Artemis

It's the 17th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Kierland

Re: Artemis

Post by Kierland »

Dude is so far in your head you can’t even watch a rocket launch without thinking of him. Why don’t you get back to coddling Nazis?
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Jsc810 wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 1:39 pm So much technology just to keep a massive conspiracy going.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

SLS is a huge pork laden waste of money, but rack JSC for telling it how it is.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
Kierland

Re: Artemis

Post by Kierland »

Kierland wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 2:17 pm Dude is so far in your head you can’t even watch a rocket launch without thinking of him. Why don’t you get back to coddling Nazis?
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4601
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: Artemis

Post by Carson »

Image
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Carson, more empty posts, please.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 2:19 pm
Jsc810 wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 1:39 pm So much technology just to keep a massive conspiracy going.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

SLS is a huge pork laden waste of money, but rack JSC for telling it how it is.
Fukk, just when I thought I was gonna get through another year without agreeing with first runner up board bitch, SM, he gets one in. :x

Rack SM!!!!!

Yer stick a dick.

Just what exactly is the point of going back to a place we confirmed was a dead fukking rock over a half century ago?

Well, other than a yob program.

Shooting shit into space is awesome. Satellites have made the world a much better place.

But attaining escape velocity for anything outside of maybe a few low budget exploratory probes, is a waste of time. The idea that we can colonize Mars and turn it into a habitable planet is BS.

And what is even more laughable is that some of the same clowns that think we have the power to ruin this place, think we have the power to unfukk Mars.

We ain't that powerful folks.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

Going forward, any money thrown down the space travel hole should go to suborbital commercial jet travel. NYC to Tokyo in under an hour is pretty cool. And getting up above 99.9% of the atmosphere is an efficient way to travel.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: Artemis

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Hey, Cali here, and darn it we want in on...going somewhere real fast...er... :oops:

Now, as the nation embarks on a historic, $1 trillion infrastructure building spree, the tortured effort to build the country’s first high-speed rail system is a case study in how ambitious public works projects can become perilously encumbered by political compromise, unrealistic cost estimates, flawed engineering and a determination to persist on projects that have become, like the crippled financial institutions of 2008, too big to fail.

Proposed California High Speed Rail
The California bullet train’s route from Los Angeles to San Francisco, traversing the state’s mountain ranges and its Central Valley, is shown in a dark black line. The route was selected over proposals that would have roughly followed the I-5 and the I-580 highways between Southern and Northern California. The light gray line shows a proposed second phase that would extend the system to San Diego and Sacramento, though it has not received environmental approvals or funding.


“There is nothing but problems on the project,” the speaker of the State Assembly, Anthony Rendon, complained recently.

The Times’s review, though, revealed that political deals created serious obstacles in the project from the beginning. Speaking candidly on the subject for the first time, some of the high-speed rail authority’s past leaders say the project may never work.


Image
Before God was, I am
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:53 pm Fukk, just when I thought I was gonna get through another year without agreeing with first runner up board bitch, SM, he gets one in. :x

Rack SM!!!!!

Yer stick a dick.

Just what exactly is the point of going back to a place we confirmed was a dead fukking rock over a half century ago?

Well, other than a yob program.

Shooting shit into space is awesome. Satellites have made the world a much better place.

But attaining escape velocity for anything outside of maybe a few low budget exploratory probes, is a waste of time. The idea that we can colonize Mars and turn it into a habitable planet is BS.

And what is even more laughable is that some of the same clowns that think we have the power to ruin this place, think we have the power to unfukk Mars.

We ain't that powerful folks.
I'm not against going back to the moon. Quite the contrary, I think it is a worthy effort.

Rather, I am completely against the Senate Launch System, which was created by Bill Nelson and upheld by Richard Shelby and, to a large extent, Barb Mikulski around 2010. Nelson wanted SLS when the Shuttle was retired to preserve those jerbs in Florida. What it did was waste taxpayer money on antiquated technology when NASA could have had "super heavy" launch capability for a much cheaper price through competitive procurement and had workers trained on modern launch technology.

