California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Post Reply
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by EAP »

California is a corrupt fascist state. The American people now understand that.
User avatar
The State
Ren Fairy
Posts: 1283
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 5:45 am

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by The State »

Has Porky42 EVER posted about something other than m2, San Francisco, or California ?

Those topics are literally 90% of her posts.

She needs a time-out.




Image
EAP wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:39 am The STATE has all the answers
User avatar
Bucmonkey
2011 CFB Bowl Pic Champ
Posts: 2828
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: ...

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Bucmonkey »

Fake News kid
Go Bucs, Gators
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by EAP »

Bucmonkey wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:44 pm Fake News kid
Fake news?
No.
California is run by extreme left wing socialist radicals who are government control and don't believe in borders or our sovereignty.

Can your limited IQ digest those facts?

I've studied politics longer than you've been alive.
The radical left runs California.
Many of these vermin are in congress. Dr Savage calls leftists dirty filthy vermin, which they are.
Anyone who believes in one world government is a filthy enemy of liberty and our Bill of rights.
These sick Democrats, these unstable vermin, don't believe in our nation's sovereignty or our liberty.
They are government control socialists.

Dr. Savage explains that repeatedly and so does Dr. Dennis Prager.

Both those esteemed scholars make you look comatose.

My expertise is showing low IQ cocksuckers what time it is.
And for you, it's Howdy Doody time 24/7.

Any questions?
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by EAP »

Papa Willie wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:41 am
Bucmonkey wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:44 pm Fake News kid
Please provide something that proves what you’re stating.
He can't.
In fact, that's why the left issues state driver's licenses to illegals.
Once you have a state issued driver's license, you can vote.
It's ballgame over.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29903
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Mikey »

This is about the Presidential primary, and the parties make their own rules. So if you don’t like this, blame your beloved GOP.

Dumbass.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 29903
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Mikey »

Papa Willie wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 6:34 pm
Glad you're back. I thought you had fucked up with a bar of soap. :shock:
Who says I didn't?

:oops:
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Innocent Bystander »

The State wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:21 pm Has Porky42 EVER posted about something other than m2, San Francisco, or California ?

Those topics are literally 90% of her posts.
I miss Bobby42. He was a brother who just wanted to chill here instead of fight. Is he ok, last anyone heard from him?

Papa Willie posts on a vast number of topics. Posting about San Francisco is just good old fashioned East Coast versus West Coast smack. It pricks you because you're so proud of the city, it's easy to needle you with its flaws. So he does.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 3:51 pm
Papa Willie wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:41 am
Bucmonkey wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 9:44 pm Fake News kid
Please provide something that proves what you’re stating.
He can't.
In fact, that's why the left issues state driver's licenses to illegals.
Once you have a state issued driver's license, you can vote.
It's ballgame over.
You can do a lot more than just vote.

Giving IDs to people who can't prove their identity is a fucking joke. Meanwhile, real citizens are punished. Commiefornie ain't shit for starting that mess.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
The State wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:21 pm Has Porky42 EVER posted about something other than m2, San Francisco, or California ?

Those topics are literally 90% of her posts.
I miss Bobby42. He was a brother who just wanted to chill here instead of fight. Is he ok, last anyone heard from him?

Papa Willie posts on a vast number of topics. Posting about San Francisco is just good old fashioned East Coast versus West Coast smack. It pricks you because you're so proud of the city, it's easy to needle you with its flaws. So he does.
I don't want to fight either, but these leftists just bring out the beast in you.
I've got a rose garden in my backyard for christ's sake! Does that sound like an aggressive prick? What could be more benign than planting beautiful
old world hybrid tea roses?
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:48 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm
The State wrote: Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:21 pm Has Porky42 EVER posted about something other than m2, San Francisco, or California ?

Those topics are literally 90% of her posts.
I miss Bobby42. He was a brother who just wanted to chill here instead of fight. Is he ok, last anyone heard from him?

Papa Willie posts on a vast number of topics. Posting about San Francisco is just good old fashioned East Coast versus West Coast smack. It pricks you because you're so proud of the city, it's easy to needle you with its flaws. So he does.
I don't want to fight either, but these leftists just bring out the beast in you.
I've got a rose garden in my backyard for christ's sake! Does that sound like an aggressive prick? What could be more benign than planting beautiful
old world hybrid tea roses?
Uh, huh.
[+] Spoorloos
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:55 pm
EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:48 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 8:40 pm

I miss Bobby42. He was a brother who just wanted to chill here instead of fight. Is he ok, last anyone heard from him?

Papa Willie posts on a vast number of topics. Posting about San Francisco is just good old fashioned East Coast versus West Coast smack. It pricks you because you're so proud of the city, it's easy to needle you with its flaws. So he does.
I don't want to fight either, but these leftists just bring out the beast in you.
I've got a rose garden in my backyard for christ's sake! Does that sound like an aggressive prick? What could be more benign than planting beautiful
old world hybrid tea roses?
Uh, huh.
[+] Spoorloos
Two things.
First, anyone THAT STUPID enough to voluntarily go unconcious, always votes blue,
And frankly, deserves to die like that.

Think about it

Jeff Bridges plays the psycho in the remake BTW.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Innocent Bystander »

He wanted his wife back, and was willing to take the risk -- to have faith. His faith was rewarded. The kidnapper gave him exactly what he told him he would.

It's a movie where the wife is more than 'the wife'. The truth doesn't always set us free. But what could he do?

I think the horror is more than the ending, but in how he got to that ending. He needed a T S motherfucking A friend to have his back through his journey to the truth.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:21 pm He wanted his wife back, and was willing to take the risk -- to have faith. His faith was rewarded. The kidnapper gave him exactly what he told him he would.

