is always projection.

Dump has been using the projection tactic for 4 years.

And also the tactic of being the polar opposite of what he claims to be.


-- The law and order president --

Who incites his deranged worshippers to violently oust the elected officials who were making official the lawful election of the people of the nation.

And what did the "law and order president" do during the hours-long rampage?

Did he attempt to intervene and help in any way?


And today he offers the utterly absurd take that impeaching him will only serve to inflame tensions.

LMAO!


Bootng lard ass to the curb is step #1 in extinguishing the fire.

Do you have any issues with how this clusterfukk of an election was held?

Save me your “where’s the evidence” claims.

There’s plenty of evidence.

The problem is we now have a system which is very easily cheated and damn near impossible to catch said cheating.

Sorry, but that is simply fact.

I get you don’t like Trump or his tactics.

I don’t either.

I would have much preferred someone with his policies who could espouse them with a bit more tact and finesse.

Would have also appreciated someone willing to stand up to Republicrat excess spending a little. This was my chief issue with what Trump did, substance wise. I think it was a factor in the republicans losing the mid-terms.

But, he is what we elected.

So, do you think we’ll get better now that the dems are running things?

I think I know the answer there. You’ve written off the whole system at this point and are cheering for team apocalypse.

I’m about ready to start cheering for team g0dless chink commies.

They are corrupt and ruthless, just like the dems, but they’ll likely spare us the hyper-woke shitshow.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Roach wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:29 pm

Save me your “where’s the evidence” claims.

There’s plenty of evidence.

I keep hearing that. If it is so obvious, it ought to be easy to give a few examples.

Mail in voting changed things, a lot more people voted. How many law suits were brought and dismissed? Was even one deemed worthy? All the judges complicit? All the states where biden won are complicit?

jesus christ we are fucked if this mentality runs things.

RACK

The Lizard King keeps saying there’s lots of evidence, so it must be true.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 2:01 pm

This one image perfectly sums up his hypocrisy.

He is all for cops acting as judge and jury and executing people if the person on the receiving end isn't a liberal democrat.

But if the person might possibly vote for a liberal democrat or is advancing a liberal democrat agenda when shot by the police officer, then get ready for the outrage.


So sad.

Yes. If you violate a secure perimeter at the US Capitol that has lawmakers inside it during a riot, you get what you have coming. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Why do you hate personal responsibility?

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 5:29 pm
Why do you hate personal responsibility?

Because it doesn't come with a tax cut.

dan's college room mate wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:20 pm I’m about ready to start cheering for team g0dless chink commies.

They are corrupt and ruthless, just like the dems, but they’ll likely spare us the hyper-woke shitshow.

Better Red than living in a democracy...that's the term, right? Hard to believe you ever served in our military in any capacity. You are a disgusting, revolting piece of shit.

Screw_Michigan wrote:Yes. If you violate a secure perimeter at the US Capitol that has lawmakers inside it during a riot, you get what you have coming. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Why do you hate personal responsibility?

Does the owner of a nail salon deserve the same protection?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Left Seater wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:38 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 2:01 pm

This one image perfectly sums up his hypocrisy.

He is all for cops acting as judge and jury and executing people if the person on the receiving end isn't a liberal democrat.

But if the person might possibly vote for a liberal democrat or is advancing a liberal democrat agenda when shot by the police officer, then get ready for the outrage.


So sad.

Fat and Greedy literally can’t post without pounding out a whataboutism.

Roach wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 2:29 pm

Save me your “where’s the evidence” claims.

There’s plenty of evidence.

I keep hearing that. If it is so obvious, it ought to be easy to give a few examples.

Mail in voting changed things, a lot more people voted. How many law suits were brought and dismissed? Was even one deemed worthy? All the judges complicit? All the states where biden won are complicit?

jesus christ we are fucked if this mentality runs things.

Cultist like the members of the Trump Death clut just believe, they don’t need evidence. Basically they run on their feelings.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 5:29 pm Yes. If you violate a secure perimeter at the US Capitol that has lawmakers inside it during a riot, you get what you have coming. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.

Why do you hate personal responsibility?

Screwy's hypocrisy requires serious mental gymnastics.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu May 28, 2020 8:16 pm the fact that NOBODY deserves to be summarily executed by police for whatever reason.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2020 12:49 am Law enforcement summarily executing citizens of any skin color is abhorrent and should be opposed at all costs. Of course, it's only conservatives who defend this practice.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Thu Jun 11, 2020 8:15 pm Police murder an unarmed man pre-trial and you don't have a problem with that at all. Because he has a "criminal history."

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 04, 2020 2:22 am I love the tradition of mvskkkal and suckaholic trying to display their legal chops and explaining why police shouldn't be charged with murder for murdering a suspect pre-trial.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Aug 05, 2020 10:25 am So It's OK police murdered him pre-trial. Schmickity logic strikes again!

