I am considering putting the following people on ignore...

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:52 pm

Jsc wrote:Let's set up a flight with a path that would demonstrate the general shape of the planet. If it is shown to be anything other than round, then I'll pay 100% of the expenses.

I (or someone) would have to take a flight going N-S over the entire continent of Antarctica, including directly over the South Pole.

That's not going to happen.
It can't happen. Not allowed.

But if that did happen, it would...

1. Make it difficult to reconcile a flat earth, unless the location of continents are entirely different than what we believe them to be.

2. Not prove your globe

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:31 am

Jayne wrote:You seem to think that science and religion are somehow at war with each other. Cracked a book or watched the news recently? These days, the two are walking hand in hand.

The arrogance has always been stunning.

You only make an asinine statement like that because you insist on things like passing your very dumb globe off as a fact.

Do you think science and religion would be walking hand in hand if it was shown to be a fact that the earth is flat and enclosed?

How do you even tie your own shoes?

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:42 am

This is a good example of the arrogance of the "science" people.

Carl Sagan?

"Wow, he's brilliant!"

"He would not deceive me"
"He wouldn't be full of shit."

"This is SCIENCE!"

"You are dumb, poptart."

So what is wrong with Carl's (the dead Mason) analysis?

Well...

At 2:40, he makes the ASSumption that the sun is... sooo far way that its rays are parallel to the earth as they approach.

But what if the sun is not far away, but is instead close to the earth?
Then the rays of the sun approach different locations on earth at different angles and...

His conclusion is ----> horseshit.

Carl talked about brains at the end.

rotf...

Rot In Peace

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:39 pm

Papa Willie wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:43 pmNever knew that. That wasn’t cheap. I always thought “fuck if they didn’t pull off the weightless scenes really well!” Still one of the best movies ever made, IMO.

Indeed. They spent the money on multiple takes and shot the real deal. Great film about an amazing moment in space history. The science and math alone that Lovell, Swigert and Haise pulled off along with the NASA engineers was miraculous.

You can see from poptart's multiple, rambling responses that he's about to come unglued. Well, more than he is already. THIS is why I keep debating, his lunacy is just so entertaining. Keep plugging away poop tard.

Sale, sorry man, but your last post to me was a bit hard to decipher. Could you rephrase that please?

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:49 pm

Jayne wrote:rambling responses

Each post (except the one to Jsc) gave you a pretty hard *thumping*.

Those who are are willing to pay attention to what I posted can plainly see it.

Beg me to stop calling you Jayne again.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 3:18 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 2:49 pm
Jayne wrote:rambling responses
Each post (except the one to Jsc) gave you a pretty hard *thumping*.

Those who are are willing to pay attention to what I posted can plainly see it.

Beg me to stop calling you Jayne again.

Beg? Bwahahahaha!!!!

Idiot. Since I was having a rational and polite conversation with Sale, I thought you might want to drop the crap and join in. Instead, you keep going to the same juvenile crap you continue to wade in like a senile old fart who just soiled his adult diaper.

No, you old dried out vagina, the only ass getting kicked here is your own. By yourself.

Revel in it moron. Indulge yourself with your irrelevant, so-called math and stick the numbers where they belong...in your dusty cunt.

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:44 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:27 pm I would settle for you explaining how I can see South Lake Tahoe from a dock in Incline village Nevada. I can show you the math that says I shouldn’t be able to if you would like.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:09 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:44 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:27 pm I would settle for you explaining how I can see South Lake Tahoe from a dock in Incline village Nevada. I can show you the math that says I shouldn’t be able to if you would like.

Okay, go for it. One question before you do...what is your elevation compared to Lake Tahoe?

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:24 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:52 pmI (or someone) would have to take a flight going N-S over the entire continent of Antarctica, including directly over the South Pole.

That's not going to happen.
It can't happen. Not allowed.

But if that did happen, it would...

1. Make it difficult to reconcile a flat earth, unless the location of continents are entirely different than what we believe them to be.

2. Not prove your globe

I told you JSC that he won't do it. Hey pops, is you are restricted from going N-S, why not simply go East to West? It accomplishes the same goal. The location and shape of the continents has been known for centuries. They are exactly what we see them to be on maps. On top of that, how in the world, if you circumnavigate the world in a single pass and end up where you started from NOT prove a globe?

Logic 101.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:24 pm

I see the usual suspects are still stuck on the idea that Earth's atmosphere is a vacuum... even though they're currently breathing.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Fri Jul 05, 2019 10:00 pm

Dinsdale wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:24 pm I see the usual suspects are still stuck on the idea that Earth's atmosphere is a vacuum... even though they're currently breathing.

Yeppers. Epic fail on physics, logic, science and basic common knowledge.

