Page 5 of 7

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:04 am
by Van
You and Sam are just bound and determined to repost every story mvscal already linked in this thread, arentcha?


:mrgreen:

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:28 pm
by Screw_Michigan
"I don't want them to think we're untamed children or anything...."

Bwaha!

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:52 pm
by R-Jack
Sudden Sam wrote:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/ ... rks-769123

Mother Seeks Trayvon Martin Trademarks|

Hell, might as well make a buck off my son...while I'm grieving, ya' know what I mean?
'Spray posted TMZ breaking that story. :mrgreen:

The only thing as sad as a mother making money off her dead son is a mother watching others make money off her dead son. I don't see this as a bad thing if she's looking to prevent the latter. She make have gotten some good advice after worring about people leeching off the tragedy, but it makes her a money grubbing whore if you want to look through the libtard hating lens. Ironically those are the same type of people who said not to rush to judgement when the kid was shot.

The second shirts with those trademarks hit the streets, go ahead and fling shit at her.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:05 pm
by Goober McTuber
Papa Willie wrote:http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1033062

A nice story here. Two black thugs set kid on fire because he's white. Almost kills him. They haven't found the black guys. Have y'all heard a fucking WORD about this shit? I have not.
Yes, I heard about it. Four weeks ago when it happened. If you occasionally took a break from stuffing your gob, you might have time to keep up with current events.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:29 pm
by Invictus
KC Scott wrote:
Sudden Sam wrote:
Did Trayvon Martin deserve to die? I don't know...I wasn't there. I hate to think anyone deserves to be shot.

Painiting Zimmerman (Jewish Hispanic?) as a racist appears to be ridiculous as well. A close friend of his (black) said that he tutors black kids on a regular basis.

But the consistent misrepresentation of the kid (old photos, hiding his school records, Facebook page taken down) is bullshit. And if the media doesn't start reporting the TRUTH in this case, the entire nation could explode.
SPOT ON

The media has gone from reporting the news to creating News

Who the fuck knows what this shit may incite
Charles Manson is in his jail cell saying "I told you so!"

Rahowa, Helter Skelter. A race riot over several states during one of the most important election cycles in history would be very deecem.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:07 pm
by Van
Sudden Sam wrote:By god, I don't think these have been posted yet!

http://www.local10.com/news/Police-Tray ... index.html

Police: Trayvon protesters ransack store

North Miami Beach Walgreens incident caught on video
I think you got the scoop on that one!

:applause:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/ ... rks-769123

Mother Seeks Trayvon Martin Trademarks|

Hell, might as well make a buck off my son...while I'm grieving, ya' know what I mean?
bradhusker (IIRC) beat you to that one!

:doh:

:lol:

(Edit: R-Jack says it was 'Spray.)

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:23 pm
by Van
Sam, the good news is that in the end this is just the story du jour. Like every other stupid media creation, this too will quickly be forgotten. People can only feign outrage for so long before one of the Kardashians gets pregnant again and the attention of the media dutifully shifts.

The shelf life on this one will probably only be another week or so before some other asshat does something stupid and we're on to the next lame topic.

We're Americans, and those National Enquirers aren't going to print themselves.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:40 pm
by Left Seater
Don't forget the New Black Panther Party which put out the bounty.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:30 pm
by bradhusker
msnbc is by far, THE WORST OFFENDER HERE. They are ignoring actual facts, and going out of their way to paint trayvon as a sweet and innocent child here. Martin Bashir closed his show today on msnbc with FACTS all showing trayvon to be sweet, BUT, Martin Bashir left out ONE VERY IMPORTANT FACT,`

An ACTUAL eyewitness who saw trayvon who is 6 ft 2, on top of zimmermann who is 5 ft 8. AND he is bashing his head into the pavement, AND this is backed up completely by hospital reports of deep gashes to the back of zimmermanns' skull. A REAL journalist would have included this in his report.
BUT like other msnbc left wing hacks, they completely hide ANY facts which dont shine a good light on their left wing agenda.