Keep kicking your own ass. You remain a pathetic racist troll.

Sorry, fat man, the rules don't apply during violent insurrections at the Capitol when you're trying to penetrate a secure corridor.

#CadetBoneSpurs will be leaving office in a week with a great legacy. Lost the House, lost the Senate, impeached twice, with his only "accomplishments" being the #GOPTaxScam that lined the pockets of the wealthy & stacking a SCOTUS with thumper justices that have no respect for the 1st Amendment (as evidenced by the abortion pill decision yesterday).

Haven’t seen that yet.

Is that the Little Sister’s of the Poor case?

I am 100% in favor of birf control. I am even in favor of limited abortion rights.

But to tell anyone that they must not only be OK with it, they must also pay for it?

First off, BC is very cheap. Second, how about having some organization raise funds to buy it and distribute to those in need?

This isn’t about BC. It’s about rubbing religious people’s nose it a pile of shit. Making them submit to the fact they have zero religious rights left.

This is in the same category as the religious baker that refused to make a gay wedding cake.

Having their rights isn’t enough. Humiliating their victims is what it’s all about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Diego in Seattle wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 10:54 pm #CadetBoneSpurs will be leaving office in a week with a great legacy. Lost the House, lost the Senate, impeached twice, with his only "accomplishments" being the #GOPTaxScam that lined the pockets of the wealthy & stacking a SCOTUS with thumper justices that have no respect for the 1st Amendment (as evidenced by the abortion pill decision yesterday).

Well he built the wall. In fact, according to his claim yesterday, they completed it.

dan's college room mate wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:09 pm Haven’t seen that yet.

Is that the Little Sister’s of the Poor case?

I am 100% in favor of birf control. I am even in favor of limited abortion rights.

But to tell anyone that they must not only be OK with it, they must also pay for it?

First off, BC is very cheap. Second, how about having some organization raise funds to buy it and distribute to those in need?

This isn’t about BC. It’s about rubbing religious people’s nose it a pile of shit. Making them submit to the fact they have zero religious rights left.

This is in the same category as the religious baker that refused to make a gay wedding cake.

Having their rights isn’t enough. Humiliating their victims is what it’s all about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fuck you're stupid

dan's college room mate wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:09 pm Haven’t seen that yet.

Is that the Little Sister’s of the Poor case?

I am 100% in favor of birf control. I am even in favor of limited abortion rights.

But to tell anyone that they must not only be OK with it, they must also pay for it?

First off, BC is very cheap. Second, how about having some organization raise funds to buy it and distribute to those in need?

So you're saying that the religious rights of the Quakers is being shit on because they're being forced to pay for the military when their creed is one of pacifism?

Diego in Seattle wrote:

dan's college room mate wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:09 pm Haven’t seen that yet.

Is that the Little Sister’s of the Poor case?

I am 100% in favor of birf control. I am even in favor of limited abortion rights.

But to tell anyone that they must not only be OK with it, they must also pay for it?

First off, BC is very cheap. Second, how about having some organization raise funds to buy it and distribute to those in need?

So you're saying that the religious rights of the Quakers is being shit on because they're being forced to pay for the military when their creed is one of pacifism?

Apples and handgrenades.

We are not talking taxes to the general fund for a constitutionally mandated task.

We are talking about forcing someone to pay for a specific thing which they are against.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

dan's college room mate wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:09 pm Haven’t seen that yet.

Is that the Little Sister’s of the Poor case?

Nope. FDA v. AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANSAND GYNECOLOGISTS, ETAL.

FDA argued that it was necessary for women to be seen at a doctors office, clinic or hospital in person in order to be prescribed mifepristone during this pandemic. The FDA argued that is was necessary due to the danger of taking the drug.

This decision showed how the government is doing the bidding of the thumpers because there's no such requirement for erectile dysfunction drugs, which has a higher mortality rate than mifepristone.

Well,I’m with you on this one, but then I am full libertarian in this regard. Any adult should be able to consume whatever fukking drug thy want.

I’d make heroin an OTC drug at CVS.

Let the stupid people take themselves out.

But I doubt this is about thumpers. It’s about FDA nazis being FDA nazis.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fuck off traitor and take the process and shove it up your ass.

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Wed Jan 13, 2021 10:24 pm Sorry, fat man, the rules don't apply during violent insurrections at the Capitol when you're trying to penetrate a secure corridor.

Keep spinning. You are a hypocrite and you know it. Of course you have different rules for your beloved government. Government over individuals or private business.

So sad.

Fuck off you fat greedy traitor and take your whataboutisms and shove them up your ass? You know, where your wife pegs you.

You've asked me two questions.

dan's college room mate wrote:Do you have any issues with how this clusterfukk of an election was held?

So, do you think we’ll get better now that the dems are running things?

1. I am not convinced that this election was significantly different than any presidential election in my lifetime.

Don did not prove anything significant in court, and he and his attorneys have spewed countless outright falsehoods about the election over the past two months.

