T1B

Joe in PB wrote:I don't need unemployment numbers to know it is lower, much lower. I've received more Indeed and LinkedIn queries the last year and a half than in all of Obama's tenure as President.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Italktoomuch

Now there's some solid fucking evidence. Idiot.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:

Joe in PB wrote:I don't need unemployment numbers to know it is lower, much lower. I've received more Indeed and LinkedIn queries the last year and a half than in all of Obama's tenure as President.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Italktoomuch

Now there's some solid fucking evidence. Idiot.

What don't you understand, Mr. Senility? Both Joe & I are agreeing that the numbers are wrong now. Can you admit they were wrong during King Coon's tenure?

I know the numbers are cooked, Mr. Meltaway. But not in the direction your fellow tard was suggesting. And I was mocking him offering anecdotes as evidence. Way to look as stupid as Joe Blows.

So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower? You do realize that you just made an idiot of yourself?

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower? You do realize that you just made an idiot of yourself?

Did you not even look at my link?

What link?

Answer the questions, Melty. So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower? You do realize that you just made an idiot of yourself?

#WalkingAway is what you should be doing from this thread. YHKYOFA.

Last Word Whore...


...meet...


...Fractionally Applicable GIF Rejoinder.

Fuck off, you ankle-nibbling gadfly. Meltspray needs to answer these questions.

Goober McTuber wrote:Fuck off RACK you, you ankle-nibbling gadfly you awesome dude that makes this board readable. Meltspray needs to answer these questions I tip the kid that brings my liquor store orders an extra $5 if he lets me hold his feet while I get him to do sit ups with no shirt on.

ftfy, you incontinent, old failure

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Fuck off RACK you, you ankle-nibbling gadfly you awesome dude that makes this board readable. Meltspray needs to answer these questions I tip the kid that brings my liquor store orders an extra $5 if he lets me hold his feet while I get him to do sit ups with no shirt on.

ftfy, you incontinent, old failure

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:ftfy, you incontinent, old failure

That fat bastard does not need you to prop him up on this board, just in real life. He totally stepped on his dick and he needs to come correct.

Answer the questions, Meltspray. So you also believe that the posted unemployment numbers are high? That unemployment is actually even lower?

I think unemployment has actually gone negative.

After all, Blow in PB keeps getting inquiries from Linkedin and Indeed.


I was sort of wondering about Glassdoor, Lensa, VirtualVocations, Trending Jobs, Ladders and the KC Manpurse Connection. No inquiries from those organizations?

Mikey wrote:I think unemployment has actually gone negative.

That must be why I am working so hard.

So goobs is asking for proof unemployment is lower, because the official numbers are not accurate. Even though using the same metrics as Obama did shows improvement.

Bitching in every thread does not mean you're smarter, quite the opposite is true when you have nothing to contribute. Thanks for confirming what I've been saying all along, that you're an ignorant, bitter, tard.



Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:So goobs is asking for proof unemployment is lower, because the official numbers are not accurate. Even though using the same metrics as Obama did shows improvement.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

I'm asking for proof that unemployment is lower than the posted numbers, you freakishly stupid fuck. I think everyone in this thread agrees on two things. That the posted unemployment numbers have gotten better, and that their methodology is flawed. Despite the flawed methodology, I do believe that employment is lower now than it was a year ago. You seemed to be suggesting that unemployment is lower than the posted numbers. Based on your "evidence".

....and the corporate tax cut has boosted GDP, and employment, something that would not have happened if a Democrat was sitting in the Oval Office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:....and the corporate tax cut has boosted GDP, and employment, something that would not have happened if a Democrat was sitting in the Oval Office.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Which was nothing to do with what I said.

I think unemployment is lower than when Obama was President, I never said it was lower than the metrics that everyone agrees are not accurate.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Joe in PB wrote:I think unemployment is lower than when Obama was President, I never said it was lower than the metrics that everyone agrees are not accurate.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Now see, when you originally responded to the idea that the numbers are not totally accurate and said they were lower, much lower, I thought you were suggesting that reality was even lower that the calculations. And I repeatedly stated that if that's what you were saying, it was wrong. You never denied saying that I had misinterpreted your remarks until just now. But I have always agreed with your statement above.

And all of the times I stated what you seemed to believe, you said nothing. Probably because that was what you believed. You have learned well from your hero, liar.

Liar.

:paul:

Joe probably still believes in Santa Claus.

I believe the Democratic party as we once knew it is dead.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

More bots.

Exactly. This forum needs balance as does much of the media. These "bots" make a lot of good points, points ignored by the Democratic party and many of its members. Fortunately these "bots" will be voting Republican for the foreseeable future.

All the while the Democrats haven't moved on since the election of Trump, and their platform of we're against everything Trump is for is backfiring. Americans want an abundance of jobs, a robust economy, law and order, and secure borders. Democratic party leadership does not.....

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Nobody gives a fuck about these stupid videos you post. At least you as a poster, albiet a mentally challenged one, can have a discussion about this shit.

Stop spamming the board.

There are so many good takes by these "bots", it'll be easy to keep this thread near the top of the board until mid terms, and likely beyond, to counter your utter hypocrisy.

Besides almost every post you make pretty much confirms the "bot" takes of identity politics, racist or white supremacy claims of all Republicans or Trump supporters, and hate & violence to all fellow Americans with differing political views, etc.

Enjoy.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Papa Willie wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:Nobody gives a fuck about these stupid videos you post. At least you as a poster, albiet a mentally challenged one, can have a discussion about this shit.

Stop spamming the board.

99% of your posts are shit spam, in case you wondered.

I-R-O-N-Y.

Another example of ANTIFA's zero tolerance of free speech if it is something they don't agree with.

Joe in PB wrote:Another example of ANTIFA's zero tolerance of free speech if it is something they don't agree with.

Snowflakes beware. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Posted today.

Why don't you sum it up for us, tardberry?

The more you post in these threads, the dumber you look, but that is nothing new. When things don't go well in the mid terms I don't want to hear about Russian bots. The reason will be, the Democratic party cares about citizens concerns as much as you do.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk