Anthony Wiener (D-NY)

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:32 am

Martyred wrote: I'm sorry, are you bored?

fat hog engorged member

We can talk about the good old days

veiny and throbbing

and how you're kind of a big deal if you like...

bigger than a baby's arm

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:37 am

KC Scott is not afraid.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:59 am

mvscal wrote:KC Scott is not afraid.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:17 am

88 wrote:meat to the Weiner

they pound on Weiner

if you fuck with Weiner

I'm feeling a slight stir.

- Scott

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:10 pm

I'm sure its only a matter of time before this pent up Weiner unleashes his arsenal all over the disgraced faces of Americans.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:41 pm

DallasFanatic wrote:I'm sure its only a matter of time before this pent up Weiner unleashes his arsenal ...

I doubt it. He doesn't have the balls.

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:09 pm

Martyred wrote:
DallasFanatic wrote:I'm sure its only a matter of time before this pent up Weiner unleashes his arsenal ...
I doubt it. He doesn't have the balls.

So you really think Weiner is a member of society? One that just hangs its head towards the ground huh? Go ahead and ask Scott. He'll confirm Weiner has his head held high, always one eye open and ready to rip through any asshole standing in his way.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:56 pm

DallasFanatic wrote:Go ahead and ask Scott.

I'm surprised Scott hasn't commented on this.

You'd think he'd be first to jump on Weiner.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:35 pm

If Wiener had used the proper protection none of this would even be an issue.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:35 pm

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:14 pm

jiminphilly wrote:If Wiener had used the proper protection none of this would even be an issue.

Are you suggesting that Wiener should have been kept under wraps?

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:09 pm

Why are you all just trying to tuck Weiner away? This guy deserves a fair handshake when its all said and done.

Incredible work by Weiner up to this point to remain stiff in the face of the competition who's trying to soften his legacy as a firm member of society.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:18 pm

Everybody seems to want to bury Wiener. Bury Wiener as deep as possible.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:42 pm

Martyred wrote:
jiminphilly wrote:If Wiener had used the proper protection none of this would even be an issue.
Are you suggesting that Wiener should have been kept under wraps?

When I think Mvscal is onto something. This smells like an inside job. Very very fishy. And yet had Weiner just insulted himself a bit, he might not be facing the irritating consequences of his actions. But now Weiner's going to be scratching his head for quite some time until a remedy to this situation is found.

I just hope this doesn't fester for too long.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:44 pm

This must be taking a terrible toll on his marriage.

The thought of two Wieners battling it out is unbearable.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:46 pm

Leave Weiner ALONE!!!

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:52 pm

Weiner's photo to be disputed in small claims court

- Ann Coulter

Personally, I was beginning to feel sorry for the Congressman, what with the way the press is relentlessly badgering him to answer their questions.

But then I paused to realize that Weiner, if forced to resign, will simply parlay his new-found notoriety into a lucractive career as a CNN talking head.

All is right with the world.

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:42 pm

jiminphilly wrote:When I think Mvscal is onto something. This smells like an inside job. Very very fishy. And yet had Weiner just insulted himself a bit, he might not be facing the irritating consequences of his actions. But now Weiner's going to be scratching his head for quite some time until a remedy to this situation is found.

I just hope this doesn't fester for too long.

If this continues, Wiener's actions are going deliver numerous open wounds to closest allies. I suggest some type of topical resolution on his part, or he's going to feel like everything around him is going up in flames.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:46 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:Weiner says that's not his weiner.

True. He might have just been wearing underwear over his head.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:43 pm

Conscience is a difficult matter to navigate.

I'm sure this keeps Wiener up all night.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:19 pm

KC Scott is not going to like this thread's stamina one bit. It just keeps growing and growing with no sign of running out of juice

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:06 pm

Cuda wrote:KC Scott is not going to like this thread's stamina one bit.

You think Wiener is going to wear Scott out?

You can't say that...you have no idea of how much Wiener Scott can take in.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:25 pm

Didn't take long for this dialogue to get as old as the Hitler video caption series.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Fri Jun 03, 2011 9:32 pm

IndyFrisco wrote:Didn't take long for this dialogue to get as old as the Hitler video caption series.

As long as it keeps Sudden42's obituary bylines off the top of the page...

trev · Post by **trev** » Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:53 pm

mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Weiner says that's not his weiner.
True. He might have just been wearing underwear over his head.

That's a negative SirStudMvscal, we've seen the pic and can confirm with great confidence,
that's a weiner.

-trev and scott.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:49 pm

trev wrote:...SirStudMvscal...