SLS has cost $24 billion (!). It had its first launch the other day. It has been a huge albatross on NASA's budget. And now Nelson is NASA administrator. Such a shameful moment in US history.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:58 pm Going forward, any money thrown down the space travel hole should go to suborbital commercial jet travel. NYC to Tokyo in under an hour is pretty cool. And getting up above 99.9% of the atmosphere is an efficient way to travel.
There's a bunch of startups taking another crack at supersonic transport. I'm not exactly sure of their chances of success. Sounds like propulsion is really difficult. Anyway, flying around the world in 1/4 the time would be awesome.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8776
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Artemis

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Thu Nov 17, 2022 12:35 pm
smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:58 pm Going forward, any money thrown down the space travel hole should go to suborbital commercial jet travel. NYC to Tokyo in under an hour is pretty cool. And getting up above 99.9% of the atmosphere is an efficient way to travel.
There's a bunch of startups taking another crack at supersonic transport. I'm not exactly sure of their chances of success. Sounds like propulsion is really difficult. Anyway, flying around the world in 1/4 the time would be awesome.
It's not so much the propulsion that's the issue so much as it is how to eliminate the sonic booms.
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

Screw_Michigan wrote:
smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:53 pm Fukk, just when I thought I was gonna get through another year without agreeing with first runner up board bitch, SM, he gets one in. :x

Rack SM!!!!!

Yer stick a dick.

Just what exactly is the point of going back to a place we confirmed was a dead fukking rock over a half century ago?

Well, other than a yob program.

Shooting shit into space is awesome. Satellites have made the world a much better place.

But attaining escape velocity for anything outside of maybe a few low budget exploratory probes, is a waste of time. The idea that we can colonize Mars and turn it into a habitable planet is BS.

And what is even more laughable is that some of the same clowns that think we have the power to ruin this place, think we have the power to unfukk Mars.

We ain't that powerful folks.
I'm not against going back to the moon. Quite the contrary, I think it is a worthy effort.

Rather, I am completely against the Senate Launch System, which was created by Bill Nelson and upheld by Richard Shelby and, to a large extent, Barb Mikulski around 2010. Nelson wanted SLS when the Shuttle was retired to preserve those jerbs in Florida. What it did was waste taxpayer money on antiquated technology when NASA could have had "super heavy" launch capability for a much cheaper price through competitive procurement and had workers trained on modern launch technology.

SLS has cost $24 billion (!). It had its first launch the other day. It has been a huge albatross on NASA's budget. And now Nelson is NASA administrator. Such a shameful moment in US history.
Well, I happily retract my rack then. Image

Should have known you’d be for boondoggles. You just want a different one.

So, putting aside the details about how we get there, please tell me why we should?

It has no atmosphere. We can not make it habitable.

I mean, if you want to do it for the challenge, go for it….with your dollars.

Orbital flight has paid off. We should continue improving it and possibly make it a form of travel.

But going to a barren rock, just because we can and to keep property values in Cocoa Beach up?

Not a good reason.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29337
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Artemis

Post by BSmack »

Diego in Seattle wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote: Thu Nov 17, 2022 12:35 pm
smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:58 pm Going forward, any money thrown down the space travel hole should go to suborbital commercial jet travel. NYC to Tokyo in under an hour is pretty cool. And getting up above 99.9% of the atmosphere is an efficient way to travel.
There's a bunch of startups taking another crack at supersonic transport. I'm not exactly sure of their chances of success. Sounds like propulsion is really difficult. Anyway, flying around the world in 1/4 the time would be awesome.
It's not so much the propulsion that's the issue so much as it is how to eliminate the sonic booms.
And reducing fuel loads so it pays to offer business class to enough people to make the flight pay.


Sent from my iPhone using a big network of tubes.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
Softball Bat
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 9843
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:02 am

Re: Artemis

Post by Softball Bat »

It's official.

It's really up there.