Friends, When the States Attorney gets hold of this information, which gets backed up by hospital records and the eyewitness's testimony, there will be no arrest, TRUST ME.

Trust me on this friends, I know the law here. I demand that the Sanford police chief be re-instated with full honors. Zimmermann was one skull bashing away from losing conciousness forever, I dare you to say that he must lose conciousness and die, instead of taking his gun and using it to preserve his own life. I DARE U.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:01 pm
by Van
I dare you to stop making these lame demands. You're in no position to demand anything, just as you have no weight, full or otherwise, to throw behind Mitt Romney's campaign.

You're a silly troll who writes at a third-grade Mayberry level. That's it.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:12 pm
by bradhusker
Van wrote:I dare you to stop making these lame demands. You're in no position to demand anything, just as you have no weight, full or otherwise, to throw behind Mitt Romney's campaign.

You're a silly troll who writes at a third-grade Mayberry level. That's it.
REALLY VAN? I bring up actual eyewitness testimony, which hospital records back up thru wounds consistent with said testimony, AND YOU VAN, beg to differ?

Then, I bring up the legal notion, that when a 6 ft 2 trayvon is bashing the skull of a 5 ft 8 zimmermann, again, eyewitness testimony, THAT legally its within zimmermann's legal rights to use his firearm rather than have his skull split open, AND YOU VAN beg to differ?

Interesting weird leftist you are van, indeed.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:22 pm
by Smackie Chan
bradhusker wrote:Interesting weird leftist you are van, indeed.
Can't argue with that.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:25 pm
by bradhusker
AND, I have listenned to the 911 audio some 25 times now. ANYONE who hears a racial slur of any kind is a sick disturbed left wing creep.
Last night on Lawrence O Donnell s show, he says he hears an obvious racial slur, "coon". HOWEVER, this shows how disturbed Lawrence O Donnell , Rachel Maddow, and Ed Shultz really are.

The word is clearly "PUNKS". anyone with a reasonable amount of intelligence can hear zimmermann say fuckin "PUNKS".

YET, the creepy weird left wing sickos on msnbc LIE and say it was a racial slur.

THIS proves how un-hinged they are over at msnbc. major meltdown.

SPEAKING of meltdowns , did anyone hear Obama's stupid attorney's argue before the supreme court the past three days?

These left wing Obama hacks tried to spin their agenda before the smartest judges in the world.
They literally got laughed out onto the sidewalk!!!!

A brilliant mind like John Roberts probably had to contain his sheer laughter at the hacks Obama sent in to pimp his plan.

Anthony Kennedy was also laughing at these losers. So was Scalia, Obama's solicitor general is a joke and a fool who came unprepared.

Even the judges appointed by democrats were laughing so hard they must have soiled their robes.

BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:29 pm
by Van
brad, where I beg to differ is not with your information, it's with your penchant for making silly demands. Oh, and for sounding like a six-year-old every time you troll with the Steven Segal/Chuck Norris garbage. And also for pretending to decry racism while spouting it at every turn.

Seriously, what grown-up would spend their days trolling that way? Of all the troll personas for you to adopt, why the fuck did you choose this one? A "cornfed stud" who nevertheless claims to be NYC born and raised, and who gushes like a Depends-wearing invalid over the corniest TV shit?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:30 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Van wrote:You're a silly troll.
Then why respond if you know the end user is just spewing bullshit.

Are you that bored?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:31 pm
by Van
Apparently.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:01 pm
by Truman
Reading a bradhusker post is like trying to wade through a New Jersey feed lot. Roll up your pants legs, kick off your Doc Martin's, and try to gain the other side as quickly as possible without anything unsavory clinging to your toes and ankles.

brad posts never fail to engage the autoscroll feature built into my laptop.

