Search found 991 matches
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:45 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: GOP gives up on health care, reconcilliation passes
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2139
Re: GOP gives up on health care, reconcilliation passes
Insurance premiums go up due to the ever increasing and ridiculous cost of medical procedures and prescription meds. Reduce those costs and insurance would be far more affordable for the average Joe. I know that's an oversimplification of the healthcare problem, but what can be done to reduce those...
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:44 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: GOP gives up on health care, reconcilliation passes
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2139
Re: GOP gives up on health care, reconcilliation passes
Aside from the lack of a single payer system, what is not to like? Just off the top of my head the following are or will be law within 4 years: You really have not looked at the experience of single-payer systems in Britain, Canada, or France, eh? The ever more costly system in France couldn't prev...
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:15 am
- Forum: College Basketball
- Topic: Sweet 16
- Replies: 49
- Views: 2202
Re: Sweet 16
Purdue"s Kramer makes this Duke/Purdue game unwatchable all by himself...
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:11 am
- Forum: College Basketball
- Topic: Sweet 16
- Replies: 49
- Views: 2202
Re: Sweet 16
Shit fuck piss fuck... Evan played great...hats off to UT...they came ready to play and pounded OSU's pussy ass under the hoop...fuck the rest of those fucking cry baby buckeyes...standing around watching ET all night...fuck you bastards... Props to Tenn... let me have it boys... OSUs coach did not...
- Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:10 am
- Forum: College Basketball
- Topic: Sweet 16
- Replies: 49
- Views: 2202
Re: Sweet 16
CBS sees the Duke/Purdue game is shit and that the State/NIU game is better, yet they stick with the shit game. Thanks, fuckheads!
- Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:16 am
- Forum: NFL
- Topic: new OT rules?
- Replies: 82
- Views: 4687
Re: new OT rules?
Baby steps, Jmak. Baby steps. They had to start somewhere. Bullshit. This ain't the federal government...or what used to be the fed govt where incrementalism ruled. Thisis the NFL. If thge new OT rules are addressing some perceived inequity in the the OT rules then fix the entire fucking thing. But...
- Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:14 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: GOP gives up on health care, reconcilliation passes
- Replies: 56
- Views: 2139
Re: GOP gives up on health care, reconcilliation passes
Uh, fucko, the GOP doesnt have to campaign that hard. Clear majorities of people oppose Obamacare despite the Democrats deliberate lies that it will lower costs, cover the insured, and save money. Common sense tells you this. This is why the Democrarts had to bribe other Democrats just to ram it thr...
- Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:04 am
- Forum: NFL
- Topic: new OT rules?
- Replies: 82
- Views: 4687
Re: new OT rules?
So regular season games don't count? Having games settled by "cheap" field goals is acceptable so long as it doesn't happen in OT of a playoff game? So cheap field goals can decide who gets into the playoffs just not who wins playoff games? Absurd, much like the reasoning for the change in...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:58 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Harris Poll of Republicans
- Replies: 42
- Views: 1648
Re: Harris Poll of Republicans
WW, ordinary newspaper articles and news programs are full of opinions...from the journalists preconceived notions of right and wrong, the very ppl he chooses to talk to even the selection of what those ppl said to include. That's why we have major US networks staging events to invent news...like ta...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:22 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Harris Poll of Republicans
- Replies: 42
- Views: 1648
Re: Harris Poll of Republicans
Merit over equality...wtf? Conservative and liberals disagree over equal opportunity and equal outcome. Conservatives embrace the constitutional of equal opportunity. Liberals embrace equal outcome. I.e., liberals prefer to exercise discrimination to achieve specific outcomes. But, for some reason, ...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:11 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
Isn't Screw the guy that advises which women with balls are hot or not??
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:29 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
Marty must be talking about teachers...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:39 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
Sorry, but of all the teachers I know and I am married to one, too...low wages aint the complaint. I have a Bro-in-law and two other friends in MI that simply for getting any Master's degree saw a huge bump in pay up to 60K+ and all three are completing PhD work which will take them to 80K+. And her...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:00 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
BSmack there was no shitstorm when Lott replaced a Senate Parliamentarian. And given that the press is carrying the Obama's water...well, they wouldn't have reported on such a shitstorm anyway.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:18 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
I was wrong about that...I thought you made that clear, already.Mikey wrote:Handpicked by Reid? Nice backpedal.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:13 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
The fact that Frumin's judgment was absolutely wrong leads only to the conclusion that he's loyal to the $.Mikey wrote:Doesn't make you any less of an ignorant dumbfuck.JMak wrote:Nice edit, dipshit.Mikey wrote:Look up one post, dipshit.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:03 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
Nice edit, dipshit.Mikey wrote:Look up one post, dipshit.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:00 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
You have an alternate explanation?Mikey wrote:Nice try.JMak wrote: But Reid's hand-picked guy wanted to keep his job and permitted reconcilliation to move ahead.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:49 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Harris Poll of Republicans
- Replies: 42
- Views: 1648
Re: Harris Poll of Republicans
Here. Polling on Presidential Pejoratives March 24, 2010 8:27 AM Whatever profoundly negative things people might think about Barack Obama, a new poll out today demonstrates splendidly how not to measure them. It nails the negativity, all right; this project purports to tote up responses to a list ...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:45 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Harris Poll of Republicans
- Replies: 42
- Views: 1648
Re: Harris Poll of Republicans
KC, it merely depends on who they poll, as well as how they word the questions. Clearly, they went out of their way to poll the absolute dumbest SECBSHs they could find. By that same token, what sort of damning results do you think they'd come up with if they polled 2500 tinfoil hat wearin' Nick Fr...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:41 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
