So, which is better?

It's the 17th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29758
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

So, which is better?

Post by Mikey »

A mandate?

Or a broad coalition?
User avatar
Tom In VA
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9042
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:04 am
Location: In Va. near D.C.

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Tom In VA »

A mandate most definitely.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29758
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Mikey »

Tom In VA wrote:A mandate most definitely.
Figures. So you're against Proposition 8?

:wink:
User avatar
Tom In VA
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9042
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:04 am
Location: In Va. near D.C.

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Tom In VA »

Walked right into that one didn't I :lol:
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29758
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Mikey »

Tom In VA wrote:Walked right into that one didn't I :lol:
Don't worry, it's late.

In VA.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29339
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: So, which is better?

Post by BSmack »

Broad coalitions make mandates. President Obama and the Congressional leadership understood that principle during the bailout negotiations. And they will continue operating under those principles.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Mister Bushice
Drinking all the beer Luther left behind
Posts: 9490
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:39 pm

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Mister Bushice »

BSmack wrote:Broad coalitions make mandates. President Obama and the Congressional leadership understood that principle during the bailout negotiations. And they will continue operating under those principles.

Yeah. I was SO happy to see all the wealthy banks and corporations get repaid (with our tax money) the money they lost through their own greed and manipulation of the market place, with no consideration of the economic impact that re-stuffing their own pockets without passing it along as mandated would have on our economy.

Meanwhile, every American homeowner in distress not willing to go FHA on their mortgage got completely ignored and will suffer the loss of the home they saved and worked for, with no unconditional bailout on the horizon.

I fully expect this new administration to continue to operate under those same principles.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29758
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Mikey »

Geez Bushice. I think you need to go into the bathroom, run a nice hot bath, climb into the tub and slit your wrists. Put us all out of your misery.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29758
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Mikey »

mvscal wrote:
Mikey wrote:A mandate?

Or a broad coalition?
Who cares? You have neither.
And you've got nothing.

Now go to bed, you're dead to me.
User avatar
Mister Bushice
Drinking all the beer Luther left behind
Posts: 9490
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:39 pm

Re: So, which is better?

Post by Mister Bushice »

Come on now, Mikey. I'm not even close to suicidal. (sorry Whitey)

I'm a realist. It's not the end of anything. It is the continuation of the same thing.

Lets be real. This is not real change, it is hope for real change.

You can Hope in one hand and shit in the other, but

ultimately this is just a variation of the same shit we always find in our other hand. Just a different consistency and color, but still.

Same shit. Different crook.
Post Reply