If this doesn’t prove that environmentalists are crazy...

[Softball Bat]

At this point no one is going to show you anything that you won't immediately dismiss out of hand.
We get it.
You're a believer.


Can we just stop this already, before T1B drops to single-digit membership?

Dismiss out of hand?

Not at all.
I dismiss asinine (and incredibly arrogant) stupidity.


Btw, Jay, Rooster, Joe, and Lefty ALL starting chirping about flat earth in this thread and it was not even the topic of the thread.
lol

Go look at that.
It's the FACT.

Being the polite gentleman that I am, I answered to those four folks.


Some of you folks need to come up for air.

[Softball Bat]

Jesus, dude. Do you have to stick your flat shit in every thread? It's really old at this point.

I didn't bring it in to the thread.

You really need to learn how to pay attention.

So this means you'll be dropping it?

You should stop posting.

Jay, Lefty, Rooster, and Joe all brought flat earth into the thread and I had not said a word about it.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

You used to be a lot more fun.


I suppose every roadrunner needs it's coyote...

[Softball Bat]

I said for many months that I was not interested in talking fl@t earth.

A few people kept begging for it, over and over again.
I finally answered one of them -- and of course then it is off to the races.

Flat earth has been rattling around in domes for a couple of years now.
And it won't stop, either.

So, there ya go.


Let's have fun instead.

I should probably start a thread about Donald Trump coming out of the closet with French President Macron yesterday.

Total faggot.

[Softball Bat]

1. I don't care what people think. People are stupid.

- Charles Barkley


2. "People" have repeatedly been beaten down by me. No ifs, ands, or buts about that.


3. Lurkers easily recognize #2. There are a handful of people who are quite interested in the beatdowns that I have delivered. They are interested in the topic but don't want to put their neck out there. So they read only. I understand it. Me? I don't care. As always, I am a straight shooter. Truth is truth.


4. You, quite frankly, have failed miserably to prove your globe. So... yeah. You should just do as Jay should have done a long time ago. Eject.

[BSmack]

2. "People" have repeatedly been beaten down by me. No ifs, ands, or buts about that.


3. Lurkers easily recognize #2. There are a handful of people who are quite interested in the beatdowns that I have delivered. They are interested in the topic but don't want to put their neck out there. So they read only. I understand it. Me? I don't care. As always, I am a straight shooter. Truth is truth.

It has been a long time since I've seen somebody play the supportive email card. Where are the flat earthers on t1b? Show yourselves.

[Left Seater]

1. I don't care what people think. People are stupid.

- Charles Barkley

At least you are comfortable in your position. Or you are trolling.

2. "People" have repeatedly been beaten down by me. No ifs, ands, or buts about that.

Link? What like your 8 inches per mile squared math? Or your YouTube videos that took about two seconds to debunk? The next beatdown you have free up will be the first.

3. Lurkers easily recognize #2. There are a handful of people who are quite interested in the beatdowns that I have delivered. They are interested in the topic but don't want to put their neck out there. So they read only. I understand it. Me? I don't care. As always, I am a straight shooter. Truth is truth.

Stop with your delusional beatdowns. An internet legend in you own mind only doesn’t make it fact. Point out just one of these lurkers that you know supports your takes but doesn’t want to reply.

As for your truth claim that is so laughable. You run and hide from all facts that support a globe model. You toss out “I don’t have all the answers, but know it isn’t a globe” and never touch the subject again. You claim to want to learn but avoid all things supporting a globe model.

4. You, quite frankly, have failed miserably to prove your globe. So... yeah. You should just do as Jay should have done a long time ago. Eject.

Actually the globe has been proven time and again. You on the other hand have proven nothing.

Finally, don’t make the mistake that we find this topic interesting. It isn’t. It is the fact that someone would ignore the world around them and make outrageous claims. The subject itself doesn’t matter, more the carnival barker trying to make the sale.

[Softball Bat]

Actually the globe has been proven time and again.

lol

Certainly not.

Many people just believe the globe.

[Carson]

At this point no one is going to show you anything that you won't immediately dismiss out of hand.
We get it.
You're a believer.


Can we just stop this already, before T1B drops to single-digit membership?

Too late.

[Rooster]

Is this your proof of the globe?

If so, you need to get up to speed on this topic.


If someone crossed the South Pole (N-S), going from one end of Antarctica to the other, it would be pretty damn hard to still make a case for a flat earth.

But what you have posted proves exactly nothing.

What I am getting from this conversation is that unless you yourself go on a flight around the world or take a ride on a rocket ship into space and see it with your own eyes, you refuse to believe anything documented with video, direct observation, or by mathematical calculation. By those lights, that’s a tough way to go through life.