BTW, mvscal was absolutely correct in his assessment that had the Senate Parliamentarian done his job then Obamacare would not be passed via reconcilliation. But Reid's hand-picked guy wanted to keep his job and permitted reconcilliation to move ahead.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:40 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
Funny, until just this week we were not allowed to read the bill. Heck, Obama wasn't allowed to see it. If he had he would not have promised as recently as Saturday that effectively immediately insurers would be prohibited from denying coverage to children with preexisting conditions. Now we know th...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:34 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
The institution of marriage is a farce. Modern civilization depends on it, stupid. Oh, do tell how that is! Just how do you imagine a civilization to survive if you break apart marriage and parenthood? That's what gay marriage, among other things, does. Hetero marriage is the most successful family...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:18 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
Modern civilization depends on it, stupid.Psycho Magnet wrote:The institution of marriage is a farce.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:17 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
The impact on my wife and I is irrelevant, fool. We're talking about disrupting the institution of marriage to include people that were never intended to be married. The burden is on you to provide a justification for wrecking that institution. You may begin... There are a lot of heteros who were n...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:16 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
I know, lets redefine the institution of marriage to allow polygamy, too. And lets include pets, too. I mean, not only should everyone have the right to marry, but everything should also have the right to marry. Because the institution of marriage has no other reason to exist except to discriminate...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:07 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
And how is it that gays are asking for "special" rights when they're asking for the same rights & privileges that hetero couples enjoy? If your wife were to end up in the ICU ward, you'd be able to visit her. Gays & lesbians don't have the ability to see their loved ones unless th...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:05 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
I know, lets redefine the institution of marriage to allow polygamy, too. And lets include pets, too. I mean, not only should everyone have the right to marry, but everything should also have the right to marry. Because the institution of marriage has no other reason to exist except to discriminate ...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:00 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
You really are as stupid as everyone claims, dumbfuck. LMAO! Yeah, I fucked that comment up...should have said cannot exempt rather than can exempt. I sucked it on that one. The point was that states have the authority to exempt some public sector personnel from SS. And, yes, that means all of them.
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:58 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
And how is it that gays are asking for "special" rights when they're asking for the same rights & privileges that hetero couples enjoy? If your wife were to end up in the ICU ward, you'd be able to visit her. Gays & lesbians don't have the ability to see their loved ones unless th...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:38 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
Yeah, but it's a tax on douchebags. I fail to see the downside of this one. It's a slippery slope and your splayed anus is at the bottom. There is nothing that could make me feel better about the pending success of health care reform than to see you spewing garbage like that. Your hate make me stro...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:28 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
They should take their contentions up with the legislatures of the various states or the voters. There isn't anything in the Constitution that further differentiates men and women based on their sexual preference. They have been and in most instances they are losing, hence, they're petioning the co...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:26 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
if i am required to play in this ponzi scam, so should cops, teachers and others who enjoy fat pensions partly because they can fund these plans with money the rest of us have to throw down the SS rat hole. and now, these same folks will get special treatment on this healthcare clusterfukk. Speakin...
- Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:19 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
- Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:53 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
Where in the history of the US has the Congress required citizens to purchase a product or service as a condition of citizenship? And 88 is right...the meaning of the Commerce Clause is now caught up in this sick joke that is the belief that the Court is an independent branch of the govt rendering j...
- Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:40 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Harris Poll of Republicans
- Replies: 42
- Views: 1648
Re: Harris Poll of Republicans
The poll was commissioned to test the hypothesis of a new book about the lunatic fringe taking over the country. I can't link to it but there's a nice take down of the poll at ABCNews...a decidedly partisan organization that swings left.
But, hey, why expect KC to know wtf he is talking about?
But, hey, why expect KC to know wtf he is talking about?
- Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:45 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
Not sure what JSC intended there with the RomneyCare reference...I don't lknow of many Republicans who embraced that type of reform and no major Republican was referring to it during the Obamacare Express...so wtf?
That MA plan is a failure. Yet, we just saw it imposed on a national level...
That MA plan is a failure. Yet, we just saw it imposed on a national level...
- Wed Mar 24, 2010 3:11 pm
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: 10% tanning tax ?
- Replies: 104
- Views: 3086
Re: 10% tanning tax ?
And posters scoffed when I suggested that Obamacare would trigger a culture war over lifestyle choices that should ber taxed or subsidized by the State. Thanks, BSmack, Mikey, other liberal fuckheads...you thought you were fixing health care and then it changed to expanding access and then it change...
- Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:34 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: O Canada
- Replies: 51
- Views: 924
Re: O Canada
Apparently, PSU is unaware of how conservatives are treated on college campuses...whether speech codes are imposed banning conservative speech, destroying conservative publications, or conservative speakers prevented from speaking and harrassed. And, yes, censorship is alive and well and growing in ...
- Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:22 am
- Forum: Cul de Smack
- Topic: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
- Replies: 311
- Views: 15611
Re: Tea Baggers and Glenn Beck et al
This is the same guy who was warned by the Dept of Health and Human Services/Child Protective Services that him setting his thermostat at 62 degrees (balmy as compared to the temps in the depths of a Nebraska winter) was borderline child abuse. He and her dressed warmly and weren't uncomfortable. H...