Yet what truly astounds, Van, is that you make the trip several times a day, posting your per usualm thoughtful, withering, er, ripostes, pummeling this sad troll into regular oblivion and banishing him to his accustomed station underneath his bridge.

Until he emerges again. Fucker won't die. Might wanna try wooden stakes next time, friendo. 'Sayin'.

brad is beginning to remind me of "Paul" from the early T1B days. A complete human pile-on who refuses to acknowledge when to quit. Trouble is, only you seem to have the ability to go soup-to-nuts on one of brad's posts.

I'm not sure if you should be commended... Or committed. :wink:

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:41 am
by Diego in Seattle
SS;
Ultimately it's the media to blame for most of this mess. Jackson & Sharpton wouldn't be jetting around the country if there wasn't a POS member of the media stupidly shoving a microphone in their piehole (just like the members of a certain whacko church in Topeka). If the media ever stopped giving them the time of day they'd go back to their holes & all races would be better for it. I don't know if they've ever proclaimed themselves as leaders of the black community, but they'd stop being that if the media stopped giving them the time of day.

The other half of the equation is the media's attempt to portray Martin as a saint & Zimmerman as a convict. The lack of pictures of Martin from the last three or four years was a huge flare that the media was slanting this story in a huge way.

Why would they do that?

Look at viewership & readership numbers from the '92 LA riots and I think you'll have your reason.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:01 am
by Van
Truman, at least I've reduced the length of my responses to brad. They're usually just short little rejoinders now.

By the way, can you or someone else here fill me in on the story behind 'usualm,' with the 'm' added? I know it's a longstanding joke, bit I missed its derivation.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:54 am
by bradhusker
Van wrote:brad, where I beg to differ is not with your information, it's with your penchant for making silly demands. Oh, and for sounding like a six-year-old every time you troll with the Steven Segal/Chuck Norris garbage. And also for pretending to decry racism while spouting it at every turn.

Seriously, what grown-up would spend their days trolling that way? Of all the troll personas for you to adopt, why the fuck did you choose this one? A "cornfed stud" who nevertheless claims to be NYC born and raised, and who gushes like a Depends-wearing invalid over the corniest TV shit?
Alright Van, let me clear a few things up. First, the Chuck Norris bit I do is for humor. Second, after watching msnbc shows like Ed, Lawrence and Maddow, I get so angry, that I start to notice things like the commentators they bring on. Usually weird and gay and hard core left.

So, In response to your concerns over my racist remarks, its the anger I feel at the lies spewed forth on msnbc. And the creepy weird commentators they put forth as experts.

I guess I could just stick to the facts, HOWEVER, I find myself drifting over to the dark side now and then. I see the very weird leftists brought on to give opinions over at msnbc. Jonathon Capeheart,(gay black), Charles Blow, (another gay black) appropriate name by the way. Julian Epstein, (gay jew) Jonathon Turley, (gay leftist) Michael Mustow( gay creepy weird leftist) etc etc

There are literally a few hundred more weird leftists who would NEVER be asked to appear on serious news shows due to their far far left views. I get angry when msnbc parades these guys on their shows as so-called experts, like we should take seriously what they have to say?

Here is a perfect example, Jonathon Capeheart tried to match wits with New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, it was a joke, Christie made Capeheart look like a little dick sucking fool without a fuckin clue.

When any of these fools leaves the safety of msnbc and tries to actually debate a real hard core republican like Chris Christie, they get bitch slapped in a bad way.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:26 pm
by Dinsdale
Van wrote:By the way, can you or someone else here fill me in on the story behind 'usualm,' with the 'm' added? I know it's a longstanding joke, bit I missed its derivation.

Anymore, I think "someone else" is down to me, Cuda, and Bace, with an occasional Invictus mixed in.

It's a Dennardism. The man left a legacy.

His extremely large fingers led to many words frequently had recurring typos with an adjacent letter on the keyboard mixed in.