[Goober McTuber]

Hey tart, here's some more information you can dismiss out of hand.

https://www.metabunk.org/flat-earth-the ... ica.t6483/

[Goober McTuber]

Hey tart, here's some more information you can dismiss out of hand.

https://www.metabunk.org/flat-earth-the ... ica.t6483/

I've brought that scenario a number of times to him, Goobs. One time he said "I don't know". He has never had a good answer as to why airlines would purposely fuck away billions of dollars a year on extra fuel to maintain the "global illusion". Too bad he never considers economics and/or logic into his fairy tale.

This link has even stronger reasoning than economics.

To debunk the Flat Earth theory, you can just use Sydney to Santiago, Chile, Quantas flight 27, 7000 miles. 12 hour flight. This flight would be impossible on the Flat Earth model, requiring the plane to travel at twice the speed of sound.

[Softball Bat]

What I am getting from this conversation is that unless you yourself go on a flight around the world or take a ride on a rocket ship into space and see it with your own eyes, you refuse to believe anything documented with video, direct observation, or by mathematical calculation. By those lights, that’s a tough way to go through life.

Video.
Direct observation.
Mathematical calculation.


1. Provide the video showing a rocket ever going from land to space. Provide the video (or pic) of a satellite in space.

2. Show direct observation of the required curvature for your asinine globe.

3. (As posted previously) If you're telling me it is a FACT that it (water) curves, show me the scientific formula for that.
At what point does it bend and what amount of force applied to it is necessary to make it bend at the rate you claim it bends?
Then show me an example of that really happening

No, see...
The deal is, you want me to believe stupid bullshit just... because.
Then you blame me when I don't buy into the stupid bullshit which you have no proof of.

No sale.

A whole lot of people like me are wide awake now to the reality that the globe is nonsense.

Now if you are really a smart guy you will put your globe to the test and see if it can really be proven, or if maybe, just maybe, you believe something... just because.


Water is clinging to the outside of a ball?
lol

Hocus-pocus.



Get with it.

[Softball Bat]

'Tardt - you are in denial, son. You've gotten your ass beaten down every single time you've talked about it. Your only response is to respond like an 8 year old would - "Prove it".

Prove you're breathing air. Prove you eat. Prove that you're typing responses. See how that works?

You're a liar.
Expected.

Go into read only mode.

You're a senseless, babbling glob of goo.



#loser

[Softball Bat]

Hey tart, here's some more information you can dismiss out of hand.

https://www.metabunk.org/flat-earth-the ... ica.t6483/

To debunk the Flat Earth theory, you can just use Sydney to Santiago, Chile, Quantas flight 27, 7000 miles.
12 hour flight. This flight would be impossible on the Flat Earth model, requiring the plane to travel at twice
the speed of sound.


The flight would be impossible on the flat earth model?

What model?
LOL

I have repeatedly said that I offer no model of what the earth is because -----> I DO NOT KNOW.


So yeah, debunk my model, which I do not have.

Good job!





p.s. - take the flight and fully document it.

[Jay in Phoenix]

No, see...
The deal is, you want me to believe stupid bullshit just... because.
Then you blame me when I don't buy into the stupid bullshit which you have no proof of.

Oh, you mean like the Bible? Like that? No proof?

Check and double check.

[Left Seater]

I showed you two examples of water curving and you ignore them like you do everything else. Face it liquids can and do curve. You want a mathematical formula? Figure it out yourself. Your claiming you need one as proof, when your own eyes tell you it is fact is just another way for you to deflect and dodge. Further if someone did post a formula it would be so far over your head that it would be floating in the water above the firmament. (See 8 inches per miles squared is a circle.)

Goobs, many of us have pointed out “flights” to him previously. JCS brought up Polar sightseeing flights and despite all the evidence he and I posted, mr vast multi-government conspiracy guy, just dismisses it all out of hand. Same for world record polar circumnavigation flights by Pan Am back in the day.

There are hundreds of things he ignores that prove a globe earth. But here’s hoping he keeps it up, as his trolling is providing lots of laughs around FBOs as I sit and wait with other pilots.

[Softball Bat]

No, see...
The deal is, you want me to believe stupid bullshit just... because.
Then you blame me when I don't buy into the stupid bullshit which you have no proof of.

Oh, you mean like the Bible? Like that? No proof?

Check and double check.

What are you gibbering about?

[Left Seater]

He is pointing out your double standard when it comes to faith.

[Softball Bat]

I showed you two examples of water curving and you ignore them like you do everything else. Face it liquids can and do curve. You want a mathematical formula? Figure it out yourself. Your claiming you need one as proof, when your own eyes tell you it is fact is just another way for you to deflect and dodge.

