New bathroom law in Cali

It's the 17th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

User avatar
trev
New Sheriff in Town
Posts: 5032
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: semi retirement

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by trev »

Left Seater, I don't know what state you live in, but it would cost way too much to have those kind of services here in Cali. Plus the bathrooms can't be clean enough unless they have someone in there designated to clean and disinfect constantly.

At my kids' middle school the boys trashed their bathroom daily. It smelled of pee. They would pee all over the room, walls and everything. Savages. My kids would hold it all day and go when they got home.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Left Seater »

trev wrote:Left Seater, I don't know what state you live in, but it would cost way too much to have those kind of services here in Cali. Plus the bathrooms can't be clean enough unless they have someone in there designated to clean and disinfect constantly.

At my kids' middle school the boys trashed their bathroom daily. It smelled of pee. They would pee all over the room, walls and everything. Savages. My kids would hold it all day and go when they got home.

I live and pay taxes in Texas. Not surprised that keeping a locker room functional is beyond the capabilities of CA. And to Schmick's point we have the same issues with illegals. Each group was required to make sure dirty towels were in the bin, our athletic gear was in another, and any trash was in its appointed place. The coaches didn't let anyone leave until everything was in its place. Then during lunch period the janitors would deep clean the locker rooms so they were ready for the after lunch groups. CA does have janitors, right? Or do you guys unionize them so that they make $85K per year and allow them to exclude certain things from their job duties?

Sounds like you need to move your kids to a better neighborhood. Who the hell would pee on the wall? Sure there is usually one kid that rides the short bus that might do such a thing, but not the general population.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Derron »

Left Seater wrote:
trev wrote:Left Seater, I don't know what state you live in, but it would cost way too much to have those kind of services here in Cali. Plus the bathrooms can't be clean enough unless they have someone in there designated to clean and disinfect constantly.

Or do you guys unionize them so that they make $85K per year and allow them to exclude certain things from their job duties?
We have a connection here. That is probably exactly what has went on. Our local districts have all finally got rid of their overpaid fat assssss janitors over 15 years ago. They all went to a contracted level of services from the big institutional maintenance houses. They hire I 9 verified of course messicans for $ 10-$ 12 an hour max. Contract says you clean the school once a day. Now with 1000 or more kids and staff in a school, a building is going to be in fairly rough condition at the end of the day, especially bathrooms if you have no mid day cleaning.

These conditions have been brought on by the need to keep paying the retirement benefits, and cadillac heatlh care plans.Keep paying the administrators, principal and above, around $ 110K per year minimum.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
User avatar
trev
New Sheriff in Town
Posts: 5032
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: semi retirement

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by trev »

They are called custodians here. I think janitor would be derogatory. I think the high school had about 1900 kids and 4 full time custodians and had trouble keeping the place clean. Kids here are lazy and unaccountable. Unless they are in private school, that is a different story. Kids trash the schools and don't care. I live in the best neighborhood in my school district. That doesn't matter. Yes, the custodians are union and some work harder than others. They make an average of $4000 a month and have a sweet retirement after 25 years.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8856
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Does CA have any $70 million high school football stadiums?
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by poptart »

LeftSeater wrote:Who the hell would pee on the wall? Sure there is usually one kid that rides the short bus that might do such a thing, but not the general population.
You are Xtremely narrow and insensitive.

Some kids have issues they are dealing with.

I think Cali should build restrooms to accommodate the wall-pissers among us.

Just a 12x12 cubicle with nothing in it -- save for some drains at the base of each wall.

Let these individuals enter, piss freely, and have their dignity.

What the hell is wrong with you?


You can pay a living wage to someone to come in, hose down the walls, and disinfect the room once a day.
User avatar
trev
New Sheriff in Town
Posts: 5032
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: semi retirement

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by trev »

I can't figure it out either. Why do middle schoolers pee on the walls? It's only the boys. The girls bathroom is much more clean and free of smell.
User avatar
Atomic Punk
antagonist
Posts: 6636
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
Location: El Segundo, CA

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Atomic Punk »

trev wrote:I can't figure it out either. Why do middle schoolers pee on the walls? It's only the boys. The girls bathroom is much more clean and free of smell.
Because in most middle schools around here they lock the bathrooms most of the day due to vandalism and no supervision once inside. Fights, graffitti, etc. and the "custodians" bitch to the unions about having to deal with it. So they lock down all bathrooms. Girls get a free pass to go to the nurse and use that bathroom all day long. They ask for a "pad" or bring up some other female issue and there you have it. Boys? Well, they ask the "custodians" to let them in to take a piss and they say no. Then the boys come to the nurse office to take a piss in those nasty bathrooms the "custodians" neglect.
BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.

Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
User avatar
Smackie Chan
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7095
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Inside Your Speakers

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Smackie Chan »

trev wrote:I can't figure it out either. Why do middle schoolers pee on the walls? It's only the boys.
Anatomy may have something to do with it.
"I see everything twice!"
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21643
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by smackaholic »

There is a simple solution for the vandalism problem.

Cameras.

Tell the little fukkers, smile, you are on candid camera. The video would not be viewed by anyone until some fukker trashes the place. The video would be erased at the end of each day after the bathrooms were cleaned by the jizzmoppers errrrr I mean custodians.

That has got to be screwey's dream job, jizzmopper with benefits and a sweet gubmint pension.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Left Seater »

trev wrote:They are called custodians here. I think janitor would be derogatory. I think the high school had about 1900 kids and 4 full time custodians and had trouble keeping the place clean. Kids here are lazy and unaccountable. Unless they are in private school, that is a different story. Kids trash the schools and don't care. I live in the best neighborhood in my school district. That doesn't matter. Yes, the custodians are union and some work harder than others. They make an average of $4000 a month and have a sweet retirement after 25 years.
So the adults and the schools are not holding kids accountable. Sucks for the kids and the state.

Can't wait to hear how calling a janitor a janitor is derogatory.
schmick wrote:My nephews school has over 3,500 students in it so other than varsity football, all of the team lockers have been moved to portable buildings
What does size have to do with this discussion? Unless the school was designed for 2500 kids then what is your point? If t is undersized then build a new school.
Diego in Seattle wrote:Does CA have any $70 million high school football stadiums?
What does the price of the stadium have to do with anything? ADA lays out much I what stadiums have to have anyway. A cinder block wall and extend a water line already required and you have a locker room with water. Tiny additional cost. Plus when the 70 million dollar stadium hosts 4 or more varsity games a weekend plus soccer, lacrosse, etc it prolly has a better cost per use than the 14 million dollar one supporting a single high school.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Cuda
IKYABWAI
Posts: 10195
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Your signature is too long

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Cuda »

smackaholic wrote: That has got to be screwey's dream job.
more like DiS's dream job, although middle schoolers might be a little beyond his age-range
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
User avatar
Cuda
IKYABWAI
Posts: 10195
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Your signature is too long

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Cuda »

Left Seater wrote: What does size have to do with this discussion? Unless the school was designed for 2500 kids then what is your point? If t is undersized then build a new school.
Do you have the slightest idea how long & how much it costs to build a new school?

First you have to identify the cheap land it's to be built on so that the "right people" can buy it for peanuts and sell it for a fortune. Then you have to make sure the "right architect" gets to design it. Then you have to make sure the "right contractor" is picked to build it. You have to do all this so that plenty of public money gets kicked back to the "right politicians". That way everybody who matters gets to be happy.

Then comes the environmental impact statement so that the "right interest groups" get to object and the circle is then complete. The school may not be built in the next 50 years- or ever, but all the "right people" get to make shit-pots full of money pretty much their entire adult lives.
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Left Seater »

Huh...developers here usually work with the schools district to identify where schools will be needed and then they donate the land to the district for said new schools. Tends to make the new homes more valuable when the kids can walk.

But I guess that doesn't happen everywhere?
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

Cuda wrote:...the "right people"...
...the "right architect"...
...the "right contractor"...
...the "right politicians"....
...the "right interest groups"...
...the "right people"...

You're talking about the Jews, eh?

:x

I never expected such anti-Semitic rubbish from you, Cuda.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
User avatar
Derron
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 7644
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Derron »

Left Seater wrote:Huh...developers here usually work with the schools district to identify where schools will be needed and then they donate the land to the district for said new schools. Tends to make the new homes more valuable when the kids can walk.

But I guess that doesn't happen everywhere?
What Cuda said. The last elementary school built in our district rolled in at about 18 million for a 700 student school. That was on district owned property, so that does not include land. If they had to buy the land, it would have been 2 million at least. There are the underground impacts of a project of this size. Where payments happen. It is just how good and slick are you at it. IN 1991 I project managed the construction of an 700 student elementary school. That school went in at 5 million.