Blacvk was a classic, and I'm forgetting the others at the moment. "Usualm" was generally the most amusing, since I'm not sure how even that giant dude managed to hit the M after the L... I think he did some of that stuff on porpose.

I miss reading about the invisible models and Emo Gurl. I'll have to pur our some laundry soap and such in honor of the big lug.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:56 pm
by Van
Dins, I figured it had something to do with hitting the 'm' when he meant to hit the adjacent comma key, since I often see 'usualm' with the 'm' replacing a comma. Hell, I do that quite a bit.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:04 pm
by War Wagon
bradhusker wrote:So, In response to your concerns over my racist remarks, its the anger I feel at the lies spewed forth on msnbc.
I watch MSNBC all the time and far from getting angry, I find it hilarious. If it makes you angry, change the channel. You know what you're going to get there, just like you know what you'll get from Fox.

I prefer to categorize watching Ed and Rachel as 'knowing what the enemy is thinking'... kinda like reading a Goobs post.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:10 pm
by Derron
Image

NRA selling concealed-carry hoodies

Until the death of Trayvon Martin, the hoodie was best known as the wardrobe choice of unshowered college kids, an in-disguise E.T. and Bill Belichick -- now, it's a co-star in the coverage surrounding the case, especially since the fashion-forward NRA has gotten involved. Their official Made-in-the-USA Concealed Carry Hooded Sweatshirt has been designed to include a pair of internal gun pockets. According to their online store, it "gives you an extra tactical edge because its unstructured, casual design appears incapable of concealing a heavy firearm -- but it does so with ease!"

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:13 pm
by bradhusker
War Wagon wrote:
bradhusker wrote:So, In response to your concerns over my racist remarks, its the anger I feel at the lies spewed forth on msnbc.
I watch MSNBC all the time and far from getting angry, I find it hilarious. If it makes you angry, change the channel. You know what you're going to get there, just like you know what you'll get from Fox.

I prefer to categorize watching Ed and Rachel as 'knowing what the enemy is thinking'... kinda like reading a Goobs post.
I suppose you are right, maybe I should take msnbc with a grain of salt. Laugh at their weird creepy talking heads, who, would be laughed off of any serious news journal.

Thanks for helping me see things more clearly here.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:22 pm
by R-Jack
Derron wrote: According to their online store, it "gives you an extra tactical edge because its unstructured, casual design appears incapable of concealing a heavy firearm -- but it does so with ease!"
So what type of person would need an extra tactical edge with consealed gunplay while wearing a hoodie?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:24 pm
by bradhusker
Guys, I'd like to clear up something if I may. Trayvon martin had his backpack searched down in Miami by school officials. they found an extra large flathead screwdriver and several thousand dollars worth of women's diamond and gold jewelry.

This isnt my opinion, but stone cold FACT.

It shows that trayvon was a fuckin head case with mental problems.

When I was 17, I never had those items in my backpack. Because I wasnt a criminal thug.

Now, I know this information is inadmissable, FINE, I only bring it up to show what kind of animal we are dealing with here.

Now, to the people defending trayvon, there is absolutely nothing wrong with finding those items in his backpack.
BUT, to healthy people, its a HUGE RED FLAG.

Zimmermann's dad came forward today saying that trayvon told his son that he was going to die today. GUESS AGAIN trayvon, YOU FUCKED WITH THE WRONG PERSON PUNK ASS BITCH.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:48 pm
by R-Jack
Link it up next time or it goes away brad.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... story.html

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:57 pm
by Van
It didn't match the description of any "reported thefts"?

:lol:

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:04 pm
by bradhusker
R-Jack wrote:Link it up next time or it goes away brad.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... story.html
Hey jack? Did I say he committed a burglary? NO I DID NOT.
Second, the report I cited was from the miami herald, ever heard of them jack?
Third, care to tell me how a 17 yr old can afford that kind of jewelry?
Take your time, Im not in a hurry.