Image
Image
88 wrote:I have no idea who Weaselberg is
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 11999
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Artemis

Post by mvscal »

smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:53 pmJust what exactly is the point of going back to a place we confirmed was a dead fukking rock over a half century ago?
Ultimately, the goal would be to move heavy industry off planet. You appear to have a very limited imagination.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Donnie Baker's Ghost
I swear to god . . .
Posts: 1063
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm

Re: Artemis

Post by Donnie Baker's Ghost »

Compounds bond differently in low G. Chemical engineering on the moon will be a fascinating new frontier.
Shut up, Randy!
Kierland

Re: Artemis

Post by Kierland »

mvscal wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 8:53 pm
smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:53 pmJust what exactly is the point of going back to a place we confirmed was a dead fukking rock over a half century ago?
Ultimately, the goal would be to move heavy industry off planet. You appear to have a very limited imagination.
You know, space slaves.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

mvscal wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 8:53 pm
smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:53 pmJust what exactly is the point of going back to a place we confirmed was a dead fukking rock over a half century ago?
Ultimately, the goal would be to move heavy industry off planet. You appear to have a very limited imagination.
I have a pretty fertile imagination, actually. I just don't see this passing any sort of cost benefit analysis. But then, we are talking federal boondoggles here and when have they ever given the slightest of fukks about such matters.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

Donnie Baker wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 9:27 pm Compounds bond differently in low G. Chemical engineering on the moon will be a fascinating new frontier.
I understand this. So, do it in orbit where you can dial in whatever level of G you want.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Donnie Baker's Ghost
I swear to god . . .
Posts: 1063
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 10:48 pm

Re: Artemis

Post by Donnie Baker's Ghost »

smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:45 am
Donnie Baker wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 9:27 pm Compounds bond differently in low G. Chemical engineering on the moon will be a fascinating new frontier.
I understand this. So, do it in orbit where you can dial in whatever level of G you want.
For experimentation, you're absolutely correct. Keep the process local, but when it's time to scale the process to full blown production it might be less expensive and faster to move mining and production to the moon rather than spending $100,00 per kg to launch raw materials at a space station.

Or I could be wrong. Just a guy shitting opinions at people he doesn't know...
Shut up, Randy!
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 11999
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Artemis

Post by mvscal »

Donnie Baker wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 1:54 am
smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 12:45 am
Donnie Baker wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 9:27 pm Compounds bond differently in low G. Chemical engineering on the moon will be a fascinating new frontier.
I understand this. So, do it in orbit where you can dial in whatever level of G you want.
For experimentation, you're absolutely correct. Keep the process local, but when it's time to scale the process to full blown production it might be less expensive and faster to move mining and production to the moon rather than spending $100,00 per kg to launch raw materials at a space station.

Or I could be wrong. Just a guy shitting opinions at people he doesn't know...
The moon would be the factory hub. Once that is established, the energy bill to move shit around drops. Mining would be done in the asteroid belt. We don't "terraform" planets. We bore into them and construct habitats. Any exo-planet that can support life should be avoided like the plague.

Just a guy shitting opinions at people he doesn't know...
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
User avatar
Wolfman
Dumpater Artist
Posts: 7154
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:16 pm
Location: SW FL

Re: Artemis

Post by Wolfman »

I'm still of the opinion that crude oli is a geothermal product that forms under the earth's crust and that there is enough of it to keep us going till the sun goes super nova.
The moon may have some rare elements that are needed for technology. We may never live long enough to find out.
"It''s not dark yet--but it's getting there". -- Bob Dylan

Carbon Dating, the number one dating app for senior citizens.

"Blessed be the Lord my strength, which teaches my hands to the war, and my fingers to fight."
Kierland

Re: Artemis

Post by Kierland »

Wolftard did his own research.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Artemis

Post by Innocent Bystander »

mvscal wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:12 am Any exo-planet that can support life should be avoided like the plague.
Why?
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8776
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Artemis

Post by Diego in Seattle »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 5:32 am
mvscal wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:12 am Any exo-planet that can support life should be avoided like the plague.
Why?
It might piss off the locals...

