T1B

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 4:00 am Nice goal post movement. He didn’t have a gun and was shot in the back running away.

This is why 88 brought you in, to just type shit.

So according to your twisted sick logic, ANY criminal could just fire at police, then turn their backs, fire quickly and turn their backs, fire quickly, turn their backs, and cops just have to take the fire?
LMAO. Papa was correct about you,.
In your fucked up head, a criminal can attack an officer, steal their taser, shoot them, and while they are incapacitated lying on the ground, steal their gun.

And the officer is not allowed to return fire at any time.

If there was justice in the world, violent punks would invade your home and sodomize you and yours. That way you can fully appreciate what cops deal with every day.
The blood coming out your anus, would be a little something extra.

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 2:33 am Only the purest ? He don’t count?
Go on say it, he deserved it?
Really IB?

This shit is messy. You don’t get to run it through your purification filter. It’s all part of it. You can’t say Rayshard fucked up, he deserved what he got. He’s not representotive of what you’re focused on.

Yes, it's very messy. That's why Rayshard's situation shouldn't be lumped in with the others. Letting focus be moved to Rayshard damages the others, again precisely because that nikk.a brought it on himself. What's the first thing cacs say about nikk.as? "He must have done something to deserve it."

If you want folks to go back to sleep, keep the focus on Rayshard.

atmdad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm A couple of questions that I have not seen IB ask yet.

1) When has a Taser been considered a lethal weapon when practically every police department in the country would argue they are not as a means to justify their continued use of them?
It wasn't his own taser. It was the cop's.
2) How effective can a Taser be when fired blindly over ones shoulder at someone while running away from that person that is chasing them?
Irrelevant. He intended to harm with the stolen taser. If he'd grasped the gold by wrestling away the gun instead, he would have fired that instead. Rayshard is a fucking moron.
And now he's a dead moron.
3) How can a suspect running away from a police officer be considered an imminent threat to the officer, justifying the use of lethal force?
The moment he used a taser as if it were a gun.
4) The suspect was an older guy, carrying a few extra pounds and drunk, by their evaluation, how far did they think this guy would be able to maintain a sprint to get away? Aren't JUBM's supposed to maintain of modicum of physical fitness that would enable them to keep pace with this guy by the time he stops to have a heart attack?
Rayshard was a 27 year old dumbass. Not the 40something George Floyd. (And not mentally ill.) He had no personal relationship with the cops, unlike Floyd confronting Chauvin on the job about being an asshole to club patrons. Allegedly.

There are better ways to handle drunk people, yes. The cop reacted to his own weapon being drawn on him. This is that one case where it's understandable -- unlike Tamir and Atatiana.
5) Was the suspect already frisked such that the JUBM's knew that he had no additional weapons on him after he unsuccessfully tried to use the taser?
Does it matter? Dude tried to shoot at the cops.
He shot first. Everyone in that parking lot is lucky it was the taser, and not the gun, which he wrestled away.

Police reform is necessary. Rayshard's case isn't an unarmed man merely running and shot in the back in spite of presenting no intention of threat, though. The nik.ka fucked up, when he should have been home, not drunk off his ass in a drive through lane. Somebody's life was saved by not having him drive drunk, anyway. But that's the 'sick of alcoholics' in me ranting.

How should it have been properly handled, though, once Rayshard failed the sobriety tests?

The Big Pickle wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 2:12 pm He should have watched the Chris Rock video and he's still be alive today.

He took himself out of the gene pool, when he fired back at the cop like a dumbass. It was for the best. Maybe he'll reincarnate as a better father and community member, next lifetime. I hope so.

IB is a strong asset to this or any board.
Screw Kierland, Diego and Tonto don't agree with your perfect logic on this topic, because they are mentally disturbed.

She is mildly amusing on her own, she just got stuck with your stink and that of your kkkrazy partner.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:38 pm

atmdad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm A couple of questions that I have not seen IB ask yet.

1) When has a Taser been considered a lethal weapon when practically every police department in the country would argue they are not as a means to justify their continued use of them?
It wasn't his own taser. It was the cop's.
2) How effective can a Taser be when fired blindly over ones shoulder at someone while running away from that person that is chasing them?
Irrelevant. He intended to harm with the stolen taser. If he'd grasped the gold by wrestling away the gun instead, he would have fired that instead. Rayshard is a fucking moron.
And now he's a dead moron.
3) How can a suspect running away from a police officer be considered an imminent threat to the officer, justifying the use of lethal force?
The moment he used a taser as if it were a gun.
4) The suspect was an older guy, carrying a few extra pounds and drunk, by their evaluation, how far did they think this guy would be able to maintain a sprint to get away? Aren't JUBM's supposed to maintain of modicum of physical fitness that would enable them to keep pace with this guy by the time he stops to have a heart attack?
Rayshard was a 27 year old dumbass. Not the 40something George Floyd. (And not mentally ill.) He had no personal relationship with the cops, unlike Floyd confronting Chauvin on the job about being an asshole to club patrons. Allegedly.