LOL

Freaking classic!

Dude, I have figured it out.
Water seeks its level and lay -----> FLAT.

If you're going to tell me it is a fact that water clings to the outside of a ball...

you're going to have to do a lot better than posting pics of curved splashing water, and water curving under pressure in a very small container.
lol

And you're going to have to do a lot better than to tell me to... figure it out.

I have.
You're a nut case.

Water will not cling to the outside of a ball.
Duh!


"Yeah... but gravity, gravity... gravity..."

Polar sightseeing flights

Prove exactly nothing.

Yada, yada...

There are hundreds of things he ignores that prove a globe earth.

Nothing posted here proves the globe, Lefty.

You have been deluded over many, many years.

The globe is entirely irrational, illogical, stupid, and it totally defies what we observe and know to be true.


NASA's stupid fake shit has been shown on this board now many times.
The ISS is a joke of a fantasy that could never be true.
No rockets go to space.
Water will not cling to the outside of a ball.
The required curvature for your globe is not there.

It's a long list.

You've been deluded.


It is wake up time.

A lot of people have.

Most of the smart folks.

[Jay in Phoenix]

I figured you were too stupid to understand I was pointing out your hypocrisy 'tard.

I did read 'holic's post. It had squat to do with my question. So again, you have a SATELLITE dish in your yard for Direct TV or Dish. Where is that signal going to your tv coming from? Your smart phone or computer in Asia are receiving signals from the US. How are they getting to you? Hint. It isn't a ground relay. And it is called SATELLITE tv for a reason.

Take your head out of your ass and see the truth.

[Left Seater]

Troll on Bat, troll on.

8 inches per mile squared says what? Your cut and paste YouTube videos debunked in seconds say what?

Your delusion that you know far better than some of the smartest people to ever live will never not fbe funny.

But a serious question for you? Why do you believe the Bible despite no evidence and nothing being a proven fact? Why selectively apply faith? In the case of the globe you are not only not applying any faith you are doing so against mountains of evidence. Yet you apply faith to the Bible in a vacuum of proof?

[Softball Bat]

8 inches per mile squared says what?

Guy, I've been posting that (dozens of times) for 2+ years. lol
Right -- earth curvature on your globe model is 8 inches per mile squared.

Did you tell Dinsdale?

LMAO!



I asked...

If you're telling me it is a FACT that it curves, show me the scientific formula for that.
At what point does it bend and what amount of force applied to it is necessary to make it bend at the rate you claim it bends?

Then show me an example of that really happening.

But a serious question for you? Why do you believe the Bible despite no evidence and nothing being a proven fact? Why selectively apply faith? In the case of the globe you are not only not applying any faith you are doing so against mountains of evidence. Yet you apply faith to the Bible in a vacuum of proof?

When I began to really look into the globe, I found that the evidence for it is lacking.
To say the very least.

I find no logical reason to believe it.


People should legitimately research the topic on their own.

[Left Seater]

Right, you have said this a 1,000 times now. But you completely ignored the question.

There is far more evidence supporting a globe than there is supporting the Bible. Why do you apply different standards of faith despite this evidence?

[Softball Bat]

There is far more evidence supporting a globe than there is supporting the Bible.

Totally not.

[Softball Bat]

I did read 'holic's post. It had squat to do with my question. So again, you have a SATELLITE dish in your yard for Direct TV or Dish. Where is that signal going to your tv coming from? Your smart phone or computer in Asia are receiving signals from the US. How are they getting to you? Hint. It isn't a ground relay. And it is called SATELLITE tv for a reason.

As of 2006, overseas satellite links accounted for only 1 percent of international traffic, while the remainder was
carried by undersea cable. The reliability of submarine cables is high, especially when (as noted above) multiple
paths are available in the event of a cable break.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine ... ine_cables




Now why don't you tell me how your dish works?

Is it your contention that your dish is receiving a signal from a satellite that is in geostationary orbit?

[Jay in Phoenix]

From the web site "Satellite TV/How Stuff Works":

At the broadcast center, the TV provider receives signals from various programming sources and beams a broadcast signal to satellites in geosynchronous orbit. The satellites receive the signals from the broadcast station and rebroadcast them to Earth.

Any other stupid questions about how a satellite dish and broadcasting system work?

[Softball Bat]

We can begin with...

1. There is no video of a rocket going from land to space
2. There is no pic or video of a satellite in space



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit

A geostationary orbit, geostationary Earth orbit (often referred to as geosynchronous equatorial orbit)[1] (GEO) is a circular
geosynchronous orbit 35,786 kilometres (22,236 mi) above the Earth's equator and following the direction of the Earth's rotation.