Image
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 11999
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Artemis

Post by mvscal »

Innocent Bystander wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 5:32 am
mvscal wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:12 am Any exo-planet that can support life should be avoided like the plague.
Why?
Plague. No shit end of all life as we know it plague as a worst case scenario. More likely it's mostly merely poisonous.
Last edited by mvscal on Sat Nov 26, 2022 4:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Kierland

Re: Artemis

Post by Kierland »

Your Qtard buddies no doubt think their immune systems can handle it.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Artemis

Post by Innocent Bystander »

Diego in Seattle wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 12:29 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 5:32 am
mvscal wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:12 am Any exo-planet that can support life should be avoided like the plague.
Why?
It might piss off the locals...

Image
It might, but that's never stopped anyone before.

Some Martians will die, some Terrans will die. Those who are left will be those able to adapt, no matter how initially painful. It won't even be the most deserving, as currently politically defined. It will be the most hardy.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Artemis

Post by Innocent Bystander »

Kierland wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 8:28 pm Your Qtard buddies no doubt think their immune systems can handle it.
Like how some people are absolutely sure they'll be taken up in the Rapture? Or will be eaten last by the Great Old Ones if they sacrifice everyone else first?

Maybe their immune system can handle it. Maybe the lies Fauci sold us were intended to save a future few by experimenting on a present many. Someone obviously wants to play with off/on switches, 1s and 0s, among the goyim. Cattle never have a choice, unless they want the choice to be eaten first for being ornery.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Artemis

Post by Innocent Bystander »

mvscal wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 7:26 pm
Innocent Bystander wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 5:32 am
mvscal wrote: Wed Nov 23, 2022 2:12 am Any exo-planet that can support life should be avoided like the plague.
Why?
Plague. No shit end of all life as we know it plague as a worst case scenario. More likely it's mostly merely poisonous.
Oxygen is poison. Perspective is everything. We terraform ourselves, we take our chances. We live on Mars, on Iapetus, on Ceres, on Venus, on Neptune. We pull Phobos and Deimos back together again, from when it was turn in two or three or whatever.

We live beneath Antarctica, we live beside the Marianas Trench, we live in the hollow of the moon. We live in a neural network like tardigrades unable to comprehend what's outside of us.

Plague won't do us in. Something outside our planning will. We should keep striving anyway.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

mvscal wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 7:26 pm Plague. No shit end of all life as we know it plague as a worst case scenario. More likely it's mostly merely poisonous.
How many times did you have to edit this to get your take straight? :meds:
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
Innocent Bystander
Koko B1
Posts: 4558
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 8:41 pm

Re: Artemis

Post by Innocent Bystander »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 1:28 pm
mvscal wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 7:26 pm Plague. No shit end of all life as we know it plague as a worst case scenario. More likely it's mostly merely poisonous.
How many times did you have to edit this to get your take straight? :meds:
I miss Beantown Basher, too, friend. I hope he's still alive, and prospering.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

Kierland wrote: Fri Nov 25, 2022 8:28 pm Your Qtard buddies no doubt think their immune systems can handle it.
Even snowflake pussy immune systems can handle CV, especially the '22 vintage. But even the OG CV was easily handled by anyone under 60 who was in anything remotely close to good health. And you can go ahead and post the pic of the fit 34 year old who croaked all you want, because in a population of 300+ mil, you will get a few.

The OL, with her battered immune system is handling the case she got at the hospital last week, just fine because she had a taste of it last june, which is still, by far the best "booster" and she was immediately given Paxlovid which is some good shit.

She tested positive Sunday morning. Tested again this morning, barely registered on the tester. 5 minutes in, it still hadn't indicated. I've been in close contact with her all along and I am still negative.

CV is now just one of the countless other coronaviri out there that have been floating around for ever. Pretty close to the point where even elderly immune systems will bitch slap it and takes its lunch money.

But, of course, the next one down the pike will get trumped up by the public healthscare officials because they like being in the news.