Amusing, but kinda sad.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:09 am

Jayne wrote:Since I was having a rational and polite conversation with Sale, I thought you might want to drop the crap and join in.

Pipe down, snake.

You're not interested in information and evidence, and this is not Mr. Rogers Neighborhood here.

If you were interested in sincere dialogue on this issue you would have responded to our information and evidence years ago.

The flat earth will never leave your psyche, and that is why you continually bring it up.
lol

#snake

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:17 am

Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:09 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:44 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:27 pm I would settle for you explaining how I can see South Lake Tahoe from a dock in Incline village Nevada. I can show you the math that says I shouldn’t be able to if you would like.

Okay, go for it. One question before you do...what is your elevation compared to Lake Tahoe?

We are at 1200.
Tahoe is 6220.
Given the given circumference of the earth the south shore (at 25 miles away) should be 450feet “lower” than the north shore.
Do you dispute that math?

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:19 am

Dinsdale wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 8:24 pm I see the usual suspects are still stuck on the idea that Earth's atmosphere is a vacuum... even though they're currently breathing.

If you would like to show me the equation for the refraction of light I’m listening.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:21 am

Jayne wrote:I told you JSC that he won't do it. Hey pops, is you are restricted from going N-S, why not simply go East to West? It accomplishes the same goal.

You truly are a dingbat who needs to -----> get up to speed on this topic, instead of posting asinine things that reveal you have done NO homework.

E-W over over Antarctica will NEVER prove your globe.

N-S won't either, although N-S (including the pole) would make a flat earth seen very unlikely.

Jayne wrote:On top of that, how in the world, if you circumnavigate the world in a single pass and end up where you started from NOT prove a globe?

Probably because it is quite obvious that it is possible to "circumnavigate" a flat earth traveling E-W.
lol

#dingbat

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 1:58 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:21 am
Jayne wrote:I told you JSC that he won't do it. Hey pops, is you are restricted from going N-S, why not simply go East to West? It accomplishes the same goal.

You truly are a dingbat who needs to -----> get up to speed on this topic, instead of posting asinine things that reveal you have done NO homework.

E-W over over Antarctica will NEVER prove your globe.

N-S won't either, although N-S (including the pole) would make a flat earth seen very unlikely.

Jayne wrote:On top of that, how in the world, if you circumnavigate the world in a single pass and end up where you started from NOT prove a globe?

Probably because it is quite obvious that it is possible to "circumnavigate" a flat earth traveling E-W.
lol

#dingbat

Um, no. You can't circumnavigate a flat surface.

Jesus Christ you're a fucking retard. Who mentioned Antarctica...beside you? N-S implies over the poles. E-W implies around the Equator. If you're so hung up about Antarctica, choose a different path. But that still leaves you as a yellow, piss stained cowardly bitch who won't do the right thing and take a free trip.

#bitch

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:10 pm

E-W "circumnavigation," 'tard.

E-W circumnavigation proves exactly dick.

N-S circumnavigation (over both poles) would mean something.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:11 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 12:17 am
Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:09 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:44 pm
Okay, go for it. One question before you do...what is your elevation compared to Lake Tahoe?
We are at 1200.
Tahoe is 6220.
Given the given circumference of the earth the south shore (at 25 miles away) should be 450feet “lower” than the north shore.
Do you dispute that math?

It isn't the math that I question, it's your line of sight. I would ask you to take a picture and show that you can actually see what you claim. On a flat surface, the human eye, on average, can only see up to 2.9 miles. Given weather or pollution factoring in, it could be less. Now then, the higher you are the further you see. Or, on a clear night, you can see light at a much greater distance, like a flickering flame up to 30 miles away.

Show me a photo that demonstrates your math.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:11 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:10 pm

E-W "circumnavigation," 'tard.

E-W circumnavigation proves exactly dick.

N-S circumnavigation (over both poles) would mean something.

Utter bullshit.

But keep swinging and whiffing softbrain batshit.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:14 pm

Jayne wrote:It isn't the math that I question, it's your line of sight. I would ask you to take a picture and show that you can actually see what you claim

Pictures of such things have been shown on this board many times, Jayne.

Unfortunately for you, you are among the -----> very slow.

poptart wrote:I posted the laser tests months ago, 'tard.

7 laser tests in 7 different locations in 7 different weather conditions.

Curvature for your globe -----> never present.

https://fecore.org/final-results-fecore ... e-surface/

https://fecore.org/project/laser-experiment/

And I've posted at least a dozen other examples of the the curvature -----> never being there.

Math is neat!

So is truth.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:18 pm

Liar. If that were true, you would post one photo right now.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sat Jul 06, 2019 2:21 pm

BTW...those links are worthless.

Carry on.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:10 am

You are slow, Jayne, but you really ought not advertise it.

No photos?