If there is evidence that the election was stolen, and it is a case of the courts all being corrupt and IN on a grand conspiracy against him, he needed to show that evidence directly to the American people.

It isn't there.

Donald lost.
He needed to grow up and accept it two months ago.

And if the election was a clusterfuck, as you insist, then Donald, as president, needed to spend time in the last two months of his term pursuing actions and legislation to help the American people have a more clean system in the future.

He was supposed to spend the last two months serving the American people, not himself.

It is nearly unimaginable that an American president would act as he has over the past two months.
He is an obvious danger to the republic and we continue to be in a very dangerous period.


2. I am not a Democrat.

I know what to expect.

Hopefully some measure of healing can take place over the next couple of years, and hopefully some measure of international respect can also be found.

However, the economic meltdown we are in is so severe that we are going to come out of this era looking much different than we were previously.
See the "Doom" thread.

Lots of pain ahead, imo.

It’s truth and reconciliation. Until the Nazis tell the truth there is no reconciliation.
We need a Sherman to March from Sea to Sea burning down every last hillbilly shack to every Ken and Karen McMansion till these fuckers understand we mean business.
That is the lesson we better have learned about reconstruction.
Fuck them and fuck their feelings.

Roach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 5:44 pm Congrats to the reptile brained assholes who fucked up this peaceful process. Are you watching the news conference? Way to fuck up a patriotic tradition.

And fuck anybody who says the violent actions were patriotic.

To quote Screwy: fuck everyone of you and I will add, I hope each perp gets 20 years in hard prison.

jesus christ.

Rack Roach

Roach wrote: ↑Fri Jan 15, 2021 5:44 pm Congrats to the reptile brained assholes who fucked up this peaceful process. Are you watching the news conference? Way to fuck up a patriotic tradition.

And fuck anybody who says the violent actions were patriotic.

To quote Screwy: fuck everyone of you and I will add, I hope each perp gets 20 years in hard prison.

jesus christ.

Rack Roach.

These weren't just people out expressing their 1rd Amendment rights.

Yeah but Obama wore a tan suit once.

Marcus Allen wrote:Putin has been playing trump like the chump he is, all along.

Thanks for the insightful analysis.

Roach wrote: ↑Wed Jan 27, 2021 5:28 pm Ok Smackie here is more Mr. Obvious news maybe but it's too apt and deep to be less than partially true, and I feel the need to share.

KGB began grooming 'young and vain' Donald Trump 40 years ago by saving him from financial ruin . . .

Orange man ponders meaning of tool






Speaking of deep, purple or chunk?

If mvscals can be tracked into special ed and juvenile, rich white kids can be targeted and groomed for Manchurian Candidate shit.

The problem is that Russia didn't engineer Trump's presidency -- Hillary Clinton's handlers did. Never, ever forget Hillary and crew were more worried about JEB, and intentionally engineered Trump's rise because they thought he would be the easiest to beat.

There are games on games on games being played by those people. This OMB/russian asset shit is a distraction, especially when it will not be paired with the Democrats fealty to China, or both parties fealty to Israel.

Russia groomed Dump for years. He then sucked Putin cock for 4yrs. Hillary didn’t do that you fucking Nazis did.

If you enjoy a nice train wreck, check out this Sarah Palin interview.









Wow!

Leftyaholic is right there with her. Freaks.

I'm not going to watch all that. Can someone give me the cliff notes, other than fascism?

P. Morgan directly asked about a half-dozen times if she acknowledges that Biden won the election.
She refused to answer, and instead diverted each time to shrill squawks about ways in which fraud supposedly took place.
Never mind that she did not produce a lick of evidence to back up her claims, let alone evidence to an extent that the fraud would have changed the election outcome.

Palin put her usual dingbattery on steroids in this interview.

Full tilt alternate reality wingnut.




#embarrassing

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 1:51 pm P. Morgan directly asked about a half-dozen times if she acknowledges that Biden won the election.
She refused to answer, and instead diverted each time to shrill squawks about ways in which fraud supposedly took place.
Never mind that she did not produce a lick of evidence to back up her claims, let alone evidence to an extent that the fraud would have changed the election outcome.

Palin put her usual dingbattery on steroids in this interview.

Full tilt alternate reality wingnut.




#embarrassing

Huh, sounds exactly like the nonsense that Orangeholic spews around here. I wonder why?

I can remember back in 2007 or so when Sarah Palin was mvscal's vision of a pin-up girl. Seemed like he was ready to hitchhike to Alaska and sweep her off her feet with his ultra-conservatard prose.

Drill Baby Drill. How poetic.

Did he go? Is that why he fell off the end of the flat erf?

I think he went to Nebraska instead. He was at the forefront of the California exodus.

You might find him at .net with the other pedophiles. Not sure though since I don't hang out there at all.