DO NOT INSULT THIS BOARD. I never said he was charged with ANYTHING. BUT, unless you can give me a nice explanation of how a punk kid can afford expensive jewelry, dont insult our intelligence.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:05 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
bradhusker wrote:...they found an extra large flathead screwdriver and several thousand dollars worth of women's diamond and gold jewelry.
Maybe he was working part-time after school as an electrician's apprentice to earn the money to buy his mom something nice...like jewellery. Ever consider that?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:08 pm
by R-Jack
bradhusker wrote:
R-Jack wrote:Link it up next time or it goes away brad.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... story.html
Hey jack? Did I say he committed a burglary? NO I DID NOT.
Second, the report I cited was from the miami herald, ever heard of them jack?
Third, care to tell me how a 17 yr old can afford that kind of jewelry?
Take your time, Im not in a hurry.

DO NOT INSULT THIS BOARD. I never said he was charged with ANYTHING. BUT, unless you can give me a nice explanation of how a punk kid can afford expensive jewelry, dont insult our intelligence.
Link it up next time or it goes away brad.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:09 pm
by bradhusker
Martyred wrote:
bradhusker wrote:...they found an extra large flathead screwdriver and several thousand dollars worth of women's diamond and gold jewelry.
Maybe he was working part-time after school as an electrician's apprentice to earn the money to buy his mom something nice...like jewellery. Ever consider that?
OK, I guess I could swallow that explanation marty in the same way you or I would be able to swallow a full grown elephants cock.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:11 pm
by bradhusker
R-Jack wrote:Link it up next time or it goes away brad.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... story.html
OK, so let me understand, Do I have to actually have a link? OR, can I cite the miami herald or some other trustworthy news organization, then have you check from there?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:14 pm
by bradhusker
It seems fair to me, and I would guess most others on this board, that if I cite a reputable news organization, that in and of itself should suffice. Once I do that, all you'd have to do is just click, and you will see what I have cited. THEN, if what I cited isnt there, I would have to explain myself.

sound fair?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:15 pm
by Van
bradhusker wrote:DO NOT INSULT THIS BOARD.
:lol:
BUT, unless you can give me a nice explanation of how a punk kid can afford expensive jewelry, dont insult our intelligence.
The Herald reported that when campus security confronted Martin with the jewelry, he told them that a friend had given it to him, but he wouldn’t give a name.

Yep, 'cause that's what teenage friends do. They give each other "thousands of dollars" worth of diamond and gold jewelry. Gifting each other with watches is the new Facebook.

What's the problem?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:17 pm
by R-Jack
bradhusker wrote:It seems fair to me, and I would guess most others on this board, that if I cite a reputable news organization, that in and of itself should suffice. Once I do that, all you'd have to do is just click, and you will see what I have cited. THEN, if what I cited isnt there, I would have to explain myself.

sound fair?
Did I fucking stutter?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:20 pm
by bradhusker
For example, I cited an article in the miami herald, why should I supply a link, when all you need do is simply click over to their site?
I dont make shit up, unless I am being funny and looking for laughs. In the case of martin's backpack, I simply cited the article from the miami herald. So, again, why go to the trouble of supplying a link, when a simple click could bring anyone to the miami herald in mere seconds?

I consider it an insult to my intelligence when I must supply you with a link. YES, I damm sure do.
What is this, middle school?

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:24 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
bradhusker wrote: I consider it an insult to my intelligence when I must supply you with a link. YES, I damm sure do.
What is this, middle school?
It's called "sourcing" your material.

Felchco doesn't do it either.


Brad, don't be like Felchco. You're better than this, man.

Re: Okay - this subject needs to be touched on.

Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:27 pm
by bradhusker
alright alright, The real reason I dont do links is cause im old school. I still dont know how to port things over from youtube. THERE, are you happy now Jack? You've embarrassed me into telling everyone in here why I dont have links/

feel better?