:x

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:49 pm

i'm sorry please don't be mad

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Jun 06, 2011 4:19 pm

Papa Willie wrote:I hope trev decides to talk Wieners.

Trev has talked to many Wieners. At least 37.

Trampis · Post by **Trampis** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:21 am

I read that dureing the news conference one of the reporters kept asking him if "he was at full erection" in the pics, or if "he had more to give"

I also read that HE....HE, has plans to stay with his wife and work through it. Wonder what plans his wife has.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:57 pm

Papa Willie wrote:Btw - have we even addressed this recently: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... 2349.story

Poor bastard was lying his ass off. I can't fucking believe a Democrat would do that! TVO - your thoughts?

So Weiner turned out to be a real dildo.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:15 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:No way the guy should remain in Congress. He lied, he has the self-control of a teenager, and he's an arrogant prick to boot.

He's perfect for Congress.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:52 pm

Speaking of presidential candidates:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504943_162- ... 91715.html

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:08 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:Speaking of presidential candidates:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504943_162- ... 91715.html

As the heat started to build, intrepid historians apparently attempted to add the following line (in italics) to Revere's Wikipedia page:

"Revere did not shout the phrase later attributed to him ('The British are coming!'), largely because the mission depended on secrecy and the countryside was filled with british army patrols; also, most colonial residents at the time considered themselves British as they were all legally British subjects."

That's your big "gotcha" moment? That's all you've got? For the record, it is factual as was Palin's assertion that he warned the British. It wasn't the purpose of his mission, but he did tell them he had alarmed the countryside behind him and that 500 militiamen were coming after he was captured.

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:23 pm

I didn't look at that as any "gotcha" moment. I saw it as her being woefully unable to answer a question and her yammering and stammering into a jumbled mess of an answer that had some truth in it. She may actually know her history, but [Palin] By golly, I just didn't go to one of those fancy finishing schools where you were taught to take those little thoughts in your head and make those things you people call sentances.[/Palin]

The "gotcha" moment will come years later when some type of campaign fundraising issues come up from this stupid little bus trip. Just calling my shot.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:28 pm

R-Jack wrote:The "gotcha" moment will come years later when some type of campaign fundraising issues come up from this stupid little bus trip. Just calling my shot.

What campaign?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:35 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:Speaking of presidential candidates:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504943_162- ... 91715.html

The queen of the GOP. So fitting.

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:48 pm

mvscal wrote:
What campaign?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:01 pm

mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Speaking of presidential candidates:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504943_162- ... 91715.html

As the heat started to build, intrepid historians apparently attempted to add the following line (in italics) to Revere's Wikipedia page:

"Revere did not shout the phrase later attributed to him ('The British are coming!'), largely because the mission depended on secrecy and the countryside was filled with british army patrols; also, most colonial residents at the time considered themselves British as they were all legally British subjects."
That's your big "gotcha" moment? That's all you've got? For the record, it is factual as was Palin's assertion that he warned the British. It wasn't the purpose of his mission, but he did tell them he had alarmed the countryside behind him and that 500 militiamen were coming after he was captured.

I just find it hilarious that Palin's followers tried to change the wikipedia page to mirror Palin's knowledge of "history".

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:13 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Speaking of presidential candidates:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504943_162- ... 91715.html

As the heat started to build, intrepid historians apparently attempted to add the following line (in italics) to Revere's Wikipedia page:

"Revere did not shout the phrase later attributed to him ('The British are coming!'), largely because the mission depended on secrecy and the countryside was filled with british army patrols; also, most colonial residents at the time considered themselves British as they were all legally British subjects."
That's your big "gotcha" moment? That's all you've got? For the record, it is factual as was Palin's assertion that he warned the British. It wasn't the purpose of his mission, but he did tell them he had alarmed the countryside behind him and that 500 militiamen were coming after he was captured.
I just find it hilarious that Palin's followers tried to change the wikipedia page to mirror Palin's knowledge of "history".

What is so hilarious about it? Do you dispute anything in the statement?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:32 pm

mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
mvscal wrote:
That's your big "gotcha" moment? That's all you've got? For the record, it is factual as was Palin's assertion that he warned the British. It wasn't the purpose of his mission, but he did tell them he had alarmed the countryside behind him and that 500 militiamen were coming after he was captured.
I just find it hilarious that Palin's followers tried to change the wikipedia page to mirror Palin's knowledge of "history".
What is so hilarious about it? Do you dispute anything in the statement?

Apparently wikipedia does. They keep removing the revisions.