Your satellite is supposedly 22,236 miles (exactly -- it is the sweet spot) above the equator and is moving along at nearly an identical pace as the earth, which is spinning at over 1,000 mph at the equator.

For comparison, the ISS is supposedly only 250 mile above the earth.

Now the earth is spinning (allegedly) 1,000 mph.
The earth is also allegedly orbiting the sun at a speed of 67,000 mph.
Oh... and the sun (and earth) are supposedly moving through the galaxy at 45,000 mph.
lol

So...

How did they get your satellite WAY out there (90 times further out than the ISS) to lock on to the earth's rotation (right at the precise sweet spot -- 22,236 miles) with all of this incredible motion going on?

Not just that, but the satellite had to be placed at a spot right over the equator.

Bullseye!!


LMAO!



#nope





Now Google satellites in space.

You'll see a bunch of cartoons.


#yep



Come back to reality any decade now, Jay.

[Left Seater]

There is far more evidence supporting a globe than there is supporting the Bible.

Totally not.

Just because you claim it doesn’t make it true. What physical evidence is there that supports the Bible? I am hoping you will link me up to some. Oh and I want solid concrete evidence like the kind you keep claiming you need to see for a globe model.

[Softball Bat]

If you want to discuss the Bible, you really ought to start a thread about it.

What physical evidence is there that supports the Bible?

For starters...

The Letters of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

[Left Seater]

We have no proof of those letters. Further you are trying to use the Bible to prove the Bible. Seriously?

[Softball Bat]

The Bible is not one book.

We have no proof of those letters.

Oh really?
Okay, then deny the letters are real.
That's easy and that's your call to make.

https://faithfulphilosophy.wordpress.co ... e-gospels/

[Left Seater]

Again, where is physical proof? Yes other writings lend credence that these people lived and wrote same for Jesus.

But where is the physical evidence of the subjects of the writing? Where is the ark, where is the tower, where is Jesus’ burial tomb. Where is the same evidence that you require for a globe earth?

So far your “proof” of the Bible is far lacking what we have for a globe model.

[Softball Bat]

Again, where is physical proof? Yes other writings lend credence that these people lived and wrote same for Jesus.

I never made the claim that there is physical proof of the letters.

I said Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are physical evidence that supports the Bible.

In fact, there is a lot of evidence for the authenticity of the letters -- see the link I posted.
There is so much evidence for the authenticity of those letters that in my estimation, when someone denies it they are either completely ignorant or in complete denial.

We don't have the original letters.
If you want to dismiss the validity of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John on that basis, so be it.
It's your call.


Why are you tripping out about this?

Tripping out about Noah's Ark, the Tower of Babel, etc.
lol
When did I ever say there was physical proof for these things?

[Derron]

What physical evidence is there that supports the Bible?

For starters...

The Letters of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Post by Softball Bat » Sun Apr 29, 2018 10:15 am

Left Seater wrote:
Again, where is physical proof? Yes other writings lend credence that these people lived and wrote same for Jesus.

Post by Softball Bat » Sun Apr 29, 2018 10:15 am I never made the claim that there is physical proof of the letters.

I said Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are physical evidence that supports the Bible.

You are a liar..flat out liar who is a tedious troll. Fuck off now.

[Softball Bat]

Do you always have trouble reading, Derron?

Do you know the difference between evidence and proof?

We have no physical proof of Mark's Gospel.
We don't have the original.

What we do have is physical evidence that Mark did indeed write his Gospel.
We happen to have an awful lot of that evidence.


Next time you decide that you should chime in, don't.
Far less embarrassing for you.

[Left Seater]

When did I ever say there was physical proof for these things?

Now we are getting somewhere. So there is no physical proof of the Bible stories. There is evidence that leads towards supporting these stories, letters, books, etc. But you apply faith and believe the stories in the Bible to be true and the word of God.

Meanwhile you ignore evidence of a globe model and demand 100% indisputable proof of a globe.


So for probably the 20th time, why do you apply Faith to the Bible despite lack of physical proof and refuse in the event of a globe earth?

[Softball Bat]

Lefty, the Bible is a different animal.


John 3:3
Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be
born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Exodus 3:14
And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the
children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.




Romans 1:20

[Left Seater]

Refusal to answer the question and quoting the Bible in reference to questions about proof of the Bible? Par for the course for you I guess.

Bottom line, you are applying a double standard and don’t really care to learn despite your claims.

See this is why you are the GOAT of trolls.

[Dinsdale]

More fake bullshit.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/blue-origi ... 018-04-29/

The ruse is getting so bad, they do this shit almost weekly to maintain the facade.

That fucker bounced right off the Firmament, which we now know is about 350,000 feet elevation.