President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/ri ... 0-negative
....the remaining airtime (51 minutes) consisted of mostly positive coverage (73% positive) for the rest of Trump’s economic agenda: job growth, tax reform, deregulation, and plans for more infrastructure spending. Yet this coverage has amounted to less than three percent of TV’s total coverage of the President this year.

The positive economic story is probably one reason why the public has rewarded Trump with higher approval ratings, despite the bad press. Another is that the public’s trust in the media has been eroding for years, which means that journalists are less credible critics than they might have been years ago.
Public trust of the media has been eroding because of the 90% negative content and the constant supporting liberal political agendas.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Goober McTuber »

newsbusters.org? :lol:
Newsbusters - Right bias

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

Notes: Newbusters claims to expose liberal bias much like its parent website MRC, however this site is also very right wing biased like MRC and perhaps even less factual. Newsbusters uses extensive loaded words and always covers just one side of the story. That side always benefits conservatives and is against liberals.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

So Goobs you disagree with their take that good news about job growth, tax reform, deregulation, and plans for more infrastructure spending amounts to less than 3% of TV'S total coverage of the president this year?

Or that the public distrusts the media?

From my point of view those takes are right on.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Goober McTuber »

I'm not impressed by your source. I would expect this president to generate a fair amount of negative press. He lies as easily as he breathes. I don't consider the tax reform as a positive, particularly when combined with the budget. Deregulation is not necessarily a positive, depending on what is being deregulated.

Joe in PB wrote:From my point of view those takes are right on.
Of course. It's what you want to hear.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29908
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Mikey »

Calling a piece of shit a piece of shit is not "negative reporting." It's telling the truth.

You all would rather the press call this piece of shit a sweet smelling rose. Sorry, that just doesn't work.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

Goober McTuber wrote:
Of course. It's what you want to hear.
More importantly, it's what I see. Trump deserves some criticism, but 90%? No, not when he's made strides in Korea and unemployment is near record lows. He lies, and I don't like it, but could care less about affairs, like I did with Clinton. I never thought impeachment proceedings for his infidelity should have happened.

I'm not an apologist for the Democratic or Republican parties. I call em' like I see em'.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Goober McTuber »

He's done jack shit so far with Korea. North Korea has made promises before and broken them every time. He lies about a lot more things that affairs. He continually exaggerates lies about what he has accomplished.

On Friday the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the economy added 148,000 nonfarm jobs in December but only 139,000 when the revisions for October and November are included. A better way to understand how the job market is doing is to include the revisions and look at a multi-month average. This is especially important due to the impact of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma since September only added 38,000 jobs.

Updated BLS information now has Trump now only being behind Obama's last 4 years vs. 6.

These are the original and updated numbers.

2011: 2.091 million

2012: 2.142 million

2013: 2.302 million

2014: 2.998 millon

2015: 2.713 million

2016: 2.240 million

2017 original: 2.046 million

2017 updated: 2.188 million
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Rooster »

For me it’s not so much the negative coverage, but the massive chasm between the fawning coverage of Obama, where the press did absolutely nothing in terms of critical examination of his speeches, policies, and his performance and the exact opposite reaction to Trump. That dichotomy is what has brought us to where we are when we look at how Americans view the press.

I love a distrustful press. I want them to test the veracity of everything a president says and does. I want the press to hold our government’s feet to the fire. But if they can’t do it to both party’s elected representatives on an equal basis, then they have abrogated their responsibilities and no longer serve a purpose and are simply propaganda for one side or the other.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Rooster wrote:...where the press did absolutely nothing in terms of critical examination of his speeches, policies, and his performance...
There was nothing to examine. He was a complete cardboard cut-out, water-carrier for the establishment.
Said nothing amounting to anything.
Did nothing amounting to anything.

His eight years were a complete (half)-black hole of meaningless placeholding.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Sirfindafold
Shit Thread Alert
Posts: 2939
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 4:08 pm

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Sirfindafold »

Shlong ark wrote: There was nothing to examine. He was a complete cardboard cut-out, water-carrier for the establishment.
Said nothing amounting to anything.
Did nothing amounting to anything.