Due to our Urban Growth Boundary's bullshit, buildable land is tight. Unlike Lefty's state of Texas, where if you want more land you just develop it. Put the roads and infrastructure in and have at it. Around here you have very finite amounts of property to work with, hence the inflated values, and wetland mitigation laws that increase costs as well. No way in hell is a developer giving up one square inch of land for anything other than building footprint, unless they are forced to.
Derron
Screw_Michigan wrote: Democrats are the REAL racists.
Softball Bat wrote: Is your anus quivering?
User avatar
Cuda
IKYABWAI
Posts: 10195
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Your signature is too long

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Cuda »

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:

You're talking about the Jews, eh?
not at all, comrade. i'm talking about the politically connected.
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20456
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Screw_Michigan »

trev wrote:I can't figure it out either. Why do middle schoolers pee on the walls? It's only the boys. The girls bathroom is much more clean and free of smell.
This is a joke, right? Have another one, lush.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Wolfman
Dumpater Artist
Posts: 7170
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: SW FL

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Wolfman »

The girls bathroom is much more clean and free of smell.

Reminds me of the summer that 2 other guys and I operated a local drive-in movie theater. I was basically ticket guy, but half way through the summer I ended up as clean up in the morning. The men's room you could just hose down and you were done. I dreaded doing the women's. I honestly would not have been surprised to find an abortion there. It was bad. Absolute PIGS!
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan

Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.

"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
User avatar
trev
New Sheriff in Town
Posts: 5032
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: semi retirement

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by trev »

Screw_Michigan wrote:
trev wrote:I can't figure it out either. Why do middle schoolers pee on the walls? It's only the boys. The girls bathroom is much more clean and free of smell.
This is a joke, right? Have another one, lush.
Why would I joke about this? Urine smells. Idiot.

By the way:

Image
User avatar
trev
New Sheriff in Town
Posts: 5032
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: semi retirement

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by trev »

A drive in movie theatre bathroom is as bad as a roller rink bathroom. Old and quite nasty.
User avatar
Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Insha'Allah
Posts: 19031
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 5:58 pm
Location: filling molotovs

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Shlomart Ben Yisrael »

trev wrote:Old and quite nasty.
You can say the same thing about Goobs.
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Goober McTuber »

Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote:
trev wrote:Old and quite nasty.
You can say the same thing about Goobs.
You gotta play to your strengths.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Cuda
IKYABWAI
Posts: 10195
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Your signature is too long

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Cuda »

I note the non-denial from Gobbles McTubesteak
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Goober McTuber »

I note the continued stupidity of Cooter.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
jiminphilly
2014 JFFL Champion
Posts: 4553
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by jiminphilly »

Cuda wrote:
Left Seater wrote: What does size have to do with this discussion? Unless the school was designed for 2500 kids then what is your point? If t is undersized then build a new school.
Do you have the slightest idea how long & how much it costs to build a new school?

First you have to identify the cheap land it's to be built on so that the "right people" can buy it for peanuts and sell it for a fortune. Then you have to make sure the "right architect" gets to design it. Then you have to make sure the "right contractor" is picked to build it. You have to do all this so that plenty of public money gets kicked back to the "right politicians". That way everybody who matters gets to be happy.

Then comes the environmental impact statement so that the "right interest groups" get to object and the circle is then complete. The school may not be built in the next 50 years- or ever, but all the "right people" get to make shit-pots full of money pretty much their entire adult lives.

Not in Texas. Those fuckers don't mess around when it comes to building schools.
User avatar
Left Seater
36,000 ft above the chaos
Posts: 13273
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:31 pm
Location: The Great State of Texas

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Left Seater »

As should everyone. Kids do far better when class sizes are smaller and they have real classrooms vs portable buildings.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote: I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
User avatar
Cuda
IKYABWAI
Posts: 10195
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:55 pm
Location: Your signature is too long

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by Cuda »

Left Seater wrote:As should everyone. Kids do far better when class sizes are smaller and they have real classrooms vs portable buildings.
naturally you have some actual evidence of this rather than recycled teachers union horseshit?

I'll save you some time, Lefty: there isn't any evidence because it's nothing more than recycled teachers union horseshit.
WacoFan wrote:Flying any airplane that you can hear the radio over the roaring radial engine is just ghey anyway.... Of course, Cirri are the Miata of airplanes..
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: New bathroom law in Cali

Post by R-Jack »

Cuda wrote:
Left Seater wrote:As should everyone. Kids do far better when class sizes are smaller and they have real classrooms vs portable buildings.
naturally you have some actual evidence of this rather than recycled teachers union horseshit?

I'll save you some time, Lefty: there isn't any evidence because it's nothing more than recycled teachers union horseshit.
ButButBut.....they need small classes! How else will they get prepared for a shitload of auditorium lecture classes in college?
Post Reply