There are better ways to handle drunk people, yes. The cop reacted to his own weapon being drawn on him. This is that one case where it's understandable -- unlike Tamir and Atatiana.
5) Was the suspect already frisked such that the JUBM's knew that he had no additional weapons on him after he unsuccessfully tried to use the taser?
Does it matter? Dude tried to shoot at the cops.
He shot first. Everyone in that parking lot is lucky it was the taser, and not the gun, which he wrestled away.

Police reform is necessary. Rayshard's case isn't an unarmed man merely running and shot in the back in spite of presenting no intention of threat, though. The nik.ka fucked up, when he should have been home, not drunk off his ass in a drive through lane. Somebody's life was saved by not having him drive drunk, anyway. But that's the 'sick of alcoholics' in me ranting.

How should it have been properly handled, though, once Rayshard failed the sobriety tests?

The Big Pickle wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 2:12 pm He should have watched the Chris Rock video and he's still be alive today.

He took himself out of the gene pool, when he fired back at the cop like a dumbass. It was for the best. Maybe he'll reincarnate as a better father and community member, next lifetime. I hope so.

You might as well clear them all.
If he reached in his pocket... kill em
If she was holding a cell phone... shoot to kill

Do you not see any better way for the police to have handled this situation than what happened? You believe there is no change needed?

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:47 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:38 pm

atmdad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm A couple of questions that I have not seen IB ask yet.

1) When has a Taser been considered a lethal weapon when practically every police department in the country would argue they are not as a means to justify their continued use of them?
It wasn't his own taser. It was the cop's.
2) How effective can a Taser be when fired blindly over ones shoulder at someone while running away from that person that is chasing them?
Irrelevant. He intended to harm with the stolen taser. If he'd grasped the gold by wrestling away the gun instead, he would have fired that instead. Rayshard is a fucking moron.
And now he's a dead moron.
3) How can a suspect running away from a police officer be considered an imminent threat to the officer, justifying the use of lethal force?
The moment he used a taser as if it were a gun.
4) The suspect was an older guy, carrying a few extra pounds and drunk, by their evaluation, how far did they think this guy would be able to maintain a sprint to get away? Aren't JUBM's supposed to maintain of modicum of physical fitness that would enable them to keep pace with this guy by the time he stops to have a heart attack?
Rayshard was a 27 year old dumbass. Not the 40something George Floyd. (And not mentally ill.) He had no personal relationship with the cops, unlike Floyd confronting Chauvin on the job about being an asshole to club patrons. Allegedly.

There are better ways to handle drunk people, yes. The cop reacted to his own weapon being drawn on him. This is that one case where it's understandable -- unlike Tamir and Atatiana.
5) Was the suspect already frisked such that the JUBM's knew that he had no additional weapons on him after he unsuccessfully tried to use the taser?
Does it matter? Dude tried to shoot at the cops.
He shot first. Everyone in that parking lot is lucky it was the taser, and not the gun, which he wrestled away.

Police reform is necessary. Rayshard's case isn't an unarmed man merely running and shot in the back in spite of presenting no intention of threat, though. The nik.ka fucked up, when he should have been home, not drunk off his ass in a drive through lane. Somebody's life was saved by not having him drive drunk, anyway. But that's the 'sick of alcoholics' in me ranting.

How should it have been properly handled, though, once Rayshard failed the sobriety tests?

The Big Pickle wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 2:12 pm He should have watched the Chris Rock video and he's still be alive today.

He took himself out of the gene pool, when he fired back at the cop like a dumbass. It was for the best. Maybe he'll reincarnate as a better father and community member, next lifetime. I hope so.

You might as well clear them all.
If he reached in his pocket... kill em
If she was holding a cell phone... shoot to kill

Do you not see any better way for the police to have handled this situation than what happened? You believe there is no change needed?

Did you say "change needed"

Yeah. Like NOT resisting arrest.
Not assaulting the police.
You change those two things alone AND BINGO, no deaths whatsoever.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:38 pm

atmdad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm A couple of questions that I have not seen IB ask yet.
5) Was the suspect already frisked such that the JUBM's knew that he had no additional weapons on him after he unsuccessfully tried to use the taser?
Does it matter? Dude tried to shoot at the cops.
He shot first. Everyone in that parking lot is lucky it was the taser, and not the gun, which he wrestled away.