His eight years were a complete (half)-black hole of meaningless placeholding.
Tell that to my tax accountant.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Left Seater »

Goober McTuber wrote: I don't consider the tax reform as a positive
Most Liberals like yourself don’t. They want more taxes and more spending. Budget be damned.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Derron »

Goober McTuber wrote:I'm not impressed by your source.
Of course not, it is not your one trick CNN honks.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Goober McTuber »

Left Seater wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote: I don't consider the tax reform as a positive
Most Liberals like yourself don’t. They want more taxes and more spending. Budget be damned.
Yes, by all means go ahead and tell me what I want. And next time, include the entire sentence, you disingenuous tard.
I don't consider the tax reform as a positive, particularly when combined with the budget.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Goober McTuber »

Papa Willie wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:newsbusters.org? :lol:
Newsbusters - Right bias

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

Notes: Newbusters claims to expose liberal bias much like its parent website MRC, however this site is also very right wing biased like MRC and perhaps even less factual. Newsbusters uses extensive loaded words and always covers just one side of the story. That side always benefits conservatives and is against liberals.

And Goobs - your source for ^^^ would be?
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newsbusters/

They identify left bias as well.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20574
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Screw_Michigan »

What a surprise to see a drooling simpleton like Joe Blow get spun like a top by President Blowhard. Is there anything your gullible ass won't believe?
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20574
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Left Seater wrote:Most Liberals like yourself don’t. They want more taxes and more spending. Budget be damned.
Budget be damned? Said the dipshit who voted for the president and the GOPers who just passed the budget blasting tax reform bill.

You are the dumbest pilot alive.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

He's done jack shit so far with Korea.
Trump negotiates release of 3 Americans held in Korea

The fact that there are scheduled peace talks is something Obama couldn..didn't do. No crying from pops today either, looks to be a great day indeed.

Even Screwy the board cry baby can't complain much, except anything Trump is for, he is not, like legal immigration. So in this case he'll just curl up into the fetal position.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Rooster »

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Left Seater wrote:Most Liberals like yourself don’t. They want more taxes and more spending. Budget be damned.
Budget be damned? Said the dipshit who voted for the president and the GOPers who just passed the budget blasting tax reform bill.

You are the dumbest pilot alive.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. I thought I was the dumbest pilot alive according to you. Now you let some Johnny-come-lately take my crown. No way. Not gonna happen. If I see Left Seater I will fight him!
Cock o' the walk, baby!
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Goober McTuber »

Tough call. You guys are neck and neck.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Bucmonkey
2011 CFB Bowl Pic Champ
Posts: 2828
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: ...

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Bucmonkey »

Suck that cock J...
Go Bucs, Gators
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

Since when is stating facts cock sucking?

I guess when ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, etc started bending over for the Democratic party on a daily basis.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29908
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Mikey »

Joe in PB wrote:Since when is stating facts cock sucking?
About the same time it becomes negative coverage or fake news?
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

242 years after our founding fathers said fuck you to Britain Democrats want to establish the UK 2.0. Higher taxes, higher welfare, weak job market, less freedom, more rules, regulations, and bullshit.

Fuck that.

Image
Last edited by Joe in PB on Wed May 09, 2018 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

Mikey wrote: About the same time it becomes negative coverage or fake news?
What have I posted here that is fake news? Not that I expect logic to be ever applied to anything you post.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8943
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Joe in PB wrote:242 years after our founding fathers said fuck you to Britain Democrats want to establish the UK 2.0. Higher taxes, higher welfare, weak job market, less freedom, more rules, regulations, and bullshit.

Fuck that.

Image
Republicans are trying to emulate Britain as well.

The difference is that Democrats want to copy current-day England as opposed to the Republicans are trying to take us back to the days of feudalism during the Middle Ages.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29908
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Mikey »

Joe in PB wrote:
Mikey wrote: About the same time it becomes negative coverage or fake news?
What have I posted here that is fake news? Not that I expect logic to be ever applied to anything you post.
Think about it for a few minutes. If you have even half a functioning brain you might get it.

Probably way too much to expect, though.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Derron »

Diego in Seattle wrote:
The difference is that Democrats want to copy current-day England
For once you get something right. Soon as the Democrats get done taking all the legal guns away and letting them Muslim cocksuckers take over and breed their way to control majority, you liberal fucks can say mission accomplished.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Left Seater »

Screw_Michigan wrote:
Left Seater wrote:Most Liberals like yourself don’t. They want more taxes and more spending. Budget be damned.
Budget be damned? Said the dipshit who voted for the president and the GOPers who just passed the budget blasting tax reform bill.

You are the dumbest pilot alive.
Yeah, I am the same pilot who has called for an immediate 20% cut across the board on all spend with no exceptions. I have also called for the elimination of multiple government agencies. Meanwhile you voted for someone who wanted to raise taxes and spending.

Get your facts straight jizz mopper.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

Trump is more popular than Dems want to admit
By Willie Brown San Francisco Chronicle

It’s time for the Democrats to stop bashing President Trump.