BTW, if you want a good booster for this winter season, I recommend hanging in your local ER for an hour or two on a busy afternoon. It is likely where Mrs Smackaholic got it last wednesday when she slipped on one of those stupid little rugs chicks like to collect and busted her hip.

And last week's medical shitshow came right after they collected her T cells at Dana Farber on monday. She'll get them back in a few weeks and hopefully put this Lymphoma nightmare behind us.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

Jsc810 wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:01 pm
smackaholic wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 6:34 pm But even the OG CV was easily handled by anyone under 60 who was in anything remotely close to good health
This is simply not true.

I personally know several people of that description who died of covid, and a few more that almost died.
Don't worry. Suckaholic believes that the CV vaccine killed more young healthy people than the virus itself.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

Jsc810 wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:01 pm
smackaholic wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 6:34 pm But even the OG CV was easily handled by anyone under 60 who was in anything remotely close to good health
This is simply not true.

I personally know several people of that description who died of covid, and a few more that almost died.
Care to give us ages and general health?
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

Screw_Michigan wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:37 pm Don't worry. Suckaholic believes that the CV vaccine killed more young healthy people than the virus itself.
Not sure if it killed more.

I do believe it caused serious lasting damage to more. For some reason, the vax has a nasty habit of causing damage to mostly very fit young males. It actually seems to go after them more than middle aged fatties like myself, who actually are at some elevated risk from CV itself.

BTW, I did get the vax and first booster. Haven't got any of the more recent ones. I decided to go with the actual infection booster last June. Had one night of terrible congestion, then nothing. The booster gave me a cough for about 2 months.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
User avatar
Diego in Seattle
Rouser Of Rabble
Posts: 8776
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Duh

Re: Artemis

Post by Diego in Seattle »

smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 1:29 am
Jsc810 wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 8:01 pm
smackaholic wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 6:34 pm But even the OG CV was easily handled by anyone under 60 who was in anything remotely close to good health
This is simply not true.

I personally know several people of that description who died of covid, and a few more that almost died.
Care to give us ages and general health?
Reading comprehension just isn't your thing, is it?
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
9/27/22
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 20359
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Artemis

Post by Screw_Michigan »

smackaholic wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 1:36 am
Not sure if it killed more.

I do believe it caused serious lasting damage to more. For some reason, the vax has a nasty habit of causing damage to mostly very fit young males. It actually seems to go after them more than middle aged fatties like myself, who actually are at some elevated risk from CV itself.

BTW, I did get the vax and first booster. Haven't got any of the more recent ones. I decided to go with the actual infection booster last June. Had one night of terrible congestion, then nothing. The booster gave me a cough for about 2 months.
You are a liar. You have zero credibility.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
smackaholic
Walrus Team 6
Posts: 21632
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: upside it

Re: Artemis

Post by smackaholic »

What am I lying about, exactly?

Serious cardiac issues with young extremely fit people after the vax?

Do a little research. It is a thing. Also, the Pharma companies and the gov had this info early and did their best to ignore it, as they were devout followers of the church of the jab.

There is also evidence now that while they bent over backwards to ignore potential problems with the vax, they did the same to try to prove the ineffectiveness of dirt cheap, off patent anti-virals like horse paste, uhhhh, I mean Ivermectin.

We still haven't had a plausible explanation for the government's active campaign to not only proclaim these other treatments are ineffective, but to actually forbid their use.

Ivermectin has a very long history of safe effective use. There was no reason to deny it to anyone other than financial/political gain.

But you fukkers can continue to pretend the CDC and BigPharm acted honorably. Funny how the libs were always all in on Corporate witch hunts before CV hit.

But then they saw a political tool and they jumped on board. The day Trump said there's this common drug which is showing promise, that drug and others became the enemy.

Whats really odd is that Trump continues to be a vax fanboy because it was his baby and he's to proud/stupid to say it might not be all it was advertised to be. Just one more reason I think he won't be the nominee in '24.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
Post Reply