It's a movie where the wife is more than 'the wife'. The truth doesn't always set us free. But what could he do?

I think the horror is more than the ending, but in how he got to that ending. He needed a T S motherfucking A friend to have his back through his journey to the truth.
Can I enlighten you?
If it's my wife?
I'm meeting with the psycho.
But instead of taking the drug and goin under?
I'm over taking him, handcuffing him and trust me,
If my wife is still alive, I'll know.
If she's dead, I'll know.
But all his screaming and pleading, won't save him.
That's a true journey of truth and enlightenment.
That's justice.
Kierland

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Kierland »

Papa Willie wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 6:34 pm
Mikey wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 4:32 pm
This is about the Presidential primary, and the parties make their own rules. So if you don’t like this, blame your beloved GOP.

Dumbass.
And where did I reveal my thoughts on it in this thread? :mrgreen:

Glad you're back. I thought you had fucked up with a bar of soap. :shock:
You didn’t, because you are a fat yellow retard.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by Innocent Bystander »

EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:00 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:21 pm He wanted his wife back, and was willing to take the risk -- to have faith. His faith was rewarded. The kidnapper gave him exactly what he told him he would.

It's a movie where the wife is more than 'the wife'. The truth doesn't always set us free. But what could he do?

I think the horror is more than the ending, but in how he got to that ending. He needed a T S motherfucking A friend to have his back through his journey to the truth.
Can I enlighten you?
If it's my wife?
I'm meeting with the psycho.
But instead of taking the drug and goin under?
I'm over taking him, handcuffing him and trust me,
If my wife is still alive, I'll know.
If she's dead, I'll know.
But all his screaming and pleading, won't save him.
That's a true journey of truth and enlightenment.
That's justice.
He's a psychopath. He's John Doe in Se7en. He wants to know if he's capable of committing ultimate evil. What is more evil than taking an innocent life, then sleeping soundly about it?

He found his own answer. Remember the CSI or L&O episode with the serial killer who murdered little girls and took heart shaped cutouts of their dresses as trophies? They never found the last little girl.

You would have never found out what happened to your wife. He would have let you kill him, and probably had a backup framing the husband, since he was telling the truth there was nothing to pin the wife's disappearance on him.

Psychopaths don't think like regular people.

He didn't want to be saved. He wanted to know if he were capable of great evil.

How do you punish what can't be punished? What doesn't understand the concept?

Funny how the remake which did ensure some justice got panned.
EAP
Mr. USA
Posts: 4431
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:54 pm

Re: California says independents can vote in Democrats' 2020 primary, but not Republicans'

Post by EAP »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 11:35 pm
EAP wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 10:00 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Sun Dec 29, 2019 9:21 pm He wanted his wife back, and was willing to take the risk -- to have faith. His faith was rewarded. The kidnapper gave him exactly what he told him he would.

It's a movie where the wife is more than 'the wife'. The truth doesn't always set us free. But what could he do?

I think the horror is more than the ending, but in how he got to that ending. He needed a T S motherfucking A friend to have his back through his journey to the truth.
Can I enlighten you?
If it's my wife?
I'm meeting with the psycho.
But instead of taking the drug and goin under?
I'm over taking him, handcuffing him and trust me,
If my wife is still alive, I'll know.
If she's dead, I'll know.
But all his screaming and pleading, won't save him.
That's a true journey of truth and enlightenment.
That's justice.
He's a psychopath. He's John Doe in Se7en. He wants to know if he's capable of committing ultimate evil. What is more evil than taking an innocent life, then sleeping soundly about it?

He found his own answer. Remember the CSI or L&O episode with the serial killer who murdered little girls and took heart shaped cutouts of their dresses as trophies? They never found the last little girl.

You would have never found out what happened to your wife. He would have let you kill him, and probably had a backup framing the husband, since he was telling the truth there was nothing to pin the wife's disappearance on him.

Psychopaths don't think like regular people.

He didn't want to be saved. He wanted to know if he were capable of great evil.

How do you punish what can't be punished? What doesn't understand the concept?

Funny how the remake which did ensure some justice got panned.
Correct. Psychos don't think like regular people.

How do you punish what can't be punished?
First, your premise is wrong.
Putting him in a chair with a nice even flow of electricity flowing through him for hours on end?

If you don't think that's punishment, try it sometimes.

Here's the thing. It's totally justified.
If a psychopath has your wife or daughter, sure they may be already dead. But using torture as a means to find them and save them, is morally justifiable.

So, some serial killing psychopath has kidnapped your little girl. You find him and have the opportunity to tie him to a chair and flow electric current thru this child killer/rapist.

That's morally acceptable.
You're going to tell me that you don't value your loved ones?

Remember the clint Eastwood movie "Gran Tourino"?
Two thugs corner a sweet little 15 year old asian girl.
They want some of her sweet asian pussy. And then, Clint Eastwood drives up and asks the thugs, "what are you two spooks up to"?

Now, a left wing socialist piece of shit is angry that Clint called them "spooks". They think he's a racist for using that word spooks.
Never mind that these two criminals are accosting a minor girl.
See, that's the fucked up mind of a leftist
Moral of the story is Clint saved the child from possible rape.

In the "vanishing".
The husband is morally justified in torturing the psychopath until he gets the answer to the whereabouts of his wife.
And yes, trust me. Current flowing thru a rapist murdering psychopath is punishment.
I don't care if you're Jeffrey dahmer, ted bundy, john Wayne gacy, or John Gotti.
You're gonna scream like a banshee.
Post Reply