It’s not going to be easy, given his policies and personality. It might even mean checking into a 12-step program. But setting a winning agenda is like maneuvering an aircraft carrier. It takes time to change course. And if they want to be on target for the November midterm elections, the Democrats need to start changing course now.

President Trump’s policies remain popular with many Americans, which means Democrats need to find a campaign strategy beyond just bashing him. Trump is more popular than Dems want to admit

Like it or not, a significant number of Americans are actually happy these days. They are making money. They feel safe, and they agree with with the president’s protectionist trade policies, his call for more American jobs, even his immigration stance.

The jobs growth reports, the North Korea summit and the steady economy are beating out the Stormy Daniels scandal and the Robert Mueller investigation in Middle America, hands down.

So you are not going to win back the House by making it all about him.

Rather than stoking the base by attacking Trump, Democrats need to come up with a platform that addresses the average voters’ hopes and concerns. Not just the needs of underdogs or whatever cause happens to be the media flavor of the week.

Democrats need to look like the adults, not like another pack of screaming kids on the playground.

And they need to start yesterday.
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29908
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Mikey »

You forgot this part, dumbass:
the rest of your linked story wrote:Besides, when it comes to bashing Trump, Donald is doing just fine on his own.
Yeah, dems should stop bashing trump. Willie Brown is doing fine on his own.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

That's why I left a link, and that way you know it isn't fake news. An article written by a long standing Democrat who is echoing a take of mine posted weeks ago.

Of course if you weren't a total zero you might have figured that out.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29908
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Mikey »

Joe in PB wrote:
Of course if you weren't a total zero..
So you’re actually a Valley Girl?
You had me like totally fooled for a while there, Stacey.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

Gibberish isn't fresh, neither is talking to yourself.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

The cancelling of the Korean summit certainly is a missed opportunity. The deal maker couldn't even attend and lay out his offer, because his offer stunk.

An offer to jump start N Korea's economy with American and European businesses would have been tough to turn down. Stating before hand that the US wasn't going to do so was dumb and the outcome predictable. Basically a one sided deal for N Korea with a limp dick promise that the UN would do what it could. A missed opportunity for Trump and American business.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20574
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Joe in PB wrote:The cancelling of the Korean summit certainly is a missed opportunity. The deal maker couldn't even attend and lay out his offer, because his offer stunk.

An offer to jump start N Korea's economy with American and European businesses would have been tough to turn down. Stating before hand that the US wasn't going to do so was dumb and the outcome predictable. Basically a one sided deal for N Korea with a limp dick promise that the UN would do what it could. A missed opportunity for Trump and American business.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Props on admitting Trump and his incompetent crew fucked this up. You're slowly making progress.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

Over the weekend, a number of left-wing activists, including Shaun King and Linda Sarsour began circulating images showing children in detention centers. Those children were being held after crossing the border illegally, many of them completely unaccompanied.

They claimed those pictures were of children who were separated from their families at the border by the Trump administration.

The only problem with that claim is that the pictures they used weren’t taken while President Trump was in office.

They came from a 2014 article by AZCentral, an Arizona based news site.

Even people close to former President Obama mirrored the lie, Jon Favreau, who was Obama’s speechwriter, tweeted out a link to the AZCentral article from 2014, stating.

“This is happening right now, and the only debate that matters is how we force our government to get these kids back to their families as fast as humanly possible,” Favreau included in his now-deleted Tweet.

While Favreau deleted his tweet, other liberal activists like King and Sarsour have refused to take them down; even after being informed that they were misleading people.

These tweets prove how clueless the left is.

These attacks show just how out of touch the anti-Trump movement is with reality.

For many years, immigration enforcement was a bi-partisan issue.

People from the likes of Barack Obama, to Hillary Clinton, and Nancy Pelosi supported building a border fence in order to secure the border.

Now that Trump is in office, they have vocally attacked the idea of securing the border, oftentimes without acknowledging their hypocrisy.....

http://greatamericandaily.com/anti-trump-attack/
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Don't feel so isolated, Democrats...there's plenty of Republicans that can't wait to see Trump go.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Joe in PB »

The issue appears to be leaders with lack of vision and common sense, hence the reason we're dealing with sanctuary politics and Trump at the moment.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: President’s Polls Improve Despite 90% Negative Coverage

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Joe in PB wrote:The issue appears to be leaders with lack of vision and common sense...
The issue appears to be leaders who aren't bought and paid for by interests that don't have the Constitutional guarantees of it's citizenry as their primary function.

You can have decent jobs, with dignity for workers and prospects for their children...

...or you can have this...

Image

So if you're stupid enough to be distracted by corporations manipulating you by grinding any organised resistance down to millions of atomized, leaderless individuals...you'll get what you deserve.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Post Reply