Just an example...

https://fecore.org/final-results-fecore ... e-surface/

On page 37 of the report.

Everything is in the 121 page report.
7 tests at 7 locations at 7 distances in 7 weather condition.

Not only is the curvature for the globe nowhere to be found, the results all show that the water is essentially -----> flat, in all cases.

Wow, who knew?

Fully documented -- and posted by me on the board many months ago.

#science

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:56 pm

Yeah...there's just one little problem with your precious web site and their resources.

True scientists have debunked their bullshit.

The group is not even remotely headed up by science or scientists. They are a scam.

Plenty of info about them if you just Google. They are even using threats and lawsuits to propagate their false flat Earth agenda.

But please do carry on. You look more and more idiotic with each flailing post.

#real science

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:13 pm

Softball Bat wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:35 pm
Why do you persist in arguing (again) with dolts like MS and I who supposedly deny basic reality?

Why would you kick yourself in the balls like that ? We all know you are a dolt, but thanks for confirming it.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:15 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 6:09 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Fri Jul 05, 2019 5:44 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:27 pm I would settle for you explaining how I can see South Lake Tahoe from a dock in Incline village Nevada. I can show you the math that says I shouldn’t be able to if you would like.

Okay, go for it. One question before you do...what is your elevation compared to Lake Tahoe?

On of off his step stool ?? The one he uses to piss in the toilet with.

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:26 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 1:56 pm Yeah...there's just one little problem with your precious web site and their resources.

True scientists have debunked their bullshit.

The group is not even remotely headed up by science or scientists. They are a scam.

Plenty of info about them if you just Google. They are even using threats and lawsuits to propagate their false flat Earth agenda.

But please do carry on. You look more and more idiotic with each flailing post.

#real science

Can you please provide that to me?
I will take a pic of what I’m talking about next time I’m in Tahoe.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:30 pm

Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:26 pmCan you please provide that to me?
I will take a pic of what I’m talking about next time I’m in Tahoe.

There are several. Just Google the words CRITICS OF FFECORE.

Here's one link. https://www.thedailyplane.com/fecore-is ... lat-earth/

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:22 pm

I didn’t watch all of the video but it just seem to be a bunch of people saying that it was a scam. That’s not science that’s closer to propaganda. Why is it a scam?

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:42 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:30 pm
Kierland wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 2:26 pmCan you please provide that to me?
I will take a pic of what I’m talking about next time I’m in Tahoe.

There are several. Just Google the words CRITICS OF FFECORE.

Here's one link. https://www.thedailyplane.com/fecore-is ... lat-earth/

Jayne just kicked his own ass -----> BADLY!

The site Jayne linked to is a pro-flat earth.

LMAO!

The site is called -- The Daily Plane.

The video is by... Shill Nye The Science Lie.

Get it?

The first 1:05 of the video is MAKING FUN OF THE COMMENTS DUMB GlOBE WORSHIPPERS MKE.

Watch the whole video.
It is pro flat earth and it is pro-FECORE.

4:33 - 4:40 - "So, sorry folks. It's flat. Independent research groups like FECORE are exposing this truth more and more each day. I'm sorry."

Jayne is an idiot who just gave himself a HELLUVA beating with this one.

Too
too
funny!

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:44 pm

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 3:58 pm

Okay, I'll own up that I didn't watch the video. Just went by the statements claiming scam.

Let's reset. Try this one...https://flatearthlunacy.com/index.php/2 ... n-campaign

This helps explain their scam.

Softball Bat · Post by **Softball Bat** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 4:06 pm

Stay down.

A guy crying on a website about FECORE.

lol

Eject, Jayne.

Seriously.

You never should have tried to start this shit.

Hey...

The smart kids got dialed in LONG AGO to the reality that the globe simply has BIG issues.

Big, big issues.

Smart kids.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 4:25 pm

Whatever you say nut ball. You want to believe in fraudulent groups, sites and videos? Be my guest.

Continue to live your life in lunacy.

You know pops, for someone who is as old as you are, you certainly do behave like a petulant, bratty five year old.

What happened to you? Once upon a time you were half way readable. Even on point with good messages.

What caused you to snap?

Sad. :(

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 5:18 pm

This thread deserved to be TROTSed weeks ago.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 5:27 pm

Actually Screw, I don't disagree.

In the meantime, here's more "special effects" for poop tard.

Enjoy.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:08 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 5:18 pm This thread deserved to be TROTSed weeks ago.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Jul 07, 2019 6:10 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote: ↑Sun Jul 07, 2019 4:25 pm
Continue to live your life in lunacy.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 8:56 pm

:grin:

Kierland · Post by **Kierland** » Sun Jul 07, 2019 10:12 pm

So they may have had a 501(c)(3) violation. What does that have to do with lasers?