Bullshit. Yea the suspect made all the wrong decisions, but the shooting was bullshit and unwarranted. After he fired the taser, missed, discarded the taser and was running away, when was the suspect an imminent threat to the LEO that required use of deadly force?

There were a couple of what if's presented here.

What if he hit pay-dirt with the taser and went back to grab the gun? The suspect would have become an imminent threat and there was second LEO in the mix that should be able to fire his weapon to take out the threat. But this was not what happened.

What if the suspect grabbed the gun and not the taser? The suspect would have become an imminent threat and there was second LEO in the mix that should be able to fire his weapon to take out the threat. But this was not what happened.

IB, as you mentioned, "Everyone in that parking lot is lucky it was the taser, and not the gun, which he wrestled away.", but this was not what happened. JUBM fired three shots with two hitting the suspect. Where did the third round go? Did the cop consider what/who may have been downrange during his rage induced assault.

atmdad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:25 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 1:38 pm

atmdad wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 9:16 pm A couple of questions that I have not seen IB ask yet.
5) Was the suspect already frisked such that the JUBM's knew that he had no additional weapons on him after he unsuccessfully tried to use the taser?
Does it matter? Dude tried to shoot at the cops.
He shot first. Everyone in that parking lot is lucky it was the taser, and not the gun, which he wrestled away.

Bullshit. Yea the suspect made all the wrong decisions, but the shooting was bullshit and unwarranted. After he fired the taser, missed, discarded the taser and was running away, when was the suspect an imminent threat to the LEO that required use of deadly force?

There were a couple of what if's presented here.

What if he hit pay-dirt with the taser and went back to grab the gun? The suspect would have become an imminent threat and there was second LEO in the mix that should be able to fire his weapon to take out the threat. But this was not what happened.

What if the suspect grabbed the gun and not the taser? The suspect would have become an imminent threat and there was second LEO in the mix that should be able to fire his weapon to take out the threat. But this was not what happened.

IB, as you mentioned, "Everyone in that parking lot is lucky it was the taser, and not the gun, which he wrestled away.", Why So. was he going to open fire on everyone in the parking lot. Is that any different than what did happen. JUBM fired three shots with two hitting the suspect. Where did the third round go? Did the cop consider what/who may have been downrange of his rage induced assault.

atmdad
You're new here, so let me help you out.

You just admitted that everyone should be glad it was a taser and not a gun.

Right there you openly acknowledge that this guy was a criminal predator who preys on society.

99.9% of human beings, wouldn't dare even think about assaulting a police officer and taking his or her weapon.
This piece of shit animal not only thinks about it, but does it.

That's the problem in our country right now. A segment of black males and black whites who think and do things that 99.9% of human beings would NEVER EVER consider.

Do you know what kind of sick animal mind you must have to attack the law?
These sub humans are walking amongst decent human beings.
And YOUR left wing socialist party is blaming the 99.9% of men and women who wear the badge?
You low IQ cocksucker.

Trust the process
Just type shit

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:38 pm Trust the process
Just type shit

low IQ says what?

Unarmed
Shot in the Back

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:55 pm Unarmed
Shot in the Back

99.9% of humans would NEVER think of attacking an officer and stealing his weapons.
This ,001 % animal is where he belongs, away from society.

Ever think of joining him?
Just attack police and steal their weapons.
You'll be doing yourself and humanity a great favor.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:35 pm atmdad
You're new here, so let me help you out. Sorry, not the case. i've seen racist trolls like you since the Jim Rome boards, I changed my nic once in 2015 and I just don't feel the need to incessantly post here.

You just admitted that everyone should be glad it was a taser and not a gun.

Right there you openly acknowledge that this guy was a criminal predator who preys on society.

99.9% of human beings, wouldn't dare even think about assaulting a police officer and taking his or her weapon.
This piece of shit animal not only thinks about it, but does it.

That's the problem in our country right now. A segment of black males and black whites who think and do things that 99.9% of human beings would NEVER EVER consider.

Do you know what kind of sick animal mind you must have to attack the law?
These sub humans are walking amongst decent human beings.
And YOUR left wing socialist party is blaming the 99.9% of men and women who wear the badge?
You low IQ cocksucker.

You know nothing about me. I have seen plenty of your tripe to form the impression that you are an insecure Racist POS.

I generally support the police and what they do. You are the one projecting what if scenarios into this case. Sure, the suspect made plenty of bad decisions which I do not condone, but as the actual situation played out, not your hypothetical what if's, after he randomly fired the taser, when was he an imminent threat to the police that required use of deadly force?

atmdad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:15 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:35 pm atmdad
You're new here, so let me help you out. Sorry, not the case. i've seen racist trolls like you since the Jim Rome boards, I changed my nic once in 2015 and I just don't feel the need to incessantly post here.

You just admitted that everyone should be glad it was a taser and not a gun.

Right there you openly acknowledge that this guy was a criminal predator who preys on society.

99.9% of human beings, wouldn't dare even think about assaulting a police officer and taking his or her weapon.
This piece of shit animal not only thinks about it, but does it.

That's the problem in our country right now. A segment of black males and black whites who think and do things that 99.9% of human beings would NEVER EVER consider.

Do you know what kind of sick animal mind you must have to attack the law?
These sub humans are walking amongst decent human beings.
And YOUR left wing socialist party is blaming the 99.9% of men and women who wear the badge?
You low IQ cocksucker.

You know nothing about me. I have seen plenty of your tripe to form the impression that you are an insecure Racist POS.

I generally support the police and what they do. You are the one projecting what if scenarios into this case. Sure, the suspect made plenty of bad decisions which I do not condone, but as the actual situation played out, not your hypothetical what if's, after he randomly fired the taser, when was he an imminent threat to the police that required use of deadly force?

your synopsis is the same kind of thinking that criminals employ.

Anyone who can critically think, understands there is a criminal segment of our population that attacks police without provocation. These are mentally disturbed sick individuals who pose a serious threat to society.

Insecure is a good description of your thin skinned response to criticism of any kind.

You are part of a knee jerk mob mentality, that is prevalent in today's society.

99% of our brave men and women protect society from very sick and depraved violent predators like the punk in Atlanta.

The American people understand that now. Fuck you and your left wing socialist party.
This isn't just me saying this.
100 million Americans are saying it, you insecure low IQ weak minded sheep.
Fuck you.

We know too many officers who also see this. You are a delusional fuck who follows like a brainwashed retard. Zero critical thinking skills.
What's going on in Seattle, Minneapolis, and several other cities now is evidence of this low IQ weak minded sheep mentality.

100 million of us are taking notice.
Got it little insecure left wing tard?

Still projecting I see.
Are you incapable of answering the simple question I posed?

atmdad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:44 pm Still projecting I see.
Are you incapable of answering the simple question I posed?

Sure.
Have you ever been in a violent struggle?

So sure, you can monday morning this situation.
Hindsight 20/20.

But every single day, male and female officers are in encounters with sub-humans of all races.
A sub human is an individual who preys on society.
Actually has thoughts of attacking police and killing them.

Human beings would NEVER EVER think of such a thing, much less do it.

So adrenaline is rushing because that is the very nature of a violent attack.
And according to the statistics, a male or female police officer is killed in the line of duty every 48 hours

Obviously, the floyd case was the .001% actual criminal cop.

This Atlanta incident was a real time violent incident
As a tax-paying member of society, I don't have a problem with this incident.

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:28 pm She is mildly amusing on her own, she just got stuck with your stink and that of your kkkrazy partner.

Meaning EAP doesn't respect me; but you respect me less than EAP or BP. Interpreting your post in T1BCHAZ.

Cacs gonna cac. It is what it is, and you is what you is.

atmdad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:44 pm Still projecting I see.
Are you incapable of answering the simple question I posed?

Can't speak for EAP. Saw the video, he was shot immediately after shooting a stolen taser at a cop. Open and shut. The cop will be reinstated if not in Atlanta then elsewhere.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:15 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:55 pm Unarmed
Shot in the Back

99.9% of humans would NEVER think of attacking an officer and stealing his weapons.

That's a lie.

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:08 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 3:28 pm She is mildly amusing on her own, she just got stuck with your stink and that of your kkkrazy partner.

Meaning EAP doesn't respect me; but you respect me less than EAP or BP. Interpreting your post in T1BCHAZ.

Cacs gonna cac. It is what it is, and you is what you is.

I respect you much more than you realize.

And, this just broke.

President Trump just signed executive orders on SWEEPING police reform across the entire country!
Something team Barack and Alzheimer's joe never did.

November here we come!

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:12 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:15 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:55 pm Unarmed
Shot in the Back

99.9% of humans would NEVER think of attacking an officer and stealing his weapons.

That's a lie.

really?
What kind of people are in your social circle?

Yes, really.
You’re a damn liar.

so, Eat a Penis and Irritable Bowel are fine with police officers shooting suspects in the back.

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:15 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:55 pm Unarmed
Shot in the Back

99.9% of humans would NEVER think of attacking an officer and stealing his weapons.
This ,001 % animal is where he belongs, away from society.

Ever think of joining him?
Just attack police and steal their weapons.
You'll be doing yourself and humanity a great favor.

That’s not a defense to murder 88.

atmdad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:04 pm so, Eat a Penis and Irritable Bowel are fine with police officers shooting suspects in the back.

Why yes, yes they are.

Bill in Houston wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:52 pm Yes, really.
You’re a damn liar.

the new guy too stupid to understand the atlanta punk was a predator.

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:50 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:15 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:55 pm Unarmed
Shot in the Back

99.9% of humans would NEVER think of attacking an officer and stealing his weapons.
This ,001 % animal is where he belongs, away from society.

Ever think of joining him?
Just attack police and steal their weapons.
You'll be doing yourself and humanity a great favor.

That’s not a defense to murder 88.

Kierland too stupid to understand definition of murder.
Too stupid to understand the Atlanta punk was a predator.

88 getting ass-kicked again.

TONTO laugh.

Kierland defending predators.
Karma is when predators like atlanta punk invade Kierland's crib. Kierland fetal position.
Karma.

TONTO wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 8:29 am 88 getting ass-kicked again.

TONTO laugh.

Tonto defends predator animal.
Karma come to horse fucker

Good riddance to another shit sack. Dead gnigger was on covid parole from a seven year sentence for violent child abuse.

Just cite the nice policeman for littering, drop the bag of trash in Dead Gnigger Storage and move on.

mvscal wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:58 pm Good riddance to another shit sack. Dead gnigger was on covid parole from a seven year sentence for violent child abuse.

Just cite the nice policeman for littering, drop the bag of trash in Dead Gnigger Storage and move on.

TRUTH WRITTEN IN LIGHTNING!

GAME!
SET!
MATCH!


Mvscal wins again!

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:26 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:12 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 6:15 pm

99.9% of humans would NEVER think of attacking an officer and stealing his weapons.

That's a lie.

really?
What kind of people are in your social circle?

Never is an absolute. Rational people aren't going to do it. Desperate people will. They're the same people. As for Rayshard, he was a special type of stupid drunk, not a cool drunk. He wasn't in Ahmaud's situation, being hunted down like prey. Rayshard was just your garden variety dude who hadn't progressed past 12 mentally and was trying to outrun responsibility for poor decision making.

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:51 pm

atmdad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:04 pm so, Eat a Penis and Irritable Bowel are fine with police officers shooting suspects in the back.

Why yes, yes they are.

EAP made a good comparison above about attacks and turned backs.

:P

mvscal wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:58 pm Good riddance to another shit sack. Dead gnigger was on covid parole from a seven year sentence for violent child abuse.
Wait, what? Source? Normally, I don't care, because (like with Floyd) it's irrelevant, but the earlier rumor was about his kid's birthday...

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 7:00 pm

EAP wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:26 pm

Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 8:12 pm

That's a lie.

really?
What kind of people are in your social circle?

Never is an absolute. Rational people aren't going to do it. Desperate people will. They're the same people. As for Rayshard, he was a special type of stupid drunk, not a cool drunk. He wasn't in Ahmaud's situation, being hunted down like prey. Rayshard was just your garden variety dude who hadn't progressed past 12 mentally and was trying to outrun responsibility for poor decision making.

Kierland wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:51 pm

atmdad wrote: ↑Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:04 pm so, Eat a Penis and Irritable Bowel are fine with police officers shooting suspects in the back.

Why yes, yes they are.

EAP made a good comparison above about attacks and turned backs.

IB.
100% correct.
But, logic and reasoning with Kierland is as useful as tits on a cockroach.

The Big Pickle wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 6:03 pm

mvscal wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 5:58 pm Good riddance to another shit sack. Dead gnigger was on covid parole from a seven year sentence for violent child abuse.

Just cite the nice policeman for littering, drop the bag of trash in Dead Gnigger Storage and move on.

TRUTH WRITTEN IN LIGHTNING!

GAME!
SET!
MATCH!


Mvscal wins again!

Did anyone verify that?
Violent child abuse?
If this is true, Society is better off.

Everything mvscal writes is TRUTH WRITTEN IN LIGHTNING!

mvscal is $$$$$$$

I guess most of you missed the press conference.

atmdad wrote: ↑Wed Jun 17, 2020 8:42 pm I guess most of you missed the press conference.

NOT GUILTY!

Good luck finding 12 people to watch that nog attack the police, steal the taser, fire the taser at the officer and still find the cops guilty!


You understand that all the cop needs is a reasonable fear for his safety!


NOT GUILTY!

BURN DOWN ATLANTA AGAIN!

SHERMAN didn't burn it good enough!


BURN
BABY
BURN!